Tools of the Trade?

REFERENCES

• Anderson, P., Levinson, D., & Parthasarathi, P. (2013). Accessibility futures. Transactions in GIS, 17(5), 705. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., Le Clercq, F., & Kapoen, L. (2005). Sustainable accessibility: A conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward. Transport Policy, 12(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., Handy, S., Kockelman, K. M., Mahmassani, H. S., Chen, Q., Srour, I., & Weston, L. M. (2001). Assessment of accessibility measures. https://ctr.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/pubs/4938_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., Handy, S., Kockelman, K. M., Mahmassani, H. S., Chen, Q., & Weston, L. M. (2000a). Accessibility measures: Formulation considerations and current applications. https://ctr.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/pubs/4938_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., Handy, S., Kockelman, K. M., Mahmassani, H., Chen, Q., & Weston, L. M. (2000b). Development of an urban accessibility index: Literature review. https://ctr.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/pubs/4938_4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., Handy, S., Kockelman, K. M., Mahmassani, H. S., Gopal, A. R., Srour, I., & Weston, L. M. (2002). Development of an urban accessibility index: Formulations, aggregation and application. https://ctr.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/pubs/4938_4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boisjoly, G., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2017). The insider: A planners’ perspective on accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 64, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E., Cartenì, A., & Montanino, M. (2016). A behavioral model of accessibility based on the number of available opportunities. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerdá, A. (2009). Accessibility: A performance measure for land-use and transportation planning in the Montréal metropolitan region [Master’s thesis]. McGill University. https://tram.mcgill.ca/Teaching/srp/documents/Assumpta.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B. Y., Yuan, H., Li, Q., Wang, D., Shaw, S.-L., Chen, H.-P., & Lam, W. H. K. (2017). Measuring place-based accessibility under travel time uncertainty. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31(4), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1238919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J., & Bertolini, L. (2013). Measuring urban job accessibility with distance decay, competition and diversity. Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., & de Jong, G. C. (2011). Modeling experienced accessibility for utility-maximizers and regret-minimizers. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1155–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conveyal. (2015). Introducing transport analyst. Medium. https://blog.conveyal.com/introducing-transport-analyst-7f0b3c595fb6
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. W., Byrd, A., & van der Linden, M. (2017). Evidence-based transit and land use sketch planning using interactive accessibility methods on combined schedule and headway-based networks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2653(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.3141/2653-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, M., & Levinson, D. (2020a). Multi-activity access: How activity choice affects opportunity. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 85, 102364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, M., & Levinson, D. (2020b). Primal and dual access. Geographical Analysis, 52(3), 452–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curl, A., Nelson, J. D., & Anable, J. (2011). Does accessibility planning address what matters? A review of current practice and practitioner perspectives. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2011.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Dong, X., Ben-Akiva, M. E., Bowman, J. L., & Walker, J. L. (2006). Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., & Guerra, E. (2016). Developing a common narrative on urban accessibility: An urban planning perspective. https://trid.trb.org/view/1489337
   Google Scholar
• El-Geneidy, A. M., & Levinson, D. (2006). Access to destinations: Development of accessibility measures. http://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/638
   Google Scholar
• El-Geneidy, A. M., & Levinson, D. (2011). Place rank: Valuing spatial interactions. Networks and Spatial Economics, 11(4), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-011-9153-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, S., Neutens, T., Miller, H. J., & Li, X. (2013). The social interaction potential of metropolitan regions: A time-geographic measurement approach using joint accessibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(3), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.689238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., & Papa, E. (2020). Re-enacting the mobility versus accessibility debate: Moving towards collaborative synergies among experts. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(3), 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, S. R., Akhavan, A., Furth, P. G., Wang, Q., & Reardon, T. G. (2020). A cycling-focused accessibility tool to support regional bike network connectivity. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 85, 102388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., & Ritsema van Eck, J. R. (2003). Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use scenarios: The implications of job competition, land-use, and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1068/b12940
   Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Golub, A., Robinson, G., & Nee, B. (2013). Making accessibility analyses accessible: A tool to facilitate the public review of the effects of regional transportation plans on accessibility. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 6(3), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v6i3.352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01936872
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. (2005). Planning for accessibility: In theory and in practice. In D. M. Levinson & K. J. Krizek (Eds.), Access to destinations (pp. 131–147). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080460550-007
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. (2020). Is accessibility an idea whose time has finally come? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, 102319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997). Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 29(7), 1175–1194. https://doi.org/10.1068/a291175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, M. W., & Downs, J. A. (2014). Integrating people and place: A density-based measure for assessing accessibility to opportunities. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 7(2), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v7i2.417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imani, A. F., Miller, E. J., & Saxe, S. (2019). Cycle accessibility and level of traffic stress: A case study of Toronto. Journal of Transport Geography, 80, 102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. (1999). Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space–time measures. The Professional Geographer, 51(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. (2010). Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis, 30(3), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P., & Hong, X. D. (1998). Network-based constraints-oriented choice set formation using GIS. Geographical Systems, 5(1–2), 139–162.
   Google Scholar
• Lättman, K., Olsson, L. E., & Friman, M. (2016). Development and test of the Perceived Accessibility Scale (PAC) in public transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Miller, H. J. (2018). Measuring the impacts of new public transit services on space-time accessibility: An analysis of transit system redesign and new bus rapid transit in Columbus, Ohio, USA. Applied Geography, 93, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Miller, H. J. (2019). Analyzing collective accessibility using average space-time prisms. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 69, 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J., Grengs, J., & Merlin, L. A. (2019). From mobility to accessibility: Transforming urban transportation and land-use planning. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, J., Grengs, J., Shen, Q., & Shen, Q. (2012). Does accessibility require density or speed? Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2012.677119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J., Merlin, L., & Grengs, J. (2017). Project-level accessibility analysis for land-use planning. Transport Policy, 53, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, D., & King, D. (2020). Transport access manual: A guide for measuring connection between people and places. Committee of the Transport Access Manual, University of Sydney. https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/23733
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, D. M., & Wu, H. (2020). Towards a general theory of access. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 13(1), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2020.1660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Zhang, T., Wang, H., & Zeng, Z. (2011). Dynamic accessibility mapping using floating car data: A network-constrained density estimation approach. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(3), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, F., & van Wee, B. (2017). Accessibility measures for robustness of the transport system. Transportation, 44(5), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9701-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2020). Evaluating accessibility for transport planning: Measuring people’s ability to reach desired goods and activities. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. https://www.vtpi.org/access.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2016). A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: Combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. Transportation, 43(3), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9585-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malekzadeh, A., & Chung, E. (2020). A review of transit accessibility models: Challenges in developing transit accessibility models. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(10), 733–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2019.1625087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCahill, C., Jain, S., & Brenneis, M. (2020). Comparative assessment of accessibility metrics across the U.S. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, 102328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCahill, C., Pettit, M., & Sinclair, C. (2017). Access scores: Measuring the why, where and how of accessibility. Citilabs. https://www.citilabs.com/citilabs_blog/access-scores-measuring-the-why-where-and-how-of-accessibility/
   Google Scholar
• Merlin, L. A., Levine, J., & Grengs, J. (2018). Accessibility analysis for transportation projects and plans. Transport Policy, 69, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E. J. (2018). Accessibility: Measurement and application in transportation planning. Transport Reviews, 38(5), 551–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1492778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. J. (1991). Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799108927856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. J. (2005). Place-based versus people-based accessibility. In D. M. Levinson & K. J. Krizek (Eds.), Access to destinations (pp. 63–89). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080460550-004
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. J., & Wu, Y.-H. (2005). Place-based versus people-based accessibility. In D. M. Levinson & K. J. Krizek (Eds.), Access to destinations (pp. 63–89). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080460550-004
   Google Scholar
• Mondschein, A., Blumenberg, E., & Taylor, B. D. (2006). Cognitive mapping, travel behavior, and access to opportunity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1985(1), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106198500129
   Google Scholar
• Mondschein, A., & Taylor, B. D. (2017). Is traffic congestion overrated? Examining the highly variable effects of congestion on travel and accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 64, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moya-Gómez, B., Salas-Olmedo, M. H., García-Palomares, J. C., & Gutiérrez, J. (2018). Dynamic accessibility using big data: The role of the changing conditions of network congestion and destination attractiveness. Networks and Spatial Economics, 18(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-017-9348-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neutens, T., Schwanen, T., & Witlox, F. (2011). The prism of everyday life: Towards a new research agenda for time geography. Transport Reviews, 31(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.484153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neutens, T., Witlox, F., Weghe, N. V. D., & Maeyer, P. H. D. (2007). Space–time opportunities for multiple agents: A constraint-based approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(10), 1061–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810601169873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, P., & Blumenberg, E. (1998). Job access, commute and travel burden among welfare recipients. Urban Studies, 35(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098985087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Páez, A., Mercado, R. G., Farber, S., Morency, C., & Roorda, M. (2010). Accessibility to health care facilities in Montreal Island: An application of relative accessibility indicators from the perspective of senior and non-senior residents. International Journal of Health Geographics, 9(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-9-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Páez, A., Moniruzzaman, M., Bourbonnais, P.-L., & Morency, C. (2013). Developing a web-based accessibility calculator prototype for the greater Montreal area. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 58, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Páez, A., Scott, D. M., & Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Q., Jin, Z., & Liu, X. (2020). Measuring the effects of job competition and matching on employment accessibility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 102535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papa, E., Silva, C., Te Brömmelstroet, M., & Hull, A. (2015). Accessibility instruments for planning practice: A review of European experiences. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(3), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proffitt, D. G., Bartholomew, K., Ewing, R., & Miller, H. J. (2019). Accessibility planning in American metropolitan areas: Are we there yet? Urban Studies, 56(1), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017710122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubulotta, E., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., & Rofè, Y. (2013). Accessibility and centrality for sustainable mobility: Regional planning case study. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 139(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoup, D. C. (2003). Truth in transportation planning. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 6(1), 1–16. https://www.bts.gov/archive/publications/journal_of_transportation_and_statistics/volume_06_number_01/paper_01/index
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C., Bertolini, L., Te Brömmelstroet, M., Milakis, D., & Papa, E. (2017). Accessibility instruments in planning practice: Bridging the implementation gap. Transport Policy, 53, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMART SCALE. (2020). SMART SCALE technical guide. http://smartscale.org/documents/2020documents/technical-guide-2022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. (2019, October 3). Access in Seattle. Medium. https://blog.conveyal.com/access-in-seattle-fb5ef952c3ae
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, A., & Zegras, P. C. (2016). CoAXs: A collaborative accessibility-based stakeholder engagement system for communicating transport impacts. Research in Transportation Economics, 59, 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundquist, E., McCahill, C., & Brenneis, M. (2021). Measuring accessibility: A guide for transportation and land use practitioners. State Smart Transportation Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Te Brömmelstroet, M., Curtis, C., Larsson, A., & Milakis, D. (2016). Strengths and weaknesses of accessibility instruments in planning practice: Technological rules based on experiential workshops. European Planning Studies, 24(6), 1175–1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1135231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, T., Mondschein, A., Osman, T., & Taylor, B. D. (2018). Not so fast? Examining neighborhood-level effects of traffic congestion on job access. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113, 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale, D. S., Saraiva, M., & Pereira, M. (2015). Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(1), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbulcke, G., Steenberghen, T., & Thomas, I. (2009). Mapping accessibility in Belgium: A tool for land-use and transport planning? Journal of Transport Geography, 17(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wee, B. (2016). Accessible accessibility research challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wee, B., Hagoort, M., & Annema, J. A. (2001). Accessibility measures with competition. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00010-2
   Google Scholar
• Vega, A. (2012). Using Place Rank to measure sustainable accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachs, M., & Kumagai, T. G. (1973). Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 7(5), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(73)90041-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Chen, B. Y., Yuan, H., Wang, D., Lam, W. H. K., & Li, Q. (2018). Measuring temporal variation of location-based accessibility using space-time utility perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 73, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, J., & Kwan, M.-P. (2003). Evaluating the effects of geographic contexts on individual accessibility: A multilevel approach. Urban Geography, 24(8), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.24.8.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., & Levinson, D. (2020). Unifying access. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, 102355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T., Sipe, N., Evans, R., & Pitot, M. (2007). A GIS-based land use and public transport accessibility indexing model. Australian Planner, 44(3), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2007.9982586
   Google Scholar