34
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Stratification and the Adjusted Chi-Square Statistic: Application to Analysis of Employment Discrimination Data

, &
Pages 289-318 | Published online: 14 Aug 2013

  • BallV. (1961). The moment of truth: Probability theory and standards of proof. Vanderbilt Law Review, 14, 807.
  • BartlettM.S. (1935). Contingency table interactions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 2, 248–252.
  • BennettB. and KaneshiroC. (1974). On the small-sample properties of the Mantel-Haenszel test for relative risk. Biometrics, 61, 236.
  • BirchM.W. (1964). The detection of partial association, I: the 2 × 2 case. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 26, 318–319.
  • BlythC.R. (1972). On Simpson's Paradox and the Sure-Thing Principal. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 364–366.
  • CochranW.G. (1954). Some methods of strengthening the common X2 tests. Biometrics, 10, 420–421.
  • DawsonJ. (1973). Probabilities and prejudice in establishing statistical inferences. Jurimetrics, 13, 191–225.
  • DawsonJ. (1980). Are statisticians being fair to employment discrimination plaintiffs?. Jurimetrics, 21, 1–20.
  • DawsonJ. (1981). The threshold of statistical significance in civil lawsuits. Unpublished manuscript.
  • FinkelsteinM. (1978). Quantitative Methods in Law. The Free Press, New York.
  • FisherR.A. (1922). On the interpretation of x2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Supplement, 85, 597–612.
  • FisherR.A. (1935). The logic of inductive inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 98, 39–54.
  • FisherR.A. (1956). Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. Hafner, New York.
  • GartJ.J. (1971). The comparison of proportions: a review of significance tests, confidence intervals and adjustments for stratification. Review of the International Statistical Institute, 39, 147–169.
  • GartJ.J. and ZweifelJ.R. (1967). On the bias of various estimators of the logit and its variance with applications to quantal bioassay. Biometrika, 54, 181–187.
  • GnedenkoB.V. (1962). The Theory of Probability. Chelsea Publishing Company, New York.
  • HaberM. (1980). A comparison of some continuity corrections for the chi-square test on 2 × 2 tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 510–515.
  • HoelP. (1971). Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, 4th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • MantelN. and HaenszelW. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748.
  • MantelN. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 690–700.
  • MantelN. and FleissJ. (1980). Minimum expected cell size requirements for the Mantel-Haenszel one-degree-of-freedom chi-square test and a related rapid procedure. American Journal of Epidemiology, 112, 129–134.
  • McCormickC. (1954). The Law of Evidence. West Publishing Company, St. PaulMinnesota.
  • NortonH.W. (1945). Calculation of chi-square from complex contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 40, 251–258.
  • PearsonK. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine, Series V, 157. (Reprinted in K. Pearson (1948), Karl Pearson's Early Statistical Papers, 339–357, Cambridge University Press.).
  • PlackettR.L. (1962). A note on interactions in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 24, 162–166.
  • Shou-HuaL., SimonR., and GartJ. (1979). Small sample properties of the Mantel-Haenszel test. Biometrika, 66, 81.
  • SimpsonE.H. (1951). The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, 238–241.
  • ThomasD.G. (1975). Exact and asymptotic methods for the combination of 2 X 2 tables. Computers and Biomedical Research, 8, 423–446. (An up-dated version of the FORTRAN program can be obtained from D.G. Thomas, Biometry Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20205.).
  • WilcoxonF. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics, 1, 80–83.
  • WilcoxonF. and WilcoxR.A. (1964). Some Rapid Approximate Procedures. Available free of charge from Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, New York 10965.
  • WoolfB. (1955). On estimating the relation between blood group and disease. Annals of Human Genetics, 19, 251–253.
  • YatesF. (1934). Contingency tables involving small numbers and the x2 test. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Supplement 1, 217–235.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.