- AnscombeF. J. (1959). Quick analysis methods for random balance screening experiments. Technometrics, 1, 195–209.
- BoothK. H. V. and CoxD. R. (1962). Some systematic supersaturated designs. Technometrics, 4, 489–495.
- BoxG. E. P. (1952). Multi-factor designs of first order. Biometrika, 39, 49–57.
- BoxG. E. P. and HunterJ. S. (1961). The 2k-p fractional factorial designs, part I and part II. Technometrics, 3, 311–351 and 449–458.
- BoxG. E. P. and WilsonK. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, (Series B), 13, 1–38.
- BoxM. J. and DraperN. R. (1971). Factorial designs, the |x'x| criterion, and some related matters. Technometrics, 13, 731–742.
- BudneT. A. (1959). The application of random balance designs. Technometrics, 1, 139–155.
- CochranW. G. and CoxG. M. (1957). Experimental Designs (Second Edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
- DanielC. (1959). Use of half-normal plots in interpreting factorial two-level experiments. Technometrics, 1, 311–341.
- DaviesO. L., editor (1978). The Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments (Second Edition). Longman, Inc., New York.
- DraperN. R. (1963). Ridge analysis of response surfaces. Technometrics, 5, 469–479.
- DudewiczE. J. and RalleyT. G. (1981). The Handbook of Random Number Generation and Testing with TESTRAND Computer Code. American Science Press, ColumbusOhio.
- DykstraO. (1971). The augmentation of experimental data to maximize |x'x|. Technometrics, 13, 682–688.
- GassS. I. (1977). Evaluation of complex models. Computers and Operations Research, 4, 25–37.
- GordonG. (1978). System Simulation (Second Edition). Prentice- Hall, Englewood CliffsNew Jersey.
- KleijnenJ. P. C. (1974). Statistical Techniques in Simulation (in two parts). Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
- KleijnenJ. P. C. (1975). Screening designs for poly-factor experimentation. Technometrics, 17, 487–493.
- KnuthD. E. (1981). The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 2, (Second Edition). Addison-Wesley, PleadingMA.
- LawA. V. and KeltonW. D. (1982). Simulation Modeling and Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- LiC. H. (1962). A sequential method for screening experimental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 455–477.
- MauroC. A. (1983). A comparison of random balance and two-stage group screening designs - part I. Desmatics, Inc. Technical Report No. 113–12. (AD-A136487).
- MauroC. A. (1984). On the performance of two-stage group screening. Technometrics, 26, to appear.
- MauroC. A. and BurnsK. C. (1984). A comparison of random balance and two-stage group screening designs - part II. Desmatics, Inc. Technical Report No. 113–14. (AD-A137994).
- MauroC. A. and SmithD. E. (1982). The performance of two- stage group screening in factor screening experiments. Technometrics, 24, 325–330.
- MauroC. A. and SmithD. E. (1984). Factor screening in simulation: evaluation of two strategies based on random balance sampling. Management Science, 30, 209–221.
- MitchellT. J. (1974). An algorithm for the construction of “D-optimal” experimental designs. Technometrics, 16, 203–210.
- MontgomeryD. C. (1979). Methods for factor screening in computer simulation experiments. Final Report (AD-A073449), Georgia Institute of Technology, AtlantaGeorgia.
- MontgomeryD. C. and BettencourtV. M. (1977). Multiple response surface methods in computer simulation. Simulation, 29, 113–121.
- MorrisM. D. and MitchellT. J. (1983). Two-level multifactor designs for detecting the presence of interactions. Technometrics, 25, 345–355.
- MyersR. H. (1971). Response Surface Methodology. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston.
- NaylorT. H. and BurdickD. G. (1975). The interface between simulation experiments and real world experiments. In A Survey of Statistical Designs and Linear Models (SrivastavaJ. N., Editor), 427–442, North Holland, Amsterdam.
- PatelM. S. (1962). Group screening with more than two stages. Technometrics, 4, 209–217.
- PlackettR. L. and BurmanJ. P. (1946). The design of optimum multifactor experiments. Biometrika, 33, 305–325.
- RaghavaraoD. (1971). Constructions and Combinatorial Problems in Design of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
- RamsayT. E. and WrightR. D. (1979). Variance reduction techniques: some limitations and efficiency limits. Modeling and Simulation, 10, 2083–2090.
- SatterthwaiteF. E. (1959). Random balance experimentation. Technometrics, 1, 111–137.
- SchellenbergerR. E. (1974). Criteria for assessing model validity for managerial purposes. Decision Sciences, 5, 644–653.
- SchrubenL. W. (1979). Designing correlation induction strategies for simulation experiments. In Current Issues in Computer Simulation, (AdamN.R. and DogramaciA., editors), Academic Press, Inc., New York.
- SchrubenL. W. (1981). Control of initialization bias in multivariate simulation response. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 24, 246–252.
- SchrubenL. W. and MargolinB. H. (1978). Pseudorandom number assignment in statistically designed simulation and distribution sampling experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 504–520.
- SmithD. E. (1973). An empirical investigation of optimum-seeking in the computer simulation situation. Operations Research, 21, 475–497.
- SmithD. E. (1976). Automatic optimum-seeking program for digital simulation. Simulation, 27, 27–31.
- SmithD. E. and MauroC. A. (1982). Factor screening in computer simulation. Simulation, 38, 49–54.
- St. JohnR. C. and DraperN. R. (1975). D-optimality for regression designs: a review. Technometrics, 17, 15–23.
- Van HornR. L. (1971). Validation of simulation results. Management Science, 17, 247–258.
- WatsonG. S. (1961). A study of the group screening method. Technometrics, 3, 371–388.
- WilsonJ. R. (1983). Variance reduction: the current state. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 25, 55–59.
- YoudenW. J., KempthorneO., TukeyJ. W., BoxG. E. P., and HunterJ. S. (1959). Discussions of the papers of Messrs. Satterthwaite and Budne. Technometrics, 1, 157–193.
Design of Experiments in Simulation
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.