Statistical Inference for Lognormal Distribution with Type-I Progressive Hybrid Censored Data

References

• Aarset, M. V. (1987). How to identify a bathtub hazard rate. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-36(1), 106–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asl, M. N., Belaghi, R. A., & Bevrani, H. (2017). On Burr XII distribution analysis under progressive type-ii hybrid censored data. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 19(2), 665–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, N., & Cramer, E. (2014). Art of Progressive Censoring. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, N., Kannan, N., Lin, C.-T., & Ng, H. T. (2003). Point and interval estimation for gaussian distribution based on progressively type-ii censored samples. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 52(1), 90–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, N., & Mi, J. (2003). Existence and uniqueness of the MLES for normal distribution based on general progressively Type-II censored samples. Statistics & Probability Letters, 64(4), 407–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, R., Pradhan, B., & Dewanji, A. (2014). Optimum life testing plans in presence of hybrid censoring: A cost function approach. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 30(5), 519–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, R., Pradhan, B., & Dewanji, A. (2016). On optimum life-testing plans under Type-II progressive censoring scheme using variable neighborhood search algorithm. TEST, 25(2), 309–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M.-H., & Shao, Q.-M. (1999). Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 8(1), 69–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. C. (1965). Maximum likelihood estimation in the Weibull distribution based on complete and on censored samples. Technometrics, 7(4), 579–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, E., & Balakrishnan, N. (2013). On some exact distributional results based on Type-I progressively hybrid censored data from exponential distributions. Statistical Methodology, 10(1), 128–150.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, S., Singh, S., Tripathi, Y. M., & Asgharzadeh, A. (2016). Estimation and prediction for a progressively censored generalized inverted exponential distribution. Statistical Methodology, 32, 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Dube, S., Pradhan, B., & Kundu, D. (2011). Parameter estimation of the hybrid censored log-normal distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 81(3), 275–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golparvar, L., & Parsian, A. (2016). Inference on proportional hazard rate model parameter under type-i progressively hybrid censoring scheme. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 45(24), 7258–7274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmati, F., & Khorram, E. (2013). Statistical analysis of the log-normal distribution under Type-II progressive hybrid censoring schemes. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 42(1), 52–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, D. (2008). Bayesian inference and life testing plan for the Weibull distribution in presence of progressive censoring. Technometrics, 50(2), 144–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, D., & Joarder, A. (2006). Analysis of type-ii progressively hybrid censored data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 50(10), 2509–2528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. T., Chou, C. C., & Huang, Y. L. (2012). Inference for the Weibull distribution with progressive hybrid censoring. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 56(3), 451–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindley, D. V. (1980). Approximate Bayesian methods. Trabajos De Estadística y De Investigación Operativa, 31(1), 223–245.
   Google Scholar
• Linhardt, H., & Zucchin, W. (1986). Model Selection. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, T. A. (1982). Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 226–233.
   Google Scholar
• Meeker, W. Q., & Escobar, L. A. (2014). Statistical methods for reliability data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, H., Chan, P., & Balakrishnan, N. (2002). Estimation of parameters from progressively censored data using EM algorithm. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 39(4), 371–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, H., Chan, P., & Balakrishnan, N. (2004). Optimal progressive censoring plans for the Weibull distribution. Technometrics, 46(4), 470–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., Balakrishnan, N., & Kim, S. W. (2011). Fisher information in progressive hybrid censoring schemes. Statistics, 45(6), 623–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, B., & Kundu, D. (2009). On progressively censored generalized exponential distribution. Test, 18(3), 497–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raqab, M. Z., & Nagaraja, H. (1995). On some predictors of future order statistics. Metron, 53(12), 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., & Tripathi, Y. M. (2016). Bayesian estimation and prediction for a hybrid censored lognormal distribution. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 65(2), 782–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., Tripathi, Y. M., & Wu, S.-J. (2015). On estimating parameters of a progressively censored lognormal distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85(6), 1071–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomer, S. K., & Panwar, M. (2015). Estimation procedures for Maxwell distribution under Type-I progressive hybrid censoring scheme. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85(2), 339–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkkan, N., & Pham-Gia, T. (1993). Computation of the highest posterior density interval in bayesian analysis. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 44(3-4), 243–250.
   Google Scholar