Co-Evolution of the General Factor of Personality and the Big Five Factors: A Mathematical Model and Its Application to Methylphenidate

References

• Amigó, S. 2005. La Teoría Del Rasgo Único de Personalidad: Hacia Una Teoría Unificada Del Cerebro y La Conducta. Valencia, Spain: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Amigó, S., A. Caselles, and J. C. Micó. 2008. A dynamic extraversion model. The brain’s response to a single dose of a stimulant drug. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 61 (Pt 1):211–31. doi:10.1348/000711007X185514.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amigó, S., A. Caselles, and J. C. Micó. 2010. General Factor of Personality Questionnaire (GFPQ): Only one factor to understand personality? The Spanish Journal of Psychology 13 (1):5–17. doi:10.1017/s1138741600003644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amigó, S., A. Caselles, J. C. Micó, M. T. Sanz, and D. Soler. 2020. Dynamics of the general factor of personality: A predictor mathematical tool of alcohol misuse. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 43 (14):8116–35. doi:10.1002/mma.6218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amigó, S., J. C. Micó, and A. Caselles. 2009. Five adjectives to explain the whole personality: A brief scale of personality. Revista Internacional de Sistemas 16:41–3. Accessed May 27, 2022. http://www.uv.es/caselles/.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H, and M. Hersen. 1984. Single case experimental designs. Strategies for studying behavior change. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baylen, C. A., and H. Rosenberg. 2006. A review of the acute subjective effects of MDMA/ecstasy. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 101 (7):933–47. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01423.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, N, and H. Ehrlichman. 1998. Personality psychology. The science of individuality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Caselles, A., J. C. Micó, and S. Amigó. 2010. Cocaine addiction and personality: A mathematical model. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 63 (Pt 2):449–80. doi:10.1348/000711009X470768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caselles, A., J. C. Micó, and S. Amigó. 2011. Dynamics of the general factor of personality in response to a single dose of caffeine. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 14 (2):675–92. doi:10.5209/rev_sjop.2011.v14.n2.16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caselles, A., J. C. Micó, and S. Amigó. 2018. A genetic algorithm to calibrate dynamical systems: Confidence intervals for parameters and residuals. RevistaInternacional deSistemas 22 (1):29–33. doi:doi:10.7203/RIS.22.1.11488.
   Google Scholar
• Corr, P. J., and V. Kumari. 2000. Individual differences in mood reactions to d-amphetamine: A test of three personality factors. Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) 14 (4):371–7. doi:10.1177/026988110001400406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, C. C., and K. R. Dyer. 2009. A review of the clinical pharmacology of methamphetamine. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 104 (7):1085–99. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02564.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossberg, S. 2000. The imbalanced DBRAIN: from normal to schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 48 (2):81–98. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00903-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwing, P. 2013. The general factor of personality: Substance or artefact? Personality and Individual Differences 55 (3):234–42. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, C. 2011. A review of literature on the general factor of personality. Personality and Individual Differences 50 (6):765–71. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, T. H., G. Robbins, C. A. Martin, M. T. Fillmore, S. D. Lane, N. G. Harrington, and C. R. Rush. 2006. Individual differences in drug abuse vulnerability: d-amphetamine and sensation-seeking status. Psychopharmacology 189 (1):17–25. doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0487-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollins, S. H., E. K. MacDonald, and C. R. Rush. 2001. Assessing the abuse potential of methylphenidate in nonhuman and human subjects: A review. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior 68 (3):611–27. doi:10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00464-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koob, G. F., and M. Le Moal. 2001. Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology 24 (2):97–129. doi:10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00195-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koob, G. F., and M. Le Moal. 1997. Drug abuse: Hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science (New York, N.Y.) 278 (5335):52–8. doi:10.1126/science.278.5335.52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micó, J. C., S. Amigó, and A. Caselles. 2012. Changing the general factor of personality and the c-fos gene expression with methylphenidate and self-regulation therapy. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 15 (2):850–67. doi:10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n2.38896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micó, J. C., S. Amigó, and A. Caselles. 2014. From the big five to the general factor of personality: A dynamic approach. Spanish Journal of Psychology 17 (17):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Micó, J. C., S. Amigó, A. Caselles, and P. D. Romero. 2021. Biology and personality: A mathematical approach to the body-mind problem. Kybernetes 50 (5):1566–87. doi:10.1108/K-03-2020-0138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micó, J. C., A. Caselles, S. Amigó, A. Cotolí, and M. T. Sanz. 2013. A Mathematical approach to the body–mind problem from a system personality theory (a systems approach to the body–mind problem). Systems Research and Behavioral Science 30 (6):735–49. doi:10.1002/sres.2241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musek, J. 2007. A general factor of personality: Evidence for the big one in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality 41 (6):1213–33. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P., and P. Irwing. 2008. A general factor of personality (GFP) from two meta-analyses of the big five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds (2005). Personality and Individual Differences 45 (7):679–83. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, R. L., and J. D. Corbit. 1974. An Opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychological Review 81 (2):119–45. doi:10.1037/h0036128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoops, W. W., J. A. Lile, C. G. Robbins, C. A. Martin, C. R. Rush, and T. H. Kelly. 2007. The reinforcing, subject-rated, performance, and cardiovascular effects of d-amphetamine: Influence of sensation-seeking status. Addictive Behaviors 32 (6):1177–88. PMID: 17011712 doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, D., J. te Nijenhuis, and A. B. Bakker. 2010. The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality 44 (3):315–27. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wit, H. d. 2009. Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addiction Biology 14:22–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wit, H. d., J. L. Enggasser, and J. B. Richards. 2002. Acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases impulsivity in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 27 (5):813–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar