An Energy-Aware Agent-Based Resource Allocation Using Targeted Load Balancer for Improving Quality of Service in Cloud Environment

References

• Aktan, M. N., and H. Bulut. 2022. Metaheuristic task scheduling algorithms for cloud computing environments. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 34 (9):e6513. doi:10.1002/cpe.6513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., R. Liu, and A. Kaushik. 2021. Hierarchical multi-agent optimization for resource allocation in cloud computing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 32 (3):692–707. doi:10.1109/TPDS.2020.3030920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadpour, A., A. K. Sangaiah, P. Pinto, F. Ja’fari, W. Zhang, A. M. H. Abadi, and H. Ahmadi. 2023. An energy optimized embedded load balancing using DVFS computing in cloud data centers. Computer Communications 197 (3):255–66. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2022.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadpour, A., A. M. H. Abadi, S. Rezaei, M. Zomorodian, and A. S. Rostami. 2022. Improving load balancing for data duplication in big data cloud computing networks. Cluster Computing 25 (4):2613–31. doi:10.1007/s10586-021-03312-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadpour, A., P. Pinto, F. Ja’fari, and W. Zhang. 2022. DMAIDPS a distributed multi agent intrusion detection and prevention system for cloud IoT environments. Cluster Computing doi:10.1007/s10586-022-03621-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khojasteh Toussi, G., and M. Naghibzadeh. 2021. A divide and conquer approach to deadline constrained cost optimization workflow scheduling for the cloud. Cluster Computing 24 (3):1711–33. doi:10.1007/s10586-020-03223-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., C. Yuan, Z. Yang, and Z. Zhang. 2016. Mobile-agent-based energy-efficient scheduling with dynamic channel acquisition in mobile cloud computing. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics 27 (3):712–20. doi:10.1109/JSEE.2016.00074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S. K., B. Sahoo, and P. P. Parida. 2020. Load balancing in cloud computing: A big picture. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences 32 (2):149–58. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nallur, V., and R. Bahsoon. 2013. A decentralized self-adaptation mechanism for service-based applications in the cloud. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 39 (5):591–612. doi:10.1109/TSE.2012.53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salami, B., H. Noori, and M. Naghibzadeh. 2020. Fairness aware energy efficient scheduling on heterogeneous multi core processors. IEEE Transactions on Computers 70 (1):72–82. doi:10.1109/TC.2020.2984607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, K. M. 2019. Agent-based approaches for intelligent intercloud resource allocation. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing 7 (2):442–55. doi:10.1109/TCC.2016.2628375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, S., and K. M. Sim. 2012. A price- and-time-slot-negotiation mechanism for cloud service reservations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics 42 (3):713–28. doi:10.1109/TSMCB.2011.2174355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, P., Y. Dai, and X. Qiu. 2017. Optimal Scheduling and management on correlating reliability, performance, and energy consumption for multiagent cloud systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 66 (2):547–58. doi:10.1109/TR.2017.2678480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Y. Jiang, and W. Wu. 2016. Multiagent-based resource allocation for energy minimization in cloud computing systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 47 (2):1–16. doi:10.1109/TSMC.2016.2523910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaodong, Z., Y. Yuan, and S. Hong. 2021. Multi heuristic scheduling methods for workflow in credit cloud. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2021 (1):1–13. doi:10.1186/s13634-021-00827-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., C. Chen, L. T. Yang, and Y. Xiang. 2015. ANGEL: Agent-based scheduling for real-time tasks in virtualized clouds. IEEE Transactions on Computers 64 (12):3389–403. doi:10.1109/TC.2015.2409864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar