Media Between Power and Empowerment: Can We Resolve This Dilemma?

REFERENCES

• Aldheide, D.L. 1985. Media power. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. 2003. Lost geographies of power. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Amichai-Hamburger, Y., K.J. A McKenna, and S.A. Tal. 2008. E-empowerment: Empowerment by the Internet. Computers in Human Behaviour 24(5): 1776–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., and W. Shrum. 2007. Circumvention and social change: ICTs and the discourse of empowerment. Women's Studies in Communication 30(2): 229–53.
   Google Scholar
• Augustine, D. 2010. Women empowerment through the SHG approach. Indian Journal of Social Work 71(4): 601–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., and M.S. Baratz. 1970. Power and poverty: Theory and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, J., C.W. Hsu, and L. Silva. 2006. Circuits of power in creating de jure standards: Shaping an international information systems security standard. MIS Quarterly 30(5): 413–38.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, L.F., and R. Gomez. 2012. Perceptions of connectedness: Public access computing and social inclusion in Colombia. Paper presented at HICSS-45 (Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences) Maui, HI, January. http://www.techbridgeworld.org/courses/15-303/Topics/Week%204/Perceptions%20of%20Connectedness.pdf (accessed August 5, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G.S. 1964. Human capital. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T. 2005. The media sensorium: cultural technologies, the sense and society. In Media audiences, ed. M. Gillespie, 51–96. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benveniste, E. 1973. Indo-European language and society. London, UK: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, A., A.M. Manganelli Rattazzi, and M. Muraro. 2007. Empowering leadership style in ambito sanitario. Uno studio sul coordinatore infermieristico. Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia 29(1): 37–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bobbio, A., A.M. Manganelli Rattazzi, and A. Zorzan. 2008. Measuring psychological empowerment in the workplace. A test of Spreitzer's model. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata 255: 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1980. Le capital social. Notes provisoires. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 3(31): 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., and S. Jovchelovitch 2000. Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 10(4): 255–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, J. 1997. A working definition of empowerment. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 20: 43–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P. 2000. Community health and empowerment. In Community health promotion: Challenges for practice, ed. J. Kerr, 27–47. London, UK: Bailliere Tindall.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2007. Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication 1: 238–66.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M., and P. Monge 2011. A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication. 5: 773–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conyers, J. 1975. Toward black political empowerment: Can the system be transformed? Black Scholar 15(4): 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Courpasson, D. 2000. Managerial strategies of domination. Power in soft bureaucracies. Organization Studies 21(1): 141–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, J., A. Smith, and P. Wingate (Eds.). 1987. Impacts and influences: Essays on media power in the twentieth century. London, UK: Meuthuen.
   Google Scholar
• Dalla Costa, M., and S. James. 1972. The power of women and the subversion of the community. Bristol, UK: Falling Wall.
   Google Scholar
• Dalla Costa, M., and G.F. Dalla Costa, eds. 1996. Donne, sviluppo e lavoro di riproduzione: questioni delle lotte e dei movimenti. Milano, Italy: Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• DeFleur, M.L., and S.J. Ball-Rokeach. 1989. Theories of mass communication. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Doctor, R.D. 1991. Information technologies and social equity: Confronting the revolution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42: 216–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieldman, M.S., and J.G. 1981. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly 26(2): 171–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. 1998. Introduzione. In Telecomunicando in Europa, ed. L. Fortunati, 13–54. Milan, Italy: Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. 2005. The mobile phone as technological artefact. In Thumb culture. The meaning of mobile phones for society, ed. P. Glotz, S. Bertschi, and C. Locke, 149–60. Bielefeld, Germany: Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. 2006. User design and the democratization of the mobile phone. First Monday, special issue 7, online. . http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1615/1530 (accessed January 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. 2007. Immaterial labor and its machinization. Ephemera. Theory & Politics in Organization 7(1): 139–57.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. 2010. Afterword: De-structuring the meaning of the mobile phone. Encyclopaideia, Journal of Phenomenology and Education XIV (28): 155–75.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. 2013. The human body, communication and the new media. In Corps et technologies. Penser l’hybridité, ed. N. Grandjean and C. Lobet-Maris. . Bruxelles, 111–30. Brussels, Belgium: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. 2014. Understanding the role of mobile media in society: Models and theories. In Companion mobile media, ed. L. Hjorth and G. Goggin. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. Discipline and punish: The birth of a prison. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., and G. Deleuze 1977. Intellectuals and power. In Language, counter-memory and practice: Selected essays and interviews, ed. D.F. Bouchard, 139–64. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1994. Biopolitica e liberalismo. Detti e scritti su potere ed etica. 1975–1984. Milan, Italy: Medusa. (It. transl. 2001.).
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1973. Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1913. Totem und Tabu. Über einige Übereinstimmungen im Seenleben der Wilden und der Neurotiker. Leipzig, Germany: Heller.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. 2011. Foundations of critical media and information studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gallino, L. 1993. Dizionario di Sociologia. Milan, Italy: Tea.
   Google Scholar
• Gallino, L. 2013. Il colpo di stato di banche e governi. L’attacco alla democrazia in Europa. Torino, Italy: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R.W. (Ed.): 2008. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. 1980. The tipping point. How little things can make big differences. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A. 1970. The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Green, N., and L. Haddon. 2009. Mobile communications: An introduction to new media. Oxford, UK: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Grewal, D.S. 2008. Network power: The social dynamics of globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., and E.H. Madden 1975. Causal powers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. 1910. An enquiry concerning human understanding. Harvard Classics Volume 37. . Originally published 1748 by P. F. Collier & Son, New York, 1910. (Published also: ed. T. L. Beauchamp. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000.)
   Google Scholar
• Hur, M.H. 2006. Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: Exploring a typology of the process and components across disciplines. Journal of Community Psychology 34(5): 523–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyer, S., and T. Sikoska. 2003. Overcoming the gender digital divide: Understanding ICTs and their potential for the empowerment of women. INSTRAW Research Paper Series No. 1. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: United Nations International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (UN-INSTRAW). . http://www.nirapad.org/admin/soft_archive/1308633754_Overcom-ing%20the%20Gender%20Digital%20Divide.pdf (accessed January 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. 1999. Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. In Gendered poverty and well-being. Development and change, ed. S. Razavi, 435–64. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kallinikos, J. 2007. The consequences of information: Institutional implications of technological change. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kallinikos, J. 2010. Governing through technology: Information artifacts and social practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S. 2001. Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society 4(4): 381–403.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, V.S. 2011. Women's empowerment and microfinance. An Asian perspective study. (Occasional Papers: Knowledge for Development Effectiveness.) Rome, Italy: International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
   Google Scholar
• Labonte, R. 1994. Health promotion and empowerment: Reflections on professional practice. Health Education Quarterly 21(2): 253–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1986. Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. In Knowledge and society studies in the sociology of culture past and present, ed. H. Kuklick, 1–40. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. . http://worrydream.com/refs/Latour%20-%20Visualisation%20and%20Cognition.pdf (accessed January 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Laverack, G. 2006. Improving Health Outcome through community empowerment: a review of the literature, Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 24(1): 113–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, B.D., B. Hague, and D. Eagle 2000. Embedding the Net: Community empowerment in the age of the information. In Community informatics: Enabling communities with information and communications technologies, ed. M. Gurstein, 81–103. London, UK: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, D. 1966. Sources of variation in working class images of society. Sociological Review 14(3): 249–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, P.O. 2003. Body and technology: Continuity or discontinuity? In Mediating the human body: Technology, communication, and fashion, eds. L. Fortunati, J.E. Katz, and R. Riccini, 23–29. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, T.W. 2006. Power and political culture. In The handbook of new media. Updated Student edition, ed. L.A. Lievrouw and S.M. Livingstone, 163–84. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A radical view. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Macchiavelli, N. 1989. Il Principe. In Opere. Milan, Italy: Gherardo Casini. (Originally published 1532.)
   Google Scholar
• March, J. 1966. The power of power. In Varieties of political theory, ed. D. Easton, 39–70. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1847. Misère de la philosophie. Paris, France: A. Frank.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1964. Il Capitale, Libro primo. Roma, Italy: Editori Riuniti.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. 2001. Neoliberalism and health care. International Journal of Consumer Studies 25(2): 82–89.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, I. 1966. Concise dictionary of politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melkote, S.R., and H.L. Steeves 2001. Communication for development in the Third World. Theory and practice for empowerment, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K. 1936. The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review 1(6): 894–904.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C.W. 1956. The power elite and the state: How policy is made in America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moglen, H. 1983. Power and empowerment. Women Studies International Forum 6(2):129–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negri, A. 1967. Studi su Max Weber (1956–65). Annuario bibliografico di filosofia del diritto. Milan, Italy: Giuffrè.
   Google Scholar
• Negri, A. 2009. Insurgencies: Constituent power and the modern state. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Negri, A. 1984. Marx beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, B. 1978. From service to advocacy to empowerment. Social Casework 59: 195–202.
   Google Scholar
• Palomba, R. (Ed.): 1991. Crescita zero. Firenze, Italy: Nuova Italia.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1963. On the concept of political power. Proceedings of American Philosophical Society 107(3): 232–62.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport, J. 1987. Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Towards a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Communication Psychology 15(2): 121–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccò, D. 1999. Sinstesie per il design. Le interazioni sensoriali nell’epoca dei multimedia. Milan, Italy: Etas.
   Google Scholar
• Riger, S. 2002. What's wrong with empowerment? In Quarter century of community psychology: Readings from the American Journal of Social Psychology, ed. T.A. Revenson, A.R. D’Augelli, S.E. French. et al., 395–408. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. 1938. Power: A new social analysis. London, UK: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., and G. Marshall. 2005. Dictionary of sociology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. 2006. Domesticating domestication. Reflections on the life of a concept. In Domestication of media and technology, ed. T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, and K. Ward, 229–48. London, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 1989. Il povero, VII chapter of Sociologia. Milan, Italy: Edizioni di Comunità. (Originally published 1908.)
   Google Scholar
• Staples, L.H. 1990. Powerful ideas about empowerment. Administration in Social Work 14(2): 29–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S.L., and G.C. Bowker 2006. How to infrastructure. In The handbook of new media. Updated student edition, ed. L.A. Lievrouw and S.M. Livingstone, 230–45. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1994. Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2(3): 177–90.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K.W., and B.A. Velthouse 1990. Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretative” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review 15(4): 666–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongia, R., and E.J. Wilson. 2007. Turning Metcalfe on his head: The multiple costs of network exclusion (Paper 120). Pittsburgh, PA: Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University. . http://repository.cmu.edu/epp/120 (accessed January 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Tronti, M. 1966. Operai e Capitale [Workers and capital]. Torino, Italy: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J., and J. Wakeford (Eds.). 1973. Power in Britain. London, UK: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vijk, J. 1999. The network society. An introduction to the social aspects of new media. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, N. 1992. Powerlessness, empowerment, and health: Implications for health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion 6(3): 197–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallerstein, N. 2006. What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? Report for the Health Evidence Network (HEN). Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization (WHO).
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, A. 2010. Power and empowerment: Fostering effective collaboration in meeting the needs of orphans and vulnerable children. Global Public Health 5(5): 509–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1968. Economy and society. New York, NY: Bedminster. (Originally published 1914.).
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, A. 2007. Empowering communities to action: Reclaiming local democracy through ICT. . http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.104.3411 (accessed January 8, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Wise, S. 1995. Feminist ethics in practice. In Ethical issues in social work, ed. R. Hugman and D. Smith, 104–19. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, J.R., L. Warwick-Booth, and R. Cross. 2012. Has empowerment lost its power? Health Education Research 27(4): 742–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M.A. 1995. Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology 23(5): 581–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 1988. In the age of the smart machine. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, D., S.K. Bonsu, and A. Darmody. 2008. Putting consumers at work: ‘Co-creation’ and new marketing govern-mentality. Journal of Consumer Culture 8(2): 163–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar