Measuring the Dynamics of Information Societies: Empowering Stakeholders Amid the Digital Divide

REFERENCES

• Albright, R. 2002. What can past technology forecast tell us about the future? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 69: 443–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J. 2001. Damned lies and statistics: Untangling numbers from the media, politicians, and activists. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggeri, L., and A. Zuliani. 1999. The dissemination of statistical literacy among citizens and public administration directors. International Statistical Institute, 52nd session 1999. http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/∼iase/publications/5/bigg0981.pdf (accessed February 18, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Blastland, M., and A. Dilnot. 2008. The tiger that isn’t: Seeing through a world of numbers. London, UK: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwman, H., and P. van der Duin. 2003. Technological forecasting and scenarios matter: Research into the use of information and communication technology in the home environment in 2010. Foresight 5(4): 6–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chermack, T.J., S.A. Lynham and W.E. A. Ruona. 2001. A review of scenario planning literature. Futures Research Quarterly 17(2): 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. 2011. The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P., E. Hargittai, C. Celeste, and S. Shafer. 2004. From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. In Social inequality, ed. K. Neckerman, 355–400. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dolničar, V., S. Čikić, V. Vehovar, P. Sicherl, A. Petrovčič, and M. Maroševič. 2005. Razširitev metode časovne distance na problematiko digitalnih razkorakov - raziskovalno poročilo [Application of the time distance methodology to digital divide studies—research report]. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Faculty of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Dolničar, V. 2007. Merjenje dinamike digitalnega razkoraka [Measuring the dynamics of the digital divide]. . Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Dolničar, V. 2008. Merjenje dinamike digitalnega razkoraka [Measuring the dynamics of the digital divide]. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Scientific Library of the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana.
   Google Scholar
• Dolničar, V. 2010. Regulating on an informed basis: An integrative methodological framework for monitoring the digital divide. In Interacting with broadband society, ed. L. Fortunati and A. Petrovčič, 227–55. Frankfurt am Main, Germanyh: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Dolničar, V., 2011. Key methodological fallacies of digital divide research. In The contemporary Internet: National and cross-national European studies, ed. L. Haddon, 190–205. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Dolničar, V., C. Christou, R. Gannon, L. Haddon, P. Puga, and J. Vieira. 2011. Cross-national broadband digital divides. In The contemporary Internet: National and cross-national European studies, ed. L. Haddon, 121–38. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, W.H., R.B. Duque, and J. Hunsinger. 2007. Global Internet research. In Past, present and future of research in the information society, ed. W. Shrum, K.R. Benson, W.E. Bijker, and K. Brunnstein, 193–211. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., E.C. Nisbet, and T. Gillespie. 2011. Who's responsible for the digital divide? Public perceptions and policy implications. The Information Society 27(2): 92–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. 2010. From ICT user to broadband e-actor. In Interacting with broadband society, ed. L. Fortunati and A. Petrovčič, 27–46. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. 2014. Media between power and empowerment: Can we resolve this dilemma? The Information Society 30(3): 169–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friel, S.N., F.R. Curcio, and G.W. Bright. 2001. Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 32(2): 124–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddon, L. 2004. Information and communication technologies in everyday life: A concise introduction and research guide. Oxford, UK: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. 2003. The digital divide and what to do about it. In New economy handbook, ed. D.C. Jones, 821–39. New York, NY: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., and A. Hinnant. 2008. Digital inequality—Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research 35(5): 602–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M. 2010. When is cheap, cheap enough to bridge the digital divide? Modeling income related structural challenges of technology diffusion in Latin America. World Development 38(5): 756–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M., P. López, and C. Vásquez. 2010. Information societies or “ICT equipment societies?” Measuring the digital information-processing capacity of a society in bits and bytes. The Information Society 26(3): 157–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M. 2011. The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy 35(1): 715–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, D. 1993. How to lie with statistics. London, UK: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• ITU. 2010. Definitions of World Telecommunication/ICT indicators. Geneva, Switzerland: ITU.
   Google Scholar
• James, J. 2008. Evaluating latecomer growth in IT: A historical perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75(8): 1339–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, J. 2009. From the relative to the absolute digital divide in developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76(8): 1124–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, J. 2011. Are changes in the digital divide consistent with global equality or inequality? The Information Society 27(2): 121–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S.P. 2003. Is the digital divide really closing? A critique of inequality measurement in A nation online. IT&Society 1(4): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nardo, M.M., A. Saisana, and S. Tarantola (EC/JRC) and A. Hoffman and E. Giovannini (OECD). 2008. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., C.J. Tolbert, and M. Stansbury. 2003. Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2001. Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2000. Learning to bridge the digital divide. Paris, France: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2001. Understanding the digital divide. Paris, France: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2009. Guide to measuring the information society. Paris, France: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2011. Guide to measuring the information society. Paris, France: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Perrons, D. 2004. Globalization and social change: People and places in a divided world. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M. 1962. Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations, . 5th ed. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sciadas, G. 2002. Unveiling the digital divide (Connectedness Series, no. 7). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Statistics Canada. . http://www.statcan.ca/english/research/56F0004MIE/56F0004MIE2002007.pdf (accessed January 12, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sciadas, G. 2005. From the digital divide to digital opportunities: Measuring infostates for development. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information. . http://www.orbicom.ca/projects/ddi2005/index_ict_opp.pdf (accessed February 1, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2004. Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society 6(3): 341–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicherl, P. 1973. Time-distance as a dynamic measure of disparities in social and economic development. Kyklos 26(3): 559–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicherl, P. 2004. Time distance—A missing perspective in comparative analysis. E-WISDOM 1(2a): 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sicherl, P. 2007. The inter-temporal aspect of well-being and societal progress. Social Indicators Research 84(2): 231–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicherl, P. 2011. New understanding and insights from time-series data based on two generic measures: S-time-distance and S-time-step . (OECD Statistics Working Papers 2011/09). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tsatsou, P. 2010. Digital divides in Greece: The role of culture and regulation in Internet adoption. Implications for the European information society. In Interacting with broadband society, ed. L. Fortunati and A. Petrovčič, 207–225. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J., and K. Hacker. 2003. The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society 19(4): 315–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. 2005. The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vehovar, V., P. Sicherl, T. Hüsing and V. Dolničar. 2006. Methodological challenges of digital divide measurements. The Information Society 22(5): 279–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehovar, V. and V. Dolničar. 2004. Benchmarking Internet. In The Internet encyclopedia, ed. H. Bidgoli, 57–71. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Weingand, D.E. 1995. Futures Research Methodologies: Linking Today's Decisions with Tomorrow's Possibilities. Paper presented at the 61^st IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) General Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, . August 20–25.
   Google Scholar