Measuring internet skills in a general population: A large-scale validation of the short Internet Skills Scale in Slovenia

References

• AAPOR. 2016. Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 9th ed. Washington, DC: American Association for Public Opinion Research. Assessed October 25, 2020. http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. 2016. Amos (version number 26.0) [computer program]. Chicago, IL: IBM SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, G. 2013. Who creates content? Stratification and content creation on the internet. Information, Communication & Society 16 (4):590–612. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.777758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. 2015. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Büchi, M. 2016. Measurement invariance in comparative internet use research. Studies in Communication Sciences 16 (1):61–9. doi: 10.1016/j.scoms.2016.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Bunz, U. 2004. The Computer-Email-Web (CEW) Fluency Scale: Development and validation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 17 (4):479–506. doi: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1704_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. 2010. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callegaro, M., K. Lozar Manfreda, and V. Vehovar. 2015. Web survey methodology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Callegaro, M., A. Villar, D. Yeager, and J. A. Krosnick. 2014. A critical review of studies investigating the quality of data obtained with online panels based on probability and nonprobability samples. In Online panel research: A data quality perspective. Vol. 2, eds. M. Callegaro, R. Baker, J. Bethlehem, A. S. Göritz, J. A. Krosnick, and P. J. Lavrakas, 23–55. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., and D. W. Fiske. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56 (2):81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, D. 2006. The essentials of factor analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, T. 2010. The participation divide among “online experts”: Experience, skills and psychological factors as predictors of college students’ web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 16 (1):71–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01532.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T. 2016. Digital skills and social media use: How internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among “digital natives”. Information Communication and Society 19 (8):1095–107. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T., I. Pavez, and J. Contreras. 2020. Digital inclusion through mobile phones?: A comparison between mobile-only and computer users in internet access, skills and use. Information Communication and Society 23 (7):1074–91. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1555270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotten, S. R., E. L. Davison, D. B. Shank, and B. W. Ward. 2014. Gradations of disappearing digital divides among racially diverse middle school students. In Communication and information technologies annual (Studies in Media and Communication, Vol. 8), eds. L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, and J. Schulz, 25–54. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Cotten, S. R., G. Ford, S. Ford, and T. M. Hale. 2014. Internet use and depression among retired older adults in the United States: A longitudinal analysis. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 69 (5):763–71. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damodaran, L., and J. Sandhu. 2016. The role of a social context for ICT learning and support in reducing digital inequalities for older ICT users. International Journal of Learning Technology 11 (2):156–20. doi: 10.1504/IJLT.2016.077520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., P. Riefler, and K. P. Roth. 2008. Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research 61 (12):1203–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., and J. A. Siguaw. 2013. Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., E. Hargittai, C. Celeste, and S. Shafer. 2004. Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In Social inequality, ed. K. Neckerman, 355–400. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dodel, M., and G. Mesch. 2018. Inequality in digital skills and the adoption of online safety behaviors. Information, Communication & Society 21 (5):712–28. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, A. M., N. Husain, and N. K. Duke. 2011. Connected kids? K-2 children’s use and understanding of the internet. Language Arts 89 (2):86–98.
   Google Scholar
• Dolničar, V., K. Prevodnik, and V. Vehovar. 2014. Measuring the dynamics of information societies: Empowering stakeholders amid the digital divide. The Information Society 30 (3):212–28. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2014.896695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, W. H., Blank, G., with, D. Grošelj. 2013. Cultures of the internet: The internet in Britain (Oxford Internet Survey 2013 Report). Oxford, UK: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford. Accessed November 1, 2020. http://oxis.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/OxIS-2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019a. Standard Eurobarometer 92: Media use in the European Union. Accessed November 1, 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinionmobile/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/surveyKy/2255
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019b. Human capital: Digital inclusion and skills (Digital Economy and Society Index Report 2019). Accessed November 1, 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=59,976
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2013. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1):39–50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., D. Straub, and M.-C. Boudreau. 2000. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4 (7):1–77. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.00407.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D., and J. G. Hamilton. 1996. Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 3 (1):62–72. doi: 10.1080/10705519609540030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, E., and W. F. Velicer. 1988. Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin 103 (2):265–75. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. 2002. Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday 7 (4). Accessed November 15, 2020. https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/942. doi: 10.5210/fm.v7i4.942.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. 2010. Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry 80 (1):92–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., and K. Dobransky. 2017. Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality. Candian Journal of Communication 42 (2):195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., and Y. P. Hsieh. 2012. Succinct survey measures of web-use skills. Social Science Computer Review 30 (1):95–107. doi: 10.1177/0894439310397146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., and Y. P. Hsieh. 2013. Digital inequality. In The Oxford handbook of internet studies, ed. W. H. Dutton, 129–50. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., and E. Litt. 2011. The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults. New Media & Society 13 (5):824–42. doi: 10.1177/1461444811405805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., and M. Micheli. 2019. Internet skills and why they matter. In Society and the internet: How networks of information and communication are changing our lives, eds. M. Graham and W. H. Dutton, 109–24. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., A. M. Piper, and M. R. Morris. 2019. From internet access to internet skills: Digital inequality among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society 18 (4):881–90. doi: 10.1007/s10209-018-0617-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, J. A., F. J. R. Van de Vijver, and P. P. Mohler. 2003. Cross-cultural survey methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J. 2012. A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory 22 (4):403–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J., and R. Eynon. 2013. Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication 28 (6):696–713. doi: 10.1177/0267323113499113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1):1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsaker, A., and E. Hargittai. 2018. A review of internet use among older adults. New Media & Society 20 (10):3937–54. doi: 10.1177/1461444818787348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. 2016. SPSS statistics for Windows (version number 24.0) [computer program]. Armonk, NY: IBM.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, E., and L. Straker. 1999. Validity of work-related assessments. Work (Reading, Mass.) 13 (2):125–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jang, Y., J. Chern, and K. Lin. 2009. Validity of the Loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment in people with intellectual disabilities. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 63 (4):414–22. doi: 10.5014/ajot.63.4.414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco, R., and S. R. Cotten. 2012. No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education 59 (2):505–14. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, P. 1986. A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, L., and P. S. N. Lee. 2012. Impact of internet literacy, internet addiction symptoms, and internet activities on academic performance. Social Science Computer Review 30 (4):403–18. doi: 10.1177/0894439311435217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litt, E. 2013. Measuring users’ internet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media & Society 15 (4):612–30. doi: 10.1177/1461444813475424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., and E. J. Helsper. 2007. Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society 9 (4):671–96. doi: 10.1177/1461444807080335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., and E. J. Helsper. 2010. Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: The role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society 12 (2):309–29. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., C. J. Tolbert, and M. Stansbury. 2003. Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NTIA. 1995. Falling through the net: A survey of the “have nots” in rural and urban America. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Potosky, D. 2007. The internet knowledge (iKnow) measure. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (6):2760–77. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9 (5):1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816.
   Google Scholar
• Putnick, D. L., and M. H. Bornstein. 2016. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review 41:71–90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragnedda, M., and G. W. Muschert. 2013. Introduction. In The digital divide: The internet and social inequality in international perspective, eds. M. Ragnedda and G. W. Muschert, 1–14. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., and B. Wellman. 2012. Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisdorf, B. C., A. Petrovčič, and D. Grošelj. 2020. Going online on behalf of someone else: Characteristics of internet users who act as proxy users. New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444820928051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., S. R. Cotten, H. Ono, A. Quan-Haase, G. Mesch, W. Chen, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, and M. J. Stern. 2015. Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society 18 (5):569–82. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerder, A., A. J. A. M. van Deursen, and J. A. G. M. van Dijk. 2017. Determinants of internet skills, use and outcomes: A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics 34 (8):1607–24. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzberg, B. H. 2006. Preliminary development of a model and measure of computer-mediated communication (CMC) Competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2):629–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00030.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surian, A., and A. Sciandra. 2019. Digital divide: Addressing Internet skills. Educational implications in the validation of a scale. Research in Learning Technology 27:1–12. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v27.2155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SURS. 2017a. Prvo četrtletje 2017: Interneta doslej še ni nikoli uporabilo 18% oseb, starih 16–74 let. Accessed November 15, 2020. https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/News/Index/6998
   Google Scholar
• SURS. 2017b. Uporaba pametnih telefonov in e-veščine uporabnikov interneta. Accessed November 15, 2020. https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/News/Index/7115
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2012. International standard classification of education ISCED 2011. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Accessed November 15, 2020. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., E. J. Helsper, and R. Eynon. 2014. Measuring digital skills: From digital skills to tangible outcomes. Oxford, UK: Oxford Internet Institute.
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., E. J. Helsper, and R. Eynon. 2016. Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Information, Communication & Society 19 (6):804–23. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1078834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., E. J. Helsper, R. Eynon, and J. A. G. M. van Dijk. 2017. The compoundness and sequentiality of digital inequality. International Journal of Communication 11:452–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., and L. Solis Andrade. 2018. First- and second-level digital divides in Cuba: Differences in internet motivation, access, skills and usage. First Monday 23 (8). Accessed November 15, 2020. https://www.firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/8258/7556. doi: 10.5210/fm.v23i8.8258.
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., and J. A. G. M. van Dijk. 2011. Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society 13 (6):893–911. doi: 10.1177/1461444810386774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., and J. A. G. M. van Dijk. 2015a. Toward a multifaceted model of internet Access for understanding digital divides: An empirical investigation. The Information Society 31 (5):379–91. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., and J. A. G. M. van Dijk. 2015b. Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: A longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010–2013) among the Dutch population. Information, Communication & Society 18 (7):782–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., J. A. G. M. van Dijk, and O. Peters. 2011. Rethinking internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, internet experience, and hours online to medium- and content-related internet skills. Poetics 39 (2):125–44. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. A. G. M. 2005. The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. A. G. M., and A. J. A. M. van Deursen. 2014. Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, B. 2011. Effects of an eHealth literacy intervention for older adults. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13 (4):e90. Accessed November 15, 2020. https://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e90/. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimic, S. 2009. Not so “techno-savvy”: Challenging the stereotypical images of the “net generation”. Digital Culture and Education 1 (2):129–44.
   Google Scholar