Publication Cover
The Information Society
An International Journal
Volume 37, 2021 - Issue 2
1,249
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Controlling petty corruption in public administrations of developing countries through digitalization: An opportunity theory informed study of Ghana customs

ORCID Icon
Pages 99-114 | Received 22 Jan 2020, Accepted 01 Dec 2020, Published online: 16 Feb 2021

References

  • Adaba, G., and L. Rusu. 2014. E-trade facilitation in Ghana: A capability approach perspective. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 63 (1):1–13. doi: 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2014.tb00450.x.
  • Addo, A. 2016. Explaining “irrationalities” of IT-enabled change in a developing country bureaucracy: The case of Ghana’s TradeNet. Electronic Journal of Information Sytems in Developing Countries 77 (1):1–22. doi: 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2016.tb00565.x.
  • Addo, A. 2019. IT and government corruption in developing countries: A literature review and reframing. In Information and communication technologies for development: Strengthening southern-driven cooperation as a catalyst for ICT4D, eds. P. Nielsen and H. C. Kimaro, 402–13. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Addo, A., and C. Avgerou. 2021. Information technology and government corruption in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana customs. MIS Quarterly.
  • Addo, A., and P. K. Senyo. 2020. Digitalization and government corruption in developing countries: Towards a framework and research agenda. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. Accessed December 9, 2020. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2020.16765abstract.
  • Aladwani, A. 2016. Corruption as a source of e-Government projects failure in developing countries: A theoretical exposition. International Journal of Information Management 36 (1):105–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.10.005.
  • Andersen, T. 2009. E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy 21 (3):201–10. doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003.
  • Andrews, M. 2013. The limits of institutional reform in development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Argandoña, A. 2007. The united nations convention against corruption and its impact on international companies. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):481–96. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9524-z.
  • Asuliwonno, C. 2011. Improving Port Efficiency and Custom Operations in Ghana: The Case of Ghana Community Network Services Limited (GCNet) Under Customs Excise and Preventive Service (CEPS). Master's thesis, Kwame Nkruman University of Science and Technology, Ghana.
  • Aydinli, Ö. F., S. Brinkkemper, and P. Ravesteyn. 2009. Business process improvement in organizational design of e-government services. Electronic Journal of E-Government 7 (2):123–34.
  • Azad, B. 2013. Sociomateriality of corruption: Technology as a lens onto materialization of power/knowledge. In Academy of Management Proceedings. Accessed November 29, 2020. doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2013.16216abstract.
  • Baker Tilly. 2014. Report on Fraud and Mismanagement of Malawi Government Finances (Report to the Auditor General of the Government of Malawi). London, UK: Baker Tilly Business Services Limited.
  • Bale, M., and T. Dale. 1998. Public sector reform in New Zealand and its relevance to developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer 13 (1):103–21. doi: 10.1093/wbro/13.1.103.
  • Bank of Ghana. 2012. Monetary policy report: Fiscal developments. Financial Stability Report 2(1). Accessed May 5, 2019. http://www.bog.gov.gh/privatecontent/MPC_Press_Releases/fiscaldevelopments-february2012.pdf.
  • Bank of Ghana. 2020. Monetary policy report. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://www.bog.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Monetary-Policy-Report-January-2020.pdf.
  • Bardhan, P. 1997. Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature 35 (3):1320–46.
  • Bernardi, R. 2009. IT enactment of new public management in Africa: The case study of health information systems in Kenya. Electronic Journal of E-Government 7 (4):311–26.
  • Bertot, J. C., P. T. Jaeger, and J. M. Grimes. 2010. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly 27 (3):264–71. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001.
  • Bhatnagar, S. 2014. Public service delivery : Role of information and communiation technology in improving governance and development impact (ADB Economics Working Paper No. 391). Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. Accessed November 29, 2020. http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/31238/ewp-391.pdf.
  • Bhuiyan, S. 2011. Modernizing Bangladesh public administration through e-governance: Benefits and challenges. Government Information Quarterly 28 (1):54–65. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.04.006.
  • Bottoms, A. 1994. Environmental criminology. In The Oxford handbook of criminology, eds. M. Maguire, R. Morgan, and R. Reiner, 585–656. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Bozeman, B. 2000. Bureaucracy and red tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Cantens, T. 2012. Is it possible to reform a customs administration? The role of the customs elite on the reform process in Cameroon. In The role of elites in economic development, A. H. Amsden, A. DiCaprio, and J. A. Robinsom, 281–306. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Cantens, T. 2013. Other people’s money and goods: The relationship between customs officers and users in some countries of Sub-Saharan Africa. Sociologus 63 (1–2):37–58. doi: 10.3790/soc.63.1-2.37.
  • Carr, I., and R. Jago. 2014. Petty corruption, development and information technology as an antidote. Round Table 103 (5):465–82. doi: 10.1080/00358533.2014.966495.
  • Castonguay, V. 1999. A review of customs administration and procedures in Ghana. Washington, DC: U.S. Agency for International Development.
  • Chalfin, B. 2008. Cars, the customs service, and sumptuary rule in neoliberal Ghana. Comparative Studies in Society and History 50 (2):424–53. doi: 10.1017/S0010417508000194.
  • Chang, H.-J. 2001. Institutional development in developing countries in a historical perspective: Lessons from developed countries in earlier times. Paper presented at European Association of Evolutionary Political Economy, Siena, Italy, November.
  • Cho, Y. H., and B.-D. Choi. 2004. E-government to combat corruption: The case of Seoul Metropolitan Government. International Journal of Public Administration 27 (10):719–35. doi: 10.1081/PAD-200029114.
  • Clarke, R. 1983. Situation crime prevention: It’s theoretical basis and practical scope. Crime and Justice 4:225–56. doi: 10.1086/449090.
  • Clarke, R., ed. 1997. Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: Harrow & Heston.
  • Clarke, R., and P. Mayhew. 1988. The British gas suicide story and its criminological implications. In Crime and justice: A review of research, Vol. 10, eds. M. Tonry and N. Morris, 79–116. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.1086/449144.
  • Cohen, L., M. Felson, and K. Land. 1980. Property crime rates in the United States: A macrodynamic analysis, 1947-1977; with ex ante forecasts for the mid-1980s. American Journal of Sociology 86 (1):90–118. doi: 10.1086/227204.
  • Corojan, A., and J. Criado. 2012. E-government for transparency, anti-corruption, and accountability: Challenges and opportunities for Central American countries. In Handbook of research on e-government in emerging economies: Adoption, e-participation, and legal frameworks, Vol. 1, eds. K. J. Bwalya and S. Zulu, 328–50. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Danziger, J., W. Dutton, R. Kling, and K. Kraemer. 1982. Computers and politics: High technology in American local governments. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Davis, J. 2004. Corruption in public service delivery : Experience from South Asia’s water and sanitation sector. World Development 32 (1):53–71. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.07.003.
  • De Wulf, L. 2004. Tradenet in Ghana: Best practice of the use of information technology. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • De Wulf, L., and J. B. Sokol, eds. 2005. Customs modernization handbook.Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Doig, A., and R. Theobald. 1999. Introduction: Why corruption? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 37 (3):1–12. doi: 10.1080/14662049908447794.
  • Dunleavy, P., and C. Hood. 1994. From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management 14 (3):9–16. doi: 10.1080/09540969409387823.
  • Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler. 2006. Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Dutton, W., and K. Kraemer. 1978. Management utilization of computers in American local governments. Communications of the ACM 21 (3):206–18. doi: 10.1145/359361.359364.
  • Economist. 2014. Malawi’s “cashgate” scandal: The $32m heist. The Economist, February 27. Accessed November 30, 2020. http://www.economist.com/blogs/baobab/2014/02/malawi-s-cashgate-scandal.
  • Eisenstadt, S. 1973. Traditional patrimonialism and modern neopatrimonialism. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Erdmann, G., and U. Engel. 2006. Neopatrimonialism revisited: Beyond a catch-all concept (GIGA Working Paper No. 16). Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
  • Felson, M. 2002. Crime and everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Felson, M., and R. Clarke. 1998. Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention. London, UK: Home Office, Government of the United Kingdom.
  • Ferreira, C., M. Engelschalk, and W. Mayville. 2007. Corruption in customs administrations. In The many faces of corruption: Tracking vulnerabilities at the sector level, eds. J. Campos and S. Pradhan, 367–86. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Fountain, J. E. 2001. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • GCNet. 2015. The Ghana Commnity Network and Ghana customs management system (Internal PowerPoint presentation shared with author).
  • GPHA. 2015. Tema port performance 2009-2019. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://unity.ghanaports.org/publications/f30f9170c80d45fca326096afac12726.pdf.
  • Guerette, R. 2009. Analyzing crime displacement and diffusion (Problem-solving Tools Series No. 10). Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. Accessed November 30, 2020. https://biblioteca.cejamericas.org/bitstream/handle/2015/3832/e0609-Displacement.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  • Guriev, S. 2004. Red tape and corruption. Journal of Development Economics 73 (2):489–504. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.06.001.
  • Halachmi, A. 1995. Re-engineering and public management: Some issues and considerations. International Review of Administrative Sciences 61 (3):329–41. doi: 10.1177/002085239506100302.
  • Heeks, R. 1998. Information technology and public sector corruption (Information Systems and Public Sector Corruption Working Paper No. 4). Manchester, UK: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.
  • Heeks, R. 1999. Information technology and the management of corruption. Development in Practice 9 (1–2):184–9. doi: 10.1080/09614529953359.
  • Hood, C. 1995. The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2-3):93–109. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.
  • Hors, I. 2000. Fighting corruption in the developing countries (OECD Observer No. 220). Accessed November 30, 2020. http://oecdobserver.org/news/archivestory.php/aid/291/Fighting_corruption_in_the_developing_countries.html.
  • Hors, I. 2001. Fighting corruption in customs administration: What can we learn from recent experiences? (Development Centre Technical Paper No. 175). Paris: Development Centre, OECD. Accessed November 30, 2020. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=CD/DOC%282001%2907&docLanguage=En.
  • Hossan, C., and T. Bartram. 2010. The battle against corruption and inefficiency with the help of eGovernment in Bangladesh. Electronic Government, an International Journal 7 (1):89–100. doi: 10.1504/EG.2010.029893.
  • Hull, M. 2012a. Documents and bureaucracy. Annual Review of Anthropology 41 (1):251–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104953.
  • Hull, M. 2012b. Government of paper: The materiality of bureaucracy of urban Pakistan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Introna, L., N. Hayes, and D. Petrakaki. 2009. The working out of modernization in the public sector: The case of an e-government initiative in Greece. International Journal of Public Administration 33 (1):11–25. doi: 10.1080/01900690903188750.
  • Kaufman, H. 1977. Red tape: It’s origin, uses and abuses. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  • Kaufmann, D., and S.-J. Wei. 2000. Does “grease money” speed up the wheels of commerce? (IMP Working Paper WP/00/64). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Accessed November 30, 2020. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/30/Does-Grease-Money-Speed-Up-the-Wheels-of-Commerce-3524.
  • Kim, S., H. J. Kim, and H. Lee. 2009. An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly 26 (1):42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2008.09.002.
  • Klitgaard, R. 1991. Controlling corruption. Berkely, CA: University of California Press.
  • Kraemer, K., and J. King. 2006. Information technology and administrative reform: Will e-government be different? International Journal of Electronic Government Research 2 (1):1–20. doi: 10.4018/jegr.2006010101.
  • Lambsdorff, J. 2007. The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence and policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 24 (4):691–710. doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.2553248.
  • Laudon, K. C. 1974. Computers and bureaucratic reform: The political functions of urban information systems. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Leavitt, H. 1964. Applied organization change in industry: Structural, technical, and human approaches. In New perspectives in organizational research, eds. C. Leavitt, H. Leavitt, and S. Kelly, 55–71. Chicester, UK: Wiley.
  • Legner, C., T. Eymann, T. Hess, C. Matt, T. Böhman, P. Drews, A. Mädche, N. Urbach, and F. Ahlemann. 2017. Digitalization : Opportunity and challenge for the business and information systems engineering community. Business & Information Systems Engineering 59 (4):301–8. doi: 10.1007/s12599-017-0484-2.
  • Madon, S. 1993. Introducing administrative reform through the application of computer-based information systems: A case study in India. Public Administration and Development 13 (1):37–48. doi: 10.1002/pad.4230130104.
  • Masiero, S. 2015. Redesigning the Indian food security system through e-governance: The case of Kerala. World Development 67:126–37. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.014.
  • Masiero, S., and A. Prakash. 2015. Does computerisation reduce PDS leakage? Lessons from Karnataka. Economic & Political Weekly 50 (50):77–81.
  • Mauro, P. 1995. Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3):681–712. doi: 10.2307/2946696.
  • Mayhew, P., R. Clarke, and D. Elliot. 1989. Motorcycle theft, helmet legislation and displacement. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 28 (1):1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.1989.tb00631.x.
  • McCourt, W. 1998. Civil service reforms equal retrenchment? The experience of “right sizing” and retrenchment in Ghana, Uganda and the UK. In Beyond the New Public Management: Changing ideas and practices in governance, eds. M. Minogue, C. Polidano, and D. Hulme, 172–87. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Mclinden, G., and A. Durrani. 2013. Corruption in customs. World Customs Journal 7 (2):3–10.
  • Michael, B., F. Ferguson, and A. Karimov. 2012. Do customs trade facilitation programs help reduce customs-related corruption? International Journal of Public Administration 35 (2):81–97. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2011.635491.
  • Mistry, J. 2012. The role of egovernance in mitigating corruption. Accounting and the Public Interest 12 (1):137–59. doi: 10.2308/apin-10287.
  • Mistry, J., and A. Jalal. 2012. An empirical analysis of the relationship between e-government and corruption. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research 12:145–76.
  • Mohr, L. 1982. Explaining organizational behavior: The limits and possibilities of theory and research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Muno, W. 2013. Clientelist corruption networks : Conceptual and empirical approaches. In (Dys-)functionalities of corruption: Comparative perspectives and methodological pluralism, eds. T. Debiel and A. Gawrich, 33–56. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Neupane, A., J. Soar, and K. Vaidya. 2012. The potential of e-procurement technology for reducing corruption. International Journal of Information Technology and Management 11 (4):273–87. doi: 10.1504/IJITM.2012.049997.
  • Neupane, A., J. Soar, K. Vaidya, and S. Aryal. 2014. The potential for ICT tools to promote public participation in fighting corruption. In Human rights and the impact of ICT in the public sphere: Participation, democracy, and political autonomy, eds. C. M. Akrivopoulou and N. Garipidis, 175–91. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
  • Olken, B., and R. Pande. 2012. Corruption in developing countries. Annual Review of Economics 4 (1):479–509. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110917.
  • Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Owusu-Gyimah, A. 2015. Tax revenue generation and the economic development of Ghana. European Journal of Business and Management 7 (14):78–89.
  • Ramasoota, P. 1998. Information technology and bureaucratic surveillance: A case study of the population information metwork (PIN) in Thailand. Information Technology for Development 8 (1):51–64. doi: 10.1080/02681102.1998.9525291.
  • Relly, J. 2012. Examining a model of vertical accountability: A cross-national study of the influence of information access on the control of corruption. Government Information Quarterly 29 (3):335–45. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.011.
  • Riley, S. 1999. Petty corruption and development. Development in Practice 9 (1-2):189–93. doi: 10.1080/09614529953368.
  • Rose-Ackerman, S. 1999. Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rothstein, B. 2011. Anti-corruption: The indirect ‘big bang’ approach. Review of International Political Economy 18 (2):228–50. doi: 10.1080/09692291003607834.
  • Sawyer, S., and M. Jarrahi. 2014. Sociotechnical approaches to the study of Information Systems. In Computing Handbook, eds. H. Topi and A. Tucker, 1–39. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Schacter, M. 2000. Public sector reform in developing countries: Issues, lessons and future directions (Prepared for Policy Branch, Canadian International Development Agency). Accessed November 30, 2020. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.473.7078&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  • Senior, I. 2004. Corruption, the government and the private sector: Why it matters and what can be done. Economic Affairs 24 (2):22–9. June 28, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0270.2004.00469.x.
  • Seyf, A. 2001. Corruption and development: A study of conflict. Development in Practice 11 (5):597–605. doi: 10.1080/09614520120085340.
  • Shim, D., and T. H. Eom. 2008. E-government and anti-corruption : Empirical analysis of international data. International Journal of Public Administration 31 (3):298–316. doi: 10.1080/01900690701590553.
  • Shim, D., and T. H. Eom. 2009. Anticorruption effects of information communication and technology (ICT) and social capital. International Review of Administrative Sciences 75 (1):99–116.
  • Shrivastava, U., and A. Bhattacherjee. 2015. ICT as a corruption deterrent: A theoretical perspective. Paper presented at the Twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems, Puerto Rico, August. Accessed November 30, 2020. https://aisel-aisnet-org.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1167&context=amcis2015.
  • Srivastava, S., T. Teo, and S. Devaraj. 2016. You can’t bribe a computer: Dealing with the societal challenge of corruption through ICT. MIS Quarterly 40 (2):511–26. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.14.
  • Singh, D., A. Das, and D. Joseph. 2007. Country-level determinants of e-government maturity. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 20:632–48. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.02040.
  • Stamati, T., T. Papadopoulos, and D. Anagnostopoulos. 2015. Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector: Cases in the Greek context. Government Information Quarterly 32 (1):12–29. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.004.
  • Sulle, A. 2010. The application of New Public Management doctrines in the developing world: An exploratory study of the autonomy and control of executive agencies in Tanzania. Public Administration and Development 30 (5):345–54. doi: 10.1002/pad.580.
  • Sundell, A. 2016. Anti-corruption reform: Evolution or big bang? (Disseration Brief Series 2016: 08). Stockholm: Expertgruppen för Biståndsanalys (EBA). Accessed November 30, 2020. https://eba.se/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/DDB_2016_8_Sundell_webb.pdf.
  • Syed, R., and W. Bandara. 2019. Controlling corruption in developing country public sector : A process ecosystems perspective. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems 2019, 1–9. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. Accessed November 30, 2020. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/133200/1/1-Parasitic_Process_Ecosystems_R2.pdf.
  • Tettey, W. 1997. Transforming tax administration in Ghana: The tension between computers and human agency. Development Policy Review 15 (4):339–56. doi: 10.1111/1467-7679.00041.
  • Toyama, K. 2011. Technology is not the answer. The Atlantic, March 28. Accessed November 11, 2015. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/03/technology-is-not-the-answer/73065/.
  • Toyama, K. 2015. Geek heresy: Rescuing social change from the cult of technology. New York, NY: Perseus Books.
  • Treisman, D. 2007. What have we learnt about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science 10 (1):211–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418.
  • Turner, M. 2013. Why is it so difficult to reform some Asian bureaucracies? Building theory from Cambodian evidence. Public Administration and Development 33 (4):275–85. doi: 10.1002/pad.1655.
  • United Nations. 2016. E-government survey 2016. NewYork: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations. Accessed November 30, 2020. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2016-Survey/E-Government%20Survey%202016.pdf.
  • van den Bersselaar, D., and S. Decker. 2011. No longer at ease”: Corruption as an institution in West Africa. International Journal of Public Administration 34 (11):741–52. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2011.598272.
  • van Dijk, J. 1994. Understanding crime rates: On interactions between rational choices of victims and offenders. The British Journal of Criminology 34 (2):105–21. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048398.
  • Wallis, J., and B. Dollery. 2001. Government failure, social capital and the appropriateness of the New Zealand model for public sector reform in developing countries. World Development 29 (2):245–63. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00092-9.
  • Walsh, J. T. 2003. Practical measures to promote integrity in customs administration. In Changing customs: Challenges and strategies for the reform of customss administration, ed. M. Keen, 154–66. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Accessed November 30, 2020. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/IMF058/01185-9781589062115/01185-9781589062115/01185-9781589062115.xml?language=en.
  • Weber, M. 1978. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkley, CA: Univervisty of California Press.
  • Widdowson, D. 2013. Bordering on corruption: An analysis of corrupt customs practices that impact the trading community. World Customs Journal 7 (2):11–22.
  • Wilcox, P., and F. Cullen. 2018. Situational opportunity theories of crime. Annual Review of Criminology 1 (1):123–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092421.
  • World Bank. 2010. Implementation, completion and results report: Ghana Trade and Investment Gateway Project (GHATIG). Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • World Bank. 2011. An evaluation of World Bank Group activities in information and communication technologies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • World Bank. 2016. World developmentrReport 2016: Digital dividents. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • World Customs Organization. 1993. The Arusha declaration: Declaration of the customs co-operation council concerning integrity in customs. Assessed November 30, 2020. http://www.wcoomd.org/-/media/wco/public/global/pdf/about-us/legal-instruments/declarations/revised_arusha_declaration_en.pdf?la=en.
  • World Customs Organization. 2012. Revised integrity development guide. Brussels: World Customs Organization. Accessed May 2, 2020. http://www.wcoomd.org/-/media/wco/public/global/pdf/topics/integrity/instruments-and-tools/integrity_guide.pdf?la=en.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.