References
- Abidin, C. 2022. Grief hypejacking: Influencers, #ThoughtsAndPrayers, and the commodification of grief on Instagrams. The Information Society 38 (3):174–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2022.2071212.
- Aceti, L. 2015. Eternally present and eternally absent: The cultural politics of a thanatophobic internet and its visual representations of artificial existences. Mortality 20 (4):319–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2015.1085297.
- Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization, vol. 1. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Armitage, J. 2013. Vision, inertia, and the mobile telephone: On the origins of control space and the spread of sociopolitical cybernetics. In New visualities, new technologies: The new ecstasy of communication, eds. J. M. Wise and H. Koskela, 67–82. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
- Arnold, M., M. Gibbs, T. Kohn, J. Meese, and B. Nansen. 2018. Death and digital media. London: Routledge.
- Bainbridge, B. 2013. Perspectives on virtual veneration. The Information Society 29 (3):196–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777312.
- Barendregt, B. 2012. Diverse digital worlds. In Digital anthropology, eds. H. A. Horst and D. Miller, 203–24. London: Bloomsbury.
- Bell, G., and J. Gemmell. 2009. Total recall: How the e-memory revolution will change everything. New York: Dutton.
- Boellstorff, T. 2013. Making big data, in theory. First Monday 18 (10). Accessed March 4, 2022. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4869/3750. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869.
- Bollmer, G. 2013. Millions now living will never die: Cultural anxieties about the afterlife of information. The Information Society 29 (3):142–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777297.
- Bollmer, G., and K. Guinness. 2018. Do you really want to live forever?”: Animism, death, and the trouble of digital images. Cultural Studies Review 24 (2):79–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v24i2.5995.
- Bratton, B. H. 2019. The stack: On software and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Brubaker, J. R., G. R. Hayes, and P. Dourish. 2013. Beyond the grave: Facebook as a site for the expansion of death and mourning. The Information Society 29 (3):152–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777300.
- Brubaker, J., G. Hayes, and M. Mazmanian. 2019. Orienting to networked grief: Situated perspectives of communal mourning on Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3, 1–19. New York: ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3359129.
- Carter, M. M. Gibbs, and G. Wadley. 2013. Death and dying in DayZ. In IE’13: Proceedings of the 9th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment, 1–6. New York: ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2513002.2513013.
- Christensen, D. R., and S. Gotved. 2015. Online memorial culture: An introduction. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 21 (1-2):1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2015.988455.
- Dobscha, S. ed. 2016. Death in a consumer culture. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
- Fisch, M. 2013. Tokyo’s commuter train suicides and the society of emergence. Cultural Anthropology 28 (2):320–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cuan.12006.
- Floridi, L., ed. 2015. The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era. New York: Springer.
- Gibson, M. 2007. Death and mourning in technologically mediated culture. Health Sociology Review 16 (5):415–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2007.16.5.415.
- Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Graham, C., and A. Montoya. 2015. Death, After-death and the human in the internet era: Remembering, not forgetting professor Michael C. Kearl (1949-2015). Mortality 20 (4):287–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2015.1085294.
- Graham, C., E. Kerr, N. Pang, and M. M. J. Fischer. 2018. The internet in Asia through Singapore. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 12 (4):479–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-7218957.
- Graham, C., M. Constable, and J. Fernando. 2015. The aesthetic of death and after-death in an Internet age. Visual Studies 30 (1):32–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2015.996393.
- Graham, C., W. Smith, W. Moncur, and E. van den Hoven. 2018. Introduction: Mortality in design. Design Issues 34 (1):3–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_e_00472.
- Hallam, E. 2016. Anatomy museum: Death and the body displayed. London: Reaktion Books.
- Hallam, E., and J. Hockey. 2001. Death, memory and material culture. Oxford, UK: Berg.
- Hockey, J., C. Komaromy, and K. Woodthorpe. eds. 2010. The matter of death: Space, place and materiality. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hopkins, J. P. 2013. Afterlife in the cloud: Managing a digital estate. Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal 5 (2):209–43.
- Howe, C., J. Lockrem, H. Appel, E. Hackett, D. Boyer, R. Hall, M. Schneider-Mayerson, A. Pope, A. Gupta, E. Rodwell, et al. 2016. Paradoxical infrastructures: Ruins, retrofit, and risk. Science, Technology, & Human Values 41 (3):547–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915620017.
- Huang, X., L. Xing, J. R. Brubaker, and M. J. Paul. 2017. Exploring timelines of confirmed suicide incidents through social media. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), 470–477. New York: IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHI.2017.47.
- Karppi, T. 2013. Death proof: On the bio-politics and noopolitics of memorializing dead Facebook users. Culture Machine 14:1–20.
- Kaur, E., C. Graham, and H. K. Koh. 2022. Inscribing place in Singapore: Instagram depictions of hauntedness. The Information Society 38 (3):200–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2022.2071216.
- Kearl, M. C. 1989. Endings: A sociology of death and dying. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kearl, M. C. 2010. The proliferation of postselves in American civic and popular cultures. Mortality 15 (1):47–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270903537591.
- Kenning, G., and C. Treadaway. 2018. Designing for dementia: Iterative grief and transitional objects. Design Issues 34 (1):42–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00475.
- Kera, D. 2013. Designing for death and apocalypse: Theodicy of networks and uncanny archives. The Information Society 29 (3):177–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777307.
- Kirk, D., A. C. Durrant, J. Kosem, and S. Reeves. 2018. Spomenik: Resurrecting voices in the woods. Design Issues 34 (1):67–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00477.
- Kitchin, R. 2014. The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage.
- Kneese, T. 2019. Networked heirlooms: The affective and financial logics of digital estate planning. Cultural Studies 33 (2):297–324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2018.1466904.
- Kohn, T., M. Gibbs, B. Nansen, and L. van Ryn. eds. 2019. Residues of death: Disposal refigured. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
- LaFrance, A. 2016. The six main arcs in storytelling, as identified by an A.I. The Atlantic, July 12, Accessed March, 2022. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/07/the-six-main-arcs-in-storytelling-identified-by-a-computer/490733/
- Lagerkvist, A. 2017. Existential media: Toward a theorization of digital thrownness. New Media & Society 19 (1):96–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816649921.
- Lagerkvist, A. 2021. Digital existence: Ontology, ethics and transcendence in digital culture. New York: Routledge.
- Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Lingel, J. 2013. The digital remains: Social media and practices of online grief. The Information Society 29 (3):190–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777311.
- Matei, S. 2018. Responsibility beyond the grave: Technological mediation of collective moral agency in online commemorative environments. Design Issues 34 (1):84–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00478.
- Mayer-Schönberger, V. 2009. Delete: The virtue of forgetting in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Meese, J., B. Nansen, T. Kohn, M. Arnold, and M. Gibbs. 2015. Posthumous personhood and the affordances of digital media. Mortality 20 (4):408–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2015.1083724.
- Miron, W. 2015. Q&A. Technology Innovation Management Review 5 (1):37–40. Accessed March 4, 2022. https://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Miron_TIMReview_January2015.pdf. doi: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/865.
- Moncur, W. 2015. Digital ownership across lifespans. In Aging and the digital life course, eds. D. Prendergast and C. Garratini, 257–73. New York: Berghahn Books.
- Munn, L. 2022. Dying on Airbnb: Digital infrastructures and deadly spaces. The Information Society 38 (3):218–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2022.2071217.
- Nansen, B., M. Arnold, M. Gibbs, and T. Kohn. 2015. From repose to restless in the digital cemetery. In Digital death: Mortality and beyond in the online age, eds. C. M. Moreman and A. D. Lewis, 111–24. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
- Öhman, C. J., and D. Watson. 2019. Are the dead taking over Facebook? A Big Data approach to the future of death online. Big Data & Society 6 (1):205395171984254–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719842540.
- Öhman, C., and L. Floridi. 2017. The political economy of death in the age of information: A critical approach to the digital afterlife industry. Minds and Machines 27 (4):639–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9445-2.
- Phillips, W., and R. M. Milner. 2017. The ambivalent internet: Mischief, oddity, and antagonism online. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- Poor, N., M. Skoric, and C. Lampe. 2022. Death of a child, birth of a guild: Factors aiding the rapid formation of online support communities. The Information Society 38 (3):188–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2022.2071219.
- Rossiter, N. 2016. Software, infrastructure, labour: A media theory of logistical nightmares. New York: Routledge.
- Rossiter, N. 2017. Imperial infrastructures and Asia beyond Asia: Data centres, state formation and the territoriality of logistical media. The Fibreculture Journal 29:1–14.
- Sas, C., S. Whittaker, and J. Zimmerman. 2016. Design for rituals of letting go: An embodiment perspective on disposal practices informed by grief therapy. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 23 (4):1–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2926714.
- Sconce, J. 2000. Haunted media: Electronic presence from telegraphy to television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Seabrook, J. 2019. The next word: Where will predictive text take us? The New Yorker, October 14. Accessed March 4, 2022. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/10/14/can-a-machine-learn-to-write-for-the-new-yorker
- Serres, M. 2019. Hominescene. London: Bloomsbury.
- Service, R. F. 2021. Scientists “program” living bacteria to store data. Science. January 11. Accessed March 4, 2022. https://www.science.org/content/article/scientists-program-living-bacteria-store-data.
- Urry, J. 2000. Sociologies beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
- Van Dijck, J., T. Poell, and M. de Waal. 2018. The platform society: Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Virilio, P. 1997. Open sky. London: Verso.
- Walter, T. 1994. The revival of death. London: Routledge.
- Walter, T. 2015. Communication media and the dead: From the Stone Age to Facebook. Mortality (Abingdon, England) 20 (3):215–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2014.993598.
- Walter, T., R. Hourizi, W. Moncur, and S. Pitsillides. 2011. Does the internet change how we die and mourn? Overview and analysis. Omega 64 (4):275–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.2190/om.64.4.a.
- Willems, T. 2018. Monsters” and “mess” on the railways: Coping with complexity in infrastructure breakdowns. Doctoral diss., Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
- Willems, T., and C. Graham. 2019. The imagination of Singapore’s smart nation as digital infrastructure: Rendering (digital) work invisible. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 13 (4):511–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-8005194.
- Willmott, H. 2000. Death. So what? Sociology, sequestration and emancipation. The Sociological Review 48 (4):649–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00237.