Publication Cover
The Information Society
An International Journal
Volume 39, 2023 - Issue 1
1,632
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The patterning of the discursive space in search for the #goodlife: A network analysis of the co-occurrence of Instagram hashtags

, &
Pages 62-78 | Received 26 Jan 2021, Accepted 15 Nov 2021, Published online: 03 Oct 2022

References

  • Abidin, C. 2016. Visibility labour: Engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia 161 (1):86–100.
  • Allesina, S., A. Bodini, and C. Bondavalli. 2006. Secondary extinctions in ecological networks: Bottlenecks unveiled. Ecological Modelling 194 (1–3):150–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.10.016.
  • Anggawi, S. 2016. Chasing the light: Imagining and representing social mobility in pre-wedding and wedding photography via Instagram. Master’s thesis, University of Leiden. Accessed January 20, 2020. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43504962.pdf/.
  • Arvidsson, A. 2005. Brands: A critical perspective. Journal of Consumer Culture 5 (2):235–58. doi: 10.1177/1469540505053093.
  • Barr, S., G. Shaw, and T. Coles. 2011. Times for (un)sustainability? Challenges and opportunities for developing behaviour change policy. A case-study of consumers at home and away. Global Environmental Change 21 (4):1234–44. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.011.
  • Bauman, Z. 2002. Society under siege. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Beer, D. 2013. Popular culture and new media: The politics of circulation. London: Palgrave
  • Bishop, S. 2018. Anxiety, panic, and self-optimization: Inequalities and the YouTube algorithm. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 24 (1):69–84. doi: 10.1177/1354856517736978.
  • Borges-Rey, E. 2015. News images on Instagram. The paradox of authenticity in hyperreal photo reportage. Digital Journalism 3 (4):571–93. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2015.1034526.
  • Brown, S. 2018. Fake it till you make it: Meet the wolves of Instagram. The Guardian, April 19. Accessed May 3, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/apr/19/wolves-ofinstagram-jordan-belmont-social-media-traders/
  • Bruns, A., and J. Burgess. 2015. Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In #Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks, ed. N. Rambukkana, 13–27. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Bucher, T. 2013. Objects of intense feeling: The case of the Twitter API. Computational Culture 3: n.p. Accessed February 20, 2020. http://computationalculture.net/objects-of-intense-feeling-the-case-of-the-twitter-api.
  • Buente, W., C. Rathnayake, R. Neo, F. Dalisay, and H. K. Kramer. 2020. Tradition gone mobile: An exploration of #betelnut on Instagram. Substance Use & Misuse 55 (9):1483–92.
  • Carah, N., and M. Shaul. 2016. Brands and Instagram: Point, tap, swipe, glance. Mobile Media & Communication 4 (1):69–84. doi: 10.1177/2050157915598180.
  • Cheney-Lippold, J. 2011. A new algorithmic identify: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (6):164–81. doi: 10.1177/0263276411424420.
  • Christopher, J. C. 1999. Situating psychological well-being: Exploring the cultural roots of its theory and research. Journal of Counseling & Development 77 (2):141–52. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02434.x.
  • Cotter, K. 2019. Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society 21 (4):895–913. doi: 10.1177/1461444818815684.
  • De Paola, J., E. J. Hakoköngäs, and J. J. Hakanen. 2020. #Happy: Constructing and sharing everyday understandings of happiness on Instagram. Human Arenas 5:469–87.
  • Dorsch, I. 2020. Hashtags on Instagram: Self-created or mediated by best practices and tools? In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2771–2780. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii doi: 10.24251/HICSS.2020.338.
  • Douglas, M. 1976. Relative poverty: Relative communication. In Traditions of social policy: Essays in honour of Violet Butler, ed. A. Hasley, 197–215. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  • Douglas, M., and B. Isherwood. 1996. The world of goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption. New York: Routledge
  • Duffy, B. E. 2017. (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
  • Duffy, B. E., and E. Hund. 2015. “Having it all” on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media + Society 1 (2):205630511560433–11. doi: 10.1177/2056305115604337.
  • Duggan, M. 2015. The demographics of social media users. Accessed April 24, 2018. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/the-demographics-ofsocial-media-users/
  • Eberle, T. S. 2014. Phenomenology as a research method. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, ed. U. Flick, 184–202. London: SAGE.
  • Eddington, S. M. 2018. The communicative constitution of hate organisations online: A semantic network analysis of “Make America Great Again”. Social Media & Society 4 (3):1–12.
  • Elliott, R., and K. Wattanasuwan. 1998. Brands as symbolic resources for the construction of identity. International Journal of Advertising 17 (2):131–44. doi: 10.1080/02650487.1998.11104712.
  • Evans, A. 2017. The myth gap: What happens when evidence and arguments aren’t enough? London: Eden Project Books.
  • Evans, D., and T. Jackson. 2008. Sustainable Consumption: Perspectives from Social and Cultural Theory (RESOLVE Working Paper 05-08). Guildford, UK: Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://resolve.sustainablelifestyles.ac.uk/sites/default/files/RESOLVE_WP_05-08.pdf
  • Eynon, R., and A. Geniets. 2019. Not all young people “use” the internet: Exploring the experiences of ex-use amongst young people in Britain. In Crossing the bridge of the digital divide: A walk with global leaders, eds. A. H. Normore, and A. I. Lahera, 37–55. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Franzke, A., A. Bechmann, M. Zimmer, and C. Ess. 2020. Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. December 9. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf/
  • Gallagher, M. M. 2015. John Berger, Paris Hilton, and The Rich Kids of Instagram: The social and economic inequality of image sharing and production of power through self-promotion. Senior thesis, Scripps College, Claremont, CA. Accessed January 20, 2020. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/545/.
  • Georgakopoulou, A. 2015. Small stories research: Methods—analysis—outreach. In Handbook of narrative analysis, eds. A. De Fina and A. Georgakopoulou, 255–72. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Giannoulakis, S., and N. Tsapatsoulis. 2016. Evaluating the descriptive power of Instagram hashtags. Journal of Innovation in Digital Ecosystems 3 (2):114–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jides.2016.10.001.
  • Giaxoglou, K. 2018. #JeSuisCharlie? Hashtgas as narrative resources in contexts of ecstatic sharing. Discourse, Context & Media 22:13–20.
  • Gottweis, H. 2003. Theoretical strategies of poststructuralist policy analysis: Towards an analytics of government. In Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society, eds M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, 247–65. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hammond, M. 2019. A cultural account of ecological democracy. Environmental Values 28 (1):55–74. doi: 10.3197/096327119X15445433913578.
  • Hartley, J. 2012. Digital futures for cultural and media studies. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
  • Helne, T., and T. Hirvilammi. 2017. The relational conception of wellbeing as a catalyst for the eco social transition. In The ecosocial transition of societies: The contribution of social work and social policy, eds. A.-L. Matthies and K. Närhi, 36–53. Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  • Highfield, T., and T. Leaver. 2015. A methodology for mapping Instagram hashtags. First Monday 20 (1):1–11.
  • Hine, C. 2015. Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Ichau, E., T. Frissen, and L. d’Haenens. 2019. From #selfie to #edgy: Hashtag networks and images associated with the hashtag #jews on Instagram. Telematics and Informatics 44:1–16.
  • Isham, A., B. Gatersleben, and T. Jackson. 2019. Flow activities as a route to living well with less. Environment and Behavior 51 (4):431–61. doi: 10.1177/0013916518799826.
  • Ivanova, D., K. Stadler, K. Steen-Olsen, R. Wood, G. Vita, A. Tukker, and E. G. Hertwich. 2016. Environmental impact assessment of household consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology 20 (3):526–36. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12371.
  • Jackson, T. 2006. Consuming paradise? Towards a social and cultural psychology of sustainable consumption. Earthscan reader in sustainable consumption, ed. T. Jackson, 367–96. London: Earthscan.
  • Jackson, T. 2017. Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow. London: Routledge
  • Kitchin, R., and M. Dodge. 2011. Code/space: Software studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Laestadius, L. 2017. Instagram. In The SAGE handbook of social media research methods, eds. L. Sloan and A. Quan-Haase, 573–92. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Lakoff, G. 1990. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  • Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Leaver, T., T. Highfield, and C. Abidin. 2020. Instagram: Visual social media cultures. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
  • Lee, C., and D. Chau. 2018. Language as pride, love, and hate: Archiving emotions through multilingual Instagram hashtags. Discourse, Context & Media 22:21–9. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.002.
  • Levitas, R. 2010. Back to the future: Wells, sociology, utopia and method. The Sociological Review 58 (4):530–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01938.x.
  • Lewis, T., and M. Phillipov. 2018. Food/media: Eating, cooking, and provisioning in a digital world. Communication Research and Practice 4 (3):207–11. doi: 10.1080/22041451.2018.1482075.
  • Littler, J. 2013. Meritocracy as plutocracy: The marketising of “equality” under neoliberalism. New Formations 80 (80):52–72. doi: 10.3898/NewF.80/81.03.2013.
  • Loukianov, A., K. Burningham, and T. Jackson. 2020. Young people, good life narratives, and sustainable futures: The case of Instagram. Sustainable Earth 3 (1):11. doi: 10.1186/s42055-020-00033-2.
  • Mackay, H. 2013. The good life: What makes a life worth living? Sydney: Pan Macmillan Australia.
  • Mair, S., A. Druckman, and T. Jackson. 2018. The future of work: Lessons from the history of utopian thought (CUSP Working Paper No. 13). Guildford, UK: Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Prosperity, University of Surrey.
  • Manovich, L. 2017. Instagram and contemporary image. Accessed May 3, 2018. http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/instagram-and-contemporary-image/
  • Marwick, A. E. 2015. Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture 27 (1):137–60. doi: 10.1215/08992363-2798379.
  • McCosker, A., and Y. Gerrard. 2021. Hashtagging depression on Instagram: Towards a more inclusive mental health research methodology. New Media & Society 23 (7):1899–919. doi: 10.1177/1461444820921349.
  • McCracken, G. 1990. Culture and consumption. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • McMahon, D. M. 2006. The pursuit of happiness: A history from the Greeks to the present. London: Penguin.
  • Meraz, S., and Z. Papacharissi. 2013. Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. International Journal of Press/Politics 18 (2):138–66.
  • Mosseri, A. 2021. Shedding more light on how Instagram works. Accessed July 14, 2021. https://about.instagram.com/blog/announcements/shedding-more-light-on-how-instagram-works
  • Palazzo, M., A. Vollero, P. Vitale, and A. Siano. 2021. Urban and rural destinations on Instagram: Exploring the influencers’ role in #sustainabletourism. Land Use Policy 100:1–11.
  • Park, H. W. 2003. Hyperlink network analysis: A new method for the study of social structure on the web. Connections 25 (1):49–61.
  • Paveau, M.-A. 2013. Technodiscursivités natives sur Twitter: Une écologie du discours numérique. Épistème 9:139–76.
  • Pilař, L., L. K. Stanislavská, M. Prokop, and P. Jaaskelainen. 2020. Food in the context of sustainability: Instagram social network analysis. In Agrarian perspectives XXIX: Proceedings of the 29th international scientific conference, 272–278. Prague: Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. Accessed January 7, 2021. https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/251517/1/proceedings-2020.pdf#page=272.
  • Rader, E., and R. Gray. 2015. Understanding user beliefs about algorithmic curation in the Facebook news feed. In CHI’15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 173–182. New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702174.
  • Ruckenstein, M. 2011. Children in creationist capitalism: The corporate value of sociality. Information, Communication & Society 14 (7):1060–76. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.565781.
  • Scott, D., P. Peeters, and S. Gössling. 2010. Can tourism deliver its “aspirational” greenhouse gas emission reduction targets? Journal of Sustainable Tourism 18 (3):393–408. doi: 10.1080/09669581003653542.
  • Serrano, A. M., M. Boguña, and A. Vespignani. 2009. Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (16):6483–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808904106.
  • Sheldon, P., P. A. Rauschnabel, M. G. Antony, and S. Car. 2017. A cross-cultural comparison of Croatian and American social network sites: Exploring cultural ­differences in motives for Instagram use. Computers in Human Behavior 75:643–51. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.009.
  • Shi, W., H. Fu, P. Wang, C. Chen, and J. Xiong. 2020. #Climatechange vs. #Globalwarming: Characterizing two competing climate discourses on Twitter with semantic network and temporal analyses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17:1–22.
  • Skeggs, B., and S. Yuill. 2016. The methodology of a multi-model project examining how Facebook infrastructures social relations. Information, Communication & Society 19 (10):1356–72. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1091026.
  • Sontag, S. 1979. On photography. New York: Penguin
  • Statista. 2014. Age distribution of active social media users worldwide as of 3rd quarter 2014, by platform. Accessed January 7, 2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/274829/age-distribution-of-active-social-media-users-worldwide-by-platform/
  • The Female Lead, and Apter, T. 2018. Disrupting the feed. Accessed October 23. https://zzjyl3­lhxs3­­eyvm92cs1kx1a-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Research-Results-July-2019.pdf/
  • Tiggemann, M., and M. Zaccardo. 2018. “Strong is the new skinny”: A content analysis of #fitspiration images on Instagram. Journal of Health Psychology 23 (8):1003–11.
  • Tiidenberg, K., and K. N. Baym. 2017. Learn it, buy it, work it: Intensive pregnancy on Instagram. Social Media & Society 3 (1):1–13.
  • Türker, İ., and E. E. Sulak. 2018. A multilayer network analysis of hashtags in twitter via co-occurrence and semantic links. International Journal of Modern Physics B 32 (4):1850029. doi: 10.1142/S0217979218500297.
  • Uldam, J. 2018. Social media visibility: Challenges to activism. Media, Culture & Society 40 (1):41–58. doi: 10.1177/0163443717704997.
  • Van Dijck, J., and T. Poell. 2013. Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication 1 (1):2–14. doi: 10.17645/mac.v1i1.70.
  • Waddock, S. 2018. Narrative, memes, and the prospect of large systems change. Humanistic Management Journal 3 (1):17–45. doi: 10.1007/s41463-018-0039-9.
  • Willson, M. 2017. Algorithms (and the) everyday. Information, Communication & Society 20 (1):137–50. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200645.
  • Ye, Z., N. H. Hashim, F. Baghirov, and J. Murphy. 2018. Gender differences in Instagram hashtag use. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 27 (4):386–404. doi: 10.1080/19368623.2018.1382415.
  • Young, I. M. 1997. Difference as a resource for democratic communication. In Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics, eds. J. Bohman and W. Rehg, 383–406. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Zappavigna, M. 2015. Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Social Semiotics 25 (3):274–91. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2014.996948.