Strategic Numeracy: Self-Serving Reasoning About Health Statistics

REFERENCES

• Alonso, D. & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2003). Irrational decisions: Attending to numbers rather than ratios. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1537–1547. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00368-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E., Gilovich, T. & Regan, D. T. (2002). Motivated reasoning and the Wason selection task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1379–1387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denes-Raj, V. & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819–829. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H. & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568–584. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.63.4.568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M. & Lockhart, L. K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 53–69. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.75.1.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. A., Hennessy, E. V. & Marzullo, D. M. (2001). Defensive evaluation of antismoking messages among college-age smokers: The role of possible selves. Health Psychology, 20, 424–433. doi:10.1037//0278–6133.20.6.424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M. & Woloshin, S. (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 53–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hibbard, J. H., Peters, E., Dixon, A. & Tusler, M. (2007). Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: It isn't just about literacy. Medical Care Research and Review, 64, 379–394. doi:10.1177/1077558707301630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L. & Kolstad, A. (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the national adult literacy survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, W. M. P. & Stefanek, M. E. (2007). Cancer risk elicitation and communication: Lessons from the psychology of risk perception. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 57, 147–167. doi:10.3322/canjclin.57.3.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493–519). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 636–647. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.53.4.636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y. & Paulsen, C. (2006). The health literacy of America's adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006–483). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. & Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669–679. doi:10.1177/0146167292186002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M. & Peters, E. (2009). Understanding the role of numeracy in health: Proposed theoretical framework and practical insights. Health Education & Behavior, 36, 1065–1081. doi:10.1177/1090198109341533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G. & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L. & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, A., Ferreira, M. B. & Sherman, S. J. (2013). Flexibility in motivated reasoning: Strategic shifts of reasoning modes in covariation judgment. Social Cognition, 31, 465–481. doi:10.1521/soco_2012_1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, W., Reyna, V. F., Fagerlin, A., Lipkus, I. & Peters, E. (2008). Clinical implications of numeracy: Theory and practice. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 261–274. doi:10.1007/s12160–008-9037–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulos, J. A. (1988). Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K. & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 407–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01720.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915–1926. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.37.10.1915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367–374. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.107.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F. & Brainerd, C. J. (2007). The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 147–159. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F. & Brainerd, C. J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 89–107. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K. & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 943–973. doi:10.1037/a0017327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, A. J. & Kiviniemi, M. (1999). Treating people with health information: An analysis and review of approaches to communicating health risk information. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25, 44–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Black, W. C. & Welch, H. G. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 966–972. doi:10.7326/0003–4819-127–11-199712010–00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaklee, H. & Tucker, D. (1980). A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events. Memory & Cognition, 8, 459–467. doi:10.3758/bf03211142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S. L., Pignone, M. P. & Lewis, C. L. (2003). A randomized comparison of patients’ understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 884–892. doi:10.1046/j.1525–1497.2003.21102.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591–615. doi:10.1177/109019810002700506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, K. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 495–506. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099–0720(199712)11:6<495::aid-acp481 > 3.0.co;2-j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar