Interest in Complex Novelty

References

• Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W., Newcomb, T., Rosenberg, M., & Tannenbaum, P. (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Antioco, M., & Kleijnen, M. (2010). Consumer adoption of technological innovations: Effects of psychological and functional barriers in a lack of content versus a presence of content situation. European Journal of Marketing, 44, 1700–1724. doi:10.1108/03090561011079846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bench, S. W., & Lench, H. C. (2013). On the function of boredom. Behavioral Sciences, 3, 459–472. doi:10.3390/bs3030459
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J., & Fitzsimons, G. (2008). Dogs on the street, pumas on your feet: How cues in the environment influence product evaluation and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 1–14. doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Blijlevens, J., Carbon, C. C., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2012). Aesthetic appraisal of product designs: Independent effects of typicality and arousal. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 44–57. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02038.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C., Faerber, S. J., Gerger, G., Forster, M., & Leder, H. (2013). Innovation is appreciated when we feel safe: On the situational dependence of the appreciation of innovation. International Journal of Design, 7, 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C., & Leder, H. (2005). The repeated evaluation technique (RET): A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 587–601. doi:10.1002/acp.1098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C., & Leder, H. (2007). Design evaluation: From typical problems to state-of-the-art solutions. Marketing Review St. Gallen (Thexis), 2, 33–37. doi:10.1007/BF03249153
   Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2012). Rigidity rather than age as a limiting factor to appreciate innovative design. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 71, 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaño, R., Sujan, M., Kacker, M., & Sujan, H. (2008). Managing consumer uncertainty in the adoption of new products: Temporal distance and mental simulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 320–336. doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.3.320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellion, G., & Markham, S. K. (2012). Perspective: New product failure rates: Influence of argumentum ad populum and self-Interest. Journal of Innovation Management, 30, 976–979. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.01009.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cierpicki, S., Wright, M., & Sharp, B. (2000). Managers’ knowledge of marketing principles: The case of new product development. Journal of Empirical Generalizations in Marketing Science, 5, 771–790.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hooge, I. E., Nelissen, R. M. A., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2011). What is moral about guilt? Acting “prosocially” at the disadvantage of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 462–473. doi:10.1037/a0021459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiereisen, S., Wong, V., & Broderick, A. J. (2008). Analogies and mental simulations in learning for really new products: The role of visual attention. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 593–607. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (Eds.). (2012). Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillebaart, M., Förster, J., & Rotteveel, M. (2012). Mere exposure revisited – The influence of growth versus security cues on evaluations of novel and familiar stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 699–714. doi:10.1037/a0027612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 209–221. doi:10.1007/BF02726497
   Google Scholar
• Gregan-Paxton, J., Hibbard, J. D., Brunel, F. F., & Azar, P. (2002). So that’s what that is: Examining the impact of analogy on consumers’ knowledge development for really new products. Psychology & Marketing, 19, 533–550. doi:10.1002/mar.10023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, P., Snelders, D., & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (2003). Most advanced, yet acceptable: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 111–124. doi:10.1348/000712603762842147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, T. E., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 141–54. doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(77)80007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeffler, S. (2003). Measuring preferences for really new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 406–421. doi:10.1509/jmkr.40.4.406.19394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B., Gallagher, M. W., Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Breen, W. E., Terhar, D., & Steger, M. F. (2009). The curiosity and exploration inventory-II. Development, factor structure, and psychometrics. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 987–998. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2009). Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. In C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 367–374). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 264–268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., & Shiota, M. N. (2003). New displays and new emotions: A commentary on Rozin and Cohen. Emotion, 3, 86–91. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, M., Lee, M., & Wetzels, M. (2009). An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 344–357. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-test and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, H., Carbon, C. C., & Ripsas, A. L. (2006). Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121, 176–198. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millis, K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1, 320–329. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2001). The effect of novel attributes on product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 462–472. doi:10.1086/323733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muth, C., Raab, M. H., & Carbon, C. C. (2015). The stream of experience when watching artistic movies. Dynamic aesthetic effects revealed by the continuous evaluation procedure (CEP). Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 365–383. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordewier, M. K., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2013). On the valence of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 1326–1334. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.777660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordewier, M. K., Topolinksi, S., & van Dijk, E. (in press). The temporal dynamics of surprise. Personality and Social Psychology Compass. doi:10.1111/spc3.12242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordewier, M. K., & Van Dijk, E. (in press). Curiosity and time: From not knowing to almost knowing. Cognition and Emotion. doi:10.1080/02699931.2015.1122577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noseworthy, T. J., Di Muro, F., & Murray, K. B. (2014). The role of arousal in congruity-based product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 1108–1126. doi:10.1086/678301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oishi, S., Miao, F. F., Koo, M., Kisling, J., & Ratliff, K. A. (2012). Residential mobility breeds familiarity-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 149–162. doi:10.1037/a0024949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 680–693. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreg, S., & Goldenberg, J. (2015). Resistance to innovation: Its sources and manifestations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proulx, T., Inzlicht, M., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2012). Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 285–291. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindova, V. P., & Petkova, A. P. (2007). When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organization Science, 18, 217–232. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The hand-book of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rutjens, B. T., van Harreveld, F., & Cunningham, W. (2016). A balance perspective on threat compensation. In preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Rutjens, B. T., van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., Kreemers, L. M., & Noordewier, M. K. (2013). Steps, stages, and structure: Finding compensatory order in scientific theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 142, 313–318. doi:10.1037/a0028716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., & Hall, J. (2011). Why most product launches fail. Harvard Business Review, 89, 21–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. (2003). Self-efficacy and interest: Experimental studies of optimal incompetence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 237–249. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00013-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. (2005). What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion, 5, 89–102. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. (2008). Interest—The curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 57–60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00548.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Interesting things and curious people: Exploration and engagement as transient states and enduring strengths. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 785–797. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00210.x
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2007). Situated social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 132–135. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00490.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D. (2014). Estimating true standard deviations. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–2. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D., & Marks, M. (2015). Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1–2. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1012991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Horen, F., & Pieters, R. (2013). Preference reversal for copycat brands: Uncertainty makes imitation feel good. Journal of Economic Psychology, 37, 54–64. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar