Modeling Attitudes Toward Science: Development and Validation of the Credibility of Science Scale

References

• Allum, N., Sibley, E., Sturgis, P., & Stoneman, P. (2014). Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 833–849. doi:10.1177/0963662513492485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 35–54. doi:10.1177/0963662506070159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, F. (2001). The basics of item response theory. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, N. E., Borgen, F. H., Rottinghaus, P., Paulsen, A., Halper, C. R., & Harmon, L. W. (2003). The expanded skills confidence inventory: Measuring basic dimensions of vocational activity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 76–100. doi:10.1016/s0001-8791(02)00034-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleich, S., Blendon, R., & Adams, A. (2007). Trust in scientific experts on obesity: Implications for awareness and behavior change. Obesity, 15, 2145–2156. doi:10.1038/oby.2007.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., McCaul, K. D., & Weinstein, N. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136–145. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose science do you believe? Explaining trust in sources of scientific information about the environment. Science Communication, 35, 115–137. doi:10.1177/1075547012441691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2009). Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 49–96. doi:10.1080/10463280802643640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460–473. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.3.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011). Lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 39, 1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Schulz, E., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin numeracy test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchley, C. R. (2008). Public opinion and trust in scientists: The role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 309–327. doi:10.1177/0963662506070162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192–203. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, T. C., & Cvetkovich, G. (1995). Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. Westport, CT: Praeger Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, T. C. (2010). Trust in risk management: A model-based review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 30, 541–574. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01398.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. H. (2013). The growing social and moral conflict between conservative protestantism and science. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 368–385. doi:10.1111/jssr.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. H. & Evans, M. S. (2008). Religion and science: Beyond the epistemological conflict narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 87–105. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finucane, M. L., & Gullion, C. M. (2010). Developing a tool for measuring the decision-making competence of older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25, 271–288. doi:10.1037/a0019106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42. doi:10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. (2008). A test of three theories of anti-science attitudes. Sociological Focus, 41, 337–357. doi:10.1080/00380237.2008.10571338
   Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. (2011). The cultural authority of science: Public trust and acceptance of organized science. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 751–770. doi:10.1177/0963662510365246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974–2010. American Sociological Review, 77, 167–187. doi:10.2307/23102567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, E. (2012). The paranormal: Who believes, why they believe, and why it matters. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, R. O., & Betz, N. E. (2007). The five-factor model and career self-efficacy: General and domain-specific relationships. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 145–161. doi:10.1177/1069072706298011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 866–883. doi:10.1177/0963662513480091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity. American Political Science Review, 109, 1–17. doi:10.1017/s0003055414000604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R., Scheitle, C. P., & Ecklund, E. H. (2015). Individual religiosity and orientation towards science: Reformulating relationships. Sociological Science, 2, 106–124. doi:10.15195/v2.a7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2015). Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Advances in Political Psychology, 36, 1–43. doi:10.1111/pops.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (2007). Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 465–505. doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 147–174. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1549444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732–735. doi:10.1038/nclimate1547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six Interests and Big Five Personality Factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 217–239. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassiter, K. S., Matthews, T. D., & Orzech, J. A. (2011). Does the Shipley Institute of Living Scale measure fluid and crystallized abilities? North American Journal of Psychology, 13, 255.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS ONE, 8, e75637. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Motivated rejection of science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 217–222. doi:10.1177/0963721416654436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobato, E., Mendoza, J., Sims, V., & Chin, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 617–625. doi:10.1002/acp.3042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A., & Langer, G. (2009). The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis, 29, 633–647. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, M. D., Critchley, C. R., & Walshe, J. (2015). Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support. Public Understanding of Science, 24, 601–618. doi:10.1177/0963662514542372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morizot, J., Ainsworth, A. T., & Reise, S. P. (2007). Toward modern psychometrics: Application of item response theory models in personality research. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 407–423). New York, NY: Guilford
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2012). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2014). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2014). The elaboration likelihood and meta-cognitive models of attitudes: Implications for prejudice, the self, and beyond. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 172–187). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, C., & Rainie, L. (2015, January 29). Public and scientists’ views on science and society . Available from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzebon, J. A., Visser, B. A., Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2010). Psychometric characteristics of a public-domain self-report measure of vocational interests: The Oregon Vocational Interest Scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 168–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Source attributions and persuasion: Perceived honesty as a determinant of message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 637–654. doi:10.1177/0146167295216010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S. L., Rupp, R., Zimet, G. D., Meza, H. M., Loza, M. L., Short, M. B., & Succop, P. A. (2008). Uptake of HPV vaccine: Demographics, sexual history and values, parenting style, and vaccine attitudes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 239–245. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schul, Y., Mayo, R., & Burnstein, E. (2008). The value of distrust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1293–1302. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, W. C., Gruber, C. P., Martin, T. A., & Klein, A. M. (2009). Shipley-2 manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20, 713–720. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.205064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. W., & Son, J. (2013, May). General Social Survey 2012—Final report: Trends in public attitudes about confidence in institutions. Chicago, IL: NORC at the University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 55–74. doi:10.1177/0963662504042690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobacyk, J. J. (2004). A revised paranormal belief scale. The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 23, 94–98.
   Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Multiple roles for source credibility under high elaboration: It’s all in the timing. Social Cognition, 25, 536–552. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.4.536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar