599
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Nudging: A Lesson in the Theatrics of Choice

References

  • Ashcroft, R. E. (2011). Personal financial incentives in health promotion: Where do they fit in an ethic of autonomy? Health Expectations, 14(2), 191–200. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00664.x
  • Bailis, D. S., Segall, A., Mahon, M. J., Chipperfield, J. G., & Dunn, E. M. (2001). Perceived control in relation to socioeconomic and behavioral resources for health. Social Science & Medicine, 52(11), 1661–1676. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00280-x
  • Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Sunstein, C. R., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., Tucker-Ray, W., Congdon, W. J., & Galing, S. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041–1055. doi:10.1177/0956797617702501
  • Blue, S., Shove, E., Carmona, C., & Kelly, M. P. (2016). Theories of practice and public health: Understanding (un) healthy practices. Critical Public Health, 26(1), 36–50. doi:10.1080/09581596.2014.980396
  • Bovens, L. (2009). The ethics of nudge. In T. Grüne-Yanoff & S. O. Hansson (Eds.), Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology (pp. 217–209). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Brewer, N. T., Morgan, J. C., Baig, S. A., Mendel, J. R., Boynton, M. H., Pepper, J. K., … Ribisl, K. M. (2016). Public understanding of cigarette smoke constituents: Three US surveys. Tobacco Control, 26(5), 592–599. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052897
  • Brown, T., Platt, S., & Amos, A. (2014). Equity impact of population-level interventions and policies to reduce smoking in adults: A systematic review. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 138, 7–16. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.001
  • De Neys, W., Cromheeke, K., & Osman, M. (2011). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PLoS ONE, 6, e15954. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015954
  • Gilman, S. E., Abrams, D. B., & Buka, S. L. (2003). Socioeconomic status over the life course and stages of cigarette use: Initiation, regular use, and cessation. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(10), 802–808. doi:10.1136/jech.57.10.802
  • Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2012). Old wine in new casks: Libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles. Social Choice and Welfare, 38(4), 635–645. doi:10.1007/s00355-011-0636-0
  • Hiscock, R., Bauld, L., Amos, A., Fidler, J. A., & Munafò, M. (2012). Socioeconomic status and smoking: A review. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1248(1), 107–123. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x
  • Holden, S. S., Zlatevska, N., & Dubelaar, C. (2016). Whether smaller plates reduce consumption depends on who’s serving and who’s looking: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(1), 134–146. doi:10.1086/684441
  • Lin, Y., Osman, M., Harris, A., & Read (2017). Underlying wishes and nudged choices. Under Review.
  • Lin, Y., Osman, M., & Ashcroft, R. (2017 /this issue). Nudging: A lesson in the theatrics of choice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. doi:10.1080/01973533.2017.1375929
  • Marjanovic, Z. (2017 /this issue). The fruitless pursuit of nudging healthy behavior: Comment on Lin, Osman, and Ashcroft. Basic and Applied Social Psychology.
  • McLeish, H. (2017). Citizens united: Taking back control in turbulent times. Edinburgh, UK: Luath Press Ltd.
  • Osman, M. (2004). An evaluation of dual process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 998–1010. doi:10.3758/bf03196730
  • Osman, M. (2007). Can tutoring improve performance on a reasoning task under deadline conditions? Memory & Cognition, 35, 342–351. doi:10.3758/bf03193455
  • Osman, M. (2010). Controlling uncertainty: A review of human behavior in complex dynamic environments. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 65–86. doi:10.1037/a0017815
  • Osman, M. (2013). A case study dual-process theories of higher cognition – Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 248–252. doi:10.1177/1745691613483475
  • Osman, M. (2014). Future-minded: The psychology of agency and control. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
  • Osman, M. (2016). Nudge: How far have we come? Economia. History, Methodology, Philosophy, (6–4), 557–570.
  • Osman, M., & Stavy, R. (2006). Intuitive rules: From formative to developed reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 935–953.
  • Rauh, J. (2017 /this issue). On the limits of type 1 and type 2 nudges as instruments of public policy: Commentary on nudging. Basic and Applied Social Psychology.
  • Reitsma, M., Fullman, N., Ng, M., Salama, J. S., Abajobir, A., … Gakidou, E. (2015). Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet, 389, 1885–1906. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30819-x
  • Roberts, M. J., & Reich, M. R. (2002). Ethical analysis in public health. The Lancet, 359(9311), 1055–1059. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08097-2
  • Robinson, E., Kersbergen, I., Brunstrom, J. M., & Field, M. (2014). I’m watching you. Awareness that food consumption is being monitored is a demand characteristic in eating-behaviour experiments. Appetite, 83, 19–25. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.029
  • Robinson, E., Proctor, M., Oldham, M., & Masic, U. (2016). The effect of heightened awareness of observation on consumption of a multi-item laboratory test meal in females. Physiology & Behavior, 163, 129–135. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.044
  • Schmidt, A. T. (2017). The power to nudge. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 404–417. doi:10.1017/s0003055417000028
  • Schüz, B. (2017). Socio-economic status and theories of health behaviour: Time to upgrade a control variable. British Journal of Health Psychology, 22(1), 1–7. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12205
  • Seidman, G., & Atun, R. (2016). Aligning values and outcomes in priority–setting for health. Journal of Global Health, 6(2), 020308. doi:10.7189/jogh.06.020308
  • Simons, A. M., Koster, A., Groffen, D. A., & Bosma, H. (2017). Perceived classism and its relation with socioeconomic status, health, health behaviours and perceived inferiority: The Dutch Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social sciences (LISS) panel. International Journal of Public Health, 62, 422–440. doi:10.1007/s00038-016-0880-2
  • Stringhini, S., Carmeli, C., Jokela, M., Avendaño, M., Muennig, P., Guida, F., … Chadeau-Hyam, M. (2017). Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: A multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1–7 million men and women. The Lancet, 389, 1229–1237. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32380-7
  • Sunstein, C. (2016). The Ethics of Influence: Government in the Age of Behavioral Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vasiljevic, M., Ng, Y. L., Griffin, S. J., Sutton, S., & Marteau, T. M. (2016). Is the intention–behaviour gap greater amongst the more deprived? A meta-analysis of five studies on physical activity, diet, and medication adherence in smoking cessation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 11–30. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12152
  • Wansink, B. (2007). Mindless eating: Why we eat more than we think. New York: Bantam-Dell.
  • Wilding, S., Conner, M., Sandberg, T., Prestwich, A., Lawton, R., Wood, C., … Sheeran, P. (2016). The question-behaviour effect: A theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 196–230. doi:10.1080/10463283.2016.1245940
  • Winkleby, M. A., Jatulis, D. E., Frank, E., & Fortmann, S. P. (1992). Socioeconomic status and health: How education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 816–820. doi:10.2105/ajph.82.6.816

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.