What Makes It Rape? A Lay Theories Approach to Defining Rape Among College Students

References

• Adelman, A. B. (1992). Sustaining passion: Eroticism and safe-sex talk. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21(5), 481–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, I. (2007). What is a typical rape? Effects of victim and participant gender in female and male rape perception. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 225–245. doi:10.1348/014466606x101780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, M. (2012). U.S. broadens archaic definition of rape. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/justice
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 751–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berzofsky, M., Krebs, C., Langton, L., Planty, M., & Smiley-McDonald, H. (2013). Female victims of sexual violence, 1994–2010. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=4594
   Google Scholar
• Biever, J. L., De Las Fuentes, C., Cashion, L., & Franklin, C. (1998). The social construction of gender: A comparison of feminist and postmodern approaches. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 11(2), 163–179.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). On male domination (E. Emery, Trans.). Le Monde Diplomatique. Retrieved from http://mondediplo.com/1998/10/10bourdieu
   Google Scholar
• Bourque, L. B. (1989). Defining rape. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buddie, A. M., & Miller, A. G. (2001). Beyond rape myths: A more complex view of perceptions of rape victims. Sex Roles, 45(3/4), 139–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, A., Mattern, J. L., Kerakova, L. L., Kahl, D. H., Jr., Tobola, C., & Bornsen, S. E. (2009). Communicating/muting date rape: A co-cultural theoretical analysis of communication factors related to rape culture on a college campus. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(4), 465–485. doi:10.1080/00909880903233150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapleau, K. M., & Oswald, D. L. (2013). Status, threat, and stereotypes: Understanding the function of rape myth acceptance. Social Justice Research, 26, 18–41. doi:10.1007/s11211-013-0177-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M., Gilston, J., & Rogers, P. (2012). Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(14), 2807–2823. doi:10.1177/0886260512438281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMatteo, M., Galloway, M., Arnold, S., & Patel, U. (2015). Sexual assault on college campuses: A 50-state survey of criminal sexual assault statutes and their relevance to campus sexual assault. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(3), 227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, M. E., Covan, E. K., Swan, S. C., & Billings, D. L. (2013). Exploring rape myths, gendered norms, group processing, and the social context of rape among college women: A qualitative analysis. Violence Against Women, 19, 465–486. doi:10.1177/1077801213487044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earnshaw, V. A., Pitpitan, E. V., & Chaudoir, S. R. (2011). Intended responses to rape as functions of attitudes, attributions of fault, and emotions. Sex Roles, 64, 382-393. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9920-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easpaig, B. N. G., & Fryer, D. (2011). Dismantling dominant sexual violence research without using the master’s tools. Gay & Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 7(2), 168–175.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, R., & Wilson, J. C. (2012). Rape victims’ attitudes to rape myth acceptance. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19(3), 345–357. doi:10.1080/13218719.2011.585128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2012). UCR program changes definition of rape. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/cjis-link/march-2012/ucr-program-changes-definition-of-rape
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women (Research report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. J., & Thomas, G. (1996). Close relationship lay theories: Their structure and function. In G. O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979/2012). The archaeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, P. A., Cochran, C. C., & Olson, A. M. (1995). Social science research on lay definitions of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (1988). Lay theories: Everyday understandings of problems in the social sciences. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex?: The cultural scaffolding of rape. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giacopassi, D. J., & Dull, R. T. (1986). Gender and racial differences in the acceptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 15(1/2), 63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbridge, J., & Furnham, A. (1991). Lay theories of rape. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 4, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York City, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., Levy, S. R., & Chiu, C. (2001). The contribution of the lay theories approach to the study of groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 98–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(1), 53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalof, L., & Wade, B. H. (1995, August). Sexual attitudes and experiences with sexual coercion: Exploring the influence of race and gender. Journal of Black Psychology, 21(3), 224–238.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York City, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C., & Frith, H. (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse & Society, 10(3), 293–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippenstine, M. A., & Schuller, R. (2012). Perceptions of sexual assault: Expectancies regarding the emotional response of a rape victim over time. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(1), 79–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koss, M. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 193–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahe, B. (1991). Social psychological issues in the study of rape. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 279–309.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, C. P., Lindquist, C. H., Warner, T. D., Fisher, B. S., & Martin, S. L. (2009). College women’s experiences with physically forced, alcohol-or other drug-enabled, and drug-facilitated sexual assault before and since entering college. Journal of American College Health, 57(6), 639–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, S. R., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (2006). Lay theories and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, S. R., Plaks, J. E., Hong, Y., Chiu, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2001). Static versus dynamic theories and the perception of groups: Different routes to different destinations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 156–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lira, L. R., Koss, M. P. & Russo, N. F. (1999). Mexican American women’s definitions of rape and sexual abuse. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 21(3), 236–265. doi:10.1177/0739986399213004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. A. (2005). Defining rape internationally: A comment on Akayesu. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 44, 940–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, J., & Kunkel, A. (2014). Making meaning of meaning-making research: Using qualitative research for studies of social and personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(4), 433–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, S. (2007). Understanding community-specific rape myths: Exploring student athlete culture. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 22(4), 357–370. doi:10.1177/0886109907306331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza-Denton, R. (1999). Lay contextualism in stereotyping: Situational qualifiers of stereotypes in intuitive theories of dispositions. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 0412.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., Powch, I. G., Phelps, J. L., & Giusti, L. M. (1992). Definitions of rape: Scientific and political implications. Journal of Social Issues, 48(1), 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. B. (1985). The lay person’s understanding of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 13(5/6), 273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rape Crisis Center of Medina & Summit Counties. (2014). Get the facts. Retrieved from http://www.rccmsc.org/resources/get-the-facts.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. M. (1988). Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 237–245. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00939.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. M. (2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles, 65, 774–782. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0033-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shweder, R. A. (1990). Cultural psychology: What is it? In J. Stigler, R. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, S. R., & Norton, M. I. (2006). Lay theories about White racists: What constitutes racism (and what doesn’t). Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 117–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. W., Dobbin, S. A., & Gatowski, S. I. (1996). “Real rapes” and “real victims”: The shared reliance on common cultural definitions of rape. Feminist Legal Studies, 4(2), 159–177.
   Google Scholar
• Tiefer, L. (1995). Sex is not a natural act: And other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandiver, D. M., & Dupalo, J. R. (2012). Factors that affect college students’ perceptions of rape: What is the role of gender and other situational factors? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(5), 592–612. doi:10.1177/0306624x12436797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, C. A. (1995). Attitudes toward rape: Feminist and social psychological perspectives. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar