References
- Abramson, P. R., & Aldrich, J. H. (1982). The decline of electoral participation in America. American Political Science Review, 76, 502–521.
- Aish, A-M., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1990). A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: An application of LISREL 7 with weighted least squares. Quality & Quantity, 24, 405–426.
- Alexander, C. N., Zucker, L. G., & Brody, C. L. (1970). Experimental expectations and autokinetic experiences: Consistency theories and judgmental convergence. Sociometry, 33, 108–122.
- Allport, G. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3–56). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Balch, G. I. (1974). Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept of “sense of political efficacy.” Political Methodology, 1, 1–43.
- Bäck, E. A., Bäck, H. & Garcia Albacete, G. (2013). Protest Activity, Social Incentives, and Rejection Sensitivity: Results from a survey experiment about tuition fees. Contention, 1, 1–15.
- Bäck, H., Teorell, J., & Westholm, A. (2011). Explaining modes of participation. A dynamic test of alternative rational choice models. Scandinavian Political Studies 34, 74–97.
- Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Harper and Row.
- Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.
- Converse, P. E. (1972). Change in the American electorate. In A. Campbell & P. E. Converse (Eds.), The human meaning of social change (pp. 263–337). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation
- Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 13, 289–314.
- Dalton, R., van Sickle, A., & Weldon, S. (2009). The individual–institutional nexus of protest behaviors. British Journal of Political Science, 40, 51–73.
- Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.
- Finkel, S. E., & Muller, E. N. (1998). Rational choice and the dynamics of collective political action: Evaluating alternative models with panel data. American Political Science Review, 92, 37–50.
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. A regression based approach. Guildford Press: New York.
- Hensler, C. (1971). The structure of orientations toward government: Involvement, efficacy, and evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
- Klandermans, B., & van Stekelenburg, J. (2013). Social movements and the dynamics of collective action. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy ( Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 774–811). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Marshall, G. (1998). A dictionary of sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Martinsson, J., Andreasson, M., & Petterson, L. (2013). Technical report LORE citizen panel 6–2013. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg, LORE.
- Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2010). Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1055–1060.
- van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.
- Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664.
- van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Exploring psychological mechanism of collective action: Does relevance of group identity influence how people cope with collective disadvantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 353–372.