Mere Exposure Effects in the Real World: Utilizing Natural Experiment Features from the Eurovision Song Contest

References

• Abakoumkin, G. (2011). Forming choice preferences the easy way: Order and familiarity effects in elections. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 2689–2707. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00845.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235. doi:10.1177/1088868309341564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N. (2013). Impartiality, friendship-networks and voting behavior: Evidence from voting patterns in the Eurovision Song Contest. Social Networks, 35, 484–497. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurovision Song Contest 2016 (2016). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurovision_Song_Contest_2016
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Norton, M. I., Reis, H. T., Ariely, D., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W., … Maniaci, M. R. (2015). When does familiarity promote versus undermine interpersonal attraction? An integrative model from erstwhile adversaries. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 3–19. doi:10.1177/1745691614561682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, A. (2008). Towards an integrated model of low attention advertising effects. European Journal of Marketing, 42, 69–86. doi:10.1108/03090560810840916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haan, M., Dijkstra, S., & Dijkstra, P. (2005). Expert judgment versus public opinion-evidence from the Eurovision Song Contest. Journal of Cultural Economics, 29, 59–78. doi:10.1007/s10824-005-6830-0
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., Dechene, A., & Wänke, M. (2008). Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 687–691. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Osman, M., & Ashcroft, R. (2017). Nudge: Concept, effectiveness, and ethics. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39, 293–306. doi:10.1080/01973533.2017.1356304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G. (2012). Revisiting truth or triviality: The external validity of research in the psychological laboratory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 109–117. doi:10.1177/1745691611432343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M., & Lauber, E. A. (2017). A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 459–498. doi:10.1037/bul0000085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., & Beach, S. R. (1992). Exposure effects in the classroom: The development of affinity among students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 255–276. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(92)90055-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1982). Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 395–415. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(82)90062-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivola, C. Y., & Todorov, A. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 83–110. doi:10.1007/s10919-009-0082-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, M., Lin, Y., & Ashcroft, R. (2017). Nudging: A lesson in the theatrics of choice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39, 311–316. doi:10.1080/01973533.2017.1375929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redker, C., Gibson, B., & Zimmerman, I. (2013). Liking of movie genre alters the effectiveness of background product placements. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 249–255. doi:10.1080/01973533.2013.785400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2015). Metacognition. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 203–229). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Stroebe, W. (2012). The truth about Triplett (1898), but nobody seems to care. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 54–57. doi:10.1177/1745691611427306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Unkelbach, C., & Stahl, C. (2009). A multinomial modeling approach to dissociate different components of the truth effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 22–38. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrier, D. B. (2012). Evidence for the influence of the mere-exposure effect on voting in the Eurovision Song Contest. Judgement and Decision Making, 7, 639–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wänke, M., & Hansen, J. (2015). Relative processing fluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 195–199. doi:10.1177/0963721414561766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerman, D. L., Lanska, M., & Olds, J. M. (2015). The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cogntiion, 41, 426–438. doi:10.1037/a0038356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27. doi:10.1037/h0025848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B., Swap, W., Harrison, A. A., & Roberts, P. R. (1971). Limiting conditions of the exposure effect: Satiation and relativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 384–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar