A Novel Measure of the Need for Moral Cognition

References

• Aluja, A., Garcı́a, Ó., & Garcı́a, L. F., (2002). A comparative study of Zuckerman's three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg's 50-bipolar adjectives. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(5), 713–726. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00186-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E., (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(1), 116–131. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. https://doiorg.ezproxy.gc.cuny.edu/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological assessment, 4(1),5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eatough, V., & Smith, J. A. (2017). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gallander Wintre, M., North, C., & Sugar, L. A. (2001). Psychologists' response to criticisms about research based on undergraduate participants: A developmental perspective. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 42(3), 216–225. doi:10.1037/h0086893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuens, M., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2002). Validity and reliability of scores on the reduced Emotional Intensity Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 299–315. doi:10.1177/0013164402062002007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidiscipliary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitayama, S. (2017). Journal of personality and social psychology: Attitudes and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 357–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakowiak, K. M. (2015). Some like it morally ambiguous: The effects of individual differences on the enjoyment of different character types. Western Journal of Communication, 79(4), 472–491. https://doi-org.ezproxy.gc.cuny.edu/10.1080/10570314.2015.1066028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Lay epistemic theory in social-cognitive psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• Maples, J. L., Guan, L., Carter, N. T., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of the international personality item pool representation of the revised NEO personality inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 1070–1084. doi:10.1037/pas0000004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 113–131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 90–94. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J., Zaldivar, A., Irani, L., & Tomlinson, B. (2009). Who are the turkers? worker demographics in amazon mechanical turk. Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, USA, Tech. Rep.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, J., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). Ethicists’ and Nonethicists’ responsiveness to student Emails: Relationships among expressed normative attitude, selfdescribed behavior, and empirically observed behavior. Metaphilosophy, 44(3), 350–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E. (2009). Do ethicists steal more books? Philosophical Psychology, 22(6), 711–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). Are ethicists any more likely to pay their registration fees at professional meetings? Economics and Philosophy, 29(03), 371–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2012). Expertise in moral reasoning? Order effects on moral judgment in professional philosophers and non-philosophers. Mind & Language, 27(2), 135–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2009). The moral behaviour of ethics professors: Peer opinion. Mind, 118(472), 1043–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2010). Do ethicists and political philosophers vote more often than other professors? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 189–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2014). The moral behavior of ethics professors: Relationships among self-reported behavior, expressed normative attitude, and directly observed behavior. Philosophical Psychology, 27(3), 293–327. doi:10.1080/09515089.2012.727135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., Rust, J., Huang, L., Moore, A., & Coates, J. (2012). Ethicists’ courtesy at philosophy conferences. Philosophical Psychology, 25(3), 331–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (2015). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, J. R., & Hunt, S. D. (1998). Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement and exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 92–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobia, K., Buckwalter, W., & Stich, S. (2013). Moral intuitions: Are philosophers experts? Philosophical Psychology, 26(5), 629–638. doi:10.1080/09515089.2012.696327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D. (2017). Using the coefficient of confidence to make the philosophical switch from a posteriori to a priori inferential statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(5), 831–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D., & MacDonald, J. A. (2017). Performing inferential statistics prior to data collection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(2), 204–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiech, K., Kahane, G., Shackel, N., Farias, M., Savulescu, J., & Tracey, I. (2013). Cold or calculating? Reduced activity in the subgenual cingulate cortex reflects decreased emotional aversion to harming in counterintuitive utilitarian judgment. Cognition, 126(3), 364–372. https://doi-org.ezproxy.gc.cuny.edu/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar