965
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

When Group Influence Is More or Less Likely: The Case of Moral Judgments

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Aramovich, N. P., Lytle, B. L., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Opposing torture: Moral conviction and resistance to majority influence. Social Influence, 7(1), 21–34. doi:10.1080/15534510.2011.640199
  • Asch, S. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. a minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70. doi:10.1037/h0093718
  • Bartels, D. M. (2008). Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition, 108(2), 381–417. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001
  • Bostyn, D. H., & Roets, A. (2017). An asymmetric moral conformity effect: Subjects conform to deontological but not consequentialist majorities. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(3), 323–330. doi:10.1177/1948550616671999
  • Camacho, C. J., Higgins, E. T., & Luger, L. (2003). Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: What feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 498–510. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.84.3.498
  • Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1327–1343. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.6.1327
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford Unviersity Press.
  • Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
  • Goodwin, G. P., & Darley, J. M. (2008). The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism. Cognition, 106(3), 1339–1366. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.007
  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141
  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
  • Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217–1230. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
  • Higgins, E. T. (2019). Shared reality: What makes us strong and tears us apart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3–23. doi:10.1002/ejsp.27
  • Kelly, M., Ngo, L., Chituc, V., Huettel, S., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2017). Moral conformity in online interactions: Rational justifications increase influence of peer opinions on moral judgments. Social Influence, 2–3, 57–68. doi:10.1080/15534510.2017.1323007
  • Kim, E. B., Chen, C., Smetana, J. G., & Greenberger, E. (2016). Does children’s moral compass waver under social pressure? Using the conformity paradigm to test preschoolers’ moral and social-conventional judgments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 241–251. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.06.006
  • Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M. N., Pierro, A., Shah, J. Y., & Spiegel, S. (2000). To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793–815. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.793
  • Kundu, P., & Cummins, D. D. (2013). Morality and conformity: The Asch paradigm applied to moral decisions. Social Influence, 8(4), 268–279. doi:10.1080/15534510.2012.727767
  • Levine, J. M. (1999). Solomon Asch’s legacy for group research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 358–364. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_5
  • Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430. doi:10.1038/nature11467
  • Sassenberg, K., Jonas, K. J., Shah, J. Y., & Brazy, P. C. (2007). Why some groups just feel better: The regulatory fit of group power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 249–267. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.249
  • Trafimow, D. (2019). A frequentist alternative to significance testing, p-values, and confidence intervals. Econometrics, 7(2), 26. doi:10.3390/econometrics7020026
  • Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Ditto, P. H. (2009). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 479–491.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.