The Government Receives Moral License to Commit Transgressions When Compared to Other Entities

References

• Alicke, M., Gordon, E., & Rose, D. (2013). Hypocrisy: What counts? Philosophical Psychology, 5, 673–701. doi:10.1080/09515089.2012.677397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonetti, P., & Maklan, S. (2016). An extended model of moral outrage at corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 429–444. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2487-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barden, J., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Saying one thing and doing another”: Examining the impact of event order on hypocrisy judgments of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(11), 1463–1474. doi:10.1177/0146167205276430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampf, H. C., & Wilson, A. D. (1997). In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1335–1348. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee, A., Berman, J. Z., & Reed, A. (2013). Tip of the hat, wag of the finger: How moral decoupling enables consumers to admire and admonish. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1167–1183. doi:10.1086/667786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchar, J. C., & Eidelman, S. (2013). Perceived system longevity increases system justification and the legitimacy of inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(4), 238–245. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (2007). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3(1), 14–25. doi:10.1002/bs.3830030103
   Google Scholar
• Chakoff, A., Russell, P., Piazza, J., & Young, L. (2016). From impure to harmful: Asymmetric expectation about immoral agents. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 201–209. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Company Facts. (2019). Retrieved from https://corporate.walmart.com/newsroom/company-facts
   Google Scholar
• Crandall, C. S., Eidelman, S., Skitka, L. J., & Morgan, G. S. (2009). Status quo framing increases support for torture. Social Influence, 4(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/15534510802124397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. (2013). Predicting persons’ versus a person’s goodness: Behavioral forecasts diverge for individuals versus populations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 28–44. doi:10.1037/a0030836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. (2014). Thinking about others versus another: Three reasons judgments about collectives and individuals differ. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(12), 687–698. doi:10.111/spc3.12142
   Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40., pp. 61–149). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denson, T. F., Lickel, B., Curtis, M., Strenstrom, D. M., & Ames, D. R. (2006). The role of entitativity and essentialism in judgments of collective responsibility. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 43–61. doi:10.1177/1368430206059857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Letting people off the hook: When do good deeds excuse transgressions? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1618–1634. doi:10.1177/0146167210385922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, A. M., & Revelle, W. (2008). Survey and behavioral measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1585–1593. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. P. (2015). Moral character in person perception. Psychological Science, 24, 38–44. doi : doi:10.1177/0963721414550709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. doi:10.1037/a0021847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E, & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. doi:10.1037/pspi0000033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. S. (2017). In a moral dilemma choose the one you love: Actions demonstrating impartiality compared to partiality are seen as less moral. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 561–577. doi:10.1111/bjso.12199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. S., & Trafimow, D. (2012). Inferences about motive and character influence intentionality attributions about side effects. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 661–673. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02031.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. S., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Mind attributions about moral actors: Intentionality is greater given coherent cues. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 220–235. doi:10.1111/bjso12077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, O. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53–91. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 260–265. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashima, Y., Kashima, E., Chiu, C.-Y., Farsides, T., Gelfand, M., Hong, Y.-Y., … Yzerbyt, V. (2005). Culture, essentialism, and agency: Are individuals universally believed to be more real entities than groups? European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 147–169. doi:10.1002/ejsp.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, A. C., & Friesen, J. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 360–364. doi:10.1177/0963721411422059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Commentary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotypes exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 259–266. doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.2.259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent, S. M., & Clark, B. A. M. (2019). What makes hypocrisy? Folk definitions, Attitude/Behavior Combinations, Attitude Strength, and Private/Public Distinctions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 104–121. doi:10.1080/01973533.2018.1556160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent, S. M., Clark, B. A. M., Walker, S., & Wiseman, K. D. (2013). Punishing hypocrisy: The roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 59–83. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.801339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. New York: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Lickel, B., Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2006). Intuitive theories of group types and relational principles. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(1), 28–39. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Hamilton, D. L. (2003). A case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the Columbine High School shootings? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(2), 194–204. doi:10.1177/0146167202239045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T., & Effron, D. A. (2010). Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 115–155). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 33–43. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, E., & Monin, B. (2016). Consistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 363–385. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newheiser, A. K., Sawaoka, T., & Dovidio, J. F. (2012). Why do we punish groups? High entitativity promotes moral suspicion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 931–936. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Laughlin, M. J., & Malle, B. F. (2002). How people explain actions performed by groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 33–48. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owuamalam, C. K., Rubin, M., & Spears, R. (2018). A critical review of the (un)conscious basis for system-supporting attitudes of the disadvantaged. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(11), e12419. doi:10.111/spc3.12419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2018). Public sees better year ahead: Democrats sharpen focus on midterm elections. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/01/20115941/1-18-18-Political-release.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2012). Mindless, harmless, and blameworthy. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 185–188. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.670100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polman, E., Pettit, N. C., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2013). Effects of wrongdoer status on moral licensing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 614–623. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1993). Rapist or “regular guy”: Explanatory coherence in the construction of mental models of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(5), 526–541. doi:10.1177/0146167293195005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (2005). Explanatory coherence and goal-based knowledge structures in making dispositional inferences. In B. F. Malle & S. D. Hodges (eds.) Other Minds: How Humans Bridge the Divide Between Self and Others. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. D. (2009). Mindreading: Judgments about intentionality and motives in dispositional inference. Psychological Inquiry, 20(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/10478400802615744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohtstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, 40, 441–459. doi:10.5129/001041508X12911362383354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523–528. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teigen, K. H., & Brun, W. (2011). Responsibility is divisible by two, but not by three or four: Judgments of responsibility in dyads and groups. Social Cognition, 29(1), 15–42. doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoemmes, F. (2015). Reversing arrows in mediation models does not distinguish plausible models. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 226–234. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1049351
   Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D. (2015). Introduction to the special issue on mediation analyses: What if planetary scientists used mediation analysis to infer causation? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(4), 197–201. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1064290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D. (2019). A frequentist alternative to significance testing, p-values, and confidence intervals. Econometrics, 7(2), 26–14. doi:10.3390/econometrics7020026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., & Diermeier, D. (2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81. doi:10.1177/1745691614556679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann, E. L., Zhu, L. L., & Tannenbaum, D. (2013). When it takes a bad person to do the right thing. Cognition, 126, 326–334. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilorio, D. (2014). Working for the federal government: Part 1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2014/article/mobile/federal-work-part-1.htm?
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2012). The varying meaning of forgiveness: Relationship closeness moderate how forgiveness affects feelings of justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 420–431. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar