On Accuracy and Revelance in Lithic Use-wear Analysis

References Cited

• Bamforth, D. 1986 A Comment on “Functional Variability in an Assemblage of Endscrapers.” Lithic Technology 15:61–4.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, A. 1932 Modes of Prehension of Some Forms of Upper Paleolithic Implements. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia 7:43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Beyries, S. 1987 Variabilite de l'industrie lithique au Mousterien: approche fonctionelle sur quelques qisements francais. Oxford: BAR International Series 328.
   Google Scholar
• Cahen, D. and L. Keeley 1980 Not Less Than Two, No More Than Three. World Archaeology 12: 166–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauvin, M. (ed.) 1983 Traces d'Utilization sur les Outils Neolithiques due Proche Orient. Maison de l'Orient, Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• Cotterell, B. and J. Kamminga 1986 Finials on Stone Flakes. Journal of Archaeological Science 13: 451–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curwen, E. 1930 Prehistoric Flint Sickles. Antiquity 4:179–182.
   Google Scholar
• Gendel, P. and L. Pirnay 1982 Microwear Analysis of Experimental Stone Tools: Further Test Results. Studia Praehistorica Belgica 2:251–266.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E.C. 1986 Diachronic Patterns of Lithic Production, Use and Exchange in the Southern Maya Lowlands. Ph.D. Dissertation, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, R., I. Graham and M. Newcomer 1985 The Quantification of Microwear Polishes. World Archaeology 17:112–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden, B. 1979 Paleolithic Reflections: Lithic Technology and Ethnographie Excavation among the Australian Aborigines. Humanities Press, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, B. 1986 Use and Misuse: the Analysis of Endscrapers. Lithic Technology 15:65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Holley, G. and T. Del Bene 1981 An Evaluation of Keeley's Microwear Approac Journal of Archaeological Science 8:337–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamminga, J. 1982 Over the Edge: Functional Analysis of Australian Stone Tools. Occassional Papers in Anthropology No. 12, University of Queensland Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, L. 1974 Technique and Methodology in Microwear Studies. World Archaeology 5:323–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, L. 1980 Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, L. and M. Newcomer 1977 Microwear Analysis of Experimental Flint Tools: A Test Case. Journal of Archaeological Science 4:29–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, L. and N. Toth 1981 Microwear Polishes on Early Stone Tools from Koobi Fora, Kenya. Nature 293:464–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, C. 1966 The Development of Edge Damage Patterns on Stone Tools. Man 1:501–511.
   Google Scholar
• Knuttson, K. and R. Hope 1984 The Application of Acetate Peels in Lithic Usewear Analysis. Archaeometry 26:49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leakey, L. 1960 Adam's Ancestors: the Evolution of Man and His Culture. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Moss E. 1983a The Functional Analysis of Flint Implements: Pincevent and Pont d'Ambon, Two Case Studies from the French Final Paleolithic. BAR International Series 177.
   Google Scholar
• Moss E. 1983b Some Comments on Edge Damage as a Factor in Functional Analysis of Stone Artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Sciences 10:231–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss E. 1986 Aspects of Site Comparison: Debitage Samples, Technology and Function. World Archaeology 18:116–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss E. 1987 A Review of “Investigating Microwear Polishes with Blind Tests.” Journal of Archaeological Science 14:473–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomer, M., R. Grace and R. Unger-Hamilton 1986 Investigating Microwear Polishes with Blind Tests. Journal of Archaeological Science 13:203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odell, G. 1979 A New and Improved System for the Retrieval of Functional Information from Microscopie Observations of Chipped Stone Tools. In Lithic Use-Wear Analysis, B. Hayden, ed., pp. 329–344. Academic Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, G. 1980 Toward a More Behavorial Approach to Archaeological Lithic Concentrations. American Antiquity 45:404–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odell, G. 1981a The Mechanics of Use-Breakage of Stone Tools: Some Testable Hypotheses. Journal of Field Archaeology 8:197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, G. 1981b The Morphological Express at Function Junction: Searching for Meaning in Lithic Tool Types. Journal of Anthropological Research 37 (2):319–342.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, G. 1985 Archaic Assemblages from the Stratified Napoleon Hollow Site in Illinois. The Wisconsin Archaeologist 66:327–358.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, G. 1986 Review of Use-Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools by P. Vaughan. Lithic Technology 15 (3):115–120.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, G. and F. Odell-Vereecken 1980 Verifying the Reliability of Lithic Use-Wear Assessments by “Blind Tests”: the Low Power Approach. Journal of Field Archaeology 7:87–120.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, L., G. Unrath and P. Vaughan 1984 Register of Microwear Analysts and Their Research. Archaeologica Venatoria, Tubingen.
   Google Scholar
• Sala, I. 1986 Use-wear and Post-Depostional Surface Modification: A Word of Caution. Journal of Archaeological Science 13:229–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenov, S.A. 1964 Prehistoric Technology. Corey Adams Mackay, London.
   Google Scholar
• Shea J. n.d. A Preliminary Functional Analysis of the Kebara Mousterian. In Contributions to the Prehistory of the Southern Levant, O. Bar-Yosef and B. Vandermeersch, eds., Oxford: BAR International Series (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, P. 1984 Functional Variability within an Assemblage of Endscrapers. Lithic Technology 13:35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, P. 1986 More on the Functional Variability within an Assemblage of Endscrapers: a Reply to Hayden and Bamforth. Lithic Technology 15:71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 1893 The Use of Flint Blades to Work Pine Wood. Arnual Report of the Smithsonian Institute for 1891:601–605.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, C. 1985 Microwear on Quartz: Fact or Fiction. World Archaeology 17 (1):101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomenchuk, J. 1985 A Functional Study of Selected Levantine Epi-Paleolithic Assemblages. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, N. 1985 The Oldowan Reassessed: A Close Look at Early Stone Artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 12:101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tringham, R., G. Cooper, G. Odell, B. Voytek, and A. Whitman 1974 Experimentation in the Formation of Edge Damage: A New Approach to Lithic Analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 1:171–96.
   Google Scholar
• Unger-Hamilton, R. 1984 The Formation of Use-Wear Polish on Flint: Beyond the “Deposit vs. Abrasion”
   Google Scholar
• Unrath, G., L. Owen, A. van Gijn, E. Moss, H. Plisson, and P. Vaughan 1986 An Evaluation of Use-Wear Studies: A Multi-Analyst Approach. Early Man News 9–11:117–176.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, P. 1985 Use-Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools. University of Arizona Press, Tuscon.
   Google Scholar
• Yerkes, R. 1987 Prehistoric Life on the Mississippi Floodplain: Stone Tool Use, Settlement Organization, and Subsistence Practices at the Labras Lake Site, Illinois. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar