16
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Consideration of the Function of Ohio Hopewell Bladelets

Pages 109-127 | Published online: 01 Apr 2016

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, D. D. 1970 Microblade Traditions In Northwestern Alaska. Arctic Anthropology 7:2–16.
  • Anderson-Gerfaud, P., M.-L. Inizan, M. Lechevallier, J. Pelegrin, and M. Pernot 1989 Des lames de silex dans un atelier de potler harappéen: Interaction de domaines techniques, Centre de Recherches Acadé- miques et Scientifiques, Paris, tome 308, Sèrie II: 443–449.
  • Andrefsky, W., Jr. 1987 Diffusion and Innovation from the Perspective of Wedge Shaped Cores in Alaska and Japan. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by J.K. Johnson and C.A. Morrow, pp. 13–44, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
  • Arnold, J.E. 1992 Complex Hunter-Gatherer-Fishers of Prehistoric California: Chiefs, Specialists, and Maritime Adaptations of the Channel Islands. American Antiquity 57: 60–84.
  • Baby. R.S., and S. M. Langlois 1979 Seip Mound State Memorial: Nonmortuary Aspects of Hopewell. In Hopewell Archaeology, the Chillicothe Conference, edited by D.S. Brose and N. Greber, pp. 16–18. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.
  • Bernhardt, J. 1976 A Preliminary Survey of Middle Woodland Prehistory in Licking County, Ohio. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 46: 39–54.
  • Blank, J.E. 1985 Results of an Intensive Study of Hopewellian Culture in Ross County, Ohio and Publically Owned Hopewellian Sites in the Remainder of Southern Ohio. Report prepared for the National Park Service, Midwest Archaeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska.
  • Braun, D. P. 1986 Midwestern Hopewellian Exchange and Supralocal Interaction. In Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change, edited by C. Renfrew and J.F. Cherry, pp. 117–126. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Caldwell, J. R. 1964 Interaction Spheres in Prehistory, In Hopewellian Studies, edited by J. R. Caldwell and R.L. Hall, pp. 133–143. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers, vol. 10, Springfield.
  • Cinadr, T. J., and R. A. Genheimer 1983 Middle Woodland Study Unit: Archaeological Resource Plan—Ohio River Basin. Ms. on file, Ohio Historic Preservation Office, Columbus.
  • Clark, J. E. 1990 Enfoque experimental en el anális de talleres de obsidiana Mesoamericanos: Un ejemplo de Ojo de Auguas, Chiapas, México. In Nuevas Enfoques en el Estudio de la Litica, edited by D. Soto de Archavaleta, pp. 83–133. Instituto de Investigationes Anthropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
  • Clark, J. E., and W.J. Parry 1990 Craft Specialization and Cultural Complexity. Research in Economic Anthropology 12: 289–346.
  • Cowan, C.W., B.W. Aument, L. I. Klempay, and L.R. Plotrowsky 1981 Variation in Hopewell Settlement Patterns and Lithic Industries in the Vicinity of the Newark EarthWorks: Some Preliminary Observations. Paper presented at the 1981 Midwestern Archaeological Conference, Madison, WI.
  • Crabtree, D. E. 1972 An Introduction to Flintworking. Occasional Papers of the Idaho State University Museum 28, Pocatello.
  • Dancey, W.S. 1991 A Middle Woodland Settlement in Central Ohio: a Preliminary Report on the Murphy Site. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 61: 37–72.
  • Essenpreis, P. S., and R. Connolly 1989 Hopewell Habitation at the Fort Ancient Site, Ohio. Paper presented at the 46th South-eastern Archaeological Conference, Tampa, FL.
  • Faulkner, A. 1974 Flintworking Mechanics: Fracture Forms and Processes. Paper presented at the Symposium for Primitive Technology and Art, Department of Archaeology, University of Calgary.
  • Feinman, G.M., and L.M. Nicholas 1993 Shell-Ornament Production in Ejutla: Implications for Highland-Coastal Interaction in Ancient Oaxaca. Ancient Mesoamerica 4: 103–119.
  • Fitting, J.E. 1972 Lithic Industries of the Schultz Site. In The Schultz Site at Green Point, a Stratified Occupation Area in the Saginaw Valley of Michigan, edited by J.E Fitting, pp. 191–224. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, no. 4. Ann Arbor.
  • Genheimer, R.A. 1984 A Systematic Examination of Middle Woodland Settlements in Warren County, Ohio. Report prepared for the Ohio Historic Preservation Office, Columbus.
  • Goodyear, A.C. 1974 The Brand site: a Techno-Functional Study of a Dalton Site in Northeast Arkansas. Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Publications in Archaeology, Research Series 7.
  • Greber, N. 1991 Report on Work at Capitolium Mound, Marietta, Ohio. Current Research, Great Lakes. American Antiquity 56: 542.
  • Greber, N. 1994 The Seip Geometric Enclosures and Environs: an Estimate of Possible Changes in Community Patterns through Time. In Ohio Hopewell Community Organization, edited by W.S. Dancey and P.J. Pacheco, Kent State University Press. In press.
  • Greber, N., R.S. Davis, and A.S. DuFresne 1981 The Micro-Component of the Ohio Hopewell Lithic Technology: Bladelets. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 376: 489–528.
  • Green, F.E. 1963 The Clovis Blades: an Important Addition to the Llano Complex. American Antiquity 29:145–165.
  • Hall, R. L. 1980 An Interpretation of the Two-Climax Model of Illinois Prehistory. In Early Native Americans, edited by D. Browman, p. 401–462. Mouton, The Hague.
  • Johnson, J.K. 1983 Poverty Point Period Blade Technology in the Yazoo Basin, Mississippi. Lithic Technology 12: 49–56.
  • Johnson, J.K. 1987 Introduction. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by J.K. Johnson and C.A. Morrow, pp. 1–12. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
  • Juel Jensen, H. 1987 Functional Analysis of Prehistoric Flint Tools by High-Power Microscopy: A Review of West European Research. Journal of World Prehistory 2: 53–88.
  • Keeley, L.H. 1980 Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Use. A Micro-Wear Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Kimball. L.R. 1991 The Function of Hopewell Blades from the Icehouse Bottom and Garden Sites. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans, LA.
  • Kimball. L.R. 1992a The Function of Hopewell Bladelets from the Southeast. Frank H. McClung Museum Notes 12. University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
  • Kimball. L.R. 1992b Early Archaic Settlement and Technology: Lessons from Tellico. In Paleoindian and Early Archaic Research in the Lower Southeast, edited by D. Anderson and K. Sassaman, pp. 143–181. Council of South Carolina Professional Archaeologlsts, Columbia.
  • Kimball. L.R. 1993 Rose Island Revisited: the Detection of Early Archaic Site Structure Using Grid Count Data. Southeastern Archaeologist 12: 93–116.
  • Kimball, L.R., and J. Chapman 1977 Other Chipped-Stone Tools. In Archaic Period Research in the Lower Little Tennessee River Valley, edited by J. Chapman, pp. 54–90. Publications in Anthropology, no. 13. Tennessee Valley Authority.
  • Kobayashi, T. 1970 Microblade Industries in the Japanese Archipelago. Arctic Anthropology 7: 38–58.
  • Lepper, B.T., and R.W. Yerkes 1994 Hopewellian Occupations at the Northern Periphery of the Newark Earthworks: The Newark Expressway Site Revisited. In Ohio Hopewell Community Organization, edited by W.S. Dancey and P.J. Pacheco, Kent State University Press. In press.
  • Mobley, C.M. 1991 The Campus Site, a Prehistoric Camp at Fairbanks, Alaska. University of Alaska Press, Fairbanks.
  • Montet-White, A. 1968 The Lithic Industries of the Illinois Valley in the Early and Middle Woodland Periods. Anthropological Paper s, no. 35, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Odell, George H. 1981 The Mechanics of Use- Breakage of Stone Tools: Some Testable Hypotheses. Journal of Field Archaeology 8:197–209.
  • Odell, George H. 1994 The Role of Stone Bladelets in Middle Woodland Society. American Antiquity 59:102–120.
  • Parry, W. J. 1994 Prismatic Blade Technologies in North America. In The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Technologies, edited by P.J. Carr, pp. 87–98. International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Pi-Sunyer, O. 1965 The Flint Industry. In The McGraw Site: a Study in Hopewellian Dynamics, edited by O.H. Prufer, pp. 60–89. Scientific Publications of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History 4(1).
  • Prufer, O.H. 1965 The McGraw Site: a Study in Hopewellian Dynamics. Scientific Publications of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History 4(1).
  • Sanger, D. 1970 Mid-Latitude Core and Blade Traditions. Arctic Anthropology 7: 106–114.
  • Seeman, M. F. 1979 Feasting with the Dead: Ohio Hopewell Charnel House Ritual as a Context for Redistribution. In Hopewell Archaeology: the Chillicothe Conference, edited by D. S. Brose and N. Greber, pp. 39–46. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.
  • Seeman, M. F. 1992 Woodland Traditions in the Midcontinent: a Comparison of Three Regional Sequences. Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement 6: 3–46. JAI Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • Shafer, H.J., and T.R. Hester 1991 Lithic Craft Specialization and Product Distribution at the Maya Site of Colha, Belize. World Archaeology 23: 79–97.
  • Squier, E.G., and E.H. Davis 1848 Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, vol. 1, Washington, D.C.
  • Smith, B.D. 1985 Chenopodtum berlandiert ssp. jonesianum: Evidence for a Hopewell Domesticate from Ash Cave, Ohio. Southeastern Archaeology 4:51–72.
  • Smith, B.D. 1988 Hopewell Farmers of Eastern North America. Paper read in plenary session at the 11th Congress of the International Union of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archaeology, Mainz, Germany.
  • Smith, B.D. 1989 Origins of Agrlculture in Eastern North America. Science 246: 1566–1571.
  • Stafford. B. D., and M. B. Sant (editors) 1985 Smiling Dan: Structure and Function at a Middle Woodland Settlement in the Illinois Valley. Center for American Archaeology, Research Series, vol. 2. Kampsville, IL.
  • Struever, S. 1964 The Hopewell Interaction Sphere ln Riverine-Western Great Lakes Culture History. In Hopewellian Studies, edited by J. R. Caldwell and R.L. Hall, pp. 85–106. Illinois State Museum, Scientific Papers 12, Springfield.
  • Struever, S., and G.L. Houart 1972 An Analysis of the Hopewell Interaction Sphere. In Social Exchange and Interaction, edited by E.N. Wilmsen, pp. 47–147. Anthropological Papers 46, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Tixier, J. 1974 Glossary for the Description of Stone Tools, with Special Reference to the Epipaleolithic of the Maghreb (translated by M.H. Newcomer) Newsletter of Lithic Technology, Special Publication 1.
  • van Gljn, A. 1990 The Wear and Tear of Flint: Principles of Functional Analysis Applied to Dutch Neolithic Assemblages. Analecta Prae-historica Leidensia 22, Rljksuniversiteit te Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Walthall, J.A., and S. Struever 1985 Prehistoric Trade. In Illinois Archaeology, edited by J.W. Porter and D.S. Rohn, pp. 101–108. Illinois Archaeological Survey Bulletin 1 (revlsed).
  • Webb, C.H., and J.L. Gibson 1981 Studies of the Microflint Industry at Poverty Point Site. Geoscience and Man 22:85–101. Baton Rouge, LA.
  • Wiant M.D., and G.H. Odell 1986 Middle Woodland Lithic Analysis: Design and Method. In Woodland Period Occupations of the Napoleon Hollow Site in the Lower Illinois Valley, edited by M.D. Wiant and C.R. McGimsey, pp. 171–189. Center for American Archaeology, Research Series vol. 6. Kampsville, IL.
  • Wiant, M.D., and C.R. McGimsey (editors) 1986 Woodland Period Occupations of the Napoleon Hollow Site in the Lower Illinois Valley. Center for American Archaeology, Research Series vol. 6. Kampsville, IL.
  • Witthoft, J. 1952 A Paleo-Indian Site in Eastern Pennsylvania: an Early Hunting Culture. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96: 464–495.
  • Wymer, D. A. 1987 The Middle Woodland-Late Woodland Interface in Central Ohio: Subsistence Continuity and Cultural Change. In Emergent Horticultural Economies of the Eastern Woodlands, edited by W.F. Keegan, pp. 201–216. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, Occasional Paper 7.
  • Yerkes, R.W. 1983 Microwear, Microdrills, and Mississippian Craft Specialization. American Antiquity 48: 499–518.
  • Yerkes, R.W. 1987 Tool Function and Prehistoric Activities at the Murphy Site, a Hopewell Settlement in Licking County, Ohio. Seed Grant Report, Ohio State University, Columbus.
  • Yerkes, R.W. 1989 Mississippian Craft Specialization on the American Bottom. Southeastern Archaeology 8:93–106.
  • Yerkes, R.W. 1990 Using Microwear Analysis to Investigate Domestic Activities and Craft Specialization at the Murphy Site, a Small Hopewell Settlement in Licking County, Ohio. In The Interpretative Possibilities of Microwear Studies, edited by B. Gräslund, H. Knutsson, K. Knutsson, and J. Tafflnder, pp. 167–176. Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, Aun 14, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Yerkes, R.W. 1991 Results of Microwear Analysis of Bladelets from Capitoleum Mound (33WN13c), Marietta, Ohio. Report submitted to N'omi Greber, Cleveland Museum of Natural History.
  • Yerkes, R.W. 1993 Microwear Analysis of Chipped Stone Artifacts from Sites LI252 and LI260, Licking County, Ohio. Report prepared for the Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.
  • Yerkes, R.W., and L. M. Gaertner n.d. Microwear Analysis of Dalton Artifacts. In The Sloan Site, edited by D.F. Morse. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. In press.
  • Yerkes, R.W., and P.N. Kardulias 1993 Recent Developments in the Analysis of Lithic Artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Research 1:89–119.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.