Stage Versus Continuum in the Debris Assemblage from Production of A Fluted Biface

References

• Ahler, Stanley A. 1989 Mass Analysis of Flaking Debris: Studying the Forest Rather Than the Trees. In Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, edited by D.Henry and G.Odell, pp. 85–118. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Amick, Daniel S., Raymond P. Mauldin and Steven A. Tomka 1988 An Evaluation of Debltage Produced by Experimental Bifacial Core Reduction of a Georgetown Chert Nodule. Lithic Technology 17:26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, Andrew P., and Philip J. Carr 1995 Flake Typologies and Alternative Approaches: an Experimental Assessment. Lithic Technology 20: 100–115.
   Google Scholar
• Brose, David A. 1994 Archaeological Investigations at the Paleo Crossing Site, a Paleolndian Occupation In Medina County, Ohio. In The First Discovery of America: Archaeological Evidence of the Early Inhabitants of the Ohio Area, edited by W. Dancey, pp. 61–76. Ohio Archaeological Council. Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, John 1980 Making Sense of Waste Flakes: New Methods for Investigating the Technology and Economics behind Chipped Stone Assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science 7:131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, Errett 1979 The Basics of Biface Knapping in the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition: a Manual for Flintknappers and Lithic Analysts. Archaeology of Eastern North America 7:1–179.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Michael B. 1975 Lithic Technology as a Means of Processual Inference. In Lithic Technology: Making and Using Stone Tools, edited by E. Swanson, pp. 15–34. Mouton. The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Dibble, Harold and Andrew Pelcin 1995 The Effect of Hammer Mass and Velocity on Flake Mass. Journal of Archaeological Science 22:429–439.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, P.R. 1978 Consistency in Archaeological Measurement and Classification: a Pilot Study. American Antiquity 43:86–89.
   Google Scholar
• 1981 Beyond Tools: Middle Paleolithic Debitage Analysis and Cultural Inference. Journal of Anthropological Research 37:374–386.
   Google Scholar
• Fladmark, Knut R. 1982 Microdebitage Analysis: Initial Considerations. Journal of Archaeological Science 9:205–220.
   Google Scholar
• Flenniken, J.Jeffrey. 1985 Stone Tool Reduction Techniques as Cultural Markers. In Stone Tool Analysis: Essays in Honor of Don E. Crabtree, edited by M.Plew, J. Woods and M. Pavesic, pp. 265–276. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
   Google Scholar
• Gilreath, Amy J. 1983 Bifacial Debitage and Sampling at a Small Lithic Scatter: an Experimental Study. Masters thesis, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.
   Google Scholar
• Ingbar, Eric E., Mary Lou Larson and Bruce A. Bradley 1989 A Nontypological Approach to Debitage Analysis. In Experiments in Lithic Technology. edited by D. Amick and R. Mauldin, pp. 117–135. British Archaeological Reports, International Series 528, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, William H. 1894 Natural History of Flaked Stone Implements. Memoirs of the International Congress of Anthropology, edited by C.S.Wake, pp. 120–139. Schulte, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Luedtke, Barbara E. 1992 An Archaeologist's Guide to Chert and Flint. UCLA Institute of Archaeology, Archaeological Research Tools, No. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Magne, Martin P. 1985 Lithics and Livelihood: Stone Tool Technologies of Central and Southern Interior British Columbia. Archaeological Survey of Canada, Paper No. 133. National Museum of Man. Mercury Series, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Magne, Martin P. and David Pokotylo 1981 A Pilot Study in Bifacial Lithic Reduction Sequences. Lithic Technology 10:34–47.
   Google Scholar
• Muto, G. 1971 A Technological Analysis of the Early Stages in the Manufacture of Lithic Artifacts. Masters thesis, Department of Anthropology, Idaho State University, Pocatello.
   Google Scholar
• Norusis, Marija J. 1993 SPSS For Windows Base System User's Guide, Release 6.0. SPSS, Inc., Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, Leland W. 1990 Characteristics of Bifacial-Reduction Flake-Size Distribution. American Antiquity 53:550–558.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, Barbara A. 1975 Fractures for the Archaeologist. In Lithic Technology: Making and Using Stone Tools, edited by E. Swanson, pp. 133–144. Mouton, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, L.M., R.F. Cande, and D.W. Stahle 1979 Debitage Graphs and Archaic Settlement Patterns in the Arkansas Ozarks. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 4:167–182.
   Google Scholar
• Root, M.J. 1992 The Knife River Flint Quarries: the Organization of Stone Tool Production, Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J. 1993 The Leavitt Site: A Parkhill Phase Paleo-Indian Occupation in Central Michigan. University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, Memoir No. 25, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• 1994 Size and Form in the Analysis of Flake Debris: Review and Recent Approaches. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1:69–110.
   Google Scholar
• 1995 Lithic Reduction at 13HA365, a Middle Woodland Occupation in Iowa. Paper presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, Donald B., Michael J. Shott and Henry T. Wright 1984 The Gainey Site: Variability in a Great Lakes Pale-Indian Assemblage. Archaeology of Eastern North America 12: 266–279.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, C.Russell 1985 Lithic Technology: Debitage and Refitted Tools. In The Campbell Hollow Archaic Occupations: a Study of Intrasite Spatial Structure in the Lower Illinois Valley, edited by C. R. Stafford, pp. 158–176. Center for American Archaeology, Research Series, vol. 4, Kampsville, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Stahle, D.W. and J.E. Dunn 1982 An Analysis and Application of the Size Distribution of Waste Flakes from the Manufacture of Bifacial Stone Tools. World Archaeology 14:84–97.
   Google Scholar
• 1984 An Experimental Analysis of the Size Distribution of Waste Flakes from Biface Reduction. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Technical Paper No. 2, Fayetteville.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan. A.P. and K.C. Rozen 1985 Debitage Analysis and Archaeological Inter-pretation. American Antiquity 50:755–779.
   Google Scholar
• Tankersley, Kenneth B. 1989 A Close Look at the Big Picture: Early Paleoindian Lithic Resource Procurement in the Midwestern United States. In Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Resource Use. edited by C. Ellis and J. Lothrop, pp. 259–292. Westview Press, Boulder.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmsen, E.N. 1970 Lithic Analysis and Cultural Inference: a Paleo-Indian Case. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona, No. 16, Tucson.
   Google Scholar