Pattern and Allometric Measurement of Reduction in Experimental Folsom Bifaces

REFERENCES CITED

• Ahler, Stanley, A., and Phil R. Geib 2000 Why Flute? Folsom Point Design and Adaptation. Journal of Archaeological Science 27: 799–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrefsky, William 1997 Thoughts on Stone Tool Shape and Inferred Function. Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology 13: 125–144.
   Google Scholar
• Andrefsky, William 2006 Experimental and Archaeological Verification of an Index of Retouch for Hafted Bifaces. American Antiquity 71: 743–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrefsky, William n.d. (editor) Artifact Life-Cycle and the Organization of Lithic Technologies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ballenger, Jesse A. M. 2001 Dalton Settlement in the Arkoma Basin of Eastern Oklahoma. Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, Monographs in Anthropology, No. 2. Norman, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, C. Michael 1990 Stone Tools and Paleolithic Settlement in the Iberian Peninsula. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 56: 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Charlotte 1995 Functional Attributes and the Differential Persistence of Great Basin Dart Forms. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 17: 222–243
   Google Scholar
• Bement, Leland C. 1999a Bison Hunting at Cooper Site: Where Lightning Bolts Drew Thundering Herds. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
   Google Scholar
• Bement, Leland C. 1999b View from a Kill: the Cooper Site Folsom Lithic Assemblages. In Folsom Lithic Technology: Explorations in Structure and Variation, edited by D. S. Amick, pp. 111–121. International Monographs in Prehistory, Archaeological Series 12. Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Binford, Lewis R. 1973 Interassemblage Variability: the Mousterian and the “Functional” Argument. In The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory, edited by C. Renfrew, pp. 227–254. Duckworth, London.
   Google Scholar
• Blades, Brooke S. 2003 End Scraper Reduction and Hunter-Gatherer Mobility. American Antiquity 68: 141–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Briggs 2006 An Analysis of Folsom Projectile Point Resharpening Using Quantitative Comparisons of Form and Allometry. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 185–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson, Christopher 2002 An Index of Invasiveness for the Measurement of Unifacial and Bifacial Retouch: a Theoretical, Experimental and Archaeological Verification. Journal of Archaeological Science 29: 65–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson, Christopher n.d. Changing Reduction Intensity, Settlement and Subsistence in Wardaman Country, Northern Australia. In Artifact Life-Cycle and the Organization of Lithic Technologies, edited by W. Andrefsky. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, Christopher, and Lara Lamb (editors) 2005 Lithics Down Under: Australian Perspectives on Lithic Reduction, Use and Classification. British Archaeological Reports, International Series 1408. Archaeopress, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Michael B. 1999 Clovis Blade Technology. University of Texas Press, Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Kim A., and Herman A. Smith 1989 Perdiz Point Damage Analysis. Bulletin of the Texas Archaeological Society 60: 283–301.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Steven L. 1986 A Re-Analysis of the Shoop Site. Archaeology of Eastern North America 14; 101–170.
   Google Scholar
• Cresson, Jack 1990 Broadspear Lithic Technology: Some Aspects of Biface Manufacture, Form, and Use History with Insights towards Understanding Assemblage Diversity. In Experiments and Observations on the Terminal Archaic of the Middle Atlantic Region, edited by R. W. Moeller, pp. 105–130. Archaeological Services, Bethlehem, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, R. H., and J. A. Gowlett 1993 Allometry and Multidimensional Form in Acheulean Bifaces from Kilombe, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution 25: 175–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, Harold L. 1995 Middle Paleolithic Scraper Reduction: Background, Clarification, and Review of the Evidence to date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2: 299–368.
   Google Scholar
• Dockall, John E. 1997 Wear Traces and Projectile Impact: a Review of the Experimental and Archaeological Evidence. Journal of Field Archaeology 24: 321–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, Chris 1984 Paleo-Indian Lithic Technological Structure and Organization in the Lower Great Lakes Area: a First Approximation. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Chris 2004 Understanding “Clovis” Fluted Point Variability in the Northeast: a Perspective from the Debert Site. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 28: 205–253.
   Google Scholar
• Eren, Metin, Manuel Dominguez-Rodrigo, Steven L. Kuhn, Daniel S. Ahler, Ian Le, and Ofer Bar-Yosef 2005 Defining and Measuring Reduction in Unifacial Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 1190–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flenniken, J. Jeffrey, and Philip J. Wilke 1989 Typology, Technology, and Chronology of Great Basin Dart Points. American Anthropologist 91: 149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear, Albert C. 1993 Tool Kit Entropy and Bipolar Reduction: a Study of Interassemblage Lithic Variability among Paleo-Indian Sites in the Northeastern United States. North American Archaeologists 14: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, Joseph 1978 Meadowood Phase Settlement Pattern in the Niagara Frontier Region of Western New York State. University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers 65. Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, Brian D. 1977 Stone Tool Functions in the Western Desert. In Stone Tools as Cultural Markers: Change, Evolution, and Continuity, edited by R. V. Wright, pp. 178–188. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Hiscock, Peter, and Val Attenbrow 2003 Early Australian Implement Variation: a Reduction Model. Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 239–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiscock, Peter, and Christopher Clarkson 2005 Measuring Artefact Reduction: an Examination of Kuhn's Geometric Index of Reduction. In Lithics “Down Under”: Australian Perspectives on Lithic Reduction, Use and Classification, edited by C. Clarkson and L. Lamb, pp. 720. BAR International Series 1408. Oxbow, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, C. Marshall 1985 Projectile Point Maintenance and Typology: Assessment with Factor Analysis and Canonical Correlation. In For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis: Bridging Data Structure, Quantitive Technique, and Theory, edited by C. Carr, pp. 566–612. Westport Press, Kansas City, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, Jack L. 1992 Recognition and Interpretation of Folsom Technological Variability on the Southern Plains. In Ice Age Hunters of the Rockies, edited by D. J. Stanford and J. S. Day, pp. 193–224. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.
   Google Scholar
• Hunzicker, David A. 2005 Folsom Hafting Technology: an Experimental Archaeological Investigation into the Design, Effectiveness, Efficiency and Interpretation of Prehistoric Weaponry. MA Thesis, Department of Museum and Field Studies, University of Colorado, Boulder.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Jay 1981 Yellow Creek Archaeological Project—Volume 2. Tennessee Valley Authority, Publications in Anthropology, No. 28. Oxford, MS.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, Robert L., and Lawrence C. Todd 1987 Coming into the Country: Early Paleoindian Hunting and Mobility. American Antiquity 53: 231–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knecht, Heidi 1997 Projectile Points of Bone, Antler, and Stone: Experimental Explorations of Manufacture and Use. In Projectile Technology, edited by H. Knecht, pp. 191–212. Plenum, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Steven L. 1990 A Geometric Index of Reduction for Unifacial Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 17: 583–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekberg, Per 1999 The Lives and Lengths of Shaft-Hole Axes. In Material Culture Studies in Scandinavian Archaeology, edited by D. Olausson and H. Vankilde, pp. 155–161. Institute of Archaeology, Lund, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• McPherron, Shannon P. 1999 Ovate and Pointed Handaxe Assemblages: Two Points Make a Line. Préhistoire Européenne 14: 9–32.
   Google Scholar
• Meitzer, David J., Lawrence C. Todd, and Vance T. Holliday 2002 Folsom (Paleoindian) Type Site,: Past Investigations, Current Studies. American Antiquity 67: 5–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musil, Robert R. 1988 Functional Efficiency and Technological Change: a Hafting Tradition Model for Prehistoric North America. In Early Human Occupation in Far Western North America: the Clovis-Archaic Interface, edited by J. A. Willig, C. M. Aikens, and J. L. Fagan. Nevada State Museum, Anthropological Papers, No. 21, pp. 373–387. Carson City.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, Hugo G. 1999 The Folsom Biface Reduction Sequence: Evidence from the Lindenmeier Collection. In Folsom Lithic Technology: Explorations in Structure and Variation, edited by D. S. Amick, pp. 82–97. International Monographs in Prehistory, Archaeological Series 12. Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, George, H., and Frank Cowan 1986 Experiments with Spears and Arrows on Animal Targets. Journal of Field Archaeology 13: 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, Colin, P., William Andrefsky, and Ian Kuijt n.d. Stone Tool Drilling and Retouch Intensity: a Neolithic Case Study. In Artifact Life Cycle and the Organization of Lithic Technologies, edited by W. Andrefsky. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Rondeau, Michael F. 1996 When Is an Elko? In Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, edited by G. H. Odell, pp. 229–243. Plenum, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sahnouni, Mohamed, Kathy Schick, and Nicholas Toth 1997 An Experimental Investigation into the Nature of Faceted Limestone “Spheroids” in the Early Palaeolithic. Journal of Archaeological Science 24: 701–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J. 1986 Settlement Mobility and Technological Organization among Great Lakes Paleo-Indian Foragers. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J. 1995 How Much Is a Scraper? Curation, Use Rates and the Formation of Scraper Assemblages. Lithic Technology 20: 5372.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J. 1996 An Exegesis of the Curation Concept. Journal of Anthropological Research 52: 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J. 2002 Weibull Estimation of Use-Life Distribution in Experimental Spear-Point Data. Lithic Technology 29: 93–109.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J. 2005 The Reduction Thesis and its Discontents: Review of Australian Approaches. In Lithics “Down Under”: Australian Perspectives on Lithic Reduction, Use and Classification, edited by C. Clarkson and L. Lamb, pp. 109–125. British Archaeological Reports, International Series 1408. Archaeopress, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J., and Jesse Ballenger 2007 Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: a Southeastern Case Study. American Antiquity 72: 153–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J., and Paul Sillitoe 2004 Modeling Use-Life Distributions in Archaeology Using New Guinea Wola Ethnographic Data. American Antiquity 69: 336–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J., and Paul Sillitoe 2005 Use Life and Curation in New Guinea Experimental Used Flakes. Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 653–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J., and Kathryn Weedman 2007 Measuring Reduction in Stone Tools: an Ethnoarchaeological Study of Gamo Hidescraper Blades from Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 1016–1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surovell, Todd A. 2003 Behavioral Ecology of Folsom Lithic Technology. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D'Arcy W. 1917 On Growth and Form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Tindale, Norman 1965 Stone Implement Making among the Nakako, Ngadadjara and Pitjandjara of the Great Western Desert. Records of the South Australian Museum 15: 131–164.
   Google Scholar
• Titmus, Gene L., and James C. Woods 1991 Fluted Points from the Snake River Plain. In Clovis: Origins and Adaptations, edited by R. Bonnichsen and K. Turnmire, pp. 119–131. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.
   Google Scholar
• Towner, Ronald H., and Miranda Warburton 1990 Projectile Point Rejuvenation: a Technological Analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 17: 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truncer, James J. 1990 Perkiomen Points: a Study in Variability. In Experiments and Observations on the Terminal Archaic of the Middle Atlantic Region, edited by R. Moeller, pp. 1–62. Archaeological Services, Bethlehem, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Weedman, Kathryn J. 2000 An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Stone Scrapers among the Gamo People of Southern Ethiopia. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville.
   Google Scholar
• Weedman, Kathryn J. 2002 On the Spur of the Moment: Effects of Age and Experience on Hafted Stone Scraper Morphology. American Antiquity 67: 731–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheat, Joe Ben 1975 Artifact Life Histories: Cultural Templates, Typology, Evidence and Inference. In Primitive Art and Technology, edited by J. Raymond, B. Loveseth, C. Arnold, and G. Reardon, pp. 7–15. Department of Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Jennifer, and William Andrefsky n.d. Assessing Retouch: Is It Production or Curation? In Artifact Life-Cycle and the Organization of Lithic Technologies, edited by W. Andrefsky. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, James C. 1988 Projectile Point Fracture Patterns and Inferences about Tool function. Idaho Archaeology 11: 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wyckoff, Don G. 1999 Southern Plains Folsom Lithic Technology: a View from the Edge. In Folsom Lithic Technology: Explorations in Structure and Variation, edited by D. S. Amick, pp. 39–64. International Monographs in Prehistory, Archaeological Series 12. Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar