Exploring New Approaches to Lithic Analysis: Laser Scanning and Geometric Morphometrics

REFERENCES CITED

• Archer, Will, and David R. Braun 2010 Variability in Bifacial Technology at Elandsfontein, Western Cape, South Africa: a Geometric Morphometric Approach. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 201–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Charlotte, and George T. Jones 2007 Early Paleoarchaic Point Morphology and Chronology. In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic? Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene/Holocene Transition, edited by K. Graf and D. Schmitt, pp. 23–41. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein, Fred L. 1991 Morphometric Took f or Landmark Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein, Fred L. 1997 Landmark Methods for Forms without Landmarks: Morphometries of Group Differences in Outline Shape. Medical Image Analysis 1: 225–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradbury, Andrew P., and Philip J. Carr 2003 A Method for Quantifying Size and Shape Dimensions of North American Hafted Bifaces. In Lithic Analysis at the Millennium, edited by N. Moloney and M. Shott, pp. 173–188. Institute of Archaeology Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, David R., Michael J. Rogers, J.W. Harris, and S.J. Walker 2009 Quantifying Variation in Landscape-Scale Behaviors: the Oldowan from Koobi Fora. Unpublished ms. on file, Dept. of Archaeology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Briggs 2006 An Analysis of Folsom Projectile Point Resharpening Using Quantitative Comparisons of Form and Allometry. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 185–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Briggs, and Mark Collard 2007 Investigating the Peopling of North America through Cladistic Analysis of Early Paleoindian Projectile Points. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26: 366–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Briggs, and Marcus J. Hamilton 2009 A Formal Test of the Origins of Variation in North American Early Paleoindian Projectile Points. American Antiquity 74: 279–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, Paul, and Erik Otárola-Castillo 2008 Knapping on an Idea: Experimental and Archaeological Projectile Point Morphological Variability using Geometric Morphometrics. Paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Cardillo, Marcelo 2006 Temporal Trends in the Morphometric Variation of the Lithic Projectile Points during the Middle Holocene of Southern Andes (Puna Region): a Coevolutionary Approach. Ms. on file, Depto. De Investigaciones Prehistóricas y Arqueológicas (DIPA-IMHICIHU), CONICET, Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• CastiHeira, C., M. Cardillo, J. Charlin, J.C. Fernicola, and J. Baeza 2007 Análisis Morfométrico de los Cabezales Líticos ‘Cola de Pescado’ del Uruguay. In Arqueometría, Segundo Congreso Argentino, pp. 1–7. Comisión Nacional de Energia Atómica, Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, Chris, Lucio Viniciu, and Marta Mirazón Lahr 2006 Quantifying Flake Scar Patterning on Cores Using 3D Recording Techniques. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 132–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, Shirley 2007 3D Lithic Analysis. http://epubs.stfc.ac.uk/hitstreflm/1752/CAA07Crompton_1.doc. Accessed 14 May 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Curnoe, D. 2003 Problems with the Use of Cladistic Analysis in Paleoanthropology. Homo 53: 225–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dildine, James P. 1999 Triangle Explorations. http://mste.illinois.edu/dildine/bernn/triarea.html. Accessed 26 March 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Eren, Metin I., and Mary E. Prendergast 2008 Comparing and Synthesizing Unifacial Stone Tool Reduction Indices. In Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use, and Curation, edited by W. Andrefsky, pp. 49–85. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Anders 1989 Hunting with Flint-Tipped Arrows: Results and Experiences from Practical Experiments. In The Mesolithic in Europe, edited by C. Bonsall, pp. 29–39. John Donald, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, Joan, and Jim Mazzullo 1984 Analysis of Artifact Shape Using Fourier Series in Closed Form. Journal of Field Archaeology 11: 315–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosman, Leore, Oded Smikt, and Uzy Smilansky 2008 On the Application of 3-D Scanning Technology for the Documentation and Typology of Lithic Artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 35: 3101–3110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunz, Philippe, Philippe Mitteroecker, and Fred L. Bookstein 2005 Semilandmarks in Three Dimensions. In Modern Morphometries in Physical Anthropology, edited by D. Slice, pp. 73–98. Kluwer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Henton, Gregory H,. and Stephen R. Durand 1991 Projectile Point Measurement and Classification Using Digital Image Processing. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 3: 53–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, C. Marshall 1985 Projectile Point Manintenance and Typology: Assessment with Factor Analysis and Canonical Correlation. In For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis: Bridging Data Structure, Quantitative Technique, and Theory, edited by C. Carr, pp. 566–612. Westport Publishers, Kansas City.
   Google Scholar
• Holmer, Richard N. 1978 A Mathematical Typology for Archaic Projectile Points of the Eastern Great Basin. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah. Salt Lake City, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Susan S. 1998 Getting to the Point: Evolutionary Change in Prehistoric Weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5: 345–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunzicker, David A. 2008 Folsom Projectile Technology: an Experiment in Design, Effectiveness and Efficiency. Plains Anthropologist 53: 291–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iovita, Radu 2009 Ontogenetic Scaling and Lithic Systematics: Method and Application. Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 1447–1457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Sam C., Matthew J. Douglass, Simon J. Holdaway, and Bruce Floyd 2010 The Application of 3D Laser Scanning Technology to the Assessment of Ordinal and Mechanical Cortex Quantification in Lithic Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 694–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, Stephen J. 2009 Quantifying Transitions: Morphometric Approaches to Palaeolithic Variability and Technological Change. In Sourcebook of Palaeolithic Transitions, edited by M. Camps and P. Chauhan, pp. 79–92. Springer Science, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lycett, Stephen J., N. von Cramon-Taubadel, and R. Foley 2006 A Crossbeam Coordinate Caliper for the Morphometry Analysis of Lithic Nuclei: A Description, Test and Empirical Examples of Application. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 847–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, Norman 1999 Generalizing and Extending the Eigenshape Method of Shape Space Visualization and Analysis. Paleobiology 25: 107–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, Norman 2008 Understanding Morphology in Systematic Contexts: 3D Specimen Ordination and 3D Specimen Recognition. In The New Taxonomy, edited by Q. Wheeler, pp. 143–210. CRC Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, Norman 2009 PalaeoMath 101: Form and Shape Models. http://www.palass.org/modules.php?name=palaeojTiath&page=1, The Palaeontological Association, London. Accessed 5 December, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McGhee, George R. 1999 Theoretical Morphology: the Concept and Its Applications. Columbia University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Mitteroecker, Phillippe, and Fred Bookstein 2008 The Evolutionary Role of Modularity and Integration in the Hominoid Cranium. Evolution 62: 943–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncel, Marie-Hélène, María Gema Chacón, Aude Coudenneau, and Paul Fernandes 2009 Points and Convergent Tools in the European Early Middle Palaeolithic Site of Payre (SE, France). Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 1892–1909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, Juliet, and T. Morrow 1999 Geographic Variation in Fluted Projectile Points: a Hemispheric Perspective. American Antiquity 64: 215–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niewoehner, Wesley A. 2005 A Geometric Morphometry Analysis of Late Pleistocene Human Metacarpal 1 Base Shape. In Modern Morphometries in Physical Anthropology, edited by D. Slice, pp. 285–298. Kluwer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, Michael J., and R. Lee Lyman 2003 Cladistics and Archaeology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
   Google Scholar
• O'Higgins, Paul, and Nicholas Jones 1998 Facial Growth in Cerocebus torquatusr. an Application of Three Dimensional Morphometric Techniques to the Study of Morphological Variation. Journal of Anatomy 193: 251–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Higgins, Paul, and Nicholas Jones 2006 Tools for Statistical Shape Analysis. Hull York Medical School, http://hyms.fme.googlepages.com/resources. Accessed 13 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew, C. 1973 Before Civilization: the Radiocarbon Revolution and Prehistoric Europe. Knopf, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Riel-Salvatore, Julien, Myungsoo Bae, Peter McCartney, and Anshuman Razdan 2003 Palaeolithic Archaeology and 3D Visualization Technology: Recent Developments. Antiquity 76: 929–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, John J. 2005 The Origins of Lithic Projectile Point Technology: Evidence from Africa, the Levant, and Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 823–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J. 2003 Time as Sequence, Type as Ideal: Whole-Object Measurement of Biface Size and Form in Midwestern North America. In Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technology, edited by M. Soressi and H. Dibble, pp. 251–271. University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J. 2005 The Reduction Thesis and Its Discontents: Review of Australian Approaches. In Lithics “Down Under:” Australian Perspectives on Lithic Reduction, Use and Classification, edited by C. Clarkson and L. Lamb, pp. 109–125. British Archaeological Reports International Monograph Series 1408, Archaeopress, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J. 2008a Darwinian Evolutionary Theory and Lithic Analysis. In Cultural Transmission and Archaeology: Issues and Case Studies, edited by M. O'Brien, pp. 146–157. Society for American Archaeology Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J. 2008b equal o nil roofht w ded l e vsbr cted: A Proposal for Conservation of Private Collections in American Archaeology. SAA Archaeological Record 8(2): 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J. 2009 Theory in Archaeology: Morphometric Approaches to the Study of Fluted Points. Paper presented at the 74^th meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. Atlanta.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, Michael J., David A Hunzicker, and Bob Patten 2007 Pattern and Allometric Measurement of Reduction in Experimental Folsom Bifaces. Lithic Technology 32(2):203–217.
   Google Scholar
• Slice, Dennis E., 2005a Modern Morphometrics. In Modern Morphometries in Physical Anthropology, edited by D. Slice, pp. 1–45. Kluwer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Slice, Dennis E. 2005b (editor) Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. Kluwer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Nicholas E., and Suzanne G. Strait 2008 PaleoView3D: From Specimen to Online Digital Model. Palaeontologia Electronica 11(2), http://palaeo-electronica.org/20082/134/index/html Accessed 17 December 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, T. Alexandra, and Andrew T. Riddle 2008 A Virtual Paleolithic: Assays in Photogrammetric Three-Dimensional Artifact Modelling. Paleo Anthropology 2008: 158–169.
   Google Scholar
• Thulman, David K. 2006 A Reconstruction of Paleoindian Social Organization in North Central Florida. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Anthropology, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, Charles N. 1993 Classifying Clovis Points: a Study in Metric Variability. Unpublished MA Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.
   Google Scholar
• von Cramon-Taubadel, Noreen, Brenda C. Frazier, and Marta Mirazón Lahr 2007 The Problem of Assessing Landmark Error in Geometric Morphometries: Theory, Methods, and Modifications. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 134: 24–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, Thomas and F. Tierson 1990 Regional Comparison of the Shapes of Later Acheulian Handaxes. American Anthropologist 92: 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelditch, Miriam L., Donald L. Swiderski, H. David Sheets and William L. Fink 2004 Geometric Morphometries for Biologists: a Primer. Elsevier, San Diego.
   Google Scholar