341
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Photogrammetrical Assessment of Procedural Patterns and Sequential Structure in “Handaxe” Manufacture: A Case Study along the Doring River of South Africa

, , , &

References

  • Agisoft, LLC. (2016). Agisoft PhotoScan user manual, 350 Professional edition, version 1.2. 2016. 351 http://www.agisoft.com/pdf/photoscan-pro12352en.pdf accessed August 26, 2016.
  • Archer, W., & Braun, D. R. (2010). Variability in bifacial technology at Elandsfontein, Western Cape, South Africa: A geometric morphometric approach. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(1), 201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.033
  • Bleed, P. (2002). Obviously sequential, but continuous or staged? Refits and cognition in three late paleolithic assemblages from Japan. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 21(3), 329–343. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4165(02)00001-6
  • Coolidge, F. L., & Wynn, T. (1999). Working memory, its executive functions, and the emergence of modern thinking. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 15(1), 5–26. doi: 10.1017/S0959774305000016
  • Coolidge, F. L., & Wynn, T. (2009). The Rise of Homo Sapiens: The Evolution of Modern Thinking. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Douglass, M., Lin, S., & Chodoronek, M. (2015). The application of 3D photogrammetry for in-field documentation of archaeological features. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 3, 136–152. doi:10.7183/2326-3768.3.2.136
  • Foley, R., & Lahr, M. M. (2003). On stony ground: Lithic technology, human evolution, and the emergence of culture. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 12(3), 109–122. doi: 10.1002/evan.10108
  • Goodwin, A. J. H., & Lowe, C. V. R. (1929). The Stone Age Cultures of South Africa. Trustees of the South African Museum.
  • Hiscock, P. (2014). Learning in lithic landscapes: A reconsideration of the hominid “toolmaking” niche. Biological Theory, 9(1), 27–41. doi: 10.1007/s13752-013-0158-3
  • Hodgson, D. (2015). The symmetry of Acheulean handaxes and cognitive evolution. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2, 204–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.02.002
  • Hoffecker, J. F. (2010). Landscape of the Mind: Human Evolution and the Archeology of Thought. Vancouver: Columbia University Press.
  • Hoffecker, J. F. (2013). The information animal and the super-brain. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 20(1), 18–41. doi: 10.1007/s10816-011-9124-1
  • Iovita, R., & McPherron, S. P. (2011). The handaxe reloaded: A morphometric reassessment of acheulian and middle paleolithic handaxes. Journal of Human Evolution, 61(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.007
  • Isaac, G. L. (1969). Studies of early culture in East Africa. World Archaeology, 1(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1080/00438243.1969.9979423
  • Kleindienst, M. R. (1961). Variability within the late Acheulian assemblage in Eastern Africa. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 16(62), 35–52. doi: 10.2307/3886868
  • Kleindienst, M. R., & Keller, C. M. (1976). Towards a functional analysis of handaxes and cleavers: The evidence from Eastern Africa. Man, 11, 176–187. doi: 10.2307/2800203
  • Kohn, M., & Mithen, S. (1999). Handaxes: Products of sexual selection? Antiquity, 73(281), 518–526. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00065078
  • Kuhn, S. L. (2010). Was anatolia a bridge or a barrier to early hominin dispersals? Quaternary international, 223–224, 434–435. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2009.07.012
  • Kuhn, S. L. (2012). Developments in quaternary sciences. Origins of Human Innovation and Creativity, 16, 69–87. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53821-5.00006-3
  • Kuman, K. (2014). The Acheulean industrial complex. In C. Smith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology (pp. 7–18). New York: Springer.
  • Li, H., Kuman, K., & Li, C. R. (2014). Re-examination of the morphological variability of east asian handaxes from a comparative perspective. World Archaeology, 46(5), 705–733. doi: 10.1080/00438243.2014.953707
  • Lycett, S. J. (2008). Acheulean variation and selection: Does handaxe symmetry fit neutral expectations? Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(9), 2640–2648. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.05.002
  • Lycett, S. J., & Bae, C. J. (2010). The movius line controversy: The state of the debate. World Archaeology, 42(4), 521–544. doi: 10.1080/00438243.2010.517667
  • Lycett, S. J., & Gowlett, J. A. (2008). On questions surrounding the Acheulean ‘tradition’. World Archaeology, 40(3), 295–315. doi: 10.1080/00438240802260970
  • Mackay, A., Sumner, A., Jacobs, Z., Shaw, M., & Bluff, K. (2014). Putslaagte 1 (PL1), the doring river, and the later middle stone age in Southern Africa's winter rainfall zone. Quaternary International, 350, 43–58. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.05.007
  • Magnani, M., Douglass, M., & Porter, S. T. (2016a). Three-dimensional Models of Experimentally-Produced Lithic Artifacts Created Using Expedient And Refined Photogrammetry Protocols. doi:0.13020/D6T88N. Retrieved August 26, 2016, from http://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/180304
  • Magnani, M., Douglass, M., & Porter, S. (2016b) Closing the seams: Resolving frequently encountered issues in photogrammetric modelling. Antiquity, 90(54), 1654–1669. doi: 10.15184/aqy.2016.211
  • McNabb, J., Binyon, F., & Hazelwood, L. (2004). The large cutting tools from the South African Acheulean and the question of social traditions1. Current Anthropology, 45(5), 653–677. doi: 10.1086/423973
  • McNabb, J., & Cole, J. (2015). The mirror cracked: Symmetry and refinement in the Acheulean handaxe. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 3, 100–111.
  • McPherron, S. P. (2000). Handaxes as a measure of the mental capabilities of early hominids. Journal of Archaeological Science, 27, 655–663. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1999.0467
  • McPherron, S. P. (2006). What typology can tell us about Acheulian handaxe production. In N. Goren-Inbar & G. Sahron (Eds.), Axe Age: Acheulean Tool Making From Quarry to Discard (pp. 267–285). London: Equinox.
  • Moore, M. W. (2010). Grammars of action and stone flaking design space. In I. Davidson & A. Nowell (Eds.), Stone Tools and the Evolution of Human Cognition (pp. 13–43). Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
  • Moore, M. W. (2011). The design space of stone flaking: Implications for cognitive evolution. World Archaeology, 43(4), 702–715. doi: 10.1080/00438243.2011.624778
  • Porter, S. T. (2015). A portable photogrammetry rig for reliable creation of high-quality 3D artifact models in the field. Poster Presentation, 2015 Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology.
  • Porter, S. T., Roussell, M., & Soressi, M. (2016). A simple photogrammetric rig for the reliable creation of 3D artifact models in the field: Lithic examples from the early upper paleolithic sequence of les cottés (france). Advances in Archaeological Practice, 4, 71–86. doi:10.7183/2326-3768.4.1.71
  • Roe, D. A. (1969). British lower and middle palaeolithic handaxe groups. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society (New Series), 34, 1–82. doi: 10.1017/S0079497X00013840
  • Roe, D. A. (1994). A metrical analysis of selected sets of handaxes and cleavers from olduvai gorge. Olduvai Gorge, 5, 1968–1971.
  • Rossano, M. J. (2009). The archaeology of consciousness (pp. 25–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Saragusti, I., Sharon, I., Katzenelson, O., & Avnir, D. (1998). Quantitative analysis of the symmetry of artefacts: Lower paleolithic handaxes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 25(8), 817–825. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1997.0265
  • Shea, J. J. (2014). Sink the mousterian? Named stone tool industries (nasties) as obstacles to investigating hominin evolutionary relationships in the later middle paleolithic Levant. Quaternary International, 350, 169–179. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.01.024
  • Spikins, P. (2012). Goodwill hunting? Debates over the ‘meaning'of lower palaeolithic handaxe form revisited. World Archaeology, 44(3), 378–392. doi: 10.1080/00438243.2012.725889
  • Stout, D. (2002). Skill and cognition in stone tool production: An ethnographic case study from Irian Jaya 1. Current Anthropology, 43(5), 693–722. doi: 10.1086/342638
  • Stout, D. (2011). Stone toolmaking and the evolution of human culture and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 1050–1059. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0369
  • Stout, D., & Chaminade, T. (2007). The evolutionary neuroscience of tool making. Neuropsychologia, 45(5), 1091–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.014
  • Stout, D., Apel, J., Commander, J., & Roberts, M. (2014). Late Acheulean technology and cognition at Boxgrove, UK. Journal of Archaeological Science, 41, 576–590. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.001
  • Stout, D., Toth, N., Schick, K., & Chaminade, T. (2008). Neural correlates of early stone age toolmaking: Technology, language and cognition in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 363(1499), 1939–1949. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0001
  • Stout, D., Toth, N., Schick, K., Stout, J., & Hutchins, G. (2000). Stone tool-making and brain activation: Position emission tomography (PET) studies. Journal of Archaeological Science, 27(12), 1215–1223. doi: 10.1006/jasc.2000.0595
  • Sumner, T. A. (2011). Psychological components of middle paleolithic technology: The proceduralization of lithic core reduction. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 30(3), 416–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2011.04.003
  • Sumner, T. A., & Kuman, K. (2014). Refitting evidence for the stratigraphic integrity of the Kudu Koppie early to middle stone age site, northern Limpopo Province, South Africa. Quaternary International, 343, 169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.04.017
  • Wynn, T., & Coolidge, F. L. (2011). How to think like a Neanderthal. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Wynn, T., & Coolidge, F. L. (2016). Archeological insights into hominin cognitive evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 25(4), 200–213. doi: 10.1002/evan.21496
  • Wynn, T., & Tierson, F. (1990). Regional comparison of the shapes of later Acheulean handaxes. American Anthropologist, 92(1), 73–84. doi: 10.1525/aa.1990.92.1.02a00050

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.