A Multi-instrument Study of Microwear Polishes on Mousterian Tools from Weasel Cave (Myshtulagty Lagat), Russia

References

• Andersen, H. H., & Whitlow, H. J. (1983). Wear traces and patination on Danish flint artefacts. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 218, 468–474. doi: 10.1016/0167-5087(83)91023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. (1980). A testimony of prehistoric tasks: Diagnostic residues on stone tool working edges. World Archaeology, 12, 181–194. doi: 10.1080/00438243.1980.9979791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. C., Georges, J. M., Vargiolu, R., & Zahouani, H. (2006). Insights from a tribological analysis of the tribulum. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 1559–1568. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson-Gerfaud, P. (1990). Aspects of behavior in the Middle Palaeolithic: Functional analysis of stone tools from southwest France. In P. A. Mellars (Eds.), The emergence of modern humans: An archaeological perspective (pp. 389–419). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Gerfaud, P. (1996). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Barkai, R., Lemorini, C., & Gopher, A. (2010). Palaeolithic cutlery 400 000–200 000 years ago: Tiny meat-cutting tools from Qesem Cave, Israel. Antiquity, 84(325), Project Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Beyriès, S. (1987). Variabilite de l’industrie lithique au mousterien: Approche fonctionnelle sur quelques gisements français. British Archaeological Reports International Series 328.
   Google Scholar
• Beyriès, S. (1988). Functional variability of lithic sets in the Middle Paleolithic. In H. Dibble, & A. Montet-White (Eds.), Upper pleistocene prehistory of Western Eurasia (pp. 213–221). Philadelphia: The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Beyriès, S., Delamare, F., & Quantin, J.-C. (1988). Tracéologie et rugosimétrie tridimensionnelle. In S. Beyries (Eds.), Industries lithiques: Tracéologie et technologie (pp. 115–132). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series 411.
   Google Scholar
• Beyriès, S., & Plisson, H. (1998). Pointes ou outils triangulairesDonnées fonctionnelles dans le Moustérien levantin [suivi des] Commentaires de J. Shea, A. Marks, J-M Geneste et de la réponse des auteurs. Paléorient, 24(1), 5–24. doi: 10.3406/paleo.1998.4666
   Google Scholar
• Beyriès, S., & Rots, V. (2008). The contribution of ethnoarchaeological macro- and microscophic wear traces to the understanding of archaeological hide-working processes. In L. Longo & N. Skakun (Eds.), ‘Prehistoric technology’ 40 years later: Functional studies and the Russian legacy (pp. 21–28). Oxford: BAR International Series 1783.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. A., & Donahue, R. E. (2005). The elemental chemistry of lithic microwear: An experiment. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32, 1733–1740. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, A. A., & Donahue, R. E. (2008). Laser scanning confocal microscopy: A potential technique for the study of lithic microwear. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2223–2230. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, A. A., & MacDonald, D. (2011). Using metrology in early prehistoric stone tool research: Further work and a brief instrument comparison. Scanning, 33(5), 294–303. doi: 10.1002/sca.20272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulks, N. R., Kimball, L. R., Hidjrati, N., & Coffey, T. S. (2011). Atomic force microscopy of microwear traces on Mousterian tools from Myshtylagty Lagat (Weasel Cave), Russia. Scanning, 33, 304–315. doi: 10.1002/sca.20273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidjrati, N., Kimball, L. R., & Koetje, T. A. (2003). Middle and Late Pleistocene investigations of Myshtulgaty Lagat (Weasel Cave) North Ossetia, Russia. Antiquity, 77, 298. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00092280
   Google Scholar
• Hidjrati, N., Kimball, L. R., Koetje, T. A., Cleghorn, N., Coffey, T., Kanukova, M., Nesmeynov, S., Voeykova, O., & Sautiyeva-Maslennikova, V. (2010). “Some results of interdisciplinary investigations of the Pleistocene cultural layers of Weasel Cave and Dormouse Hall in North Ossetia (in Russian).” In R. S. Bzarov, N. I. Hidjrati, Y.A. Dzitzzoity, T. K. Salbiev, & R. F. Fidarov (Eds.), The question of history and culture of the peoples of Russia (pp. 221–244). Vladikavkaz: North Osssetian State University, Insititute of History and Archaeology.
   Google Scholar
• Juel Jensen, H. (1994). Flint tools and plant working: Hidden traces of stone age technology. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juel Jensen, S. (1996). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, L. H. (1977). The functions of Paleolithic flint tools. Scientific American, 237, 108–126. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1177-108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, L. H. (1980). Experimental determination of stone tool use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, L. R., Allen, P. E., & Kimball, J. F. (1995). Microwear polishes as viewed through the atomic force microscope. Lithic Technology, 20, 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, L. R., Allen, P. E., Kimball, J. F., Schlichting, B., & Pham, K. (1998). The analysis of microwear polishes with the atomic force microscope. Proceedings of the XIII Congress of the International Union of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, ABACO, Forli, Italy, 1121–1132.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner Harry, J., Xiangdong, D., Costopoulos, A., & Ostoja-Starzewski, M. (2007). Lithic raw material physical properties and use-wear accrual. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 711–722. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohse, E. S. (1996). A computerized descriptive system for functional analysis of stone tools. Tebiwa, 26(1), 3–66.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, D. A. (2014). The application of focus variation microscopy for lithic use-wear quantification. Journal of Archaeological Science, 48, 26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansur-Franchomme, M. E. (1983). Scanning electron microscopy of dry hide working tools: The role of abrasives and humidity in microwear polish formation. Journal of Archaeological Science, 10, 223–230. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(83)90005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollé, A., & Vergès, J. M. (2008). SEM functional analysis and the mechanism of microwear formation. In L. Longo, & N. Skakun (Eds.), ‘Prehistoric technology’ 40 years later: Functional studies and the Russian legacy (pp. 39–50). Oxford: BAR International Series 1783.
   Google Scholar
• Ollé, A., & Vergès, J. M. (2014). The use of sequential experiments and SEM in documenting stone tool microwear. Journal of Archaeological Science, 48, 60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plisson, H. (1985). Etude fonctionnelle d’outillages lithiques préhistoriques par l’analyse des micro-usures: recherche méthodologique et archéologique (Thèse de Doctorat). L’Université de Paris I, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Semenov, S. A., & Schilinskii, V. E. (1971). Micrometrical analysis of traces of use on Palaeolithic tools (in Russian). Soviet Archaeology, 1, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Stemp, W. J., Watson, A., & Evans, A. A. (2016). Topical review: Surface analysis of stone and bone tools. Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties, 4, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemp, W. J., Lerner, H. J., & Kristant, E. H. (2013). Quantifying microwear on experimental mistassini quartzite scrapers: Preliminary results of exploratory research using LSCM and scale-sensitive fractal analysis. Scanning 35: 28–39. doi: 10.1002/sca.21032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemp, W. J., & Stemp, M. (2001). UBM laser profilometry and lithic use-wear analysis: A variable length scale investigation of surface topography. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 81–88. doi: 10.1006/jasc.2000.0547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemp, W. J., & Stemp, M. (2003). Documenting stages of polish development on experimental stone tools: Surface characterization by fractal geometry using UBM laser profilometry. Journal of Archaeological Science, 30, 287–296. doi: 10.1006/jasc.2002.0837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, N. E., Harro, D. R., & Hicklin, A. (2010). Practical quantitative lithic use-wear analysis using multiple classifiers. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 2671–2678. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unrath, G., Owen, L., van Gijn, A., Moss, E. H., Plisson, H., and Vaughan., P. (1986). An evaluation of use-wear studies: A multi-analyst approach. In Technical aspects of microwear studies on stone tools. Early Man News 9/10/11: 117–176.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gijn, A. (1986). Fish polish, fact and fiction. In L. R. Owen & G. Unrath (Eds.), Technical aspects of microwear on stone tools. Early Man News 9–11: 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gijn, A. (1990). The wear and tear of flint: Principles of functional analysis applied to Dutch Neolithic assemblages. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, 22, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gijn, A. (1996). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Van, Gijn, A.L. (2010) Flint in focus: the meaning of flint in the Neolithic and Bronze Age. Sidestone Press, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Yerkes, R. W. (1996). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar