A Bifacial Point of Extraordinary Dimensions Found in Paraná State, Southern Brazil

Bibliography

• Boldurian, A. T., Cotter, J. L. (1999). Clovis revisited: New perspectives on Paleoindian adaptations from Blackwater Draw. (Vol. 103). UPenn Museum of Archaeology.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A., Collins, M. B., & Hemmings, A. (2010). Clovis technology. International Monographs in prehistory. International Monographs in Prehistory.
   Google Scholar
• Dauvois, M. (1976). Precis de dessin dynamique et structural des industries litiquesprehistoriques. Perigueux, Fanlac.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. (1998). Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5(4), 345–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loponte, D., Carbonera, M., & Silvestre, R. (2015). Fishtail projectile points from South America: The Brazilian record. Archaeological Discovery, 3(3), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.4236/ad.2015.33009
   Google Scholar
• Loponte, D., Okumura, M., & Carbonera, M. (2016). New records of fishtail projectile points from Brazil and its implications for its peopling. Journal of Lithic Studies, 3(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v3i1.1312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentz Ribeiro, P. A. M., & Hentschke, O. (1976). Método para classificação de pontas-de-projétil e algumas aplicações práticas. Revista do CEPA (Santa Cruz do Sul), 3, 7–71.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno de Sousa, J. C. (2017). Paleoindian lithic Industries of southern Brazil: A technological study of the Laranjito archaeological site, Pleistocene-Holocene Transition. PaleoAmerica, 3(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2016.1248752
   Google Scholar
• Moreno de Sousa, J. C. (2019a). Tecnologia de ponta a ponta: Em busca de mudanças culturais durante o Holoceno em indústrias líticas do Sudeste e Sul do Brasil [PhD thesis, Museu Nacional, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro].
   Google Scholar
• Moreno de Sousa, J. C. (2019b). Bringing experimental lithic technology to Paleoamerican Brazilian Archaeology: replication studies on the Rioclarense and Garivaldinense industries. EXARC Journal. 3. Persistent identifier https://exarc.net/ark:/88735/10440.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno de Sousa, J. C., & Okumura, M. (2018). The association of palaeoindian sites from southern Brazil and Uruguay with the Umbu Tradition: Comments on Suárez et al.(2017). Quaternary International, 467, 292–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.11.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura, M. (2015). Dardo ou flecha? Testes e reflexões sobre a tecnologia de uso de pontas de projétil no Sudeste e Sul do Brasil durante a pré-história. Cadernos do Lepaarq, XII(24), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.15210/LEPAARQ.V12I24.5623
   Google Scholar
• Okumura, M. (2018). Boundaries and identities in prehistory: the relation between raw material and shape of lithic bifacial points in southeastern and southern Brazil. In Alcántara, Manuel; Monteiro, Mercedes García, López, Francisco Sánchez. Arqueología, Actas del 56° CongresoInternacional de Americanistas, Salamanca. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca y losautores. ISBN 978-84-9012-913-5.
   Google Scholar
• Okumura, M., & Araujo, A. (2013). Pontas Bifaciais no Brasil Meridional: Caracterização Estatística das Formas e suas Implicações Culturais. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, Universidade de São Paulo, 23(23), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2448-1750.revmae.2013.106842
   Google Scholar
• Okumura, M., & Araujo, A. (2016). The Southern Divide: Testing morphological differences among bifacial points from Southern and South-eastern Brazil using geometric morphometrics. Journal of Lithic Studies, 3(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v3i1.1379.ISSN 2055-0472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura, M., & Araujo, A. (2017). Fronteiras Sul e Sudeste: uma análise morfométrica de pontas bifaciais de Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Paraná e Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil). Journal of Lithic Studies, 4(3), 163–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v4i3.1619
   Google Scholar
• Okumura, M., & Araujo, A. G. M. (2014). Long-term cultural stability in hunter–gatherers: A case study using traditional and geometric morphometric analysis of lithic stemmed bifacial points from southern Brazil. Journal of Archaeological Science, 45, 59–71. ISSN: 0305-4403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura, M., & Araujo, A. G. M. (2015). Contributions to the dart versus arrow Debate: New Data from Holocene projectile points from Southeastern and southern Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 87(4), 2349–2373. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520140625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodet, M. J., Duarte-Talim, D., Souza, J., & Cruz, I. R. (2014). Nota sobre a ponta bifacial em sílex encontrada no município de Itamarandiba, estado de Minas Gerais. Arquivos do Museu de História Natural e Jardim Botânico da UFMG, 23(2), 142–151.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, M. J. (1997). Stones and shafts redux: The metric discrimination of chipped-stone dart and arrow points. American Antiquity, 62(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/282380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade, A. M. (2010). Clovis: What´s the point? A study of thick-bodied and thin-bodied fluted projectile point variability [MA dissertation, Faculty of Humanities, School of Humanities, University of Southampton].
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. H. (1978). Arrowheads and atlatl darts: How the stones got the shaft. American Antiquity, 43(3), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/279405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar