References
- Adovasio, J. M., & Dillehay, T. D. (2020). Perishable technology and the successful peopling of South America. PaleoAmerica, 6(3), 210–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2019.1686849
- Adovasio, J. M., Soffer, O., Illingworth, J. S., & Hyland, D. C. (2014). Perishable fiber artifacts and paleoindians: New implications. North American Archaeologist, 35(4), 331–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2190/NA.35.4.d
- Amick, D. S. (2017). Evolving views on the Pleistocene colonization of North America. Quaternary International, 431, 125–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.030
- Anderson, D. G. (1990). The Paleoindian colonization of eastern North America. In B. Isaac & K. Tankersley (Eds.), Early Paleoindian economies of eastern North America (Supplement 5) (pp. 163–216). Research in Economic Anthropology/JAI.
- Bebber, M. R., Lycett, S. J., & Eren, M. I. (2017). Developing a stable point: evaluating the temporal and geographic consistency of Late Prehistoric unnotched triangular point functional design in Midwestern North America. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 47, 72–82.
- Bebber, M. R., Wilson, M., Kramer, A., Meindl, R. S., Buchanan, B., & Eren, M. I. (2020). The non-invention of the ceramic arrowhead in world archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 31, 102283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102283
- Bradley, B. A., Collins, M. B., & Hemmings, A. (2010). Clovis Technology. International monographs in prehistory.
- Buchanan, B., & Hamilton, M. J. (2020). Scaling laws of Paleoindian projectile point design. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-020-09481-8
- Buchanan, B., O’Brien, M. J., & Collard, M. (2014). Continent-wide or region-specific? A geometric morphometrics-based assessment of variation in Clovis point shape. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 6(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-013-0168-x
- Cheshier, J., & Kelly, R. L. (2006). Projectile point shape and durability: The effect of thickness:length. American Antiquity, 71(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/40035908
- Ellis, C. J. (1997). Factors influencing the use of stone projectile tips. In H. Knecht (Ed.), Projectile Technology (pp. 37–74). Springer.
- Engelbrecht, W. (2015). Interpreting broken arrow points. American Antiquity, 80(4), 760–766. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.80.4.760
- Eren, M. I., & Buchanan, B. (2016). Clovis Technology. eLS, 1–9.
- Eren, M. I., Buchanan, B., & O'Brien, M. J. (2015). Social learning and technological evolution during the Clovis colonization of the New world. Journal of Human Evolution, 80, 159–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.01.002
- Eren, M. I., Lycett, S., Patten, R., Buchanan, B., Pargeter, J., & O’Brien, M. (2016). Test, model, and method validation: The role of experimental stone artifact replication in hypothesis-driven archaeology. Ethnoarchaeology, 8(2), 103–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19442890.2016.1213972
- Eren, M. I., Romans, J., Buchanan, B., & Bebber, M. R. (2021). Validating chronograph photo sensor measurement accuracy of stone-tipped projectile velocity. Measurement: Sensors, 13, 100037.
- Eren, M. I., Story, B., Perrone, A., Bebber, M., Hamilton, M., Walker, R., & Buchanan, B. (2020). North American Clovis point form and performance: An experimental assessment of penetration depth. Lithic Technology, 45(4), 263–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2020.1794358
- Fauvelle, M., Smith, E. M., Brown, S. H., & Des Lauriers, M. R. (2012). Asphaltum hafting and projectile point durability: An experimental comparison of three hafting methods. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(8), 2802–2809. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.014
- Frison, G. C. (1989). Experimental use of Clovis weaponry and tools on African elephants. American Antiquity, 54(4), 766–784. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/280681
- Frison, G. C., & Todd, L. C. (1986). The Colby mammoth site: Taphonomy and archaeology of a Clovis kill in Northern Wyoming. University of New Mexico Press.
- Hamilton, M. J., & Buchanan, B. (2009). The accumulation of stochastic copying errors causes drift in culturally transmitted technologies: Quantifying Clovis evolutionary dynamics. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2008.10.005
- Huckell, B. B. (1979). Of chipped stone tools, elephants, and the Clovis hunters: An experiment. Plains Anthropologist, 24(85), 177–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2052546.1979.11908930
- Huckell, B. B., & Kilby, J. D. (2014). Clovis caches: Recent discoveries and new research. University of New Mexico Press.
- Hunzicker, D. A. (2008). Folsom projectile technology: An experiment in design, effectiveness and efficiency. Plains Anthropologist, 53(207), 291–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1179/pan.2008.020
- Hurcombe, L. (2008). Organics from inorganics: Using experimental archaeology as a research tool for studying perishable material culture. World Archaeology, 40(1), 83–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240801889423
- Jennings, T. A., & Smallwood, A. M. (2019). The Clovis record. SAA Archaeological Record, 19, 45–50.
- Jennings, T. A., Smallwood, A. M., & Pevny, C. D. (2021). Reviewing the role of experimentation in reconstructing paleoamerican lithic technologies. PaleoAmerica, 7(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1848269
- Kilby, J. D. (2008). An investigation of Clovis caches: Content, function, and technological organization. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of New Mexico.
- Loendorf, C., Blikre, L., Bryce, W., Oliver, T., Denoyer, A., & Wermers, G. (2018). Raw material impact strength and flaked stone projectile point performance. Journal of Archaeological Science, 90, 50–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.12.003
- Lowe, C., Kramer, A., Wilson, M., Meindl, R., Spurlock, L., & Eren, M. I. (2019). Controlled ballistics tests of ground, percussion-flaked, and pressure-flaked projectile point impact durability: Implications for archaeological method and theory. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 24, 677–682. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.02.017
- Lowrey, N. S. (1999). An ethnoarchaeological inquiry into the functional relationship between projectile point and armor technologies of the northwest coast. North American Archaeologist, 20(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2190/YG4T-2YG1-0NWP-HTCA
- Lycett, S. J., & Eren, M. I. (2013). Levallois lessons: The challenge of integrating mathematical models, quantitative experiments and the archaeological record. World Archaeology, 45(4), 519–538.
- Maguire, L., Wilson, M., Buchanan, B., & Eren, M. I. (2021). The effect of isometric scaling on flaked stone projectile point impact durability. Lithic Technology.
- Meltzer, D. J. (2021). First peoples in a new world. University of Cambridge Press.
- Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution. University of Chicago Press.
- Mika, A., Flood, K., Norris, J. D., Wilson, M., Key, A., Buchanan, B., Redmond, B., Pargeter, J., Bebber, M., & Eren, M. I. (2020). Miniaturization optimized weapon killing power during the social stress of late pre-contact North America (AD 600-1600). PLoS ONE, 15(3), e0230348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230348
- Miller, G. L. (2014). Lithic microwear analysis as a means to infer production of perishable technology: A case from the great lakes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 49, 292–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.019
- Morrow, J. E., & Morrow, T. A. (1999). Geographic variation in fluted projectile points: A hemispheric perspective. American Antiquity, 64(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2694275
- O’Brien, M. J., Boulanger, M. T., Buchanan, B., Collard, M., Lyman, R. L., & Darwent, J. (2014). Innovation and cultural transmission in the American paleolithic: Phylogenetic analysis of eastern Paleoindian projectile-point classes. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 34, 100–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2014.03.001
- O’Brien, M. J., Buchanan, B., & Eren, M. I. (2016). Clovis colonization of eastern North America: A phylogenetic approach. STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research, 2(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20548923.2016.1183920
- O’Brien, M. J., Lyman, R. L., Buchanan, B., & Collard, M. (2016). A review of late Pleistocene North American bone and ivory tools. In M. Langley (Ed.), Osseous projectile weaponry (pp. 221–235). Springer.
- Odell, G. H., & Cowan, F. (1986). Experiments with spears and arrows on animal targets. Journal of Field Archaeology, 13, 195–212.
- Outram, A. K. (2008). Introduction to experimental archaeology. World Archaeology, 40(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240801889456
- Prasciunas, M. M., & Surovell, T. (2015). Reevaluating the duration of Clovis: The problem of non-representative radiocarbon. In A. Smallwood & T. Jennings (Eds.), Clovis: On the edge of a new understanding (pp. 21–35). Texas A&M University Press.
- Redmond, B. G., & Tankersley, K. B. (2005). Evidence of early Paleoindian bone modification and use at the Sheriden Cave site (33WY252), Wyandot County, Ohio. American Antiquity, 70, 503–526.
- Richard, A. J. (2015). Clovis and Folsom functionality comparison [MA thesis]. University of Arizona, Tucson.
- Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2014a). Copying error and the cultural evolution of” additive” vs.” reductive” material traditions: An experimental assessment. American Antiquity, 79(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.79.1.128
- Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2014b). Considering the role of time budgets on copy-error rates in material culture traditions: An experimental assessment. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e97157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097157
- Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2015). The impact of imitative versus emulative learning mechanisms on artifactual variation: Implications for the evolution of material culture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(6), 446–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.04.003
- Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2016). Copying error, evolution, and phylogenetic signal in artifactual traditions: An experimental approach using “model artifacts”. Journal of Archaeological Science, 70, 23–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.04.013
- Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2017). Differences in manufacturing traditions and assemblage-level patterns: The origins of cultural differences in archaeological data. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24(2), 640–658. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9280-4
- Sholts, S. B., Stanford, D. J., Flores, L. M., & Wärmländer, S. K. (2012). Flake scar patterns of Clovis points analyzed with a new digital morphometrics approach: Evidence for direct transmission of technological knowledge across early North America. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(9), 3018–3026. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.049
- Sisk, M. L., & Shea, J. J. (2009). Experimental use and quantitative performance analysis of triangular flakes (Levallois points) used as arrowheads. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(9), 2039–2047. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.023
- Sitton, J., Story B., Buchanan, B., & Eren, M. I. (2020). Tip cross-sectional geometry predicts the penetration depth of stone-tipped projectiles. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70264-y
- Smallwood, A. M. (2010). Clovis biface technology at the topper site, South Carolina: Evidence for variation and technological flexibility. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(10), 2413–2425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.05.002
- Smallwood, A. M. (2012). Clovis technology and settlement in the American southeast: Using biface analysis to evaluate dispersal models. American Antiquity, 77(4), 689–713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.77.4.689
- Smith, H., Smallwood, A., & DeWitt, T. (2015). Defining the normative range of Clovis fluted point shape using geographic models of geometric morphometric variation. In A. Smallwood & T. Jennings (Eds.), Clovis: On the edge of a new understanding (pp. 161–180). Texas A&M Press.
- Snyder, B. J. (2017). An examination of variation in function among early paleoindian weapon systems on the plains [Doctoral dissertation]. Northern Arizona University.
- Story, B. A., Eren, M. I., Thomas, K., Buchanan, B., & Meltzer, D. J. (2019). Why are Clovis fluted points more resilient than Non-fluted lanceolate points? A quantitative assessment of breakage patterns between experimental models. Archaeometry, 61(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12407
- Thomas, K. A., Story, B. A., Eren, M. I., Buchanan, B., Andrews, B. N., O'Brien, M. J., & Meltzer, D. J. (2017). Explaining the origin of fluting in North American Pleistocene weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Science, 81, 23–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.03.004
- Titmus, G. L., & Woods, J. C. (1986). An experimental study of projectile point fracture patterns. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 8, 37–49.
- Waters, M. R., & Stafford, T. W. (2007). Redefining the age of Clovis: Implications for the peopling of the Americas. Science, 315(5815), 1122–1126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137166
- Waters, M. R., Stafford, T., & Carlson, D. (2020). The age of Clovis – 13,050 to 12,750 cal yr B.P. Science Advances, 6, eaaz0455.
- Werner, A., Kramer, A., Reedy, C., Bebber, M., Pargeter, J., & Eren, M. I. (2019). Experimental assessment of proximal-lateral edge grinding on haft damage using replicated late Pleistocene (Clovis) stone projectile points. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(11), 5833–5849. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-017-0594-2
- Whittaker, J. C. (2010). Weapon trials: The atlatl and experiments in hunting technology. In J. Ferguson (Ed.), Designing experimental Research in archaeology (pp. 195–224). University of Colorado Press.
- Whittaker, J. C., Pettigrew, D. B., & Grohsmeyer, R. J. (2017). Atlatl dart velocity: Accurate measurements and implications for Paleoindian and archaic archaeology. PaleoAmerica, 3(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2017.1301133
- Wilson, M., Perrone, A., Smith, H., Norris, D., Pargeter, J., & Eren, M. I. (2020). Modern thermoplastic (hot glue) versus organic-based adhesives and haft bond failure rate in experimental prehistoric ballistics. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 104, 102717. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102717
- Wood, J., & Fitzhugh, B. (2018). Wound ballistics: The prey specific implications of penetrating trauma injuries from osseous, flaked stone, and composite inset microblade projectiles during the pleistocene/holocene transition, Alaska USA. Journal of Archaeological Science, 91, 104–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.10.006