North American Clovis Point Form and Performance III: An Experimental Assessment of Knife Cutting Efficiency

References

• Atkins, A. G., Xu, X., & Jeronimidis, G. (2004). Cutting, by ‘pressing and slicing,’ of thin floppy slices of materials illustrated by experiments on cheddar cheese and salami. Journal of Materials Science, 39(8), 2761–2766. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000021451.17182.86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamforth, D. B., & Bleed, P. (1997). Technology, flake stone technology, and risk. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 7(1), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1997.7.1.109
   Google Scholar
• Bebber, M. R. (2017). Tempered strength: A controlled experiment assessing opportunity costs of adding temper to clay. Journal of Archaeological Science, 86, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebber, M. R., Miller, G. L., Boulanger, M. T., Andrews, B. N., Redmond, B. G., Jackson, D., & Eren, M. I. (2017). Description and microwear analysis of Clovis artifacts on a glacially-deposited secondary chert source near the Hartley Mastodon discovery, Columbiana County, Northeastern Ohio, U.S.A. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 12, 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.02.027
   Google Scholar
• Bebber, M. R., Norris, J. D., Flood, K., Fisch, M., Meindl, R. S., & Eren, M. I. (2019). Controlled experiments support the role of function in the evolution of the North American copper tool repertoire. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 26, 101917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.101917
   Google Scholar
• Beers, J. D. (2006). A usewear analysis of clovis informal stone tools from the Gault site, Texas. [Unpublished M.A. Thesis]. Department of Anthropology, University of Wyoming.
   Google Scholar
• Bleed, P. (2001). Trees or chains, links or branches: Conceptual alternatives for consideration of stone tool production and other sequential activities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 8(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009526016167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleed, P. (2002). Cheap, regular, and reliable: Implications of design variation in Late Pleistocene Japanese microblade technology. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 12(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.2002.12.1.95
   Google Scholar
• Boulanger, M. T., Buchanan, B., O’Brien, M. J., Redmond, B. G., Glascock, M. D., & Eren, M. I. (2015). Neutron activation analysis of 12,900-year-old stone artifacts confirms 450–510+ km Clovis tool-stone acquisition at Paleo Crossing (33ME274), northeast Ohio, U.S.A. Journal of Archaeological Science, 53, 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A., Collins, M. B., & Hemmings, C. A. (2010). Clovis technology. International Monographs in Prehistory.
   Google Scholar
• Broughton, J. M., & O'connell, J. F. (1999). On evolutionary ecology, selectionist archaeology, and behavioral archaeology. American Antiquity, 64(1), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/2694351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., Andrews, B., O'Brien, M. J., & Eren, M. I. (2018). An assessment of stone weapon tip standardization during the Clovis–Folsom Transition in the Western United States. American Antiquity, 83(4), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2018.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., Eren, M. I., Boulanger, M. T., & O'Brien, M. J. (2015). Size, shape, scars, and spatial patterning: A quantitative assessment of late Pleistocene (Clovis) point resharpening. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 3, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.05.011
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., O’Brien, M. J., & Collard, M. (2014). Continent-wide or region-specific? A geometric morphometrics-based assessment of variation in Clovis point shape. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 6(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-013-0168-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. J. Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Solera, S. D. (2012). With only one flake. An experiment about the possibilities of processing a carcass with flint during hunting. Journal of Taphonomy, 10(2), 113–121.
   Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I. (2013). The technology of stone age colonization: An empirical, regional-scale examination of Clovis unifacial stone tool reduction, allometry, and edge angle from the North American Lower Great Lakes region. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(4), 2101–2112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., Bebber, M. R., Miller, G. L., Buchanan, B., Boulanger, M., & Patten, R. J. (2018). Description, morphometrics, and microwear of late Pleistocene-early Holocene artifacts from Southwestern Kentucky, U.S.A. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 20, 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.04.038
   Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., Bebber, M. R., Wilcox, D., Story, B., & Buchanan, B. (2021). North American Clovis point form and performance II: An experimental assessment of point, haft, and shaft durability. Lithic Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2021.1926724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., & Buchanan, B. (2016). Clovis technology. eLS, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0026512
   Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., Buchanan, B., & O'Brien, M. J. (2015). Social learning and technological evolution during the Clovis colonization of the new world. Journal of Human Evolution, 80, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., Lycett, S. J., Patten, R. J., Buchanan, B., Pargeter, J., & O'Brien, M. J. (2016). Test, model, and method validation: The role of experimental stone artifact replication in hypothesis-driven archaeology. Ethnoarchaeology, 8(2), 103–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/19442890.2016.1213972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., Story, B., Perrone, A., Bebber, M., Hamilton, M., Walker, R., & Buchanan, B. (2020). North American Clovis point form and performance: An experimental assessment of penetration depth. Lithic Technology, 45(4), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2020.1794358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingerich, J. A., & Stanford, D. J. (2018). Lessons from Ginsberg: An analysis of elephant butchery tools. Quaternary International, 466, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramly, R. M. (1999). The lamb site: A pioneering Clovis encampment. Persimmon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gramly, R. M., & Yahnig, C. (1991). The Adams site (15Ch90) and the Little River, Christian County, Kentucky, Clovis workshop complex. Southeastern Archaeology, 10, 134–145.
   Google Scholar
• Hannus, L. A. (2018). Clovis Mammoth butchery: the Lange/Ferguson site and associated bone tool technology. Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holdaway, S., & Douglass, M. (2012). A twenty-first century archaeology of stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 19(1), 101–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-011-9103-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckell, B. B. (1979). Of chipped stone tools, elephants, and the Clovis hunters: An experiment. Plains Anthropologist, 24(85), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/2052546.1979.11908930
   Google Scholar
• Ioviţă, R. (2010). Comparing stone tool resharpening trajectories with the aid of elliptical Fourier analysis. In S. J. Lycett & P. Chauhan (Eds.), New perspectives on old stones (pp. 235–253). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, T. A. (2013). The Hogeye Clovis Cache, Texas: Quantifying lithic reduction signatures. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(1), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, T. A., & Smallwood, A. M. (2019). The Clovis record. SAA Archaeological Record, 19(3), 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Jeske, R. (1992). Energetic efficiency and lithic technology: An upper Mississippian example. American Antiquity, 57(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/280935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, M. (1996). Microwear analysis of some Clovis and experimental chipped stone tools. In G. Odell (Ed.), Stone tools (pp. 315–344). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, M. (2018). Use-wear analysis of the Lange/Ferguson chipped stone artifacts. In A. Hannus (Ed.), Clovis Mammoth Butchery: The Lange/Ferguson site and associated bone tool technology (pp. 201–210). Texas A&M Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelterborn, P. (1984). Towards replicating Egyptian Predynastic flint knives. Journal of Archaeological Science, 11(6), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4403(84)90023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2020). Torque creation and force variation along the cutting edges of Acheulean handaxes: Implications for tip thinning, resharpening and tranchet flake removals. Journal of Archaeological Science, 120, 105189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, A. J., & Lycett, S. J. (2011). Technology based evolution? A biometric test of the effects of handsize versus tool form on efficiency in an experimental cutting task. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(7), 1663–1670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, A. J., & Lycett, S. J. (2014). Are bigger flakes always better? An experimental assessment of flake size variation on cutting efficiency and loading. Journal of Archaeological Science, 41, 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, A. J., & Lycett, S. J. (2018). Investigating interrelationships between Lower Palaeolithic stone tool effectiveness and tool user biometric variation: Implications for technological and evolutionary changes. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10(5), 989–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0433-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, A. J. M. (2016). Integrating mechanical and ergonomic research within functional and morphological analyses of lithic cutting technology: Key principles and future experimental directions. Lithic Technology, 8(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19442890.2016.1150626
   Google Scholar
• Key, A. J. M., Farr, I., Hunter, R., Mika, A., Eren, M. I., & Winter, S. L. (2021). Why invent the handle? Electromyography (EMG) and efficiency of use data investigating the prehistoric origin and selection of hafted stone knives. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 13(10), 162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01421-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, S. L., & Miller, D. S. (2015). Artifacts as patches: The marginal value theorem and stone tool life histories. In N. Goodale & W. Andrefsky (Eds.), Lithic technological systems and evolutionary theory (pp. 172–197). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loebel, T. J. (2013). Endscrapers, use-wear, and early Paleoindians in Eastern North America. In J. A. M. Gingerich (Ed.), In the Eastern fluted point tradition (pp. 315–330). University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lycett, S. J. (2011). “Most beautiful and most wonderful”: Those endless stone tool forms. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 9(2), 143–171. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.9.2011.23.1
   Google Scholar
• Lycett, S. J. (2015). Cultural evolutionary approaches to artifact variation over time and space: Basis, progress, and prospects. Journal of Archaeological Science, 56, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, S. J. (2016). The importance of a “quantitative genetic” approach to the evolution of artifact morphological traits. In L. M. Straffon (Ed.), Cultural phylogenetics (pp. 73–93). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lycett, S. J., & Eren, M. I. (2013). Levallois economics: An examination of ‘waste’production in experimentally produced Levallois reduction sequences. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(5), 2384–2392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, S. J., Schillinger, K., Eren, M. I., von Cramon-Taubadel, N., & Mesoudi, A. (2016). Factors affecting Acheulean handaxe variation: Experimental insights, microevolutionary processes, and macroevolutionary outcomes. Quaternary International, 411, 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, S. J., & von Cramon-Taubadel, N. (2015). Toward a “quantitative genetic” approach to lithic variation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(2), 646–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-013-9200-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyman, R. L., O'Brien, M. J., & Hayes, V. (1998). A mechanical and functional study of bone rods from the Richey–Roberts Clovis cache, Washington, U.S.A.. Journal of Archaeological Science, 25(9), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1997.0270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, T. R., & Hiscock, P. (2021). Lithic utility and risk: Examining mid to late Holocene stone points from Australia with a utility model. Journal of Archaeological Science, 134, 105467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2021.105467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzke, M. W., & Wullstein, K. L. (1996). Chimpanzee and human grips: A new classification with a focus on evolutionary morphology. International Journal of Primatology, 17(1), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, D. J. (1993). Is there a Clovis adaptation? In O. Soffer & N. Praslov (Eds.), From Kostenki to Clovis (pp. 293–310). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, D. J. (2021). First peoples in a new world (2nd ed.). University of Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mesoudi, A., & O’Brien, M. J. (2008). The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile-point technology I: An experimental simulation. American Antiquity, 73(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002731600041263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. L. (2013). Illuminating activities at Paleo Crossing (33ME274) through microwear analysis. Lithic Technology, 38(2), 108–197. https://doi.org/10.1179/0197726113Z.00000000012
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. L., Bebber, M. R., Rutkoski, A., Haythorn, R., Boulanger, M. T., Buchanan, B., Bush, J., Lovejoy, C. O., & Eren, M. I. (2019). Hunter-gatherer gatherings: Stone-tool microwear from the welling site (33-Co-2), Ohio, U.S.A. supports Clovis use of outcrop-related base camps during the Pleistocene peopling of the Americas. World Archaeology, 51(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2018.1461128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, J. E. (2019). On fluted point morphometrics, cladistics, and the origins of the Clovis Culture. PaleoAmerica, 5(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2019.1618179
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, T. A. (1996). Bigger is better: Comments on Kuhn's formal approach to mobile tool kits. American Antiquity, 61(3), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.2307/281842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. J., Holland, T. D., Hoard, R. J., & Fox, G. L. (1994). Evolutionary implications of design and performance characteristics of prehistoric pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1(3), 259–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02231877
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. J., Lyman, R. L., & Leonard, R. D. (1998). Basic incompatibilities between evolutionary and behavioral archaeology. American Antiquity, 63(3), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.2307/2694632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohio Archaeologist. (1964). Ohio Archaeologist, 14, 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Reti, J. S. (2016). Quantifying oldowan stone tool production at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. PLoS ONE, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzenthaler, R. E. (1957). The old copper culture. The Wisconsin Archeologist, 38(4).
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, M. B. (1972). Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity, 37(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/278203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2014). Copying error and the cultural evolution of “additive” vs. “reductive” material traditions: An experimental assessment. American Antiquity, 79(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.79.1.128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffer, M. B., & Skibo, J. M. (1987). Theory and experiment in the study of technological change. Current Anthropology, 28(5), 595–622. https://doi.org/10.1086/203601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffer, M. B., & Skibo, J. M. (1997). The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity, 62(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/282378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoberg, M. (2010). Functional analysis of Clovis tools. In B. Bradley, M. Collins, & C. Hemmings (Eds.), Clovis technology (pp. 138–156). International Monographs in Prehistory.
   Google Scholar
• Sholts, S. B., Stanford, D. J., Flores, L. M., & Wärmländer, S. K. (2012). Flake scar patterns of Clovis points analyzed with a new digital morphometrics approach: Evidence for direct transmission of technological knowledge across early North America. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(9), 3018–3026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shott, M. J., & Otárola-Castillo, E. (2021). Parts and wholes: Reduction allometry and modularity in experimental Folsom points. American Antiquity, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2021.62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shott, M. J., Williams, J. P., & Slade, A. M. (2021). Measuring allometry in dimensions of western North American Clovis points. Journal of Archaeological Science, 131, 105359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2021.105359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, S. J., Sword, G. A., & Lo, N. (2011). Polyphenism in insects. Current Biology, 21(18), R738–R749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood, A. M. (2010). Use-wear analysis of the Clovis biface collection from the Gault site in central Texas [Doctoral dissertation]. Texas A & M University.
   Google Scholar
• Smallwood, A. M. (2012). Clovis technology and settlement in the American Southeast: Using biface analysis to evaluate dispersal models. American Antiquity, 77(4), 689–713. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.77.4.689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood, A. M. (2015). Building experimental use-wear analogues for Clovis biface functions. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 7(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-013-0139-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L., Jennings, T. A., & Smallwood, A. M. (2021). Do early Paleoindian point blades carry culturally significant shape information? Modules versus complete points using geometric morphometrics. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 40, 103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103245
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L., Smallwood, A. M., & DeWitt, T. (2015). A geometric morphometric exploration of Clovis fluted point shape variability. In A. M. Smallwood & T. A. Jennings (Eds.), Clovis: On the edge of a new understanding (pp. 161–180). Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, M. W. (1996). Commodity or gift: Teotihuacan obsidian in the Maya region. Latin American Antiquity, 7(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3537012
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, N. E., & McElreath, R. (2015). When are two tools better than one? Mortars, millingslabs, and the California acorn economy. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 37, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2014.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiner, M. C., & Kuhn, S. L. (2016). Are we missing the “sweet spot” between optimality theory and niche construction theory in archaeology? Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 44, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2016.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story, B. A., Eren, M. I., Thomas, K., Buchanan, B., & Meltzer, D. J. (2019). Why are Clovis fluted points more resilient than non-fluted lanceolate points? A quantitative assessment of breakage patterns between experimental models. Archaeometry, 61(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surovell, T. A. (2009). Toward a behavioral ecology of lithic technology. University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. A., Story, B. A., Eren, M. I., Buchanan, B., Andrews, B. N., O’Brien, M. J., & Meltzer, D. J. (2017). Explaining the origin of fluting in North American Pleistocene weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Science, 81, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurmond, J. P. (1990). A small Clovis assemblage from Western Oklahoma. Plains Anthropologist, 35(129), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/2052546.1990.11909546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomka, S. A. (2001). An ethnoarchaeological study of tool design and selection in an Andean agro-pastoral context. Latin American Antiquity, 12(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/972086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrence, R. (1989). Time, energy and stone tools. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trampisch, U. S., Franke, J., Jedamzik, N., Hinrichs, T., & Platen, P. (2012). Optimal Jamar dynamometer handle position to assess maximal isometric hand grip strength in epidemiological studies. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 37(11), 2368–2373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tune, J. W. (2016). The Clovis–Cumberland–Dalton succession: Settling into the Midsouth United States during the Pleistocene to Holocene transition. PaleoAmerica, 2(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2016.1199193
   Google Scholar
• Vermilion, M. R., Krekeler, M. P., & Keeley, L. H. (2003). Pigment identification on two Moorehead phase Ramey knives from the Loyd site, a prehistoric Mississippian homestead. Journal of Archaeological Science, 30(11), 1459–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4403(03)00041-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, P. L. (1978). Butchering and stone tool function. American Antiquity, 43(4), 710–715. https://doi.org/10.2307/279502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, M. R., Pevny, C. D., & Carlson, D. L. (2011). Clovis lithic technology. Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, A., Jones, K., Miller, G. L., Buchanan, B., Boulanger, M. T., Key, A. J. M., Reedy, C., Bebber, M. R., & Eren, M. I. (2017). The morphometrics and microwear of a small Clovis assemblage from guernsey county, Southeastern Ohio, U.S.A. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 15, 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.07.029
   Google Scholar
• Werner, A., Kramer, A., Reedy, C., Bebber, M. R., Pargeter, J., & Eren, M. I. (2019). Experimental assessment of proximal-lateral edge grinding on haft damage using replicated Late Pleistocene (Clovis) stone projectile points. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(11), 5833–5849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-017-0594-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., Perrone, A., Smith, H., Norris, D., Pargeter, J., & Eren, M. I. (2021). Modern thermoplastic (hot glue) versus organic-based adhesives and haft bond failure rate in experimental prehistoric ballistics. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 104, 102717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. H., & Andrew Pospisilik, J. (2019). Polyphenism – A window into gene-environment interactions and phenotypic plasticity. Frontiers in Genetics, 10, 132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar