1,332
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Intercomparison of Form, Size and Allometry in a Million-year-old and Modern Replicated Handaxe Set

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Archer, W., & Braun, D. R. (2010). Variability in bifacial technology at Elandsfontein, Western cap, South Africa: A geometric morphometric approach. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(1), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.033
  • Arroyo, A., Proffitt, T., & Key, A. (2019). Morphometric and technological analysis of Acheulean large cutting tools from Porzuna (Ciudad Real, Spain) and questions of African affinities. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 27, 101992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.101992
  • Ashton, N., & Davis, R. (2021). Cultural mosaics, social structure, and identity: The Acheulean threshold in Europe. Journal of Human Evolution, 156, 103011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103011
  • Baber, C. (2009). Cognition and tool use: Forms of engagement in human and animal use of tools. Taylor & Francis.
  • Bishop, W. W. (1978). Geological framework of the Kilombe Acheulian site, Kenya. In W. W. Bishop (Ed.), Geological background to fossil man (pp. 329–336). Scottish Academic Press.
  • Callow, P. (1976). The lower and middle palaeolithic of Britain and adjacent areas of Europe. [Unpublished PhD dissertation]. University of Cambridge.
  • Clark, J. D. (2001). Variability in primary and secondary technologies of the later Acheulian in Africa. In S. Milliken, & J. Cook (Eds.), A very remote period indeed: Papers on the palaeolithic presented to Derek Roe (pp. 1–18). Oxbow Books.
  • Cole, J. (2012). The identity model: a theory to access visual display and hominin cognition within the palaeolithic. In Cole, James and Ruebens, Karen (Eds.), Human Origins (Vol. 1., pp. 24-40). (Papers from the British Academy. Lucy to Language: Archaeology of the Social Brain. Seminar Series on Palaeolithic Visual Display) Oxford, GB. Archaeopress.
  • Cole, J. (2015). Handaxe symmetry in the lower and middle palaeolithic: Implications for the Acheulean gaze. In F. Wenban-Smith, F. Coward, R. Hosfield, & M. Pope (Eds.), Settlement, society and cognition in human evolution (pp. 234–257). Cambridge University Press.
  • Cole, J. (2017). Accessing hominin cognition: Language and social signalling in the lower to middle palaeolithic. In T. Wynn, & F. Coolidge (Eds.), Cognitive models in palaeolithic archaeology (pp. 157–186). Oxford University Press.
  • Costa, A. G. (2010). A geometric morphometric assessment of plan shape in bone and stone acheulean bifaces from the middle pleistocene site of Castel di Guido, latium, Italy. In S. Lycett, & P. Chauhan (Eds.), New perspectives on old stones (pp. 23–41). Springer.
  • Crompton, R. H., & Gowlett, J. A. J. (1993). Allometry and multidimensional form in Acheulean bifaces from Kilombe, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution, 25(3), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1993.1043
  • de la Torre. (2016). The origins of the Acheulean: Past and present perspectives on a major transition in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0245
  • de la Torre, I., Mora, R., Arroyo, A., & Benito-Calvo, A. (2014). Acheulean technological behaviour in the middle pleistocene landscape of Mieso (east-central Ethiopia). Journal of Human Evolution, 76, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.06.008
  • Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. (2012). Stone tools and fossil bones: Debates in the archaeology of human origins. Cambridge University Press.
  • Eren, M. I., Roos, C. I., Story, B. A., von Cramon-Taubedel, N., & Lycett, S. J. (2014). The role of raw material differences in stone tool shape variation: An experimental assessment. Journal of Archaeological Science, 49, 472–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.034
  • Gallotti, R., & Mussi, M. (2018). The emergence of the Acheulean in east Africa and beyond. Springer.
  • Goren-Inbar, N., & Sharon, G. (2006). Axe age: Acheulian tool-making from quarry to discard. Equinox.
  • Goren-Inbar, N., Sharon, G., Alperson-Afil, N., & Laschiver, I. (2008). The Acheulean massive scrapers of Gesher Benot Ya’aqov – a product of the biface chaîne opératoire. Journal of Human Evolution, 55(4), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.07.005
  • Gowlett, J.A.J., Brink, J.S., Herries, A.I.R., Hoare, S. & Rucina, S.M. (2017). The small and short of it: Mini-bifaces and points from Kilombe, Kenya, and their place in the Acheulean. In Wojtczak, D., Al Najjar, D.M., Jagher, R., Elsuede, H., & Wegmüller, F. (Eds.), Vocation Préhistoire: Homage à Jean-Marie Le Tensorer (pp. 121-132). ERAUL, University of Liege.
  • Gowlett, J. A. J. (2006). The elements of design form in Acheulian bifaces: Modes, modalities, rules and language. In N. Goren-Inbar, & G. Sharon (Eds.), Axe Age: Acheulian tool-making from quarry to discard (pp. 203–221). Equinox.
  • Gowlett, J. A. J. (2012). Shared intention in early artefacts: An exploration of deep structure and implications for communication and language. In S. C. Reynolds, & A. Gallagher (Eds.), African genesis: Perspectives on Hominin evolution (pp. 506–530). Cambridge University Press.
  • Gowlett, J. A. J. (2013). Elongation as a factor in artefacts of humans and other animals: An acheulean example in comparative context. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B., 368(1630), 20130114. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.01114
  • Gowlett, J. A. J., Brink, J. S., Herries, A. I. R., Hoare, S., Onjala, I., & Rucina, S. M. (2015). At the heart of the African Acheulean: The physical, social and cognitive landscapes of Kilombe. In F. Coward, R. Hosfield, & F. Wenban-Smith (Eds.), Settlement, society and cognition in human evolution: Landscapes in mind (pp. 75–93). Cambridge University Press.
  • Gowlett, J. A. J., & Crompton, R. H. (1994). Kariandusi: Acheulean morphology and the question of allometry. The African Archaeological Review, 12(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01953037
  • Gowlett, J. A. J., Crompton, R. H., & Yu, L. (2001). Allometric comparisons bewteen Acheulean and Sangoan large cutting tools at Kalambo falls. In J. D. Clark (Ed.), Kalambo falls prehistoric site, Vol 3: The earlier cultures: Middle and earlier stone Age (pp. 612–219). Cambridge University Press.
  • Grosman, L., Goldsmith, Y., & Smilansky, U. (2011). Morphological analysis of Nahal Zihor handaxes: A chronological perspective. Paleoanthropology, 2011, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.4207/PA.2011.ART53
  • Groucutt, H. S., White, T. S., Scerri, E. M. L., Andrieux, E., Clark-Wilson, R., Breeze, P. S., Armitage, S. J., Stewart, M., Drake, N., Louys, J., Price, G. J., Duval, M., Parton, A., Candy, I., Carleton, W. C., Shipton, C., Jennings, R. P., Zahir, M., Blinkhorn, J., … Petraglia, M. D. (2021). Multiple hominin dispersals into southwest Asia over the past 400,000 years. Nature, 597(7876), 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03863-y
  • Herries, A. I. R. (2011). New explorations and magnetobiostratigraphical analysis of the Kilombe Acheulian localitiy, Central Rift, Kenya. Paleoanthropology, 2011, 961401A16. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/961401
  • Herzlinger, G., & Goren-Inbar, N. (2020). Beyond a cutting edge: A morpho-technical analysis of Acheulian handaxes and cleavers from Gesher Benot Ya’aqov, Israel. Journal of Palaeolithic Archaeology, 3(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-019-00033-5
  • Herzlinger, G., Goren-Inbar, N., & Grosman, L. (2017). A new method for 3D geometric morphometric shape analysis: The case study of handaxe knapping skill. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 14, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.05.013
  • Hoare, S., Brink, J. S., Herries, A. I. R., Mark, D. F., Morgan, L. E., Onjala, S. M., Stanistreet, I., Stollhofen, H., & Gowlett, J. (2021). Geochronology of an ultra-long Pleistocene sequence from Kilombe volcano, Kenya. Journal of Archaeological Science, 125, 105273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105273
  • Hosfield, R., Cole, J., & McNabb, J. (2018). Less of a birds song than a hard rock ensemble. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 27(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21551
  • Hovers, E., Gossa, T., Asrat, A., Niespolo, E. M., Resom, A., Renne, P. R., Ekshtain, R., Herzlinger, G., Ketema, N., & Martinez-Navarro, B. (2021). The expansion of the Acheulian to the southeastern Ethiopian highlands: Insights from the new early Pleistocene site-complex of Melka Wakena. Quaternary Science Reviews, 253, 106763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106763
  • Iovita, R., & McPherron, S. P. (2011). The handaxe reloaded: A morphometric reassessment of Acheulian and middle paleolithic handaxes. Journal of Human Evolution, 61(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.007
  • Isaac, G. L. (1977). Olorgesailie: Archaeological studies of a middle pleistocene lake basin in Kenya. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Jolicoeur, P. (1963). The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation. Biometrics, 19(3), 497–499. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527939
  • Jones, P. R. (1980). Experimental butchery with modern stone tools and its relevance for palaeolithic archaeology. World Archaeology, 12(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1980.9979789
  • Jones, W. B. (1985). Discussion on the geological evolution of the trachyte caldera volcano Menengai, Kenya rift valley. Journal of the Geological Society, 142(4), 711–712. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.142.4.0711
  • Key, A. J. M. (2015). Form and function in the lower palaeolithic [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. University of Kent.
  • Key, A. J. M. (2019). Handaxe shape variation in a relative context. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 18(5), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2019.04.008
  • Key, A. J. M., & Lycett, S. J. (2017). Influence of handaxe size and shape on cutting efficiency: A large-scale experiment and morphometric analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24(2), 514–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9276-0
  • Klingenberg, C. P. (2016). Size, shape, and form: Concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics. Development Genes and Evolution, 226(3), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-016-0539-2
  • Kuijt-Evers, L. F. M., Groenesteijn, L., de Looze, M. P., & Vink, P. (2004). Identifying factors of comfort in using hand tools. Applied Ergonomics, 35(5), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.04.001
  • Leakey, M. D. (1971). Olduvai gorge: Excavations in beds I & II 1960-1963. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lycett, S. J. (2008). Acheulean variation and selection: Does handaxe symmetry fit neautral expectations? Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(9), 2640–2648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2008.05.002
  • Lycett, S. J., & Gowlett, J. A. J. (2008). On questions surrounding the Acheulean ‘tradition’. World Archaeology, 40(3), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240802260970
  • Lycett, S. J., Schillinger, K., Eren, M. I., von Cramon-Taubadel, N., & Mesoudi, A. (2016). Factors affecting Acheulean handaxe variation: Experimental insights, microevolutionary processes, and macroevolutionary outcomes. Quaternary International, 411(Part B), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.021
  • Machin, A. J., Hosfield, R. T., & Mithen, S. J. (2007). Why are some handaxes symmetrical? Testing the influence of handaxe morphology on butchery effectiveness. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34(6), 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.008
  • McNabb, J. (2017). Journeys in space and time. Assessing the link bewteen Acheulean handaxes and genetic explanations. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 13, 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.04.010
  • McNabb, J., Binyon, F., & Hazelwood, L. (2004). The large cutting tools from the South African Acheulean and the question of social traditions. Current Anthropology, 45, 653–677. https://doi.org/10.1086/423973
  • McNabb, J., & Cole, J. (2015). The mirror cracker: Symmetry and refinement in the Acheulean handaxe. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 3, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.06.004
  • McPherron, S. P. (2003). Technological and typological variability in the bifaces from Tabun Cave, Israel. In M. Soressi, & H. L. Dibble (Eds.), Multiple approaches to the study of Bifacial technologies (pp. 55–75). University of Pennsylvania Museum Press.
  • McPherron, S. P., & Dibble, H. L. (1999). Stone tool analysis using digitized images: Examples from the lower and middle paleolithic. Lithic Technology, 24(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.1999.11720944
  • Noll, M. P. (2000). Components of Acheulean lithic assemblage variability at Olorgesailie, Kenya [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. University of Illinois.
  • Pargeter, J., Khreisheh, N., & Stout, D. (2019). Understanding stone tool-making skill acquisition: Experimental methods and evolutionary implications. Journal of Human Evolution, 133, 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.05.010
  • Pitts, M., & Roberts, M. (1997). Fairweather eden: Life in Britain half a million years ago as revealed by the excavations at Boxgrove. Century.
  • Roe, D. A. (1964). The British lower and middle palaeolithic: Some problems, methods of study, and preliminary results. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 30, 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00015140
  • Roe, D. A. (1994). A metrical analysis of selected sets of handaxes and cleavers from Olduvai Gorge. In M. Leakey (Ed.), Olduvai Gorge-excavations in beds III, IV and the masek beds (1968-71) vol 5 (pp. 146–235). Cambridge University Press.
  • Roe, D. A. (2001). The Kalambo falls large cutting tools: A comparative metrical and statistical analysis. In J. D. Clark (Ed.), Kalambo falls prehistoric site, Vol 3: The earlier cultures: Middle and earlier stone Age (pp. 492–599). Cambridge University Press.
  • Rubio-Jara, S., Panera, J., Santonja, M., Perez-Gonzalez, A., Yravedra, J., Dominguez-Rodrigo, M., Bello, P., Rojas, R., Mabulla, A., & Baquedano, E. (2017). Site function and lithic technology in the acheulean technocomplex: A case study from Thiongo Korongo (TK), Bed II, Olduvai Gorge. Tanzania. BOREAS, 46(4), 894–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/bor.12275
  • Sharon, G. (2008). The impact of raw material on Acheulian large flake production. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 1329–1344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2007.09.004
  • Sharon, G. (2010). Large flake Acheulian. Quaternary International, 223-224, 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2009.11.023
  • Shipton, C., Clarkson, C., & Cobden, R. (2019). Were Acheulean bifaces deliberately made symmetrical? Archaeological and experimental evidence. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 29(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977431800032X
  • Shipton, C., & White, M. (2020). Handaxe types, colonization waves, and social norms in the British Acheulean. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 31, 102352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102352
  • Stout, D., Hecht, E., Khreisheh, N., Bradley, B., & Chaminade, T. (2015). Cognitive demands of lower palaeolithic toolmaking. PLOS One, 10(4), e0121804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121804
  • Toth, N., & Schick, K. (2009). The importance of actualistic studies in early stone Age research: Some personal reflections. In K. Schick, & N. Toth (Eds.), The cutting edge: New approaches to the archaeology of human origins (pp. 267–344). Stone Age Institute Press.
  • Vaughan, C. D. (2001). A million years of style and function: Regional and temporal variation in Acheulean handaxes. In T. D. Hurt, & G. F. M. Rakita (Eds.), Style and function: Conceptual issues in evolutionary archaeology (pp. 141–164). Bergin and Garvey.
  • White, M. (2022). A global history of the earlier palaeolithic: Assembling the Acheulean world, 1673–2020s. Routledge.
  • White, M., & Foulds, F. (2018). Symmetry is its own reward: On the character and significance of acheulean handaxe symmetry in the middle pleistocene. Antiquity, 92, 304–319. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.35
  • Wynn, T., & Gowlett, J. (2018). The handaxe reconsidered. Evolutionary Anthropology, 27, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21552