Functional Perspectives on Lithic Standardization

References

• Akerman, K. (1978). Notes on the Kimberley stone-tipped spear focusing on the point hafting mechanism. Mankind, 11(4), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-9310.1978.tb01190.x
   Google Scholar
• Akerman, K., Fullagar, R., & van Gijn, A. (2002). Weapons and wunan: Production, function and exchange of Kimberley points. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2002(1), 13–42. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.594391190349745
   Google Scholar
• Antoine, P., Auguste, P., Munaut, A.-V., Frechen, M., Englemann, A., & Michel, V. (2002). Etudes géologiques, environnementales et datations. In J.-L. Locht (Ed.), Bettencourt-Saint-Ouen (Somme), cinq occupations paléolithiques au début de la dernière glaciation (pp. 15–55). Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, W., & Braun, D. R. (2010). Variability in bifacial technology at Elandsfontein, Western cape, South Africa: A geometric morphometric approach. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(1), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barham, L. (2013). From hand to handle: The first industrial revolution. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Yosef, O., & Kuhn, S. L. (1999). The big deal about blades: Laminar technologies and human evolution. American Anthropologist, 101(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1999.101.2.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binford, L. R. (1973). Interassemblage variability–The Mousterian and the “Functional” argument. In C. Renfrew (Ed.), The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory (pp. 254–277). Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Binford, L. R., & Binford, S. R. (1966). A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian Facies of Levallois. American Anthropologist, 68(2), 238–295. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1966.68.2.02a001030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisson, M. S. (2001). Interview with a Neanderthal: An experimental approach for reconstructing scraper production rules, and their implications for imposed form in Middle Palaeolithic tools. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774301000099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleed, P. (1986). The optimal design of hunting weapons: Maintainability or reliability. American Antiquity, 51(4), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.2307/280862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordes, F. (1953). Essai de Classification des industries “moustériennes”. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique de France, 50(7–8), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1953.5156
   Google Scholar
• Bordes, F. (1967). Considérations sur la Typologie et les techniques dans le Paléolithique. Quartär, 18, 25–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bordes, F. (1981). Vingt-cinq ans après : le complexe moustérien revisité. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique Française, 78(3), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1981.5336
   Google Scholar
• Bordes, F., & de Sonneville-Bordes, D. (1970). The significance of variability in Palaeolithic assemblages. World Archaeology, 2(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1970.9979464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordes, F., Rigaud, J.-P., & de Sonneville-Bordes, D. (1972). Des buts, problèmes et limites de l’archéologie paléolithique. Quaternaria, 16(1), 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, H. M. (1995). Le paléolithique supérieur de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne): les fouilles de H. L. Movius Jr. Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, H. M., & David, N. (1984). Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne): The Périgordian VI (Level 3) Assemblage. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, H. M., & David, N. (1995). Le Périgordian VI de l’abri Pataud niveau 3. In H. M. Bricker (Ed.), Le Paléolithique supérieur de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne) : les fouilles de H. L. Movius Jr. (pp. 89–104). Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., Andrews, B., O’Brien, M. J., & Eren, M. I. (2018). An assessment of stone weapon tip standardization during the Clovis-Folsom transition in the western United States. American Antiquity, 83(4), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2018.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buisson, D. (1991). Le Périgordien du Blot (Cerzat, Haute-Loire) [Note préliminaire]. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 88(4), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1991.9465
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, E., Forsberg, L., Knutsson, K., & Lindgren, C. (1992). Frakturbilder. Kulturhistoriska kommentarer till det säregna sönderfallet vid bearbetning av kvarts. Tor, 24, 27–63.
   Google Scholar
• Cattelain, P. (1997). Hunting during the Upper Paleolithic: bow, spearthrower, or both? In H. Knecht (Ed.), Projectile Technology (pp. 213–240). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1851-2
   Google Scholar
• Cattelain, P., & Perpère, M. (1993). Tir expérimental de sagaies et de flèches emmanchées de pointes de la Gravette. Archéo-Situla, 17–20, 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, P. G. (1991). Symbols and Paleolithic artifacts: Style, standardization, and the imposition of arbitrary form. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 10(3), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(91)90013-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chazan, M. (1995). The language hypothesis for the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic transition: An examination based on a multiregional lithic analysis. Current Anthropology, 36(5), 749–768. https://doi.org/10.1086/204430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesnaux, L. (2014). Réflexion sur le microlithisme en France au cours du premier Mésolithique Xe-VIIIe millénaires avant J.-C.: approches technologique, expérimentale et fonctionelle. Université de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Chiotti, L., Nespoulet, R., & Henry-Gambier, D. (2015). Occupations and status of the Abri Pataud (Dordogne, France) during the Final Gravettian. Quaternary International, 359–360, 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.08.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiotti, L., Nespoulet, R., Morala, A., & Guillermin, P. (2013). Données typo-technologiques de l’industrie lithique. In R. Nespoulet, L. Chiotti, & D. Henry-Gambier (Eds.), Le Gravettien final de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne, France) : Fouilles et études 2005-2009. BAR International Series 2458 (pp. 111–126). Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. D. (1970). The Prehistory of Africa. Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. E. (1987). Politics, prismatic blades, and Mesoamerican civilization. In J. K. Johnson, & C. A. Morrow (Eds.), The Organization of Core Technology (pp. 259–284). Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, C., Hiscock, P., Mackay, A., & Shipton, C. (2018). Small, sharp, and standardized: Global convergence in backed-microlith technology. In M. J. O’Brien, B. Buchanan, & M. I. Eren (Eds.), Convergent Evolution in Stone-Tool Technology (pp. 175–199). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, R. B. (1995). Le Protomagdalénien de l’abri Pataud niveau 2. In H. M. Bricker (Ed.), Le Paléolithique supérieur de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne): les fouilles de H. L. Movius Jr. (pp. 67–87). Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
   Google Scholar
• Coppe, J. (2020). Sur les traces de l’armement préhistorique : mise au point d’une méthode pour reconstruire les modes d’emmanchement et de propulsion des armatures lithiques par une approche expérimentale, mécanique et balistique [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Liège.
   Google Scholar
• Coppe, J., Lepers, C., Clarenne, V., Delaunois, E., Pirlot, M., & Rots, V. (2019). Ballistic study tackles kinetic energy values of Palaeolithic weaponry. Archaeometry, 61(4), 933–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppe, J., Lepers, C., & Rots, V. (2022). Projectiles under a new angle: A ballistic analysis provides an important building block to grasp Paleolithic weapon technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 29, 1131–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-022-09551-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppe, J., & Rots, V. (2017). Focus on the target. The importance of a transparent fracture terminology for understanding projectile points and projecting modes. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 12, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.010
   Google Scholar
• Corbey, R., Jagich, A., Vaesen, K., & Collard, M. (2016). The Acheulean handaxe: More like a bird’s song than a Beatles’ tune? Evolutionary Anthropology, 25(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormarèche, E. (2020). Les comportements techniques au Gravettien récent. Réflexions sur la diversité de l’équipement cynégétique lithique [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Université Paris Nanterre.
   Google Scholar
• Crombé, P., Perdaen, Y., Sergant, J., & Caspar, J. (2001). Wear analysis on Early Mesolithic microliths from the Verrebroek Site, East Flanders, Belgium. Journal of Field Archaeology, 28(3–4), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1179/jfa.2001.28.3-4.253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Heinzelin, J. (1973). L’industrie du site paléolithique de Maisières-Canal. Institut royal des sciences naturelles de Belgique.
   Google Scholar
• de la Peña, P., Taipale, N., Wadley, L., & Rots, V. (2018). A techno-functional perspective on quartz micro-notches in Sibudu’s Howiesons Poort reveals the use of barbs in hunting technology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 93, 166–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lombera Hermida, A. (2009). The scar identification of lithic quartz industries. In F. Sternke, L. Eigeland, & L.-J. Costa (Eds.), Non-flint raw material use in prehistory. Old prejudices and New directions, BAR international series 1939 (pp. 5–12). Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• de Lombera-Hermida, A., & Rodríguez-Rellán, C. (2016). Quartzes matter. Understanding the technological and behavioural complexity in quartz lithic assemblages. Quaternary International, 424, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.11.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, H. L. (1984). Interpreting typological variation of Middle Paleolithic scrapers: Function, style, or sequence of reduction? Journal of Field Archaeology, 11(4), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.2307/529322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, H. L. (1987). The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity, 52(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/281062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, H. L. (1989). The implications of stone tool types for the presence of language during the Lower and Middle Paleolithic. In P. Mellars, & C. Stringer (Eds.), The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans (pp. 415–432). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dibble, H. L. (1991). Mousterian assemblage variability on an interregional scale. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.47.2.3630327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, H. L. (1995). Middle Paleolithic scraper reduction: Background, clarification, and review of evidence to date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2(4), 299–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229003
   Google Scholar
• Domanski, M., Webb, J., & Boland, J. (1994). Mechanical properties of stone artefact materials and the effect of heat treatment. Archaeometry, 36(2), 177–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1994.tb00963.x
   Google Scholar
• Douka, K., Chiotti, L., Nespoulet, R., & Higham, T. (2020). A refined chronology for the Gravettian sequence of Abri Pataud. Journal of Human Evolution, 141, 102730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, K. (2010). Understanding quartz technology in early prehistoric Ireland [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University College Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, K. (2011a). Identifying and classifying vein quartz artefacts: An experiment conducted at the World Archaeological Congress, 2008. Archaeometry, 53(6), 1280–1296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2011.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, K. (2011b). Vein quartz in lithic traditions: An analysis based on experimental archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(3), 734–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. J. (1997). Factors influencing the use of stone projectile tips: An ethnographic perspective. In H. Knecht (Ed.), Projectile technology (pp. 37–78). Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, J. G., & Audouze, F. (2010). The Magdalenian site of Verberie (Le Buisson Campin): An overview. In E. Zubrow, F. Audouze, & J. G. Enloe (Eds.), The Magdalenian household: Unraveling domesticity (pp. 15–21). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, N. (2008). Blank concerns: Issues of skill and consistency in the replication of Scottish Later Mesolithic blades. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 15(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-007-9048-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friis-Hansen, J. (1990). Mesolithic cutting arrows: Functional analysis of arrows used in the hunting of large game. Antiquity, 64(244), 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X0007839X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frison, G. C. (1968). A functional analysis of certain chipped stone tools. American Antiquity, 33(2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/278516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaillard, Y., Chesnaux, L., Girard, M., Burr, A., Darque-Ceretti, E., Felder, E., Mazuy, A., & Regert, M. (2015). Assessing hafting adhesive efficiency in the experimental shooting of projectile points: A new device for instrumented and ballistic experiments. Archaeometry, 58(3), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillermin, P. (2011). La fin du Gravettien dans le sud-ouest de la France : à la recherche de l’identité protomagdalénienne … . In N. Goutas, L. Klaric, D. Pesesse, & P. Guillermin (Eds.), À la recherche des identités gravettiennes : actualités, questionnements et perspectives. Actes de la table ronde sur le Gravettien en France et dans les pays limitrophes, Aix-en-Provence (6-8 octobre 2008) (Mémoire LII de la Société préhistorique française) (pp. 129–144). Société préhistorique française.
   Google Scholar
• Guipert, G., de Lumley, M. A., Tuffreau, A., & Mafart, B. (2011). A late Middle Pleistocene hominid: Biache-Saint-Vaast 2, North France. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 10(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2010.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesaerts, P., & Damblon, F. (2004). Les dates radiocarbone de Maisières-Canal. In R. Miller, P. Haesaerts, & M. Otte (Eds.), L’atelier de taille aurigacien de Maisières-Canal (Belgique). ERAUL 110 (pp. 27–28). Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l’Université de Liège.
   Google Scholar
• Harrold, F. B. (1993). Variability and function among Gravette points from Southwestern France. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 4(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1993.4.1.69
   Google Scholar
• Hiscock, P., Clarkson, C., & Mackay, A. (2011). Big debates over little tools: Ongoing disputes over microliths on three continents. World Archaeology, 43(4), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2011.624755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggard, C. S., McNabb, J., & Cole, J. N. (2019). The application of elliptic Fourier analysis in understanding biface shape and symmetry through the British Acheulean. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 2(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-019-00024-6
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, R. L. (1969). Culture: A human domain. Current Anthropology, 10(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1086/201036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inizan, M.-L., Reduron-Ballinger, M., Roche, H., & Tixier, J. (1999). Technology and terminology of knapped stone. Cercle de Recherches et d’Etudes Préhistoriques.
   Google Scholar
• Iovita, R. (2011). Shape variation in Aterian tanged tools and the origins of projectile technology: A morphometric perspective on stone tool function. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e29029. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iovita, R., & McPherron, S. P. (2011). The handaxe reloaded: A morphometric reassessment of Acheulian and Middle Paleolithic handaxes. Journal of Human Evolution, 61(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobi, R. M., Higham, T. F. G., Haesaerts, P., Jadin, I., & Basell, L. S. (2010). Radiocarbon chronology for the early Gravettian of Northern Europe: New AMS determinations for Maisières-Canal, Belgium. Antiquity, 84(July), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00099749
   Google Scholar
• Jardón Giner, P., & Sacchi, D. (1994). Traces d’usage et indices de réaffûtages et d’emmanchements sur des grattoirs magdaleniens de la Grotte Gazel à Sallèles-Cabardes (Aude, France). L’Anthropologie, 98(2–3), 427–446.
   Google Scholar
• Kamminga, J. (1982). Over the edge: Functional analysis of Australian stone tools. University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, L. R. (1989). Planning and functional variability in the Upper Palaeolithic: Microwear analysis of Upper Perigordian tools from Le Flageolet I (Dordogne). Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Klaric, L. (2006). Des armatures aux burins : des critères de distinction techniques et culturels à partir des productions lamellaires de quelques sites du gravettien moyen et récent (France). In M. de Araujo Igreja, J.-P. Bracco, & F. Le Brun-Ricalens (Eds.), Burins prehistoriques : formes, fonctionnements, fonctions. Actes de la table-ronde d’Aix-en-Provence (3–5 mars 2003) (pp. 199–223). Musée National d’Histoire et d’Art.
   Google Scholar
• Klaric, L. (2018). The prehistoric apprentice: Investigating apprenticeship, know-how and expertise in prehistoric technologies - L’apprenti préhistorique : Appréhender l’apprentissage, les savoir-faire et l’expertise à travers les productions techniques des sociétés préhistoriques. The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Archaeology.
   Google Scholar
• Klaric, L., Guillermin, P., & Aubry, T. (2009). Des armatures variées et des modes de productions variables : Réflexions à partir de quelques exemples issus du Gravettien d’Europe occidentale (France, Portugal, Allemagne). Gallia Préhistoire, 51, 113–154. https://doi.org/10.3406/galip.2009.2476
   Google Scholar
• Knecht, H. (1997). Projectile Technology. Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knutsson, H., Knutsson, K., Molin, F., & Zetterlund, P. (2016). From flint to quartz: Organization of lithic technology in relation to raw material availability during the pioneer process of Scandinavia. Quaternary International, 424, 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.10.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsson, H., Knutsson, K., Taipale, N., Tallavaara, M., & Darmark, K. (2015). How shattered flakes were used: Micro-wear analysis of quartz flake fragments. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2, 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.04.008
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, M., & Mithen, S. (1999). Handaxes: Products of sexual selection? Antiquity, 73(281), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00065078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong-Cho, S. (1997). Étude de l’industrie lithique de la couche 2 dite protomagdalenienne de l’abri Pataud (Les Eyzies, Dorgodne) : etude technologique et typologique. Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, S. L. (1992). Blank form and reduction as determinants of Mousterian scraper morphology. American Antiquity, 57(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2694838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, S. L., & Shimelmitz, R. (2022). From hafting to retooling: Miniaturization as tolerance control in Paleolithic and Neolithic blade production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-022-09575-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, R., & Williams, T. (2015). Variation in flintknapping skill among Folsom-era projectile point types: A quantitative approach. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 4, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.09.007
   Google Scholar
• Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1971). L’homme et la matière. Éditions Albin Michel. (Original work published 1943).
   Google Scholar
• Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1973). Milieu et techniques. Éditions Albin Michel. (Original work published 1945).
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, C. (1998). Shapes of quartz and shapes of minds. In L. Holm, & K. Knutsson (Eds.), Proceedings from the Third Flint Alternatives Conference at Uppsala, Sweden, October 18-20, 1996. Occasional Papers in Archaeology 16 (pp. 95–103). Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, D. A., Bartkowiak, T., & Stemp, W. J. (2020). 3D multiscale curvature analysis of tool edges as an indicator of cereal harvesting intensity. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 33(July), 102523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102523
   Google Scholar
• Manninen, M. A. (2016). The effect of raw material properties on flake and flake-tool dimensions: A comparison between quartz and chert. Quaternary International, 424(7), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manninen, M. A., & Knutsson, K. (2011). Northern inland oblique point sites – a new look into the late mesolithic oblique point tradition in eastern fennoscandia. In T. Rankama (Ed.), Mesolithic interfaces. Variability in lithic technologies in Eastern Fennoscandia. Monographs of the Archaeological Society of Finland (Vol. 1, pp. 142–175). Archaeological Society of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Manninen, M. A., & Tallavaara, M. (2011). Descent history of mesolithic oblique points in eastern fennoscandia – a technological comparison between two artefact populations. In T. Rankama (Ed.), Mesolithic interfaces. Variability in lithic technologies in Eastern Fennoscandia (Vol. 1, pp. 176–211). Archaeological Society of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, H., & Aymé, A. (1935). Recherches stratigraphiques sur l’Atérien. Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle d’Afrique du Nord, XXVI(9), 333–343.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, A., Hietala, H. J., & Williams, J. K. (2001). Tool Standardization in the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic: a Closer Look (with comments). Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774301000026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBrearty, S., & Brooks, A. S. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39(5), 453–563. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.2000.0435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, G. S., & Thomas, J. T. (2012). Still Bay and Howiesons Poort foraging strategies: Recent research and models of culture change. African Archaeological Review, 29(1), 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-012-9107-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, H. A. (1994). A new Arabian stone tool assemblage and notes on the Aterian industry of North Africa. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0471.1994.tb00052.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNabb, J., Binyon, F., & Hazelwood, L. (2004). The large cutting tools from the South African Acheulean and the question of social traditions. Current Anthropology, 45(5), 653–677. https://doi.org/10.1086/423973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellars, P. (1989). Major issues in the emergence of modern humans. Current Anthropology, 30(3), 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1086/203755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellars, P. (1991). Cognitive changes and the emergence of modern humans in Europe. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 1(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300000251
   Google Scholar
• Mellars, P. (1996). The Neanderthal legacy: An Archaeological perspective from Western Europe. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monnier, G. (2006). Testing retouched flake tool standardization during the Middle Paleolithic. In E. Hovers, & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions Before the Transition: Evolution and Stability in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age (pp. 57–83). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Montoya, C. (2002). Les pointes à dos épigravettiennes de Saint-Antoine-Vitrolles (Hautes-Alpes) : diversité typologique ou homogénéité conceptuelle ? Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 99(2), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2002.12657
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, L., Brandl, M., Filzmoser, P., Hauzenberger, C., Goemaere, É, Jadin, I., Collet, H., Hauzeur, A., & Schmitz, R. W. (2016). Geochemical sourcing of flint artifacts from Western Belgium and the German Rhineland: Testing hypotheses on Gravettian period mobility and raw material economy. Geoarchaeology, 31(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau, L., Hauzeur, A., & Jadin, I. (2013). La gestion des ressources lithiques dans l’ensemble gravettien de Maisières-Canal (Bassin de Mons, Hainaut, B) : Nouvelles perspectives. Notae Praehistoricae, 33(2013), 105–126.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, E. H. (1983). Some comments on edge damage as a factor in functional analysis of stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science, 10(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4403(83)90006-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, E. H., & Newcomer, M. H. (1982). Reconstruction of tool use at Pincevent: Microwear and experiments. In D. Cahen (Ed.), Tailler! Pourquoi faire: Préhistoire et technologie lithique II, Recent Progress in Microwear Studies (pp. 289–312). Studia Praehistorica Belgica Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Mourre, V. (1996). Les industries en quartz au Paléolithique. Terminologie, méthodologie et technologie. Paléo, 8(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.3406/pal.1996.1160
   Google Scholar
• Movius, H. L. J. (1975). Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne). Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Movius, H. L. J. (1977). Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne): Stratigraphy. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, A., Shipton, C., & Clarkson, C. (2022). Stone toolmaking difficulty and the evolution of hominin technological skills. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09914-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. C. (1991). The study of technological organization. Archaeological Method and Theory, 3(1991), 57–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/20170213
   Google Scholar
• Nespoulet, R. (1996). Le Périgordien VI de l’abri Pataud, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne. L’étude technologique et typologique de l’industrie lithique de la couche 3 [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Muséum national d’histoire naturelle.
   Google Scholar
• Nespoulet, R. (2000). Le Gravettien final de l’abri Pataud, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne : Nouvelles données technologiques et typologiques sur l’industrie lithique provenant du niveau 3. L’Anthropologie, 104(1), 63–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-5521(00)90004-9
   Google Scholar
• Nespoulet, R., Chiotti, L., & Henry-Gambier, D. (2013). Le Gravettien final de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne, France): Fouilles et études 2005-2009. BAR International Series 2458, Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Nicoud, É. (2011). Le Phénomène Acheuléen en Europe occidentale : approche chronologique, technologie lithique et implications culturelles [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Aix-Marseille Université / Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”.
   Google Scholar
• Nicoud, É. (2013a). Le paradoxe acheuléen. CTHS.
   Google Scholar
• Nicoud, É. (2013b). Complexité des stratigraphies régionales et nouveau modèle d’apparition et de diffusion du phénomène acheuléen en Europe de l’ouest. Quaternaire, 24(4), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.4000/quaternaire.6790
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, T., Bril, B., & Rein, R. (2010). How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution, 59(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuzhnyj, D. (1989). L’utilisation des microlithes géométriques et non géométriques comme armatures de projectiles. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 86(3), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1989.9368
   Google Scholar
• Odell, G. H. (1980). Butchering with stone tools: Some experimental results. Lithic Technology, 9(2), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.1980.11754469
   Google Scholar
• Odell, G. H. (1981). The Morphological Express at Function Junction: Searching for Meaning in Lithic Tool Types. Journal of Anthropological Research, 37(4), 319–342. https://doi.org/10.2307/3629831
   Google Scholar
• O’Farrell, M. (1996). Approche technologique et fonctionnelle des pointes de la Gravette : une analyse archéologique et expérimentale appliquée à la collection de Corbiac (Dordogne) [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Université de Bordeaux I.
   Google Scholar
• O’Farrell, M. (2004). Les pointes de La Gravette de Corbiac (Dordogne) et considérations sur la chasse au Paléolithique supérieur ancien. In P. Bodu, & C. Constantin (Eds.), Approches fonctionnelles en préhistoire. Actes du XXVe Congrès Préhistorique de France, Nanterre 24-26 novembre 2000 (pp. 121–138). Société préhistorique française.
   Google Scholar
• Otte, M. (1979). Documentation archéologique. In P. Haesaerts, & J. de Heinzelin (Eds.), Le site paléolithique de Maisières-Canal (pp. 69–89). De Tempel.
   Google Scholar
• Pargeter, J., Chen, C., Buchanan, B., Fisch, M., Bebber, M., & Eren, M. I. (2022). Stone tool backing and adhesion in hunting weaponry: First results of an experimental program. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 45, 103639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103639
   Google Scholar
• Pelegrin, J. (2000). Les techniques de débitage laminaire au Tardiglaciaire: critères de diagnose et quelques réflexions. In B. Valentin, P. Bodu, & M. Christensen (Eds.), L’europe centrale et septentrionale au Tardiglaciaire. Table-ronde de Nemours 13-16 mai 1997 (pp. 73–86). Éd. APRAIF.
   Google Scholar
• Pelegrin, J. (2006). Long blade technology in the Old World: An experimental approach and some archaeological results. In J. Apel, & K. Knutsson (Eds.), Skilled production and social reproduction: Aspects of traditional stone-tool technologies. Proceedings of a symposium in Uppsala, August 20-24, 2003 (pp. 37–68). Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis & The Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Pelegrin, J. (2021). Sur la motivation des tailleurs experts du Paléolithique supérieur. Paléo, Hors-série(Décembre 2021), 148–165. https://doi.org/10.4000/paleo.6895
   Google Scholar
• Perpère, M. (2000). Les points de La Gravette de la couche 5 de l’abri Pataud : Réflexion sur les armes de pierre dans les outillages périgordiens. Anthropologie et Préhistoire, 111, 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pesesse, D., & Flas, D. (2012). The Maisierian, at the edge of the Gravettian. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 78, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00027122
   Google Scholar
• Pétillon, J.-M., Bignon, O., Bodu, P., Cattelain, P., Debout, G., Langlais, M., Laroulandie, V., Plisson, H., & Valentin, B. (2011). Hard core and cutting edge: Experimental manufacture and use of Magdalenian composite projectile tips. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(6), 1266–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigeot, N. (1987). Magdaléniens d’Étiolles. Economie de débitage et organisation sociale (l’unité d’habitation U5) (XXVe supplément à Gallia Préhistoire). Éditions du CNRS.
   Google Scholar
• Plisson, H. (2006). Un burin ne sert pas à buriner mais en burinant …  In M. de Araujo Igreja, J.-P. Bracco, & F. Le Brun-Ricalens (Eds.), Burins prehistoriques : formes, fonctionnements, fonctions. Actes de la table-ronde d’Aix-en-Provence (3–5 mars 2003) (Vol. 2, pp. 23–33). Musée National d’Histoire et d’Art.
   Google Scholar
• Plisson, H., & Beyries, S. (1998). Pointes ou outils triangulaires ? Données fonctionnelles dans le Moustérien levantin [suivi des] Commentaires de J. Shea, A. Marks, J-M Geneste et de la réponse des auteurs. Paléorient, 24(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.3406/paleo.1998.4666
   Google Scholar
• Rankama, T. (2002). Analyses of the quartz assemblages of houses 34 and 35 at Kauvonkangas in Tervola. In H. Ranta (Ed.), Huts and Houses. Stone Age and Early Metal Age Buildings in Finland (pp. 79–108). National Board of Antiquities.
   Google Scholar
• Rankama, T., Manninen, M. A., Hertell, E., & Tallavaara, M. (2006). Simple production and social strategies: Do they meet? Social dimensions in Eastern Fennoscandian quartz technologies. In J. Apel, & K. Knutsson (Eds.), Skilled production and social reproduction: Aspects of traditional stone-tool technologies. Proceedings of a symposium in Uppsala, August 20-24, 2003 (pp. 245–261). Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis & The Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Rellán, C. (2016). Variability of the rebound hardness as a proxy for detecting the levels of continuity and isotropy in archaeological quartz. Quaternary International, 424, 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolland, N., & Dibble, H. L. (1990). A new synthesis of Middle Paleolithic variability. American Antiquity, 55(3), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.2307/281279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2002a). Are tangs morphological adaptations in view of hafting? Macro- and microscopic wear analysis on a selection of tanged burins from Maisières-Canal. Notae Praehistoricae, 22(2002), 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2002b). Hafting Traces on Flint Tools: Possibilities and Limitations of Macro- and Microscopic Approaches [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2002c). Bright spots and the question of hafting. Anthropologica et Praehistorica, 113, 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2003). Towards an understanding of hafting. Antiquity, 77(298), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00061743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2005). Wear traces and the interpretation of stone tools. Journal of Field Archaeology, 30(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1179/009346905791072404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2008). Hafting and raw materials from animals. Guide to the identification of hafting traces on stone tools. Anthropozoologica, 43(1), 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2009). The functional analysis of the Mousterian and Micoquian assemblages of Sesselfelsgrotte, Germany: Aspects of tool use and hafting in the European Late Middle Palaeolithic. Quartär, 56(2009), 37–66. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/230551.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2010). Prehension and hafting traces on flint tools: A methodology. Universitaire Pers Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2013). Insights into early middle palaeolithic tool use and hafting in Western Europe. The functional analysis of level IIa of the early middle palaeolithic site of Biache-Saint-Vaast (France). Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(1), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2015). Hafting and site function in the European Middle Paleolithic. In N. J. Conard, & A. Delagnes (Eds.), Settlement dynamics of the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age: Vol. IV (pp. 383–410). Kerns Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V., Coppe, J., & Conard, N. J. (2021). A leaf point documents hunting with spears in the Middle Paleolithic at Hohle Fels, Germany. Mitteilungen Der Gesellschaft Für Urgeschichte, 2021(30), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.51315/mgfu.2021.30004
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V., Hayes, E., Akerman, K., Green, P., Clarkson, C., Lepers, C., Bordes, L., McAdams, C., Foley, E., & Fullagar, R. (2020). Hafted tool-use experiments with Australian aboriginal plant adhesives: Triodia Spinifex, Xanthorrhoea grass tree and Lechenaultia divaricata Mindrie. EXARC Journal, 2020(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V., Lentfer, C., Schmid, V. C., Porraz, G., & Conard, N. J. (2017). Pressure flaking to serrate bifacial points for the hunt during the MIS5 at Sibudu Cave (South Africa). PLoS ONE, 12(4), e0175151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rots, V., Pirnay, L., Pirson, P., & Baudoux, O. (2006). Blind tests shed light on possibilities and limitations for identifying stone tool prehension and hafting. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33(7), 935–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rots, V., & Plisson, H. (2014). Projectiles and the abuse of the use-wear method in a search for impact. Journal of Archaeological Science, 48(1), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.027
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V., & Van Peer, P. (2006). Early evidence of complexity in lithic economy: Core-axe production, hafting and use at late Middle Pleistocene site 8-B-11, Sai Island (Sudan). Journal of Archaeological Science, 33(3), 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rots, V., Van Peer, P., & Vermeersch, P. M. (2011). Aspects of tool production, use, and hafting in Palaeolithic assemblages from Northeast Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 60(5), 637–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rots, V., & Williamson, B. S. (2004). Microwear and residue analyses in perspective: The contribution of ethnoarchaeological evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 31(9), 1287–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2004.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scerri, E. M. L. (2013). On the spatial and technological organisation of hafting modifications in the North African Middle Stone Age. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(12), 4234–4248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlanger, N. (1996). Understanding Levallois: Lithic technology and cognitive archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 6(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001724
   Google Scholar
• Sealy, J. (2016). Cultural change, demography, and the archaeology of the last 100 kyr in Southern Africa. In S. C. Jones & B. A. Stewart (Eds.), Africa from MIS 6-2: Population Dynamics and Paleoenvironments (pp. 65–75). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Semenov, S. A. (1964). Prehistoric technology: An experimental study of the oldest tools and artefacts from traces of manufacture and wear. Adams & Dart.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, M. J., & Weedman, K. J. (2007). Measuring reduction in stone tools: An ethnoarchaeological study of gamo hidescrapers from Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34(7), 1016–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriano, S. (1998). Les microgravettes du Périgordien de Rabier à Lanquais (Dordogne) : analyse technologique fonctionnelle. Gallia Préhistoire, 40(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.3406/galip.1998.2158
   Google Scholar
• Soriano, S., Villa, P., Delagnes, A., Degano, I., Pollarolo, L., Lucejko, J. J., Henshilwood, C., & Wadley, L. (2015). The Still Bay and Howiesons Poort at Sibudu and Blombos: Understanding Middle Stone Age Technologies. PloS One, 10(7), e0131127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternke, F., & Sørensen, M. (2009). The identification of children’s flint knapping products in Mesolithic Scandinavia. In S. McCartan, R. Schulting, G. Warren, & P. Woodman (Eds.), Mesolithic Horizons: Papers Presented at the Seventh International Conference on the Mesolithic in Europe, Belfast 2005 (pp. 720–729). Oxbow Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stordeur, D. (1987). Manches et emmanchements préhistoriques : quelques propositions préliminaires. In D. Stordeur (Ed.), La main et l’outil. Manches et emmanchements préhistoriques (pp. 11–34). Maison de l’Orient Méditerranéen.
   Google Scholar
• Taipale, N. (2020). Hafting as a flexible strategy: variability in stone tool use and hafting at three European Upper Palaeolithic sites [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Université de Liège.
   Google Scholar
• Taipale, N., Chiotti, L., & Rots, V. (2022). Why did hunting weapon design change at Abri Pataud? Lithic use-wear data on armature use and hafting around 24,000–22,000 BP. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0262185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taipale, N., Coppe, J., Touzé, O., & Rots, V. (2017). The weapon system behind the point: Early gravettian hunting technologies at Maisières-Canal [Abstract]. PESHE, 6(2017), 193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228967.2011.556516
   Google Scholar
• Taipale, N., & Rots, V. (2020). Revisiting Maisières-Canal (Hainaut, BE): New results on tool use and hafting. Notae Praehistoricae, 40(2020), 105–127.
   Google Scholar
• Taipale, N., & Rots, V. (2021). Every hunter needs a knife: Hafted butchering knives from Maisières-Canal and their effect on lithic assemblage characteristics. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 36, 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102874
   Google Scholar
• Tallavaara, M., Manninen, M. A., Hertell, E., & Rankama, T. (2010). How flakes shatter: A critical evaluation of quartz fracture analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(10), 2442–2448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardy, N., Vosges, J., & Varoutsikos, B. (2016). Micro-blade production on hyaline quartz during the Late Neolithic of northern Greece (5400–4600 cal. B.C.): examples from Dikili Tash and Promachonas-Topolniča. Quaternary International, 424, 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasso, A., Rots, V., Purdue, L., Beyries, S., Buckley, M., Cheval, C., Cnuts, D., Coppe, J., Julien, M. A., Grenet, M., Lepers, C., M’hamdi, M., Simon, P., Sorin, S., & Porraz, G. (2018). Gravettian weaponry: 23,500-year-old evidence of a composite barbed point from Les Prés de Laure (France). Journal of Archaeological Science, 100, 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2018.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasso, S. (2021). What is new in the Aterian? A functional view on tool use, hafted stone tool technologies and assemblage variability at Ifri n’Ammar within the context of the Northwest African Middle Stone Age [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Université de Liège.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasso, S., Cnuts, D., Mikdad, A., & Rots, V. (2020). Changes in hafting practices during the Middle Stone Age at Ifri n’ Ammar. Quaternary International, 555(March), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.03.026
   Google Scholar
• Tomasso, S., & Rots, V. (2018). What is the use of shaping a tang? Tool use and hafting of tanged tools in the Aterian of Northern Africa. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10(6), 1389–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0448-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touzé, O. (2018). Aux prémices du Gravettien dans le Nord-Ouest européen. Étude de la production des pointes lithiques à Maisières-Canal (province de Hainaut, Belgique). Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 115(3), 455–495. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2018.14920
   Google Scholar
• Touzé, O. (2019). D’une tradition à l’autre, les débuts de la période gravettienne. Trajectoire technique des sociétés des chasseurs-cueilleurs d’Europe nord-occidentale [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Université de Liège / Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Tydgadt, L., & Rots, V. (2022). Stick to it! Mechanical performance tests to explore the resilience of prehistoric glues in hafting. Archaeometry, January, 1252–1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12779
   Google Scholar
• Villa, P., & Roebroeks, W. (2014). Neandertal demise: An archaeological analysis of the modern human superiority complex. PLoS ONE, 9(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Way, A. M., de la Peña, P., de la Peña, E., & Wadley, L. (2022). Howiesons Poort backed artifacts provide evidence for social connectivity across Southern Africa during the Final Pleistocene. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12677-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weedman, K. J. (2006). An ethnoarchaeological study of hafting and stone tool diversity among the Gamo of Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 13(3), 188–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-006-9010-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. J. (1998). On the significance of Acheulean biface variability in southern Britain. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 64, 15–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00002164
   Google Scholar
• Wierer, U. (2013). Variability and standardization: The early Gravettian lithic complex of Grotta Paglicci, Southern Italy. Quaternary International, 288, 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2012.04.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, T. (1988). Tools and the evolution of human intelligence. In R. Byrne, & A. Whiten (Eds.), Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans (pp. 271–284). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar