Geometric Morphometric Analyses of Levallois Points from the Levantine Middle Paleolithic do not Support Functional Specialization

References

• Ahler, S. A., & Geib, P. R. (2000). Why flute? Folsom point design and adaptation. Journal of Archaeological Science, 27(9), 799–820. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1999.0503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Yosef, O. (1992). The role of western Asia in modern human origins. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 337, 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1992.0097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Yosef, O. (2002). The chronology of the middle paleolithic of the Levant. In T. Akazawa, K. Aoki, & O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.), In Neandertals and modern humans in Western Asia (pp. 39–56). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Yosef, O., & Meignen, L. (1992). Insights into Levantine middle Paleolithic cultural variability. In H. Dibble & P. Mellars (Eds.), The middle paleolithic: Adaptation, behavior, and variability (pp. 163–182). University of Pennsylvania Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, C. (1998). Projectile point types as valid chronological units. Unit issues in archaeology: Measuring time, space, and material. (p. 21–40). University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beyries, S. (1987). Variabilité de l’Industrie lithique au moustérien: Approache fonctionnelle sur quelques gisements françaises. British archaeological reports (international series), (p. 328). Oxford:BAR.
   Google Scholar
• Boëda, E. (1994). Le concept Levallois: variabilité des méthodes. CNRS Éditions.
   Google Scholar
• Boëda, E., Connan, J., Dessort, D., Muhesen, S., Mercier, N., Valladas, H., & Tisnérat, N. (1996). Bitumen as a hafting material on middle Palaeolithic artefacts. Nature, 380(6572), 336–338. https://doi.org/10.1038/380336a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boëda, E., Geneste, J. M., Griggo, C., Mercier, N., Muhesen, S., Reyss, J. L., Taha, A., & Valladas, H. (1999). A Levallois point embedded in the vertebra of a wild ass (Equus africanus): hafting, projectiles and Mousterian hunting weapons. Antiquity, 73(280), 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00088335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldurian, A. T., & Hubinsky, S. M. (1994). Preforms in folsom lithic technology: A view from blackwater draw, New Mexico. Plains Anthropologist, 39(150), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/2052546.1994.11931735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilauri, S. (2015). Le débitage Levallois : un concept de préhension normalisé et varié ? Exemples de productions levalloiso-moustériennes issues du site d’Umm el Tlel, Syrie centrale. Paléorient, 41(1), 83–115. https://doi.org/10.3406/paleo.2015.5657
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordes, F. (1953). Notules typologie paléolithique II: Pointes levalloisiennes et pointes pseudo-levalloisiennes. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 5–6, 311–313.
   Google Scholar
• Bordes, F. (1961). Typologie du paléolithique ancien et moyen. Imprimeries Delmas.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B. (2006). An analysis of Folsom projectile point resharpening using quantitative comparisons of form and allometry. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., Andrews, B., O’Brien, M. J., & Eren, M. I. (2018). An assessment of stone weapon tip standardization during the Clovis-Folsom transition in the western United States. American Antiquity, 83(4), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2018.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., Kilby, J. D., Hamilton, M. J., LaBelle, J. M., Meyer, K. A., Holland-Lulewiscz, J., Andrews, B., Morgan, B. M., Asher, B., Holliday, V. T., Hodgins, G. W. L., & Surovell, T. A. (2021). Bayesian revision of the Folsom age range using IntCal20. PaleoAmerica, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2021.1890401
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., Walker, R. S., Hamilton, M. J., Story, B., Bebber, M., Wilcox, D., & Eren, M. I. (2022). Experimental assessment of lanceolate projectile point and haft robustness. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 42, 103399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103399
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, K., & Bement, L. (2013). Organization of bison hunting at the pleistocene/holocene transition on the plains of North America. Quaternary International, 297, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2012.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carper, R. G. (2005). On the use of symmetry to assess biface production goals. Lithic Technology, 30(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2005.11721030
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. L. (1968). Analytical archaeology. Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, C. (2016). Testing archaeological approaches to determining past projectile delivery systems using ethnographic and experimental data. In R. Iovita & K. Sano (Eds.), In Multidisciplinary approaches to the study of stone Age weaponry (pp. 189–201). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Debénath, A., & Dibble, H. L. (1993). Handbook of Paleolithic typology. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demidenko, Y. E., & Usik, V. I. (2003). Into the mind of the maker: Refitting study and technological reconstructions. In D. O. Henry (Ed.), In behavioral organization and the beginnings of human modernity (pp. 107–155). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dev, S., & Riede, F. (2015). Quantitative functional analysis of late glacial projectile points from Northern Europe. Lithics–The Journal of the Lithic Studies Society, 33, 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Dryden, I. L., & Mardia, K. V. (1998). Statistical shape analysis. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., Bebber, M. R., Knell, E. J., Story, B., & Buchanan, B. (2022). Plains paleoindian projectile point penetration potential. Journal of Anthropological Research, 78(1), 84–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., & Lycett, S. J. (2012). Why levallois? A morphometric comparison of experimental ‘preferential’ levallois flakes versus debitage flakes. PLoS one, 7(1), e29273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., Meltzer, D. J., Story, B., Buchanan, B., Yeager, D., & Bebber, M. R. (2021). On the efficacy of clovis fluted points for hunting proboscideans. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 39, 103166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103166
   Google Scholar
• Frison, G. C., & Bradley, B. A. (1980). Folsom tools and technology at the Hanson site, Wyoming. University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrod, D. A. E., & Bate, D. M. A. (1937). The stone age of mount Carmel, Vol. I.. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goval, E., Hérisson, D., Locht, J. L., & Coudenneau, A. (2016). Levallois points and triangular flakes during the middle Palaeolithic in northWestern Europe: Considerations on the status of these pieces in the Neanderthal hunting toolkit in northern France. Quaternary International, 411, 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.04.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groman-Yaroslavski, I., Zaidner, Y., & Weinstein-Evron M. (2016). Mousterian Abu Sif points: Foraging tools of the early middle paleolithic site of misliya cave. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 7, pp. 312-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Groucutt, H. S. (2014). Middle Palaeolithic point technology, with a focus on the site of Tor Faraj (Jordan, MIS 3). Quaternary International, 350, 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groucutt, H. S., Scerri, E. M. L., Stringer, C., & Petraglia, M. D. (2019). Skhul lithic technology and the dispersal of homo sapiens into southwest Asia. Quaternary International, 515, 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.12.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauck, T. C., Connan, J., Charrié-Duhaut, A., Le Tensorer, J.-M., & al Sakhel, H. (2013). Molecular evidence of bitumen in the Mousterian lithic assemblage of Hummal (Central Syria). Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(8), 3252–3262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, D. O.1995). Prehistoric cultural ecology and evolution. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, D. O., Hall, S. A., Hietala, H. J., Demidenko, Y. E., Usik, V. I., Rosen, A. M., & Thomas, P. A. (1996). Middle Paleolithic behavioral organization: 1993 excavation of Tor Faraj, southern Jordan. Journal of Field Archaeology, 23(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1179/009346996791974034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, J. L. (1991). Folsom land use: Projectile point variability as a key to mobility. In A. Montet-White & S. R. Holen (Eds.), Raw material economies Among prehistoric hunter-gatherers (pp. 335–355). University of Kansas. Publications in Anthropology 19.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, J. L. (1992). Recognition and interpretation of Folsom technological variability on the southern plains. In D. J. Stanford, & J. S. Day (Eds.), In Ice age hunters of the rockies (pp. 193–224). University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Holdaway, S. (1989). Were there hafted projectile points in the Mousterian? Journal of Field Archaeology, 16(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1179/jfa.1989.16.1.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. (1998). Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5(4), 345–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iovita, R., Schönekeß, H., Gaudzinski-Windheuser, S., & Jäger, F. (2014). Projectile impact fractures and launching mechanisms: Results of a controlled ballistic experiment using replica Levallois points. Journal of Archaeological Science, 48, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.01.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iovita, R., Schönekeß, H., Gaudzinski-Windheuser, S., & Jäger, F. (2016). Identifying weapon delivery systems using macrofracture analysis and fracture propagation velocity: A controlled experiment. In R. Iovita & K. Sano (Eds.), In Multidisciplinary approaches to the study of stone age weaponry (pp. 13–27). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jelinek, A. J. (1981). The middle paleolithic in the southern Levant from the perspective of tabun cave. In J. Cauvin & P. Sanlaville (Eds.), Préhistoire du Levant (pp. 265–280). CNRS Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Jelinek, A. J. (1982). The Tabun cave and paleolithic man in the Levant. Science, 216(4553), 1369–1375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.216.4553.1369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, W. J. (1973). Paleoindian occupation of the central Rio Grande valley in New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, M. (1996). Microwear analysis of some Clovis and experimental chipped stone tools. In G. H. Odell (Ed.), In stone tools: Theoretical insights into human prehistory (pp. 315–344). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kerry, K. W., & Henry, D. O. (2000). Conceptual domains, competence, and chaîne opératoire in the Levantine Mousterian. In L. E. Stager, A. E. Greene, & M. D. Coogan (Eds.), The Archaeology of Jordan and Beyond (pp. 238–254). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Klingenberg, C. P. (2011). Morphoj: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11(2), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg, C. P., Barluenga, M., & Meyer, A. (2002). Shape analysis of symmetric structures: Quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution, 56(10), 1909–1920. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00117.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, S. L. (1995). Mousterian lithic technology: An ecological perspective. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, S. L. (2020). The evolution of Paleolithic technologies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lycett, S. J. (2008). Acheulean variation and selection: Does handaxe symmetry fit neutral expectations? Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(9), 2640–2648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2008.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, S. J., & Chauhan, P. R. (2010). Analytical approaches to Palaeolithic technologies: An introduction. In S. J. Lycett & P. R. Chauhan (Eds.), In New perspectives on Old stones (pp. 1–22). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, A., Hietala, H. J., & Williams, J. K. (2001). Tool standardization in the middle and upper Palaeolithic: A closer look (with comments). Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774301000026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, D. J., & Eren, M. I. (2021). The Mountaineer Folsom projectile point assemblage. In B. Andrews, D. Meltzer & M. Stiger (Eds.), In The mountaineer site (pp. 296–358). University of Colorado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. L. (2013). Illuminating activities at paleo crossing (33ME274) through microwear analysis. Lithic Technology, 38, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1179/0197726113Z.00000000012
   Google Scholar
• O'Driscoll, C. A., & Thompson, J. C. (2014). Experimental projectile impact marks on bone: Implications for identifying the origins of projectile technology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 49, 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten, B. (2005). Peoples of the flute: A study in anthropolithic forensics. Stone Dagger Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Patten, B. (2012). Explaining temporal change in artifacts by the use of process controls. Lithic Technology, 37(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1179/lit.2012.37.1.25
   Google Scholar
• Plisson, H., & Beyries, S. (1998). Pointes ou outils triangulaires? Données fonctionnelles dans le Moustérien levantin [suivi des] Commentaires de J. Shea, A. Marks, J-M Geneste et de la réponse des auteurs. Paléorient, 24(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.3406/paleo.1998.4666
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F. J. (2017). Tpsdig, version 2.31, shareware program. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook (http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph).
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F. J. (2019a). Relative warps, version 1.70, shareware program. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook (http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph).
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F. J. (2019b). Tps utility program, version 1.78, shareware program. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook (http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph).
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F. J., & Bookstein, F. L., Eds. (1990). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Special Publication, No. 2).
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F. J., & Marcus, L. F. (1993). A revolution morphometrics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 8(4), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90024-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roler, K. L., & Clark, G. A. (1997). Use-wear analysis of Levallois points from the ‘Ain Difla Rockshelter, west-central Jordan. In H. G. K. Gebel, Z. Kafael, & G. Rollefson (Eds.), The prehistory of Jordan II: Perspectives from 1997. pp. 101–109. ex Oriente.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2013). Insights into early middle Palaeolithic tool use and hafting in Western Europe. The functional analysis of level IIa of the early middle Palaeolithic site of Biache-Saint-Vaast (France). Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(1), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz, C. M., Call, J., & Boesch, C. (Eds). (2013). Tool use in animals: Cognition and ecology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J., Davis, Z., & Brown, K. (2001). Experimental tests of middle Palaeolithic spear points using a calibrated crossbow. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28(8), 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.2000.0590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, J J. (1988). Spear points from the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant. Journal of Field Archaeology, 15(4), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1179/jfa.1988.15.4.441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, J J. (1995). Lithic microwear analysis of Tor Faraj rockshelter. In Prehistoric cultural ecology and evolution: Insights from Southern Jordan (pp. 85–105). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J J. (1997). Middle Paleolithic spear point technology. In Projectile technology (pp. 79–106). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J J. (1998). Neandertal and early modern human behavioral variability a regional-scale approach to lithic evidence for hunting in the Levantine Mousterian. Current Anthropology, 39(S1), S45–S78.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J J. (2006). The origins of lithic projectile point technology: evidence from Africa, the Levant, and Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33(6), 823–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, J. J., Brown, K. S., & Davis, Z. J.. (2002). Controlled experiments with middle Palaeolithic spear points: Levallois points. In Experimental Archaeology: Replicating Past Objects, Behaviors, and Processes (Vol. BAR International Series 1035, pp. 55–72). Oxford: Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Sheets, H. D. (2014). Integrated Morphometrics Package (IMP). 8, 2014 (www.canisius.edu/~sheets/morphsoft.html).
   Google Scholar
• Sheets, H. D., Covino, K. M., Panasiewicz, J. M., & Morris, S. R. (2006). Comparison of geometric morphometric outline methods in the discrimination of age-related differences in feather shape. Frontiers in Zoology, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-3-15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shimelmitz, R., & Kuhn, S. L. (2013). Early Mousterian Levallois technology in unit IX of Tabun cave. PaleoAnthropology, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.4207/PA.2013.ART77
   Google Scholar
• Shimelmitz, R., & Kuhn, S. L. (2018). The toolkit in the core: There is more to Levallois production than predetermination. Quaternary International, 464(Part A), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.08.011
   Google Scholar
• Sisk, M. L., & Shea, J. J. (2009). Experimental use and quantitative performance analysis of triangular flakes (Levallois points) used as arrowheads. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(9), 2039–2047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitton, J., Story, B., Buchanan, B., & Eren, M. I. (2020). Tip cross-sectional geometry predicts the penetration depth of stone-tipped projectiles. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70264-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slice, D. E., (Ed). (2005). Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Slice, D. E. (2007). Geometric morphometrics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36(1), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120613
   Google Scholar
• Smallwood, A. M. (2006). Use-Wear analysis of the Clovis biface collection from the Gault site in central Texas. Master’s thesis. Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. M., Noack, E. S., Behrens, N. M., Ruebens, K., Street, M., Iovita, R., & Gaudzinski-Windheuser, S. (2020). When lithics hit bones: Evaluating the potential of a multifaceted experimental protocol to illuminate middle Palaeolithic weapon technology. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 3(2), 126–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-020-00053-6
   Google Scholar
• Solecki, R L. (1992). More on hafted projectile points in the Mousterian. Journal of Field Archaeology, 19(2), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1179/009346992791548905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, J. (2008). Who were the flintknappers? A study of individual characteristics. Lithic Technology, 33(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2008.11721066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, D. (2002). Skill and cognition in stone tool production. Current Anthropology, 43(5), 693–722. https://doi.org/10.1086/342638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K A, Story, B A, Eren, M I, Buchanan, B, Andrews, B N, O'brien, M J, & Meltzer, D J. (2017). Explaining the origin of fluting in North American Pleistocene weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Science, 81, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa, P., Soressi, M., Henshilwood, C. S., & Mourre, V. (2009). The still bay points of Blombos cave (South Africa). Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(2), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2008.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, M., & Sheets, H. D.. (2010). A Practical Introduction to Landmark-Based Geometric Morphometrics. The Paleontological Society Papers, 16, 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1089332600001868
   Google Scholar
• Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity, 48(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/280450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., Sheets, H. D., & Fink, W. L. (2004). Geometric morphometrics for biologists: A primer. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar