6. BIBLIOGRAFÍA

• Abdel-Kader, M. G., y Dugdalet, D. [1998]: «Investment in advanced manufacturing technology: A study of practice in large U.K. companies», Management Accounting Research, vol. 9, 261–284.
   Google Scholar
• Ahire, S. L.; Golhar, D. Y., y Waller, M. A. [1996]: «Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs», Decision Sciences, vol. 27, n.° 1, 23–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Álvarez, M. J. [1993]: «Cambio tecnológico y Contabilidad de Gestión. Los sistemas de información y las nuevas estrategias productivas», en Carmona, S. (Ed.): Cambio tecnológico y Contabilidad de Gestión, Madrid: ICAC, Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M.; Conti, R.; Coon, H.; Lazenby, J., y Herron, M. [1996]: «Assesing the work environment for creativity», Academy of Management Journal, vol. 39, n.° 5, 1154–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C.; Cleveland, G., y Schroeder, R. G. [1989]: «Operations strategy: A literature review», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 8, 133–158.
   Google Scholar
• AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION (AERA), AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (APA) y NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION (NCME) [1985]: Standards for Educational and Psichological testing, Washington, D.C.: American Psichological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S. A., y Porter, L. J. [1996]: «Identification of the critical factors of TQM», Decision Sciences, vol. 27, n.° 1, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, K. K; Leong, G. K.; Ward, P. T., y Krajewski, L. J. [1997]: «Unlocking the potential of advanced manufacturing technologies», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 15, 331–347.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. [1984]: «The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices», British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol. 37, mayo, 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camisón, C. [1999]: «Sobre cómo medir las competencias distintivas: un examen empírico de la fiabilidad y validez de los modelos multi-ítem para la medición de los activos intangibles», Comunicación presentada a la First International Conference de The Iberoamerican Academy of Management celebrada en Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Camisón, C., y Bou, J. C. [2000]: «Calidad percibida de la empresa: desarrollo y Validación de un instruménto de medida», Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 9, n.° 1, 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., y Fiske, D. W. [1959]: «Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix», Psychological Bulletin, vol. 56, 81–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañibano, L.; García-Ayuso, M.; Sánchez, P.; Chaminade, C.; Olea, M., y Escobar, C. G. [1999]: «Medición de intangibles. Discusión de los indicadores seleccionados. Estudio de un caso español», Comunicación presentada al X Congreso de la Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas celebrado en Zaragoza.
   Google Scholar
• Cañibano, L.; Garc&ia-Ayuso, M., y Sánchez, P. [1999]: «La relevancia de los intangibles para la valoración y la gestión de empresas», Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, vol. 28, n.° 100.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., y Zeller, R. A. [1979]: Reliability and validity assessment, Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, P. Y. K. [1999]: «On the use of construct reliability in MIS research: a meta-analysis», Information and Management, vol. 35, 217–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chryssochoidis, G. M., y Wong, V. [2000]: «Customización of product technology and international new product success: Mediating effects of new product development and rollout timeliness», The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 17, 268–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchil, G. A. [1979]: «A paradigm for developping better measures of marketing constructs», Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 16, 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, K. B.; Chew, W. B., y Fujimoto, T. [1987]: «Product development in the world auto industry», Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 729–771.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K. B., y Fujimoto, T. [1991]: Product development performance, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. [1995]: «Empirical studies of innovative activity», en Stoneman, P. (Ed.): Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, R.; Narandrenm, P., y Richards, A. [1996]: «A literature-based innovation output indicator», Research Policy, vol. 25, 403–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. [1951]: «Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests», Psychometrika, vol, 16, n.°3, 297–334.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H. [1993]: Process Innovation. Reengineering work through Information technolog, Ernst & Young. Harvard Business School Press. Boston Massachusets.
   Google Scholar
• Dabholkar, P. A.; Thorpe, D. I., y Rentz, J. O. [1996]: «A measure. of service quality for retail stores: Scale development and validation», Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 24, n.° 1, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• De vaus, D. A. [1990]: Surveys in social research, London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION [1995]: Evaluation of R&D projects, Paris: EIRMA.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, B. B.; Schroeder, R. G., y Sakakibara, S. [1994]: «A Framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument», Journal of Operations Research, vol. 1, n.° 4, 339–366.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, B. B.; Schroeder, R. G., y Flynn, E. J. [1999]: «World Class manufacturing: An investigation of Hayes and Wheelwright's foundation», Journal of Operations Research, vol. 17, 249–269.
   Google Scholar
• Galende, J., y Suárez, I. [1998]: «Los factores determinantes de las inversiones empresariales en I+D», Economía Industrial, n.° 319, 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• GAMBAU [1997]: «Análisis microeconómico de los determinantes de la innovación: aplicación a las empresas industriales españolas», Revista Española de Economía, vol. 14, n.° 1, 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Gemser, G., y Leenders, M. A. A. M. [2001]: «How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance», The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 18, 28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarnizo, J. V., y Guadamillas, F. [1998]: «Innovación y desarrollo tecnológico en las empresas industriales españolas», Economía Industrial, n.° 319, 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, R. H., y Wheelwright, S. C. [1984]: Restoring our competitive edge; Competing throught manufacturing, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hensley, R. [1999]: «A review of operations management studies using scale development techniques», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 17, 343–358.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., y Shea, C. M. [2001]: «Individual differences, environmental scanning, innovation framing, and champion behaviour: Key predictors of project performance», The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 18, 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram, J.; Droge, C., y Vickery, S. K. [1999]: «The impact of human resource management practices on manufacturing performance», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 18, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joreskog, K. [1971]: «Statistical analysis of sets of codgenric test», Psycometrica, vol. 36, junio, 109–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. N. [1975]: Investigación del comportamiento. Técnicas y metodología, México: Nueva Editorial Interamericana, S.A. de C.V.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A. [1993]: New concepts in innovation output measurement. Klein-Kecht, A., y Bain, D. (Edits.), St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koste, L. L., y Malhotra, M. K. [1999]: «A theoretical framework for analyzing the dimensions of manufacturing flexibility», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 19, 75–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwork, W. C. C., y Sharp, D. J. [1998]: «A review of construct measurement issues in Behavioural Accounting research», Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 17, 137–174.
   Google Scholar
• Latiesa, M. [1998]: «Validez y fiabilidad de las observaciones sociológicas», en GARCIA, M.; IBÁÑEZ, J., y ALVIRA, F. (Coord.): Análisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigación, Madrid: Alianza Editorial).
   Google Scholar
• Madrigal, R., y Miller, C. M. [1996]: «Construct validity of spouses' relative influence measures: an application of the Direct Product Model», Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 24, n.° 2, 152–170.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, R. [1995]: Psicometría: Teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos, Madrid: Editorial Síntesis, S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. [1980]: «Test validity and the ethics of assessment», American Psychologist, vol. 35: 1012–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MINISTERIO DE INDUSTRIA Y ENERGÍA [1994]: Encuesta sobre estrategias empresariales, Madrid: Ministerio de Industria y Energía.
   Google Scholar
• Minor, E. D.; Hensley, R. L., y Wood, D. R. [1994]: «A review of empirical manufacturing studies», International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 14, n.° 1, 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. [1978]: Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2.a ed.
   Google Scholar
• OCDE [1991]: OCDE Proposed Guidelines for Colecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (Oslo Manual), DSTI/STII/IND/STO (91) 3, París.
   Google Scholar
• OCDE [1996]: The measurement of Scientific and technological activities. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Oslo Manual, European Commission (EUROSTAT).
   Google Scholar
• O'leary-Kelly, S. W., y Vokurka, R. J. [1998]: «The empirical assessment of construct validity», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 16, 386–405.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, P., y Pavitt, K. [1995]: «Patterns of technological activity: their measurement and interpretation», en Stoneman, P. (Ed.): Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, J. P., y Churchill, G. A. [1986]: «Relationships among research design choices and psychometric properties of rating scales: A meta-analysis», Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 23, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, J.; Miller, C. E., y Coe, B. [1995]: «Applied scale development: Measurement of store image», Journal of Applied Business Research, vol. 11, n.° 4, 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Sakakibara, S.; Flynn, B. B., y Schroeder, R. G. [1993]: «A framework and measurement instrument for just-in-time manufacturing», Production and Operations Management, vol. 2, n.° 3, 177–194.
   Google Scholar
• Samson, D., y Terziovski, M. [1999]: «The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 17, 393–409.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez, M., y Sarabia, F. J. [1999]: «Validez y habilidad de escalas», en SARABIA, F. J. (Coord.): Metodología para la investigación en marketing y dirección de empresas, Madrid: Editorial Pirámide.
   Google Scholar
• Saraph, J. V.; Benson, P. G., y Schroeder, R. G. [1989]: «An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management», Decision Sciences, vol. 20, 810–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, D. P. [1980]: «Construct validity in organizational behavior», Organizational Behavior, vol. 2, 3–43.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. [1912]: Teoría del desenvolvimiento económico, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 3.a ed., 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. D.; Souder, W. E., y Jenssen, S. A. [2000]: «Differencial effects of the primary forms of cross functional integration on product development cycle time», The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 17, 257–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, M. H., y Yasin, M. M. [1997]: «Advanced manufacturing technology: Implementation policy and performance», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 15, 349–370.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, M.; Vonverembse, M., y Lim, J. S. [1999]: «Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: Keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving perfomance», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 17, 411–428.
   Google Scholar
• Urraca, A. [1998]: «I+D y recursos alternativos a la innovación en la industria española», Economía Industrial, n.° 319, 91–104.’
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, S. K.; Dröge, C., y Germain, R. [1999]: «The relationship between product customization and organizational structure», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 17: 377–391.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, P. T.; Leong, G. K., y Boyer, K. K. [1994]: «Manufacturing proactiveness and performance», Decision Science, vol. 25, n.° 3, 337–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar