BIBLIOGRAFÍA

• AECA [1988]: «La competítividad de la empresa: concepto, características y factores determinantes», Principios de Organización de Empresas, Documento n.° 4, Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas.
   Google Scholar
• AECA [1999]: «Estrategia empresarial: Modelo dinámico del proceso estratégico», Principios de Organización y Sistemas, Documento n.° 9, Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas.
   Google Scholar
• AECA [2002]: «Factores determinantes de la eficiencia y rentabilidad de las Pyme en España», Estudios Empíricos, Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, J. A., y Barnecilla, S. [1999]: «Retorno a la competitividad: nuevos desarrollos», Revista Vasca de Economía, n.° 44, pp. 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, K. [1971]: The concept of corporate strategy, Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Ansoff, H. [1965]: Corporate stretegy: an analytical approach to business policy for growth and expansion, McGraw-Hill, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bahace, M. S. [1992]: «Strategy-comprehensiveness fit and performance», Australian Journal of Management, 17, 2, December.
   Google Scholar
• Bantel, K. A., y Osborn, R. N. [1995]: «The influence of performance, environment and size on the iden- tifiability of firm strategy», British Journal of Management, Vol. 6, pp. 235–248.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno, E.; Casani, F., y Lizcano, J. L. [1999]: «Formación de la estrategia empresarial: un análisis de las dinámicas del proceso estratégico», Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, extraordinario n.° 100, pp. 195–217.
   Google Scholar
• Camisón, C. [1997]: La competítividad de la pyme industrial española: estrategia y competencias distintivas, Ed. Civitas, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Camisón, C. [2001]: La competítividad de la empresa industrial de la Comunidad Valenciana: análisis del efecto del atractivo del entorno, los distritos industriales y las estrategias empresariales, Ed. Tirant Lo Blanch, Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Cañibano calvo, L. [1996]: Análisis contable de la realidad económica, Ed. Pirámide, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• COMISIÓN EUROPEA [1996]: Euro-Info 88/ES.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, J. S.; Mokwa, P. R., y Varadarajan, P. R. [1990]: «Strategie types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizacional performance: a multiple measures-based study», Strategie Management Journal, 11, pp. 365–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuervo, A. [1993]: «El papel de la empresa en la competítividad», Papeles de Economía, n.° 56, pp. 362–378.
   Google Scholar
• Croteau, A. M.; Raymond, L., y Bergeron, F. [1999]: «Testing the validity of Miles and Snow?s typology», Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal, Vol. 2, n.° 2, pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. A. D. [1962]: Strategy and structure, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davig, W. [1986]: «Business strategies in smaller manufacturing firms», Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 24, n.° 1, pp. 38–46.
   Google Scholar
• Day, G. S., y Wensley, R. [1988]: «Assessing competitive advantage: a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority», Journal of Marketing, 52, pp. 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delery, J. E., y Doty, D. H. [1996]: «Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions», Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, n.° 4, pp. 802–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., y Davis, P. S. [1984]: «Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance», Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, n.° 3, pp. 467–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvir, D.; Segev, E. y Shenar, A. [1993]: «Technology's varying impact on the success of strategic business units within Miles and Snow typology», Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), pp. 155–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, R. G. [1991]: «The performance measurement manifesto», Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Febr., pp. 131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Freel, M. [2000]: «External linkages and product innovation in small manufacturing firms», Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 12, n.° 3, pp. 245–266.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, C., y Schendel, D. [1983]: «An empirical analysis of strategy types», Strategic of Management Journal, n.° 4, pp. 153–173.
   Google Scholar
• Gallego, A. M., y Gómez albero, M. A. [2002]: «Análisis integrado de la absorciÓn y la quiebra empresarial mediante la estimaciÓn de un modelo multilogit», Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, n.° 111, pp. 111–143.
   Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. y Machin, S. [1992]: «Do innovating firms outperform non-innovators?», Business Strategy Review, summer, pp. 79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, A. [1984]: «Operationalizing organizational strategy: Toward an integrative framework», The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, n.° 3, pp. 548–557.
   Google Scholar
• González pérez, A. L.; Correa rodríguez, A., y Acosta molina, M. [2002]: «Factores determinantes de la rentabilidad de las pymes», Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, Vol. XXXI, n.° 112, abril-junio.
   Google Scholar
• Green, W. H. [1997]: Econometric Analysis, Prentice-Hall International, Ine, 3.a ed.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. [1983]: «Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types», Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, n.° 1, pp. 5–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heunks, F. [1998]: «Innovation, creativity and success», Small Business Economics, 10, pp. 263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohli, A. K., y Jaworski, B. J. [1990]: «Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications», Journal of Marketing, 54, pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. L., y Hatten, K. J. [1995]: «Research notes and communications: further evidence on the validity of the self typing paragraph approach: Miles and Snow strategic archetypes in banking», Strategic Management Journal, 16(2), pp. 161–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, D. F.; Rajaratnam, D., y Lawrence, F. B. [2003]: «Strategy-performance relationships in service firms: a test for equifinality», Journal of Management Issues, Vol. XXV(2), pp. 208–220.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., y Norton, D. P. [1993]: «Evaluación de resultados: algo más que números», Harvard-Deus-to Business Review, n.° 55, pp. 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, A. K., y Jaworski, B. J. [1990]: «Market orientation: the construct, research propositions and managerial implications», Journal of Marketing, 54, pp. 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotabe, M., y Duhan, D. F: [1993]: «Strategy clusters in japanese markets: firm performance implications», Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 21(1), pp. 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kotey, M., y Meredith, G. G. [1997]: «Relationships among onwer/manager personal values, business stra
   Google Scholar
• Kotha, S., y Nair, A. [1995]: «Strategy and environment as determinants of performance: evidence from the Japanese machine tool», Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16(7), pp. 497–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotha, S., y Vadlamani, L. [1995]: «Assesing generic strategies: an empirical investigation of two competing typologies in discrete manufacturing industries», Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, K.; Subramanian, R.; y Strandholm, K. [2001]: «Market orientation and performance: does organizational strategy matter?», Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 18(1), pp. 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lado, N. [1997]: «La tipología de estrategias de Miles y Snow: xm estudio aplicando una escala multi-ítem», Revista Europea de DirecciÓn y Economía de la Empresa, Vol. 6, n.° 2, pp. 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G., y Dess, G. [1996]: «Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and kinking it to performance», Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21(1), pp. 135–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuno, K., y Mentzer, J. T. [2000]: «The effects of strategic type on the market orientation-performance relationship», Journal of Marketing, 64, pp. 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdaniel, S. W., y Kolari, J. W. [1987]: «Marketing strategy implications of the Miles and Snow strategic typology», Journal of Marketing, 51(4), pp. 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgahan, A. M. [1999]: «Competition, strategy and business performance», California Management Review, Vol. 41(3), pp. 74–102.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E., y Snow, C. C. [1978]: Organizational strategy, structure and process, West Publishing Company, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E., y Cameron, K. [1982]: Coffin nails and corporate strategy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Namiki, N. [1989]: «Miles and Snow's typology of strategy, perceived environmental uncertainty and organizational performance», Akron Business and Economic Review, 20(2), pp. 72–88.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, P. D., y Bokor, D. W. [1995]: «Strategy process-content interaction: effets on growth performance in small, start-up firms», Journal of Small Business Management 33(1), pp. 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnell, J. A. [1997]: «New evidence in the generic strategy and business performance debate: a research note», British Journal of Management, Vol. 8, pp. 175–181.
   Google Scholar
• Parnell, J. A. y Wright, P. [1993]: «Generic strategy and performance: an empirical test of the Miles and Snow typology», British Journal of Management, Vol. 4, pp. 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. [1980]: «Competitive strategy», Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. [1985]: «Competitive advantage», Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan, N. [1997]: «Strategic orientations, incentive plan adoptions, and firm performance: evidence from electric utility firms», Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 761–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugman, A. M., y Verbeke, A. [1987]: «Does competitive strategy work for small business?», Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 5, n.° 3, pp. 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, V. [1992]: Aspectos micro-organizativos de la competítividad, FundaciÓn Empresa Pública, Documento de Trabajo 9205.
   Google Scholar
• Salgueiro, A. [2001]: Indicadores de gestión y cuadro de mando, Ed. Díaz De Santos, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Segev, E. [1989]: «A systematic comparative analysis and synthesis of two business-level strategies typologies», Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 487–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortell, S. M., y Zajac, E. J. [1990]: «Perceptual and Archival Measures of Miles and Snow's Strategic Types: A Comprehensive Assessment of Reliability and Validity», Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, n.° 4, pp. 817–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, S. F, y Narver, J. C. [1994]: «Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship?», Journal of Marketing, 58, pp. 46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, S., y Olson, E. M. [2000]: «Strategy type and performance: the influence of sales force management», Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 813–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. G.; Guthrie, J. P., y Chen, M-J. [1986]: «Miles y Snow's tipology of strategy, organizational size and organizacional performance», Academic of Management Proceedings, 5, pp. 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. G.; Guthrie, J. P., y Ciien, M-J. [1989]: «Strategy, size and performance», Organization Studies, 10(1), pp. 63–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. C., y Hambrick, D. C. [1980]: «Measuring organizational strategies. Some theoretical and methodological problems», Academy of Management Review, 5, pp. 527–538.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. C., y Hrebiniak, L. G. [1980]: «Strategy, distinctive competence and organizational performance», Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, pp. 317–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, M. T., y Szwejczewski, M. [1996]: «Manufacturing strategy and performance». International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 16(5), pp. 25–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, J. T. [2003]: Empirical study of medium to large sized companies. Environment, competency, strategy types and performance, DBA, Henley Management College, Oxfordshire.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. S., y Ramaswamy, K. [1996]: «Matching managers to strategy: further tests of the Miles and Snow typology», British Journal of Management, Vol. 7, pp. 247–261.
   Google Scholar
• Veliyath, R., y Shortell, S. M. [1993]: «Strategic orientation, strategic planning system characteristics and performance», The Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 30, n.° 3, pp. 359–381.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigth, P.; Kroll, M.; Chan, P., y Hamel, K. [1991]: «Strategic profiles and performance: an empirical test of select key propositions», Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sdence, Vol. 19, n.° 3, pp. 245–254.
   Google Scholar
• Zajac, E. C., y Shortell, S. M. [1989]: «Changing generic strategies: likelihood, direction, and performance implications», Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp. 413–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar