6. BIBLIOGRAFÍA

• Ahnell, L.; Davidson, L., y Mckenzie, K. [1995]: «Case Note: A First Experience with SEA Reporting», International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 18(2 y 3), pp. 581–591.
   Google Scholar
• Aibar-Guzmán, C., y Da silva, M. J. [2003]: Management Indicators in Public Entities: A Comparison Between the Practices Used in Spain and Portugal, Paper Presented at the XXVI Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association, Sevilla, April, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Albi, E.; González-páramo, J. M., y López casanovas, G. [1997]: Gestión pública, Ariel Economía, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J., y Baird, J. [1997]: «Performance Monitoring in the Australian Public Services: A Government-Wide Analysis», Public Money and Management, April-June, pp. 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N. [1992]: «Productivity Barriers in the Public Sector», in HOLZER [1999]: Public Productivity Handbook, National Center for Public Productivity, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N.; Coe, C., y Lombardo, M. [2001]: «Performance-Comparison Projects in Local Governments: Participants Perspectives», Public Administration Review, Vol. 61(1), pp. 100–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R.; Boyne, G. A.; Law, J., y Walker, R. M. [2002]: «A Comparison of Local Authority Performance in England and Wales», Discussion Paper, Local and Regional Government Research Unit, London.
   Google Scholar
• ASOCIACIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE CONTABILIDAD Y ADMINISTRACIÓN DE EMPRESAS [1989]: Estrategias y Políticas Empresariales, Documento 2, Principios de Organización y Sistemas, AECA, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• ASOCIACIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE CONTABILIDAD Y ADMINISTRACIÓN DE EMPRESAS [1994]: Glosario de Contabilidad de Gestión, Documento 0, Principios de Contabilidad de Gestión, AECA, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• ASOCIACIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE CONTABILIDAD Y ADMINISTRACIÓN DE EMPRESAS [1997]: Indicadores de Gestión para las Entidades Públicas, Documento 16, Contabilidad de Gestión, AECA, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• ASOCIACIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE CONTABILIDAD Y ADMINISTRACIÓN DE EMPRESAS [2002]: Un Sistema de Indicadores de Gestión para los Ayuntamientos, Documento 26, Contabilidad de Gestión, AECA, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• AUDIT COMMISSION [2000]: Audit Commission's Role in Setting Statutory Performance Indicators. Consultation Feedback, Audit Commission, London.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E., y Wang, X. [2000]: «Performance Measurement in US Counties: Capacity for Reform», Public Administration Review, Vol. 60(5), pp. 409–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S., y Wechsler, B. [1995]: «State Agencies Experience with Strategic Planning: Findings from a National Survey», Public Administration Review, Vol. 55(2), pp. 159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. [2001]: «Planning, Performance and Public Services», Public Administration Review, vol. 79(1), pp. 73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G.; Gould-Williams, J.; Law, J., y Walker, R. [2002]: Wales Evaluation Study on Best Value, Working Paper n.° 1, Audit Commission, London.
   Google Scholar
• Brignall, S., y Modell, S. [1999]: An Institutional Perspective on Performance Mesurement and Management in the Public Sector, 22th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, C. A. [1995]: «Performance-Based Government Models: Building a Track Record», Public Budgeting and Finance, Vol. 15(4), pp. 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, P. E.; Gordon, V., y Jeffers, S. [2002]: The Use of Performance Measurement Tools and Techniques by State Agencies, Paper to be Presented at The 2001 Annual Meeting ABFM, January.
   Google Scholar
• CÁMARA DE CUENTAS DE ANDALUCÍA [2000]: Fiscalización operativa de las dotaciones y costes de la policía local en los Ayuntamientos Capital de Provincia, 2000, Informe SL 07/2000, BOJA n.° 110 de 11–06–2003.
   Google Scholar
• CÁMARA DE CUENTAS DE ANDALUCÍA [2001]: Fiscalización del servicio municipal de transporte urbano, ejercicio 2000, Informe OE 06/2001, BOJA n.° 84 de 06–05–2003.
   Google Scholar
• CÁMARA DE CUENTAS DE ANDALUCÍA [2002]: El tratamiento de los residuos sólidos urbanos de Andalucía, 2001, Informe OE 06/2002, BOJA pendiente de publicar.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N., y Greer, P. [1993]: «Evaluating Agencies: the Newt Steps and Performance Indicators», Public Administration Review, Vol. 71, pp. 407–416.
   Google Scholar
• Enticott, G.; Walker, R. M.; Boyne, G. A.; Martin, S., y Ashworth, R. [2002]: Best Value in English Local Governments: Summary Results from the Census of Local Authorities in 2001, Report Prepared for The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
   Google Scholar
• FEDERACIÓN NAVARRA DE MUNICIPIOS Y CONCEJOS [1986]: Sistemas de información y evaluación por indicadores de la gestión pública local, Vols. 1 y 2, FNMC, Pamplona.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, A. L. [2002]: «An Examination of the Impact of Budget Reform on Arizona and Oklahoma Appropriations», Public Budgeting and Finance, Fall, pp. 26–45.
   Google Scholar
• García alegre, E. [2000]: «La determinación de los costes de los servicios público locales», Auditoría Pública, n.° 20, pp. 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• García valderrama, T., y Calzado cejas, Y. [1995]: «Metodología de evaluación de la eficiencia en las entidades públicas», Presupuesto y Gasto Público, n.° 15, pp. 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• Garsombke, H. P., y Schrad, J. [1999]: «Performance Measurement Systems: Results Form a City and State Survey», Government Finance Review, February, pp. 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Grizzle, G. A., y Pettijohn, C. D. [2002]: «Implementing Performance-Based Program Budgeting: A System-Dynamics Perspective», Public Administration Review, Vol. 62(1), pp. 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD BOARD [1997]: Survey of State and Local Government Use and Reporting of Performance Measures, GASB, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD BOARD [2000]: State and Local Government Case Studies on Use and the Effects of Using Performance Measures for Budgeting, Management and Reporting, GASB, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD BOARD [2002a]: Performance Measurement at the State and Local Levels: A Summary of Survey Results, GASB, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD BOARD [2002b]: State and Local Government Case Studies on Use and the Effects of Using Performance Measures for Budgeting, Management and Reporting, GASB, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Haselbekke, A. G. J. [1995]: «Public Policy and Performance Measurement in the Netherlands», Public Money and Management, October-December, pp. 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschmann, D. [2002]: «Thermometer or Sauna?: Performance Measurement and Democratic Assistance in the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)», Public Administration Review, Vol. 80(2), pp. 235–255.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, N., y Eden, R. [2000]: «A Study of the Co-ordination of Mission, Objectives and Targets in UK Executive Agencies», Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp. 175–191.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, N., y Eden, R. [2001]: «Rational Management, Performance Targets and Executive Agencies: Views from Agency Chief Executives in Northern Ireland», Public Administration Review, Vol. 79(3), pp. 579–598.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, A. [1999]: «Implementation Mode, and Local Government Performance Measurement: A Norwegian Experience», Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 15(1), pp. 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. M., y Hackbat, M. M. [1999]: «Performance Budgeting and Performance Funding in the States: A Status Assessment», Public Budgeting and Finance, Fall, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kliivers, R. [2001]: «An Analysis of Introducing Program Budgeting in local Government» Public Bud
   Google Scholar
• Lancer, P. DE [2001]: «Does Participation Increase Perceptions of Usefulness? A Evaluation of a Participatory Approach to the Development of Performance Measures», Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 24(4), pp. 403–418.
   Google Scholar
• De lancer, P., y Holzer, M. [2001]: «Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation», Public Administration Review, Vol. 61(6), pp. 693–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R., y Burns, R. C. [2000]: «Performance Measurement in State Budgeting: Advancement and Backsliding From 1990 to 1995», Public Budgeting and Finance, Spring, pp. 38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Likierman, A. [1993]: «Performance Indicators: 20 Early Lessons from Managerial Use», Public Money and Management, n.° 13, pp. 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Melkers, J. E., y Willoughby [1998]: «The State of the States: Performance-Based Budgeting Requirements in 47 out of 50», Public Administration Review, Vol. 58(1), pp. 66–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers, J. E., y Willoughby [2001]: «Budgeters' Views of State Performance-Budgeting Systems: Distinctions Across Branches», Public Administration Review, Vol. 61(1), pp. 54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers, J. E., y Willoughby [2002]: «Evolving Performance Measurement in Local Governments», Draft Presented at The 2002 Meeting of the ABFM, Kansas City, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Miaja fol, M., y Estrada gonzález, E. M. [1996]: Primeros años de aplicación de las instrucciones de contabilidad para la administración local, Ponencia presentada a las IV Jornadas de Trabajo sobre Contabilidad Pública, Zaragoza.
   Google Scholar
• Miaja fol, M., y Estrada gonzález, E. M. [1999]: Perspectivas de adaptación del Plan General de Contabilidad Pública de 1994 a la Administración local, Ponencia presentada a las V Jornadas de Trabajo sobre Contabilidad Pública, Málaga.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. I., y Miller, M. A. [1991]: «Standards of Excellence: US Residents' Evaluation of Local Government Services», Public Administration Review, Vol. 51(6), pp. 503–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NATIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW [1997]: Serving the American Public: Best Practices in Performance Measurement, Benchmarking Study Report, USA, June.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro galera, A., y Rodríguez bolívar, M. P. [2004]: «Análisis de la utilidad del fair value para la valoración de activos de las administraciones públicas españolas», Revista de Contabilidad, Vol. 7(13), pp. 245–276.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, E. [1994]: Manual de investigación comercial, Editorial Pirámide, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• PABLOS RODRÍGUEZ [1997]: «El proceso de planificación y control y el sistema de información para la gestión», Cuadernos Aragoneses de Economía, Vol. 7(1), pp. 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., y Streib, G. [1999]: «Performance Measurement in Municipal Government: Assessing the State of the Practice», Public Administration Review, Vol. 59(4), pp. 325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRICE WATERHOUSE [1990]: Value for Money Auditing. The Investigation of Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness, Gee and Co Publishers, London.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, K. [1994]: «Performance Measurement in a Direct Democratic Environment: Local Government Reforms in Switzerland», Public Budgeting and Finance, Winter, pp. 36–53.
   Google Scholar
• Scheps, P. B. [2000]: «Linking Performance Measures to Resource Allocation», Government Finance Review, June, pp. 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• SINDICATURA DE COMPTES DE CATALUNYA [1995]: Transporte urbano colectivo de superficie en Cataluña. Indicadores 1994, Informe 21/95-SM, Sindicatura de Comptes de Catalunya.
   Google Scholar
• SINDICATURA DE COMPTES DE CATALUNYA [2001]: Eficiencia y coste de los servicios locales de recogida de basuras, Informe 7/B, Sindicatura de Comptes de Catalunya.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. F. [1990]: «The use of Performance Indicators in the Public Sector», Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 153, part 1, pp. 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. F. [1999]: «The Benefits and Threats of PBB: An Assessment of Modern Reform», Public Budgeting and Finance, Fall, pp. 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, F., y Wechsler, B. [1995]: «State Agencies' Experience with Strategic Planning: Findings from a National Survey», Public Administration Review, Vol. 55(2), pp. 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. [1995]: «Problems with Service Performance Reporting: The Case of Public Art Galleries», Financial, Accountability and Management, Vol. 11(4), pp. 175–191.
   Google Scholar
• Tower, G. [1998]: «An Analysis of Performance Indicators in Annual Reports of Aboriginal-Based Programs in Western Australia», Accountability and Performance, Vol. 4(2), pp. 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, N., y Zaleski, G. [1996]: «Criteria for Developing Performance Measurement Systems in the Public Sector», International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 19(11 and 12), pp. 1945–1978.
   Google Scholar
• Van helden, G. J. [1998]: «A Review of the Policy and Management Instruments Project for Municipalities in the Netherlands», Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 14(2), pp. 85–104.
   Google Scholar
• Van helden, G. J., y Johnse, A. [2000]: A Comparative Analysis of the Development of Performance-Base Management Systems in Dutch and Norwegian Local Government, Paper to be Presented at The EIASM International Conference on Accounting, Auditing and Management in Public Sector Reforms, Zaragoza, Spain, September, pp. 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, A., y Martín, G. [2003]: «The Disclosure of the Key Performance Indicators in the Public Sector», Public Management Review, Vol. 5(4), pp. 491–509.
   Google Scholar
• Wiioley, J., y Hatry, H. [1992]: «The Case for Performance Monitoring», Public Administration Review, 52(6), pp. 604–610.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby, K. [2002]: Performance Measurement Importance to State Budget Process and Deliberation, Paper Presented at The Annual Meeting of the Association of Budgeting and Financial Management of ASPA, Washington, January, pp. 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby, K., y Melkers, J. E. [2000]: «Implementing PBB: Conflicting Mews of Success», Public Budgeting and Finance, Spring, pp. 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, A., y Dollery, B. [2000]: Measuring Performance in Australian Local Governments: An Analysis of National and State-Based Frameworks, Work Paper of Queensland University of Technology, School of Economics and Finance.
   Google Scholar