REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS

• Abbott, L. J.; Parker, S.; Peters, G. F., y Raghunandan, K. 2003. An empirical investigation of audit fees, non-audit fees, and audit committees, Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2), 215–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, E. 1968. Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis, and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy, Journal of Finance, 23, 589–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anandarajan, A., y Jaenicke, H. R. 1995. How auditors' reporting choices influence loan officers' decisions, The Journal of Commercial Lending, mayo, 55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bamber, E. M., y Stratton, R. A. 1997. The information content of the uncertainty-modified audit report: evidence from bank loan officers, Accounting Horizons, 11(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, D. W.; Noland, T. R., y Winters, D. B. 1998. The Value of Auditor Assurance: Evidence from Loan Pricing, Journal of Accounting Research, 36(1), 57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, A. N., y Udell, G. F. 1995. Relationship Lending and Lines of Credit in Small Firm Finance, Journal of Business, 68(3), 351–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., y Nagy, A. L. 2004. Client size, auditor specialization and fraudulent financial reporting, Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(5), 651–668.
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, G., y Murray, D. 1998. The association between auditor quality and auditor size: an analysis of small CPA firms, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 13, 135–350.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinides, S. 2002. Auditors', bankers' and insolvency practitioners' going-concern opinion logit model, Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(8), 487–501.
   Google Scholar
• Cravens, K. S.; Flagg, J. C., y Glover, H. D. 1994. A Comparison of Client Characteristics by Auditor Attributes: Implications for the Auditor Selection Process, Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(3), 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• De angelo, L. 1981. Auditor size and auditor quality, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1, 113–127.
   Google Scholar
• Defond, M. L.; Raghunandan, K., y Subramanyam, K. R. 2002. Do Non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions, Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, D. W. 1989. Reputation Acquisition in Debt Markets, Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 828862.
   Google Scholar
• Dopouch, N.; Holthausen, R. W., y Leftwich, R. W. 1987. Predicting Audit Qualifications with Financial and Market Variables, The Accounting Review, 62(3), 431–54.
   Google Scholar
• Duréndez, A. 2003. The usefulness of the audit report in investment and financing decisions, Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(6), 549–559.
   Google Scholar
• Duréndez, A. 2004, La Auditoría de Cuentas en España: un estudio empírico sobre la función, utilidad y comprensión del informe de auditoría, ProQuest-UMI.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, R., y Reimer, M. 1977. A study of the effect of qualified auditors' opinions on bankers' lending decisions, Accounting and Business Research, otoño, 250–259.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. 1985. What's Different about Banks? Journal of Monetary Economics, 15, 29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., y French, K. R. 2002. Testing Tradeoff and Pecking Order Predictions About Dividends and Debt, The Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargher, N., Taylor, M. H., y Simon, D. T. 2001. The demand for auditor reputation across international markets for audit services, The International Journal of Accounting, 36, 407–421.
   Google Scholar
• Fazzari, S., Hubbard, R., y Petersen, B. 1988. Financing constraints and corporate investment, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 141–206.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., y Stokes, D. 2002. Brand Name Audit Pricing, Industry Specialization, and Leadership Premiums post-Big 8 and Big 6 Mergers, Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(1), 77–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feroz, E. H.; Park, K., y Pastena, V. S. 1991. The Financial and Market Effects of the SEC's Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases, Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 107–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L. P.; Fraser, D. R., y Wilkins, M. S. 2004. An investigation of the pricing of audit services for financial institutions, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23, 53–77.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, M. 1979. Qualified audit reports and bank lending decisions, Journal of Bank Research, invierno, 231–241.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, M. 1980. A note on the impact of audit qualifications on lending and credit decisions, Journal of Banking and Finance, 4, 257–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., y Krishnan, J. 1999. Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism, Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1), 135–165.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J., y Wilson, E. 1988. Auditor Changes a Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation, The Accounting Review, 63(4), 663–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García benau, M. A.; Garrido, P.; Vico, A.; Moizer, P., y Humphrey, C. 1999. La calidad del servicio de auditoría: Los auditores vistos por sus clientes, Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 102, 1.005–1.041.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A. 1992. Audit disclosures of consistency: an analysis of loan officer reaction to SAS 58, Advances in Accounting, 10, 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, G., y Moizer, P. 1990. The Meaning of Audit Reports, Accounting and Business Research, 78, 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, K. A. 1983. Audit reports. Their impact on the loan decision process and outcome: an experiment, Accounting and Business Research, invierno, 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., y Lyon, R. A. 1994. A simulated lending decision with external management audit reports, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7(4), 73–93.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., y Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, V. E.; Khurana, I. K., y Reynolds, J. K. 2002. Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports, Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 637–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. A.; Pany, K., y White, R. 1983. Audit reports and the loan decision: actions and perceptions, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2(2), 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, G. D., y Velury, U. 2004. The role of institutional ownership in the market for auditing services: an empirical investigation, Journal of Business Research, 57, 976–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kida, T. 1980. An investigation into auditor's continuity and related qualification judgments, Journal of Accounting Research, 18(2), 506–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, D. P., y Belt, B. 1994. Sustainable Growth and Choice of Financing: A Test of the Pecking Order Hypothesis, Review of Financial Economics, 3(2), 141–154.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J., y Krishnan, J. 1996. The role of economic trade-offs in the Audit Opinion decision: an empirical analysis, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 4, 565–586.
   Google Scholar
• Lasalle, R. E., y Anandarajan, A. 1997. Bank loan officers' reactions to audit reports issued to entities with Litigation and going concern uncertainties, Accounting Horizons, 11(2), 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Leland, H. E. 1998. Agency costs, risk management and capital structure, The Journal of Finance, 53(4), 1.213–1.243.
   Google Scholar
• Libby, R. 1979a. The Impact of Uncertainty Reporting on the Loan Decision, Journal of Accounting Research, 17, 35–71.
   Google Scholar
• Libby, R. 1979b. Bankers' and Auditors' Perceptions of the Message Communicated by the Audit Report, Journal of Accounting Research, 17(1), 99–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Z. J., Tang, Q., y Xiao, J. 2003. An experimental study of users' responses to qualified audit reports in China, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 12, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mansi, S. A.; Maxwell, W. F., y Miller, D. P. 2004. Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market, Journal of Accounting Research, 42(4), 755–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. 1977. Debt and taxes, Journal of Finance, 32(2), 261–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. R., y Smith, L. M. 2002. The Effects of the level of assurance, accounting firm, capital structure, and bank size on bank lending decisions, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17(1), 51–73.
   Google Scholar
• Modigliani, F., y Miller, M. 1958. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment, American Economic Review, 48, 261–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moizer, P. 1997. Auditor reputation: the international empirical evidence. International Journal of Auditing, 1(1), 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Mutchler, J.; Hopwood, W., y Mckeown, J. 1997. The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies, Journal of Accounting Research, 35, 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. C., y Majluf, N. S. 1984. Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have, Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, R. D., y Rittenberg, L. E. 1987. Messages Perceived from Audit, Review, and Compilation Reports: Extension to More Diverse Groups, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 7(1), 15–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocaña, C.; Salas, V., y Valles, J. 1994. Un análisis empírico de la financiación de la pequeña y mediana empresa manufacturera española: 1983–1989, Moneda y Crédito 199, 57–96.
   Google Scholar
• Palmrose, Z. 1988. An analysis of auditors litigation and audit service quality, The Accounting Review, 63(1), 55–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pany, K., y Johnson, D. A. 1985. Forecasts auditor review and bank loan decisions, Journal of Accounting Research, 22(2), 731–743.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, R., y Singer, R. 1985. Small business finance: a research agenda, Financial Management, 14(3), 47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillsbury, C. M. 1985. Limited Assurance Engagements, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 4(2). 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Piot, C. 2001. Agency costs and audit quality: evidence from France. European Accounting Review, 10(3), 461–499.
   Google Scholar
• Pittman, J. A., y Fortin, S. 2004. Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for newly public firms, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37, 113–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle, L. M.; Crum, R. P., y Swetz, R. J. 1990. Do SAS no 59 format changes affect the outcome and the quality of investment decisions? Accounting Horizons, September, 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, R. G., y Zingales, L. 1995. What do We know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data, Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1.421–1.460.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. K., y Francis, J. R. 2001. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30, 375–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. C. 1988. Analysts' Reactions to Auditors' Messages in Qualified Reports, Accounting Horizons, June, 82–89.
   Google Scholar
• Rollins, T. P., y Bremser, W. G. 1997. The Sec's enforcement actions against auditors: an auditor reputation and institutional theory perspective, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8, 191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Sainty, B. J., Taylor, G. K., y Williams, D. D. 2002. Investor dissatisfaction toward auditors, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17(2), 111–137.
   Google Scholar
• Shocley, R., y Holt, R. 1983. A Behavioral Investigation of Supplier Differentiation in the Market for Audit Services, Journal of Accounting Research, 21(2), 545–564.
   Google Scholar
• Spathis, C. M.; Doumpos, M., y Zopounidis, C. 2003. Using client performance measures to identify pre-engagement factors associated with qualified audit. Reports in Greece, The International Journal of Accounting, 38, 267–284.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J., y Weiss, A. 1981. Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information, The American Economic Review, 71, 393–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucher, P.; Moizer, P. y Zarova, M. 1999. The images of the Big Six audit firms in the Czech Republic. The European Accounting Review, 8(3), 499–521.
   Google Scholar
• Sundgren, S. 1998. Auditor choices and auditor reporting practices: evidence from Finnish small firms. The European Accounting Review, 7(3), 443–465.
   Google Scholar
• Vico martínez, A., y Pucheta martínez, M. C. 2005. Un estudio empírico acerca de la relevancia del informe de auditoría entre los analistas de riesgos de las entidades de crédito, Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 124, 45–75.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, J. B. 1977. Bankruptcy Costs: Some Evidence, Journal of Finance, 32(2), 337–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whisenant, S.; Sankaraguruswamy, S., y Raghunandan, K. 2003. Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non-audit fees, Journal of Accounting Research, 41(4), 721–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijst, D. V. 1989. Financial Structure in Small Business, Theory, Tests and Applications, Berlín: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar