BIBLIOGRAFÍA

• Aldrich, H. E., y Pfeffer, J. 1976. Enviroments of Organitations. Annual Review of Sociology 2: 79–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amat, O. 1999. EVA. Valor añadido económico. Un nuevo enfoque para optimizar la gestión, motivar y crear valor. Barcelona: Ediciones Gestión 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Arellano, M. 1990. Testing for Autocorrelation in Dynamic Random Effects Models. Review of Economic Studies 57: 127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., y Bover, O. 1990. La EconometrÍa de datos de panel. Investigaciones Económicas 1: 3–45.
   Google Scholar
• Argandoña, A. 1998. The Stakeholders Theory and the Common Good. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 1093–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asher, C. C.; Mahoney, J. M., y Mahoney, J. T. 2005. Towards a Property Rights Foundation for a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm. Journal of Management and Governance 9: 5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, C.; Navarro, M., y Peña, I. 2002. Influence of knowledge-based intangible resources and alliances on business performance. Working paper presented at The transparent enterprise. The value of intangibles, 25–26 November, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Brickley, J. A.; Smith, C. W., y Zimmerman, J. L. 1997. Management Fads and Organizational Architecture. Journal of Corporate Finance 2(10): 24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bontis, N., y Chua, K. 2000. Intellectual Capital and Business Performance in Malaysian Industrie. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(1): 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bontis, N., y Fitz-Enz, J. 2002. Intellectual capital ROI: a Causal Map of Human Capital Antecedents and Consequents. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(3): 223–247.
   Google Scholar
• Both, R. 1997. Economic Value Added as a Management Incentive. Management Accounting October: 48.
   Google Scholar
• Breush, T. S.; Mizon, G. E., y Schmidt, P. 1989. Efficient Estimation Using Panel Data. Econometrica 57: 695–700.
   Google Scholar
• Bukh, N.; Nielsen, CH.; Gormsen, P., y Mouritsen, J. 2002. Disclosure of intellectual capital indicators in Danish IPO prospectuses. Working paper presented at The transparent enterprise. The value of intangibles, 25–26 November, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Cañibano, L.; García-Ayuso, M., y Sánchez, M. P. 1999. La relevancia de los intangibles para la valoración y la gestión de empresas: Revisión de la Literatura (1). Revista EspaÑola de Financiación y Contabilidad 100: 17–88.
   Google Scholar
• Cañibano, L.; García-Ayuso, M., y Sánchez, M. P. 1999. La valoración de intangibles: estudios de innovación versus información contable-financiera. Análisis Financiero 80: 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Carleton asher, CH.; Mahoney, J. M., y Mahoney, J. T. 2005. Towards a Property Rights Foundation for a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm. Journal of Management and Governance 9: 5 32.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, S.; Deyá, B., y Gutiérrez, I. 2003. El EVA como moda en control de gestión. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 118: 725–753.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, R., y Tansey, R. 2000. Intellectual Capital in the New Internet Economy. Its Meaning, Measurement and Management for Enhancing Quality. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(1): 296–311.
   Google Scholar
• Cazavan, A. 2002. Market to book ratio and recognition of intangibles, a French survey. Working paper presented at The transparent enterprise. The value of intangibles, 25–26 November, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Chauvel, D., y Despres, CH. 2002. Knowledge management and the management development function in European business. Working paper presented at The transparent enterprise. The value of intangibles, 25–26 November, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, T. 1990. Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cuello, D. J., y Walker, M. 2002. Stock market reaction to corporate accumulation of intangible resources. Working paper presented at The transparent enterprise. The value of intangibles, 25–26 November, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Darroch, J. 2002. Examinig the Link Between Knowledge Management Practices and Types of Innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(2): 261–272.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T. 2002. The Stakeholders Revolution and the Clarkson Principles. Business Ethics Quartely 2(12): 107–112.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., y Preston, L. 1995. The Stakeholders Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review 1(20): 65–91.
   Google Scholar
• Da costa, A. I., y Correia, R. M. 2002. The Brand as an Intangible Asset: The Portuguese Textil Sector. Working paper presented at The transparent enterprise. The value of intangibles, 25–26 November, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• De torre, A.; Clare, M., y Weide, J. 2002. Measuring the Value of Lincoln Re's R&D. Journal of Intellectual capital 1(3): 40–50.
   Google Scholar
• Esteban salvador, L. 2007. Consejos de Administración y creación de valor: la perspectiva de género. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 135: 645–648.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., y Philips, R. A. 2002. Stakeholders Theory: a Libertarian Defence. Business Ethics Quartely 3(12): 331–350.
   Google Scholar
• FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (FASB). 2001. Business combination. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards [SFAS], N.o 141. Norwalk CT.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbert, M.; Leibold, M., y Voelpel, S. 2001. Rejuvenating Corporate Intellectual Capital by Co-opting Customer Competence. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(2): 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. A., y Taylor, W. E. 1981. Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects. Econometrica 49: 1377–1398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwitz, K.; Lines, S.; Montgomery, B., y Schmidt, J. 2002. The Linkage Between Management Practices, Intangibles Performance and Stock Returns. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(3): 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. 2001. Value Maximisation, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objetive Function. European Financial Management 3(7): 297–317.
   Google Scholar
• Insinga, R. C., y Werle, M. J. 2000. Linking Outsourcing to Business Strategy. Academy of Management Executive 4: 58–70.
   Google Scholar
• INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARS COMMITTEE (IASC). 1989. Marco conceptual para la preparación y presentación de los estados financieros. Abril.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, F., y Morgan, K. 1998. Estrategias de excelencia organizacional. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kannan, R. S., y Akhilesh, K. B. 2002. Human Capital Knowledge Value Added. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(3): 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Lorca, P. 2003. La creación de valor en la empresa y los stakeholders. Harvard-Deusto Finanzas & Contabilidad 51: 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez ochoa, L. 2002. Gestión de conocimiento e intangibles: impacto en contabilidad y mercado de capitales. Tesis Doctoral. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. 2001. Is Intellectual Capital Performance and Disclosure Practices Related? Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(2): 192–203.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, E. 1998. La gestión del conocimiento en la era de la innovación. Dirección y Progreso 160: 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nerdrum, L., y Erikson, T. 2001. Intellectual Capital: a Human Capital Perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(2): 127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Ordóñez DE Pablos, P. 2002. Direct and Indirect Effects of Intellectual Capital on Organizational Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence. Working paper presented at The transparent enterprise. The value of intangibles, 25–26 November. Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Ordóñez DE Pablos, P. 2003. Evidence of Intellectual Capital Measurement from Asia, Europe and the middle East. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(3): 287–302.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. 1981. Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. New York: Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peña, I. 2002. Intellectual Capital and Business Star-up Success. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(3): 180–198.
   Google Scholar
• Peña, Miguel N. 2005. Modelos contables y financieros sobre capital intelectual y gestión del conocimiento. Revista de Estudios financieros 268: 183–236.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, T., y Watterman, R. 1982. In Search of Excellence. Lessons from American Best Run Companies. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Poppo, L., y Zenger, T. 1998. Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction on Knowledge-based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or-Buy Decisions in Information Services. Strategic Management Journal 19: 853–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahald, C. K., y Hamel, G. 1990. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review 68: 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojo ramírez, A., y García pérez DE Lema, D. 2006. La valoración de empresas en España: un estudio empírico. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 132: 913–934.
   Google Scholar
• Seetharaman, A.; Helmi, H., y Saravanan, A. S. 2002. Intellectual Capital Accounting and Reporting in the Knowledge Economy. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(3): 128–148.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, M.; Rios, A.; Tirado, P., y Carbonell, A. 2007. Identification of Groups and the Generation of Value in Spanish firms on the IBEX-35. Congreso internacional A la recherche de la performance: un concept de gestionnaire essential á l'entreprise, Febrero. ESC Bretagne Brest (Francia).
   Google Scholar
• Ventura, J.; Ordóñez, P.; García, J. L., y Arias, A. M. 2003. Capital intelectual y aprendizaje organizativo. Nuevos desafÍos para la empresa. Madrid: AENOR.
   Google Scholar
• Von mises, L. 2001. La acción humana. Tratado de Economía. Madrid: Unión Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whysall, P. 2000. Addressing Ethical Issues in Retailing: a Stakeholders Perspective. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 10(3): 305–318.
   Google Scholar