References

• Arruñada, B. (2004). Audit failure and the crisis of auditing. European Business Organization Law Review, 4, 635–643. doi:10.1017/S1566752904006354
   Google Scholar
• Arruñada, B., & Paz-Ares, C. (1997). Mandatory rotation of company auditors: A critical examination. International Review of Law and Economics, 17, 31–61. doi:10.1016/S0144-8188(96)00063-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asthana, S. C., & Boone, J. P. (2012). Abnormal audit fee and audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(3), 1–22. doi:10.2308/ajpt-10294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basioudis, I. G., Papakonstantinou, E., & Geiger, M. A. (2008). Audit fees, non-audit fees and auditor going-concern reporting decisions in the United Kingdom, ABACUS. A Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, 44, 284–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. X., Morgan, K. P., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1997). The impossibility of auditor independence. Sloan Management Review, 38(4), 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Blay, A. D., & Geiger, M. A. (2013). Auditor fees and auditor independence: Evidence from going concern reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30, 579–606. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan, J., Parkash, M., & Singhal, R. (2009). Going-concern audit opinions and the provision of nonaudit services: Implications for auditor independence of bankrupt firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28, 153–169. doi:10.2308/aud.2009.28.1.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano-Rodriguez, M., Sánchez-Alegría, S., & Arenas-Torres, P. (2016). The influence of auditor’s opinion and auditor’s reputation on the cost of debt: Evidence from private Spanish firms. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 45(1), 32–62. doi:10.1080/02102412.2015.1111096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J., & Nagy, A. (2004). Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 55–69. doi:10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J., & Neal, T. (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75, 453–467. doi:10.2308/accr.2000.75.4.453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, P., & Momparler, A. (2011). Nonaudit services provided by incumbent auditors and earnings management: Evidence of auditor independence from an EU country. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 40(152), 587–612. doi:10.1080/02102412.2011.10779712
   Google Scholar
• Carrera, M. N., Gutiérrez, I., & Carmona, S. (2005). Concentración en el mercado de auditoría en España: análisis empírico del período 1990–2000. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 34(125), 423–457. doi:10.1080/02102412.2005.10779552
   Google Scholar
• Carson, E., Fargher, N. L., Geiger, M. A., Lennox, C. S., Raghunandan, K., & Willekens, M. (2013). Audit reporting for going-concern uncertainty: A research synthesis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 353–384. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-H., Kim, J.-B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(2), 115–140. doi:10.2308/aud.2010.29.2.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H. S., & Kallapur, S. (2003). Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 78, 931–955. doi:10.2308/accr.2003.78.4.931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, B. K., Jenkins, J. G., McCracken, S. A., Roush, P. B., & Stanley, J. D. (2015). Auditor independence in fact: Research, regulatory, and practice implications drawn from experimental and archival research. Accounting Horizons, 29(1), 217–238. doi:10.2308/acch-50966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craswell, D., Stokes, J., & Laughton, J. (2002). Auditor independence and fee dependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 253–275. doi:10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00044-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fuentes, C., & Pucheta-Martínez, M. C. (2009). Auditor independence, joint determination of audit and non-audit fees and the incidence of qualified audit reports. Academia. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 43, 63–92.
   Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981a). Auditor independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113–127. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(81)90009-4
   Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981b). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyan, K. (2002). Do non-audit services fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 1247–1274. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Francis, J. R. (2005). Audit research after Sarbanes-Oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice &Theory, 24, 5–30. doi:10.2308/aud.2005.24.s-1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directiva 2006/43/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 17 de mayo de 2006, relativa a la auditoría legal de las cuentas anuales y de las cuentas consolidadas por la que se modifican las Directivas 78/660CEE y 83/349/CEE del Consejo y se deroga la Directiva 84/253/CE del Consejo.
   Google Scholar
• Directiva 2014/56/UE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 16 de abril de 2014 por la que se modifica la Directiva 2006/43/CE relativa a la auditoría legal de las cuentas anuales y de las cuentas consolidadas.
   Google Scholar
• Dye, R. A. (1991). Informationally motivated auditor replacement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14, 347–374. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(91)90008-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettredge, M., Li, C., & Emeigh, E. (2011). Auditor independence during the ‘Great Recession’ of 2007–2009. recuperado noviembre 2013, 11, de. Documento de trabajo. Disponible en SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1838485
   Google Scholar
• Firth, M. (1997). The provision of non-audit services and the pricing of audit fees. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24, 511–525. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.00118
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125–152. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Benau, M. A., Humphrey, C., Moizer, P., & Turley, S. (1993). Auditing expectations and performance in Spain and Britain: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Accounting, 28, 281–307.
   Google Scholar
• García Benau, M. A., Ruiz Barbadillo, E., & Vico Martínez, A. (2000). Factores que condicionan la elección y el cambio de auditor en la empresa española. Revista de Contabilidad, 3(6), 49–80.
   Google Scholar
• García Benau, M. A., & Vico Martínez, A. (2003). Los escándalos financieros y la auditoría: pérdida y recuperación de la confianza en una profesión en crisis. Revista Valenciana de Economía y Hacienda, 7(I), 25–48.
   Google Scholar
• García, J., & Argilés, J. M. (2013). Audit firm tenure and qualified opinions: New evidence from Spain. Revista de Contabilidad – Spanish Accounting Review, 16(2), 118–125. doi:10.1016/j.rcsar.2013.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & Raghunandan, K. (2002). Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21, 68–78. doi:10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (1998). Costs associated with going-concern modified audit opinions: An analysis of auditor changes, subsequent opinions, and client failures. Advances in Accounting, 16, 117–139.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2005). Recent changes in the association between bankruptcies and prior audit opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24, 21–35. doi:10.2308/aud.2005.24.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & Rama, D. V. (2003). Audit fees, nonaudit fees, and auditor reporting on stressed companies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 53–69. doi:10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gietzmann, M., & Sen, P. K. (2002). Improving auditor independence through selective mandatory rotation. International Journal of Auditing, 6, 183–210. doi:10.1111/j.1099-1123.2002.tb00012.x
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalo, J. A. (1995). Presentación: La auditoría, una profesión en la encrucijada de los noventa. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 24, 595–629.
   Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2010). Econometría (5ª Edición). México: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, D. (2013). Further evidence from meta-analysis of audit fee research. International Journal of Auditing, 17(2), 162–176. doi:10.1111/j.1099-1123.2012.00462.x
   Google Scholar
• Houston, R. W., Peters, M. F., & Pratt, J. H. (2005). Nonlitigation risk and pricing audit services. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(1), 37–53. doi:10.2308/aud.2005.24.1.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, V., Khurana, I., & Reynolds, J. (2002). Audit firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19, 637–661. doi:10.1506/LLTH-JXQV-8CEW-8MXD
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, K. M., Sutton, M. H., & Warfield, T. D. (2001). Antecedents and consequences of independence risk: Framework for analysis. Accounting Horizons, 15, 1–18. doi:10.2308/acch.2001.15.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Kao, J. L., Li, Y., & Zhang, W. (2014). Did SOX influence the association between fee dependence and auditors’ propensity to issue going-concern opinions? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(2), 165–185. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennox, C. S. (2000). Do companies successfully engage in opinion-shopping? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 321–337. doi:10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00025-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley 12/2010, de 30 de junio, por la que se modifica la Ley 19/1988, de 12 de julio, de Auditoría de Cuentas, la Ley 24/1988, de 28 de julio, del Mercado de Valores y el texto refundido de la Ley de Sociedades Anónimas aprobado por el Real Decreto Legislativo 1564/1989, de 22 de diciembre, para su adaptación a la normativa comunitaria.
   Google Scholar
• Ley 19/1988, de 12 de Julio, de Auditoría de Cuentas.
   Google Scholar
• Ley 22/2015, de 20 de julio, de Auditoría de Cuentas
   Google Scholar
• Ley 44/2002, de 22 de Noviembre, de Medidas de Reforma del Sistema Financiero
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. (2009). Does client importance affect auditor independence at the office level? Empirical evidence from going-concern opinions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26, 201–230. doi:10.1506/car.26.1.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee, R. P., & Tseng, M. (1990). Audit pricing and independence. The Accounting Review, 65, 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mautz, R. K., & Sharaf, H. A. (1961). Philosophy of auditing. Monograph No. 6, Evanston, IL: American Accounting Association, Sarasota.
   Google Scholar
• Monterrey, J., & Sánchez-Segura, A. (2007). Rotación y dependencia económica de los auditores: Sus efectos sobre la calidad del resultado en las compañía cotizadas españolas. Investigaciones Económicas, 31, 119–159. recuperado marzo 2016, 23, de. http://ftp.fundacionsepi.es/investigacion/revistas/paperArchive/Ene2007/v31i1a4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Numan, W., & Willekens, M. (2011). Competitive pressure, audit quality and specialization. Working paper, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Park, B.-J. (2015). Client importance and earnings quality: An analysis of the moderating effect of managerial incentives for target beating versus auditors’ incentives to avoid reputational losses and litigation. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española De Financiación Y Contabilidad, 44, 427–457. doi:10.1080/02102412.2015.1076634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz-Ares, C. (1996). La ley, el mercado y la independencia del auditor (1ª Edicion ed.). Madrid: Editorial Civitas, S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Ratzinger-Saker, N. V. S. (2013). Auditor fees and auditor independence - Evidence from going concern reporting decisions in Germany. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(4), 129–168. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real Decreto 1517/2011, de 31 de octubre, por el que se aprueba el Reglamento que desarrolla el texto refundido de la Ley de Auditoría de Cuentas, aprobado por el Real Decreto Legislativo 1/2011, de 1 de julio.
   Google Scholar
• Reglamento (UE) nº 537/2014 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 16 de abril de 2014, sobre los requisitos específicos para la auditoría legal de las entidades de interés público y por el que se deroga la Decisión 2005/909/CE de la Comisión.
   Google Scholar
• Resolución de 19 de enero de 1991, del Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas, por la que se publican las Normas Técnicas de Auditoría.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. K., & Francis, J. R. (2001). Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30, 375–400. doi:10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00010-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, R. (2005). Quack Corporate Governance. Regulation, 28(4): 36–44. Disponible en SSRN recuperado marzo 2016, 23, de http://ssrn.com/abstract=875370
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz Barbadillo, E., & Gómez Aguilar, N. (2003). Evidencia empírica sobre inductores del cambio de auditor: Especial referencia a la situación financiera de la empresa. Revista De Contabilidad, 6, 139–167. recuperado marzo, 2016, 23 de http://www.rc-sar.es/verPdf.php?articleId=99
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz Barbadillo, E., Gómez Aguilar, N., & Carrera Pena, N. (2006). Evidencia empírica sobre el efecto de la duración del contrato en la calidad de la auditoría: Análisis de las medidas de retención y rotación obligatoria de auditores. Investigaciones Económicas, 30(2), 283–316. recuperado marzo 23, 2016, de. ftp://ftp.fundacionsepi.es/InvEcon/paperArchive/May2006/v30i2a4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz Barbadillo, E., Gómez Aguilar, N., De Fuentes Barbera, C., & García Benau, M. A. (2004). Audit quality and the going-concern decision making process: Spanish evidence. The European Accounting Review, 13, 597–620. doi:10.1080/0963818042000216820
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Segura, A. (2003). Salvedades y cambio de auditor. Revista Española de Financiación Y Contabilidad, 32(119), 983–1012. doi:10.1080/02102412.2003.10779504
   Google Scholar
• Ley Sarbanes-Oxley. (2002). Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Washington, DC: One Hundred and Seventh Congress of the United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, V. D., Sharma, D. S., & Ananthanarayanan, U. (2011). Client importance and earnings management: The moderating role of audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 125–156. doi:10.2308/ajpt-10111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 19, 161–190. doi:10.2307/2490397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. (1996). Impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15, 119–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp. (2009). Stata: Release 11. Statistical software. College Station, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Svanström, T. (2013). Non-audit services and audit quality: Evidence from private firms. European Accounting Review, 22(2), 337–366. doi:10.1080/09638180.2012.706398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teoh, S. H. (1992). Auditor independence, dismissal threats, and the market reaction to auditor switches. Journal of Accounting Research, 30, 1–23. doi:10.2307/249108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vico Martínez, A. (1997). Expectativas ante la auditoría: La independencia del auditor,( Tesis doctoral). Universitat Jaume I, Castellón de la Plana.
   Google Scholar
• Winkelmann, R., & Boes, S. (2009). Analysis of microdata (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zmijewski, M. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 59–82. doi:10.2307/2490859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar