References

• Abernethy, M. A., & Bouwens, J. (2005). Determinants of accounting innovation implementation. Abacus, 41(3), 217–240. doi:10.1111/abac.2005.41.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (2006). Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software. ISBN 1-885898-03–7.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. M., & Wang, X. (2000). Performance measurement in U.S. counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60, 409–420. doi:10.1111/puar.2000.60.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2001). The benefits and costs of information technology innovations: An empirical assessment of a local government agency. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(4), 351–366. doi:10.2307/3381224
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Brudney, J. L. (2001). Achieving advanced electronic government services: An examination of obstacles and implications from an international perspective. Paper presented at the National Public Management Research Conference, Bloomington, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Caba, C., Rodríguez, M., & López, A. M. (2008). e-Government process and incentives for online public financial information. Online Information Review, 32(3), 379–400. doi:10.1108/14684520810889682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárcaba, A., & García, J. (2003). La información financiera en internet de las corporaciones locales europeas. Partida Doble, 144, 56–69.
   Google Scholar
• Carrizales, T. (2008). Functions of e-government: A study of municipal practices. State and Local Government Review, 40(1), 12–26. doi:10.1177/0160323X0804000102
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. (2000). Constructing the questionnaire: Mail and Internet surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandía, J. L., & Archidona, M. (2008). Determinants of web site information by Spanish city councils. Online In-Formation Review, 32(1), 35–57. doi:10.1108/14684520810865976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárcaba, A., & García, J.  (2008). Determinantes de la divulgación de información contable a través de Internet por parte de los gobiernos locales. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 37(137), 63–84. doi:10.1080/02102412.2008.10779639
   Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. (2004). The promise of digital government. In A. Pavlichev & G. D. Garson (Eds.), Digital government principles and best practices. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gimeno, A. (2000). New public management and its accounting implications: Some references to recent developments in Spanish local authorities. In E. Caperchione & R. Mussari (Eds.), Comparative issues in local government accounting. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, M., & Montesinos, V. (2014). Gobierno electrónico y transparencia financiera y presupuestal de los departamentos en Colombia. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia (RVG), Año, 19(68), 670–698.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the “e-government” initiative. Public Administration Review, 62, 434–444. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A., & Ni, A. Y. (2004). Explaining the adoption of E-government features - A case study of Iowa County treasurers’ offices. The American Review of Public Administration, 34(2), 164–180. doi:10.1177/0275074004264355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., & Callahan, K. (1998). Government at work: Best practices and model programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The New Public Management in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, O. (1994). Public management and administration. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira – INEP. (2015). Resumo técnico: Censo da educação superior 2013. Retrieved from http://download.inep.gov.br/download/superior/censo/2013/resumo_tecnico_ censo_educacao_superior_2013.pdf. On 22-7-2015
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (1999). Accounting and the new public management: Instruments of substantive efficiency or a rationalising modernity? Financial Accountability & Management, 15(3&4), 201–207. doi:10.1111/fam.1999.15.issue-3&4
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (2008). The NPM agenda: Back to the future. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1), 77–96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00444.x
   Google Scholar
• Manoharan, A. (2013). A study of the determinants of county E-government in the United States. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 159–178. doi:10.1177/0275074012437876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marra, A. V., & Melo, M. C. (2005). A prática social de gerentes universitários em uma Instituição pública. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (RAC), 9(3), 9–31. doi:10.1590/S1415-65552005000300002
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 198–206. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A., & Bekkers, V. (2015). A metatheory of e-government: Creating some order in a fragmented research field. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 237–245. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of E-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M.J., & Bretschneider, S. (2002). Does the perception of red tape constrain IT innovativeness in organizations? Unexpected results from a simultaneous equation model and implications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2), 273–292. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naranjo-Gil, D. (2006). Salvando las dificultades del uso de la encuesta en la investigación contable de gestión: Una aplicación empírica. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 35, 361–385. doi:10.1080/02102412.2006.10779583
   Google Scholar
• Naranjo-Gil, D., Maas, V. S., & Hartmann, F. G. H. (2009). How CFOs determine management accounting innovation: An examination of direct and indirect effects. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 667–695. doi:10.1080/09638180802627795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F. (1999). Leading edge information technologies and their adoption: Lessons from U.S. cities. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Information technology and computer applications in public administration: Issues and trends. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F., Fletcher, P. D., & Holden, S. H. (2001). Is your local government plugged in? Highlights of the 2000 Electronic Government Survey. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grass roots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64–75. doi:10.1111/puar.2005.65.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2003). The modernization of the public sector. Paris: Observer Policy Briefs.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). La modernización del Estado. El camino a seguir. Instituto Nacional de la Administración Pública. Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, O. A., & Cruz, F. (2009). Proposta de um painel de informações sintéticas sobre as universidades: Aplicação do “Raio X” na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 1(12), 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, B., & Wu, L. (2002). Public versus private information systems: Do they differ in important ways? A review and empirical test. The American Review of Public Administration, 32(4), 379–397. doi:10.1177/027507402237866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. R., & Navarro, A. (2007). Could fair value accounting be useful, under NPM models, for users of financial information? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 473–502. doi:10.1177/0020852307081153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siew, L. S., & Leng, L. Y. (2003). E-Government in Action: Singapore case study. Journal Of Political Marketing, 2(3–4), 18–30. doi:10.1300/J199v02n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Silva, R., Ensslin, S. R., Ripoll, V. F., & Crespo, C. (2014). E-government and public accounting information: Bibliometric and systemic analysis. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue, 122, pp. 76–91.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, R. V., Ripoll, V. F., & Crespo, C. (2015). E-Government Process: The access to information and accounting disclosure. Evidence from Brazilian public universities. International Journal of Economic Research, 12(4), 999–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, P. (2003). The standards programme of IFAC’s public sector committee. Public Money and Management, 23(1), 29–36. doi:10.1111/pmam.2003.23.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of E-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66, 354–369. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2006). E-governance developments in European union cities: Reshaping government’s relationship with citizens. Governance, 19(2), 277–302. doi:10.1111/gove.2006.19.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27. doi:10.1111/puar.2004.64.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar