References

• Altman, E. I. (1982). Accounting implications on failure predictions models. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Summer, 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, E. I., Haldeman, R. G., & Narayanan, P. (1977, June). Zeta analysis: A new model to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29–54. doi:10.1016/0378-4266(77)90017-6
   Google Scholar
• Altman, E. I., & Mcgough, T. P. (1974). Evaluation of a company as a going. Concern. Journal of Accounting, December, 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Arnedo-Arjona, L., Lizarraga-Dallo, F., & Sánchez-Alegría, S. (2008). Going concern uncertainties in pre- bankrupt audit reports: New evidence regarding discretionary accruals in the wording ambiguity. International Journal of Auditing, 12(1), 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Arnedo-Arjona, L., Lizarraga-Dallo, F., Sánchez-Alegría, S., & Ruíz-Barbadillo, E. (2012). Las expectativas del usuario ante la salvedad al principio de empresa en funcionamiento. Evidencia empírica del fenómeno de la profecía autocumplida para el caso español. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 41(154), 263–289.
   Google Scholar
• Bamber, E. M., Bamber, L. S., & Schoderbeck, M. P. (1993). Audit structure and other determinants of audit report lag: An empirical analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice &Theory, 12(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, T. B., Doogar, R., & Solomon, I. (2008). Audit labor usage and fees under business risk auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 729–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, T. B., Landsman, W. R., & Shackelford, D. A. (2001). Auditors’ perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, B. D. (2015). Are going concern opinions associated with lower audit impact?. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2700896
   Google Scholar
• Cano-Rodríguez, M. (2007). Tamaño del auditor y calidad de auditoría en las empresas españolas no cotizadas. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española De Financiación Y Contabilidad, 36(135), 481–507.
   Google Scholar
• Cano-Rodríguez, M. (2010). Big auditors, private firms and accounting conservatism: Spanish evidence. European Accounting Review, 19(1), 131–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano-Rodríguez, M., Sánchez-Alegría, S., & Arenas-Torres, P. (2016). The influence of auditor’s opinion and auditor’s reputation on the cost of debt: Evidence from private Spanish firms. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 45(1), 32–62.
   Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., & Nagy, A. (2004). Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice Y Theory, 23(2), 55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going-concern reports. The Accounting Review, 78, 95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, E., Fargher, N., Geiger, M., Lennox, C., Raghunandan, K., & Willekens, M. (2013). Auditor reporting on going-concern uncertainty: A research synthesis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), 353–384.
   Google Scholar
• Casterella, J., Lewis, B., & Walker, P. (2000). Modeling the audit opinions issued to bankrupt companies: A two-stage empirical analysis. Decision Sciencies, 31(2), 507–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K. C. W., & Church, B. K. (1992). Default on debt obligations and the issuance of going concern. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 11(2), 30–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K. C. W., & Church, B. K. (1996). Going concern opinions and the market´s reaction to bankruptcy filings. The Accounting Review, 71(1), 117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., Liu, X. H., & Simunic, D. A. (2008). Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25, 55–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citron, D. B., & Taffler, R. J. (2001). Ethical behaviour in the U.K. audit profession: The case of the self-fulfilling prophecy under going-concern uncertainties. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(4), 353–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comisión Europea. (2010). Libro Verde. Política de auditoría: lecciones de la crisis, Bruselas, Author, 13.10.2010 COM (2010) 561 final. DOC 248/16 de 28.5.2011.
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, A. (1988). The association between qualified opinions and auditor switches. Accounting and Business Research, 19(73), 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, A., Stroken, D., & Laughton, J. (2002). Auditor independence and fee dependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 253–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E., & Ashton, R. (2000). Threshold adjustment in judgment and choice: The case of auditors’ substantial doubt thresholds. Documento de trabajo, Baylor University and Dake University.
   Google Scholar
• De Fuentes, C., Illueca, M., & Pucheta-Martínez, M. C. (2015). External investigations and disciplinary sanctions against auditors: The impact on audit quality. Series, 6(3), 313–347.
   Google Scholar
• De Las Heras, E., Cañibano, L., & García-Osma, B. (2011). La supervisión pública de la profesión de la auditoría en España. Revista De La Asociación Española De Contabilidad Y Administración De Empresas, 94, 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin, E. B. (1972). A discriminant analysis of predictors of business failure (pp. 167–179). Spring: Journal of Accounting Research.
   Google Scholar
• Deangelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Defond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2), 275–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, R. A. (1995). Incorporation and the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, 75–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargher, N. L., & Jiang, L. (2008). Changes in the audit environment and auditors’ propensity to issue going-concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27, 55–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC). (2013). Implementing the Recommendations of the Sharman Panel: Revised Guidance on Going Concern and Revised International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). January. Consultation Paper. London, UK: The Financial Reporting Counsel.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Krishnan, J. (1999). Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1), 135–165.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Krishnan, J. (2002). Evidence on auditor risk-management strategies before and after the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 9, 135–157.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Wilson, E. R. (1988). Auditor changes: A joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation. The Accounting Review, 58(4), 663–682.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & Raghunandan, K. (2001). Bankruptcies, audit reports, and the Reform Act. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 187–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & Raghunandan, K. (2002a). Going concern opinions in the new legal environment. Accounting Horizons, 16(1), 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & Raghunandan, K. (2002b). Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2005). Recent changes in the association between bankruptcies and prior audit opinion. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24, 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., Raghunandan, K., & Riccardi, W. (2014). The global financial crisis: U.S. bankruptcies and going-concern audit opinions. Accounting Horizons American Accounting Association, 28(1), 59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & Rama, D. V. (2006). Audit firm size and going-concern reporting accuracy. Accounting Horizons, 20, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Aguilar, N. (2003). El informe de auditoría y su efecto sobre la decisión del cambio de auditor. Premio de investigación contable “José Mª Fernández Pirla” (XI edición). Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas. http://www.icac.meh.es/Documentos/PUBLICACIONES/253.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guiral Contreras, A., Ruíz-Barbadillo, E., & Gonzalo Angulo, J. A. (2007). Efectos de la hipótesis de la profecía autocumplida en la evaluación de la evidencia en el contexto de la gestión continuada. (Recurso electrónico). Comunicaciones presentadas en XIV Congreso AECA: Respondiendo al cambio, 2007, Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Hackenbrack, K., & Nelson, M. W. (1996). Auditors’ incentives and their application of financial accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 71(1), 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Lords, 2011: Auditors: Market concentration and their role. Select committee on economic affairs. 2nd Report of session 2010-2011. London: The Stationery Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas, ICAC. (1993). Resolución de 31 de mayo de 1993, del Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas, por la que se publica la Norma Técnica de Auditoría sobre la aplicación del principio de empresa en funcionamiento. Available at: http://www.icac.meh.es/Temp/20130204181606.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2008). Introducción a la CNAE. http://www.ine.es/daco/daco42/clasificaciones/cnae09/int_cnae_2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2009). Going concern (revised). International standard on auditing (ISA) 570. New York, NY: IAASB.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2012). Improving the auditor’s report. invitation to comment. New York, NY: IFAC.
   Google Scholar
• Joe, J. R. (2003). Why press coverage of a client influences the audit opinion. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 109–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadous, K. (2000). The effects of audit quality and consequence severity on juror evaluations of auditor responsibility for plaintiff losses. The Accounting Review, 75(3), 327–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney, W. R. (1986). Audit technology and preferences for auditing standars. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8, 73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J., & Krishnan, J. (1996). The role of economic trade-offs in the audit opinion decision: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 11, 565–586.
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, C. (1999). The accuracy and incremental information content of audit reports in predicting bankruptcy. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 26(5 & 6), 757–778.
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, C. (2000). Going-concern opinions in failing companies: Auditor dependence and opinion shopping. SSRN Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Mareque, M., López-Corrales, F., & Pedrosa, A. (2017). Audit reporting for going concern in Spain during the global financial crisis. Economic Research Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 154–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Izquierdo, M., Camacho-Miñano, M. M., & Pascual-Ezama, D. (2017). Contenido del informe de auditoría en el año previo a la declaración del concurso de acreedores. Contraste empírico para el caso español. Revista Española De Financiación Y Contabilidad, 46(1), 92–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutchler, J. F., Hopwood, W., & Mckeown, J. (1997). The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors in audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies. Journal of Accounting Research, 35, 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, A. J., & Bernard, C. (2004). Las sanciones impuestas a los auditores: Un indicador de la calidad de las auditorías. Partida Doble, 156, 6–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, E., & Peñalosa, J. (2012). Claves de la crisis económica española y retos para crecer en la UEM. Banco de España. Documentos Ocasionales. Nº 1.201. Available at: http://www.bde.es/f/webbde/SES/Secciones/Publicaciones/PublicacionesSeriadas/DocumentosOcasionales/12/Fich/do1201.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pedrosa, A. (2015). Respuesta de los auditores al principio de empresa en funcionamiento durante la crisis financiera: Un estudio empírico aplicado a las empresas españolas no cotizadas. (Tesis doctoral) Universidad de Vigo.
   Google Scholar
• Provasi, R., & Riva, P. (2015). Assessment of going concern for the Italian listed companies: An empirical study. Review of Business and Finance Studies, 6(1), 27-34.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) (2009). Standing Advisory Group Meeting: Panel Discussion—Going Concern. April 2. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/News/Events/Documents/04022009_SAGMeeting/Panel_Going_Concern.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2011a. Concept Release on Possible Revisions to PCAOB Standards Related to Reports on Audited Financial Statements. June 21. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Pages/Docket034.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2011b. Standing Advisory Group Meeting. November 9. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/News/Events/Documents/11092011_SAGMeeting/Going_Concern_PCAOB_Slides.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. K., & Francis, J. R. (2001). Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 375–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruíz- Barbadillo, E. (2016). Regulación frente a reputación como medio de salvaguardar la independencia de la auditoría. Revista De Contabilidad Y Tributación, 401-402, 161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Ruíz-Barbadillo, E., Gómez Aguilar, N., De Fuentes-Barberá, C., & García Benau, M. A. (2004). Audit quality and the going-concern decisión making process: Spanish evidence. The European Accounting Review, 13(4), 597–620.
   Google Scholar
• Ruíz-Barbadillo, E., Gómez-Aguilar, N., & Carrera-Pena, N. (2006). Evidencia empírica sobre el efecto de la duración del contrato en la calidad de la auditoría: Análisis de las medidas de retención y rotación obligatoria de los auditores. Investigaciones Económicas, 30(2), 283–316.
   Google Scholar
• Ruíz-Barbadillo, E., Gómez-Aguilar, N., & Carrera-Pena, N. (2009a). Derogación de la rotación obligatoria de auditores y calidad de la auditoria. Revista De Economía Aplicada, 17(49), 105–134.
   Google Scholar
• Ruíz-Barbadillo, E., Gómez-Aguilar, N., & Carrera-Pena, N. (2009b). Does mandatory audit. Firm rotation enhance auditor independence? Evidence from Spain. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(1), 113–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharman Inquiry (2011). Going concern and liquidity risks: Lessons for companies and auditors. Preliminary Report and Recommendations of the Panel of Inquiry. London: UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sikka, P. (2009). Financial crisis and the silence of the auditors. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 868–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundgren, S., & Svanström, T. (2014). Auditor-in-charge characteristics and going-concern reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(2), 531–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoman, L. (1996). Legal damages and auditor efforts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, 275–306.
   Google Scholar
• Tsipouridou, M., & Spathis, C. (2014). Audit opinion and earnings management: Evidence from Greece. Accounting Forum, 38, 38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Vanstraelen, A., & Schelleman, C. (2017): Auditing private companies: What do we know? WP. Disponible en: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2918499
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M., Humphrey, C., Dowd, K., & Liu, Y. (2009). Crunch time for banks? Questions of practice and scope of dialog. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(2), 114–134.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Jiang, A. L., Fargher, N., & Carson, E. (2011). Audit reports in Australia during the global financial crisis. Australian Accounting Review, 21(1), 22–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Jiang, A. L., Fargher, N., & Carson, E. (2013). Responses by Australian auditors to the global financial crisis. Accounting and Finance, 53, 301–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavgren, C. (1983). The prediction of corporate failure: The state of the art. Journal of Accounting Literature, 2, 1-37.
   Google Scholar
• Zmijewski, M. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(suplemento), 59–82.
   Google Scholar