References

• Aguirre-Urreta, M. I, & Marakas, G. M. (2012). Revisiting bias due to construct misspecification: different results from considering coefficients in standardized form. Mis Quarterly, 36(1), 123-138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. (2017). The basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, United States, Boston: Wadsworth Publishing. (Cengage, Ed.)
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 39(1), 83–128. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213017798?accountid=14555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay, D. W., Higgins, C. A., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–309.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467–498. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/206722480?accountid=14555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J. M., Rai, A., & Rigdon, E. E. (2013). Predictive validity and formative measurement in structural equation modeling: Embracing practical relevance. Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Milan, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, N., Ecker, F., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2012). Direct and mediated associations among earnings quality, information asymmetry, and the cost of equity. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 449–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H., & Welker, M. (2003). The world price of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 641–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, G. C., & Hilary, G. (2006). Accounting quality and firm-level capital investment. The Accounting Review, 81(5), 963–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisbe, J., Batista-Foguet, J.-M., & Chenhall, R. (2007). Defining management accounting constructs: A methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 789–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanthorne, C., Jones-Farmer, L. A., & Almer, E. D. (2006). Why you should consider SEM: A guide to getting started. In V. Arnold, B. D. Clinton, P. Luckett, R. Roberts, C. Wolfe, & S. Wright (Eds.), Advances in accounting behavioral research (Vol. 9, pp. 179–207). Emerald Group Publishing, Limited. Bingley, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 605–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Bauldry, S. (2011). Three Cs in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 265–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton, T. J., Smart, S. B., & Zutter, C. J. (2011). Earnings quality and international IPO underpricing. The Accounting Review, 86(2), 483–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, D., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). The importance of reporting incentives: Earnings management in European private and public firms. The Accounting Review, 81(5), 983–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. SAGE University papers on quantitative applications in the social sciences 07-17. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. K., Cooil, B., & Jeter, D. (2008). A latent class model of earnings attributes.(June 12, 2008). Available at SSRN:  https://ssrn.com/abstract=916605
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W., Franke, G. R., & Lee, N. (2016). Comparing reflective and formative measures: New insights from relevant simulations. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3177–3185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for estructural equation modeling. Modern methods for business researchs (pp. 295–336). Psychology Press. Hove, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 655–690). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, D., Ma, L., & Vasnev, A. (2018). Inference-in-residuals as an estimation method for earnings management. Abacus, 54(2), 154–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davick, N. S. (2014). The use and misuse of structural equation modeling in management research: A review and critique. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 35(2008), 441–458.
   Google Scholar
• Dechow, P., & Dichev, I. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(Supplement), 35–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 50(2/3), 344–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechow, P., & Schrand, C. (2004). Earnings quality. The research foundation of CFA institute. Charlottesville,VA., United States.
   Google Scholar
• Dechow, P., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L. (2010). Earnings quality research: Advances, challenges and future research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 402–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerjian, P., Lewis, M., Lev, B., & McVay, S. (2013). Managerial ability and earnings quality. The Accounting Review, 88(2), 463–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichev, I., & Tang, V. W. (2009). Earnings volatility and earnings predictability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 47(1–2), 160–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 81, 10–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doupnik, T. S. (2008). Influence of culture on earnings management: A note. Abacus, 44(3), 317–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4(2), 144–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 155–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewert, R., & Wagenhofer, A. (2011). Earnings quality metrics and what they measure (Working Paper). University of Graz.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, C., & Lainez, J. (2013). Detecting differences on the earnings quality measurement: Empirical evidence on Spanish firms. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos Para La Economía y La Empresa, 16, 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2004). Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 967–1010. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/218535414?accountid=14555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J., Nanda, D., & Olsson, P. (2008). Voluntary disclosure, earnings quality and cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1), 53–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaio, C., & Raposo, C. (2011). Earnings quality and firm valuation: International evidence. Accounting and Finance, 51(2), 467–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. W. (2011). An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), iii–A7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7.
   Google Scholar
• Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting & Economics, 29(3), 287–320. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213053787?accountid=14555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. (2012). Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data? MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 981–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, I. D., Larcker, D. F., & Reiss, P. C. (2016). Causal inference in accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 477–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Tomas, G., Hult, M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, C. (2015). Estimating and reporting structural equation models with behavioral accounting data. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 27(2), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henri, J.-F. (2007). A quantitative assessment of the reporting of structural equation modeling information. The case of management accounting research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 26, 76–115. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/216304849?accountid=8003%5Cnhttp://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Using partial least squares path modeling in advertising research: Basic concepts and recent issues. In S. Okazaki (Ed.), Handbook of research on international advertising (pp. 252–276). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., … Calantone, R. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: comments on Ronkko and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermanns, S. (2006). Financial information and earnings quality: A literature review. (April 2006). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=897722
   Google Scholar
• Hinson, L. A., & Utke, S. (2018). Structural equation modeling in archival capital markets research. (July 2, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2614085
   Google Scholar
• IASB. (2010). The conceptual framework for financial reporting. International Accounting Standards Board, London.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. B. (2018). Discretionary accruals: Earnings management … or Not? Abacus, 54(2), 136–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K. L., Krishnan, G. V., & Melendrez, K. D. (2008). Do models of discretionary accruals detect actual cases of fraudulent and restated earnings? An empirical analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 6. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/194220750?accountid=14555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laksmana, I., & Yang, Y. (2009). Corporate citizenship and earnings attributes. Advances in Accounting, 25(1), 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., & Rusticus, T. O. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 186–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L., Petter, S., Fayard, D., & Robinson, S. (2011). On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(4), 305–328.
   Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. D. (2016). The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 525–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, R., Bloomfield, R., & Nelson, M. W. (2002). Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 775–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licerán-Gutiérrez, A., & Cano-Rodríguez, M. (2019). A review on the multidimensional analysis of earnings qualilty. Revista de Contabilidad, 22(1), 41-60.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Jarvis, C. B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 710–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in mis and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos-Aparicio, G. (2011). Partial least squares (PLS) methods: Origins, evolution, and application to social sciences. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 40(13), 2305–2317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNichols, M. F., & Stubben, S. R. (2018). Research design issues in studies using discretionary accruals. Abacus, 54(2), 227–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzl, C. (2016). The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development. Journal of Accounting Literature, 37, 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Numally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Penman, S. H., & Zhang, X.-J. (2002). Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 237–264. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/218538202?accountid=14555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perotti, P., & Wagenhofer, A. (2014). Earnings quality measures and excess returns. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(5–6), 545–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E. (2012). Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: In praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 341–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E. (2014). Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: Breaking chains and forging ahead. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal, 34, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Schlittgen, R. (2014). Genetic algorithm segmentation in partial least squares structural equation modeling. OR Spectrum, 36(1), 251–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, W., & Guiral, A. (2011). Potential model misspecification bias: Formative indicators enhancing theory for accounting researchers. The International Journal of Accounting, 46(1), 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Roldán, J. L., & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guideliness for using partial least squares in information systems research. In M. Mora, O. Gelman, A. Steenkamp, & M. S. Raisinghani (Eds.), Research methodologies, innovations and philosophies in software systems engineering and information systems (pp. 193–211). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Ronkko, M., & Evermann, J. (2013). A critical examination of common beliefs about partial least squares path modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 425–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2014). PLS-SEM: Looking back and moving forward. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 132–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper, K., & Vincent, L. (2003). Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons, 17, 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling : Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 35–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanTendeloo, B., & Vanstraelen, A. (2008). Earnings management and audit quality in Europe: Evidence from the private client segment market. European Accounting Review, 17(3), 447–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold, H. (1980). Model construction and evaluation when theoretical knowledge is scarce (pp. 47–74). Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Wold, H. (1985, September). Systems analysis by partial least squares. Measuring the unmeasurable, Llumina Press. NYC, United States.
   Google Scholar