Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance / Rúbricas y guiones de autoevaluación: efectos sobre la autorregulación y el rendimiento de estudiantes universitarios de primer año

References / Referencias

• Alonso-Tapia, J., Huertas, J. A., & Ruiz, M. A. (2010). On the nature of motivational orientations: Implications of assessed goals and gender differences for motivational goal theory. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 232–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Tapia, J., & Panadero, E. (2010). Effect of self-assessment scripts on self-regulation and learning. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33(3), 385–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Tapia, J., Panadero, E., & Ruiz, M. A. (2014). Development and validity of the Emotion and Motivation Self-regulation Questionnaire (EMSR-Q): Intertwined effects between self-regulation styles and classroom motivational climate. Spanish Journal of Psychology.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 27(2), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., Wang, X. L., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. L. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannert, M. (2009). Promoting self-regulated learning through prompts. Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie, 23(2), 139–145. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. W., & Chew, S. L. (2008). Improving learning through interventions of student-generated questions and concept maps. Teaching of Psychology, 35(4), 305–312. doi:10.1080/00986280802373841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 564–577. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology-an International Review-psychologie Appliquee-revue Internationale, 54(2), 199–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halonen, J. S., Bosack, T., Clay, S., McCarthy, M., Dunn, D. S., Hill I., G. W., … Whitlock, K. (2003). A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing scientific inquiry in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30(3), 196–208. doi:10.1207/s15328023top3003_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs-Lawson, J. M., & Hershey, D. A. (2002). Concept maps as an assessment tool in psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 25–29. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2901_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Dudai, V. (2009). Group-metacognitive support for online inquiry in mathematics with differential self-questioning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4), 377–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009). Three metacognitive approaches to training pre-service teachers in different learning phases of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 15(5), 465–485.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434–447. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., & Cascallar, E. (2011). The perception of workload and task complexity and its influence on students’ approaches to learning: A study in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(3), 339–415. doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0053-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos, M., Villalón, R., de Dios, M. J., & Martín, E. (2007). Reading and writing tasks on different university degree courses: what do the students say they do? Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 489–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning. Theory, research and applications (pp. 111–168). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E. (2011). Instructional help for self-assessment and self-regulation: Evaluation of the efficacy of self-assessment scripts vs. rubrics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Revisión sobre autoevaluación educativa: evidencia empírica de su implementación a través de la autocalificación sin criterios de evaluación, rúbricas y guiones. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 11(2), 172–197.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences(0). doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Reche, E. (2013). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts effect on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy in pre-service teachers. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 125–132. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9(0), 129–144. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286. doi:10.1080/00313830120074206
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitmeier, C. A., & Vrchota, D. A. (2009). Self-assessment of oral communication presentations in food science and nutrition. Journal of Food Science Education, 8(4), 88–92.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Keefer, L. (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An opportunity to learn by using. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 15(8). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15&n=8
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2007). Examining the validity of self-reports on scales measuring students’ strategic processing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 351–378. doi:10.1348/000709906x106147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taras, M. (2010). Student self-assessment: Processes and consequences. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 199–209. doi:10.1080/13562511003620027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torenbeek, M., Jansen, E., & Hofman, A. (2010). The effect of the fit between secondary and university education on first-year student achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 659–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2010). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). The hidden dimension of personal competence: Self-Regulated learning and practice. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 509–526). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 299–315). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar