TuinLEC, an intelligent tutoring system to improve reading literacy skills / TuinLEC, un tutor inteligente para mejorar la competencia lectora

References / Referencias

• Blanch, S., Duran, D., Valdebenito, V., & Flores, M. (2013). The effects and characteristics of family involvement on a peer tutoring programme to improve the reading comprehension competence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castello, M., Liesa, E., & Monereo, C. (2012) El conocimiento estratégico durante el estudio de textos en enseñanza secundaria. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(2), 125–141.
   Google Scholar
• Cerdán, R., Gilabert, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2013). Self-generated explanations on the question demands are not always helpful. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, 1–11
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, A., Vidal-Abarca, E., Ávila, V., Mañá, A., & Llorens, A. (2010, August). Do text availability and question format have an impact on on-line reading behavior and comprehension processes? Proceedings 20th Annual Meeting of Society for Text & Discourse, Chicaco, IL: USA.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Conley, M. W., & Olney, A. M. (2012). Intelligent tutoring systems. In S. Graham, & K. Harris (Eds.), APA Educational Psychology Handbook: Vol. 3. Applications to Learning and Teaching (pp. 451–473). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., D’Mello, S., & Cade, W. (2011). Instruction based on tutoring. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 408–426). New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., D’Mello, S. K., & Person, N. (2009). Meta-knowledge in tutoring. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 361–412). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H. H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., & Louwerse, M. M. (2004). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(2), 180–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Motivational Impacts of a Game-Based Intelligent Tutoring System. In R. C. Murray & P. M. McCarthy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference (pp. 519–524). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, G. T., Boonthum, C., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). iSTART-ME: Situating extended learning within a game-based environment. In H. C. Lane, A. Ogan & V. Shute (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Educational Games at the 14th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 59–68). Brighton. UK: AIED.
   Google Scholar
• Llorens, A. C., Gil, L., Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, E., Mañá, A., & Gilabert, R., (2011) Evaluación de la competencia lectora: la prueba de Competencia Lectora para Educación Secundaria (CompLEC). Psicothema, 23(4), 808–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mañá, A., Vidal-Abarca, E., Domínguez, C., Gil, L., & Cerdán, R. (2009). Papel de los procesos metacognitivos en una tarea de pregunta-respuesta con textos escritos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 32(4), 553–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, T., Vidal-Abarca, E., Gil, L., & Gilabert, R. (2009). On-line assessment of comprehension processes. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 308–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (Ed.). (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Jackson, G. T., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Intelligent tutoring and games (ITaG). In Y. K. Baek (Ed.), Gaming for classroom-based learning: Digital role-playing as a motivator of study (pp. 44–65). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Levinstein, I. B., & Boonthum, C. (2004). iSTART: Interactive Strategy Trainer for Active Reading and Thinking. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(2), 222–233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 297–384). New York: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T. P., Best, R. M., & Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students’ reading comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(2), 147–171.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Educación (MEC) (2010). PISA 2009. Programa para la evaluación internacional de los alumnos. OCDE Informe Español. Retrieved 4 June 2012, from http://www.mcu.es/libro/docs/MC/Observatorio/pdf/PISA_espanol_2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T., Sinclair, G. P., & McNamara, D. S. (2004). iSTART: A web-based reading strategy intervention that improves students’ science comprehension. En D. Kinshuk, G. Sampson & P. Isaías (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age: CELDA 2004 (pp. 173–180). Lisboa: IADIS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2009). PISA 2009 Assessment Framework - Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ozuru, Y., Best, R., Bell, C., Witherspoon, A., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Influence of question format and text availability on the assessment of expository text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 399–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, E. (Coord.) (2010). La lectura en el aula. Qué se hace, qué se debe hacer y qué se puede hacer. Barcelona: Graó.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S. (2011). What readers have and do: Effects of students’ verbal ability and reading time components on comprehension with and without text availability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 877–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 344–360). New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (2002) Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., Dehkinet, R., Blanch S., Corcelles, M., & Duran, D. (2013). Paradoxical effects of feedback in international online reciprocal peer tutoring. Computers & Education, 61, 225–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rosé, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31(1), 3–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., Mañá, A., & Gil, L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 817–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., Salmerón, L., Gilabert, R., Llorens, A. C., & Mañá, A. (2011, August). CompLEC: A technological tool to assess task-oriented reading skills of high-school students. Paper presented at the 14 Biennal Conference EARLI 2011, Exeter, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., Salmerón, L., & Mañá, A. (2011). Individual differences in task-oriented reading. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 267–294). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Reflections on theories of self- regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives, (pp. 289–307). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar