624
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Qualitative Epistemology and constructive-interpretative methodology: a proposal for the study of subjectivity (La Epistemología Cualitativa y la metodología constructivo-interpretativa: una propuesta para el estudio de la subjetividad)

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 53-73 | Received 16 Nov 2019, Accepted 25 Nov 2019, Published online: 26 Mar 2020

References / Referencias

  • Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1996). El experto es el cliente: la ignorancia como enfoque terapeútico. In S. McNamee & K. Gergen ( Orgs.), La terapia como construcción social (pp. 45–60). Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Chamberlain, K. (2000). Methodolatry and qualitative health research. New Zealand. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 285–296.
  • Gergen, K. (1996). Realidades y relaciones: aproximaciones a la construcción social. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • González Rey, F., & Mitjáns Martínez, A. (2016). Una epistemología para el estudio de la subjetividad: sus implicaciones metodológicas. Psicoperspectivas (Online): Individuo y Sociedad, 15(1), 5–16.
  • González Rey, F., & Mitjáns Martínez, A. (2017a). Subjetividade: epistemologia, teoria e método. Campinas: Alínea.
  • González Rey, F., & Mitjáns Martínez, A. (2017b). Epistemological and methodological challenges for the study of subjectivity from a cultural-historical perspective. In M. Fleer, F. González Rey, & N. Veresov (Eds.), Perezhivanie, emotions and subjectivity: Advancing Vygotsky’s legacy (pp. 264–296). New York, NY: Springer.
  • González Rey, F., & Mitjáns Martínez, A. (2019). The constructive-interpretative methodological approach: Orienting research and practice on the basis of subjectivity. In F. L. González Rey, A. Mitjáns Martinez, & D. M. Goulart (Eds.), Subjectivity within cultural-historical approach: Theory, methodology and research (pp. 37–60). Singapore: Springer.
  • González Rey, F. L. (1997). Epistemología Cualitativa y subjetividad. São Paulo: Educ.
  • González Rey, F. L. (2000). Investigación cualitativa en psicología: rumbos y desafíos. México: Paraninfo.
  • González Rey, F. L. (2003). Sujeito e subjetividade: uma aproximação histórico-cultural. São Paulo: Pioneira Thomson Learning. Tradução de Raquel Souza Guzzo.
  • González Rey, F. L. (2005). O valor heurístico da subjetividade na investigação psicológica. In F. L. González Rey ( Org.), Subjetividade, complexidade e pesquisa em psicologia (pp. 27–51). São Paulo: Thomson.
  • González Rey, F. L. (2007). Investigación cualitativa y subjetividad. Los procesos de construcción del conocimiento. México: McGraw-Hill.
  • González Rey, F. L. (2013). O que oculta o silêncio epistemológico da Psicologia? Revista Pesquisas e Práticas Psicossociais, 8, 20–34.
  • González Rey, F. L. (2014). Ideias e modelos teóricos na pesquisa construtivo-interpretativa. In A. Mitjáns, M. Neubern, & E. V. Mori ( Orgs.), Subjetividade contemporânea. Discussões epistemológicas e metodológicas (pp. 13–34). Campinas: Alínea.
  • González Rey, F. L. (2016). Advancing the topics of social reality, culture, and subjectivity from a cultural-historical standpoint: Moments, paths, and contradictions. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 36, 175–189.
  • González Rey, F. L. (2017). The topic of subjectivity in psychology: Contradictions, paths and new alternatives. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47, 502–521.
  • González Rey, F. L. (2018). Subjectivity and discourse: Complementary topics for a critical psychology. Culture & Psychology. doi:10.1177/1354067X18754338
  • González Rey, F. L., & Patiño, J. F. (2017). La Epistemología Cualitativa y el estudio de la subjetividad en una perspectiva cultural-histórica. Conversación con Fernando González Rey. Revista Estudios Sociales, 60, 120–127.
  • Goulart, D. M. (2018). A pesquisa qualitativa em psicologia: contradições, alternativas e desafios. Revista Psicologia, Diversidade e Saúde, 7, 2–7.
  • Goulart, D. M. (2019a). Saúde mental, desenvolvimento e subjetividade: da patologização à ética do sujeito. São Paulo: Cortez.
  • Goulart, D. M. (2019b). Subjectivity and critical mental health: Lessons from Brazil. London: Routledge.
  • Heisenberg, W. K. (1995). Física e filosofia. Brasília: UnB.
  • Janesick, V. J. (1998). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, metodolatry, and meaning. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 35–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Koch, S. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge. American Psychologist, 36, 257–269.
  • Koch, S. (1985). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: Lessons of a century qua ‘science’. In S. Koch & D. Leary (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 75–99). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Koch, S. (1999). Psychology in human context: Essays in dissidence and reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Patiño, J. F. (2016). A formação investigativa de doutorandos em educação e psicologia: um estudo da relação orientador-orientando a partir da Teoria da Subjetividade. Tese (Doutorado). Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.
  • Patiño, J. F., & Goulart, D. M. (2016). Qualitative Epistemology: A scientific platform for the study of subjectivity from a cultural-historical approach. The Journal of International Research in Early Childhood Education, 7(1), 161–181.
  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (2004). Naturaleza y creatividad. In I. Prigogine ( Org.), ¿Tan solo una ilusión? Una exploración del caos al orden (pp. 67–98). Barcelona: Tusquets Editores.
  • Shotter, J. (1995). Dialogical psychology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 160–178). London: Sage.
  • Teo, T. (2008). From speculation to epistemological violence in psychology: A critical hermeneutical reconstruction. Theory & Psychology, 18, 47–67.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.