‘My daughter is no angel’: impairments in nominal metaphor comprehension by aphasic patients (‘Mi hija no es un tesoro’: alteraciones en la comprensión de metáforas nominales en personas con afasia)

References / Referencias

• Almagro, Y. (2003). Estudio del componente léxico y morfosintáctico en pacientes afásicos bilingües del catalán y del castellano. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitat Rovira i Virgili.
   Google Scholar
• Amanzio, M., Geminiani, G., Leotta, D., & Cappa, S. (2007). Metaphor comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: novelty matters. Brain & Language, 107 (1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Kravetz, S. (1998). Cerebral hemispheric asymmetries in processing lexical metaphors. Neuropsychologia, 36(4), 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00141-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzouan, Y., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M. (2007). Brainwaves are stethoscopes: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research, 1160, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.05.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardillo, E., McQuire, M., & Chatterjee, A. (2018). Selective metaphor impairments after left, not right, hemisphere injury. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catena, A., Ramos, M. H., & Trujillo, H. M. (2003). Análisis multivariado: Un manual para investigadores. Biblioteca Nueva.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature, 380(6574), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1038/380499a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1994). Abstract word meaning deafness. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299408251964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1995). Abstract word anomia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(5), 549–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299508252007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., Turner, J., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Morris, J., & Bailey, P. J. (1996). A distinctive case of word meaning deafness? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13(8), 1139–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432996381683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainotti, G. (2007). The anatomical locus of lesion in category-specific semantic disorders and the format of the underlying conceptual representations. In J. Hart Jr. & M. A. Kraut (Eds.), Neural basis of semantic memory (pp. 8–61). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• García-Albea, J. E., & Sánchez-Bernardos, M. L. (2005). Adaptación española del Test de Boston (3rd ed.). Médica Panamericana.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Wolff, P. (1997). Alignment in the processing of metaphor. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind. Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 457–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00046-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giora, R., Zaidel, E., Soroker, N., Batori, G., & Kasher, A. (2000). Differential effects of right- and left-hemisphere damage on understanding sarcasm and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678865
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A., Arzouan, Y., & Faust, M. (2012). Killing a novel metaphor and reviving a dead one: ERP correlates of metaphor conventionalization. Brain & Language,123(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S. (1989). Metaphors in conversation: How are they understood? Why are they used? Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4(3), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0403_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language. From metaphors to idioms. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories quickly. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookin, H. B. (1982). On understanding non-literal speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90467-4
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., & Haught, C. (2006). On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind and Language, 21(3), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00282.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., Manfredi, D., & McGlone, M. (1995). Metaphor comprehension: How metaphors create new categories. In T. Ward, S. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought. An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 27–49). APA.
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M. S., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, R., & Faust, M. (2010). Right hemisphere dysfunction and metaphor comprehension in young adult with asperger syndrome. Journal of Autims and Developmental Disorders, 40(7), 800–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0930-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2005). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination (3rd ed.). Lippincott Wiliams y Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Cipolotti, L., & Price, C. J. (2000). Category differences in brain activation studies: Where do they come from? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 267(1449), 1253–1258. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1957). Significado. In L. Valdés Villanueva (Ed.), La búsqueda del significado (pp. 81–90). Tecnos. (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Jr., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (2007). Análisis multivariante (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., & Riddoch, J. (1997). Word meaning deafness: Spelling words that are not understood. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(8), 1131–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432997381295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain, 114(5), 2081–2094. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.5.2081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, V. T., Van Dam, W., Conant, L., Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2015). Familiaritydifferentially affects right hemisphere contributions to processing metaphors and literals. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, M., & Martin, N. (2006). Anomia. Theoretical and clinical aspects. Psychological Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Cátedra.
   Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph, M. A., Sage, K., & Roberts, J. (2000). Classical anomia: Aneuropsychological perspective on speech production. Neuropsychologia, 38(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00056-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. S., & Dapretto, M. (2006). Metaphorical vs. literal word meanings: FMRI evidence against a selective role of the right hemisphere. NeuroImage, 29(2), 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marulanda, E. (2003). La valoración de la competencia metafórica en la afasia [Memoria inédita para el Título de Estudios Avanzados. Programa de Doctorado “Cognición y Trastornos”]. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Marulanda, E., & Igoa, J. M. (2007). Estudio normativo de dos corpus de expresiones figuradas: Principales indicadores de metáforas nominales y modismos [Poster presentation]. At the VIII Simposio de Psicolingüística, April 26-28, Palma de Mallorca, España.
   Google Scholar
• Mashal, N., Faust, M., & Hendler, T. (2005). The role of the right hemisphere in processing nonsalient metaphorical meanings: Application of principal components analysis to fMRI data. Neuropsychologia, 43(14), 2084–2100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monetta, L., & Pell, M. (2007). Effects of verbal working memory deficits on metaphor comprehension in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain and Language, 101(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norusis, M. J. (1994). SPSS base para Mac (versión 6.0). Guía del usuario. Hispanoportuguesa.
   Google Scholar
• Onishi, K., & Murphy, G. (1993). Metaphoric reference: When metaphors are not understood as easily as literal expressions. Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 763–772. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peleg, O., Giora, R., & Fein, O. (2001). Salience and context effects: Two are better than one. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3–4), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2001.9678894
   Google Scholar
• Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F., & Poli, J. (1996). The time-course of metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language, 55(3), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1997). The modality-specific organization of gramatical categories: Evidence from impaired spoken and written sentence production. Brain and Language, 56(2), 248–286. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Mutschler, D. E., & Erb, M. (2012). Where in the brain is non literal language? A coordinated-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Neuroimage, 63(1), 600–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, R., & Kreuz, R. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science, 5(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roncero, C., & de Almeida, R. G. (2014). The importance of being apt: Metaphor comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers of Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, G. L., & DeBuse, C. J. (2009). Neural correlates of metaphor processing: The role of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty. Brain and Cognition, 71(3), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, G. L., DeBuse, C. J., & Seger, C. A. (2007). Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes. Brain and Language, 100(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1979). Metáfora. In L. Valdés Villanueva (Ed.), La búsqueda del significado (pp. 83–617). Tecnos.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). La relevancia. Visor distribuciones (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stringaris, A. K., Medford, N. C., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M. J., & David, A. S. (2007). Deriving meaning: Distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal, and non-meaningful sentences. Brain and Language, 100(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle, F., & Cuetos, F. (1995). Evaluación del procesamiento lingüístico en la afasia (EPLA). Traducción, revisión y adaptación al castellano. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. (1998). Discourse, coherence and relevance: A reply to Rachel Giora. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00012-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the “emergent property” issue. Mind and Language, 21(3), 404–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar