REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRAFICAS
- Alexander, C.N. y Scriven, C.D., 1977, Role playing: an essential component of experimentation, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 3, p. 455–466.
- Asch, S.E., 1951, Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments, en H. Guetzkow (ed.), Groups, leadership and men, Pittsburgh, Carnegie Press.
- Asch, S.E. 1972, Psicología Social, Buenos Aires, Eudeba, p. 449–498.
- Backman, C.W. 1980, The premature abandonment of promising research, en R. Gilmour y S. Duck (eds.), The Development of Social Psychology, Londres, Academic.
- Banuazizi, A. y Movahedi, S., 1975, Interpersonal dynamics in a simulatad prison: a methodological analysis, American Psychologist, 30, p. 152–160.
- Baron, R.M. 1977, Role playing and experimental research: the identification of appropriate domains of power, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 3, p. 505–513.
- Baron, R.A. y Byrne, D., 1977, Social Psychology: understanding human interaction, Boston, Allyn and Bacon.
- Blumberg, H.H. y otros (eds.), 1983, Small Groups and Social Interaction, Chichester, Wiley, 2 volúmenes.
- Bronfenbrenner, U., 1979, The Ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
- Dejong, W., 1975, Another look at Banuazizi and Movahedi s analysis of the Stanford Prison experiment, American Psychologist, 30, p. 1013–1015.
- Deutsch, M., 1975, Introduction, en M. Deutsch y H.A. Hornstein (eds.) Applying Social Psychology, Hillsdale, LEA.
- Doise, W., 1980, La articulación psicosociológica y las relaciones entre grupos, Barcelona, Rol, 2 volúmenes.
- Doyle, C.L., 1975, Interpersonal dynamics in role playing, American Psychologist, 30, p. 1011–1013.
- Eiser, J.R., 1980, Cognitive Social Psychology, Londres, McGraw Hill.
- Evans, R.I., 1980, The Making of Social Psychology: discussion with creative contributors, Nueva York, Gardner Press.
- Fernández Dols, J.M. y otros, 1980, Obediencia institucional en el laboratorio, Estudios de Psicología, 2, p. 56–63.
- Fernández Dols, J.M., 1985, La norma social en el Grupo humano I., en C. Huici (ed.), Estructura y Procesos de Grupo, Madrid, UNED, Especialmente p. 489–496 del Vol. I.
- Fromm, E., 1977, The Anatomy of human destructiveness, Harmondsworth, Penguin (Publicado originalmente en 1973).
- Gergen, K.J., 1982, Toward transformation in Social Knowledge, Nueva York, Springer Verlag.
- Ginsburg, G.P., 1979, The effective use of role playing in social psychological research, en G.P. Ginsburg (ed.) Emerging strategies in social psychological research, Chichester, Wiley.
- Hendrick, C., 1977, Role taking, role playing and the laboratory experiment, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 3, p. 467–478.
- Hollander, E.P., 1978, Applied Social Psychology: problems and prospects, Conferencia leída ante el XIX Congreso Internacional de Psicología Social Aplicada, Munich.
- Kidder, L.H. y Stewart, V.M., 1975, The psychology of intergroup relations: conflict and consciousness, Nueva York, Mc Graw Hill.
- Krupat, E., 1977, A reassessment of role playing as a technique in Social Psychologty, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 3, p. 498–504.
- Lamberth, J., 1982, Psicología Social, Madrid, Pirámide.
- * Lovibond, S.H., 1975, Simulating Prison Investigations: a critique of Banuazizi and Movahedi, Documento inédito, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de New South Wales.
- Lovibond, S.H., Mithiran, C. y Adams, W.G., 1979, The effects or three experimental prison environments on the behavior of non convict volunteer subjects, Australian Psychologist, 14, 3, p. 273–285.
- Milgran, S., 1963, Behavioral Study of obedience, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, p. 371–378.
- Milgram, S., 1965, Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18, p. 57–76.
- Milgram, S., 1974, Obedience to authority. Nueva York, Harper.
- Milgram, S., 1980, Obediencia a la autoridad: un punto de vista experimental, Bilbao, Desclée de Brouwer.
- Mixon, D., 1977, Temporary False belief, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 3, p. 479–488.
- Mixon, D., 1979, Understanding shocking and puzzling conduct, en G.P. Ginsburg (ed.), op. cit.
- Movahedi, S., 1977, Role playing: an alternative to what?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 3, p. 489–497.
- Oskamp, S., 1977, Methods of studying social behavior, en L.S. Wrightsman (ed.), Social Psychology, Monterey, Brooks/Cole.
- Reicher, S., 1982, The determination of collective behaviour, en H. Tajfel (ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press.
- Rubin, Z., (ed.), 1975, Doing unto others, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
- Samuel, W., 197, Contemporary Social Psychology: an introduction, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
- Saxe, L., 1983, The perspective of Social Psychology: toward a viable model for application, en R.F. Kidd, y M. J. Saks (eds.). Advances in Applied Social psychology, Hillsdale, LEA, vol. 2.
- Sherif, M., 1935, A study some social factors in perception, Archives or Psychology, n.o 187.
- Sherif, M., 1974, Las influencias del grupo en la formación de normas y actitudes, en J.R. Torregrosa (ed.), Teoría e investigación en la Psicología Social actual, Madrid, IOP, (También en J.R. Torregrosa y E. Crespo (eds.), 1984, Estudios básicos de Psicología Social, Madrid, Barcelona, CIS, Hora).
- Steiner, I.D., 1974, Whatever Happened to the group in Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 1, p. 94–108.
- Stephenson, G., 1978, Social Behavior in Organizations, en H. Tajfel y C. Fraser (eds.), Introducing Social Psychology Harmondsworth, Penguin.
- Tedeschi, J.T. y Lindskold, S., 1976, Social Psychology, Interdependence, Interaction and influence, Nueva York, Wiley.
- Thayer, S. y Saarmi, C., 1975, Demand characteristics are everywhere (anyway): a comment on the Stanford prison experiment, American Psychologist, 30, p. 1015–1016.
- Turner, J.C., 1982, Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group, en H. Tajfel (ed.), op. cit..
- Zimbardo, P.G., 1970, The Human Choice: individuation, reason and order vs. deindividuation, impulse and chabs, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln, Univ. of Nebraska Pres.