Referencias

• Barttlet, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Londres: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, J. y Davies, G. (1988). Attitudinal influences on witness Memory: Fact and fiction. En: Gruneberg, Morris y Sykes (Eds.) Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues. Vol. I, Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Borgida, E. y White, P. (1978). Social perception of rape victims: the impact of legal reform. Law & Human Behavior, 2, 339–352.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, J. y Perlmutter, M. (1982). Metamemory: a critical examination. Chad Development, 53, 11–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, B. y Bull, R. (1978). The Psychology of Person Identification. Londres: Routledge and Kegan Paul, LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G., Shepherd, J. y Ellis, H. (1981). Perceiving and remembering faces. Londres: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Efran, M. (1974). The effect of physical attractiveness on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishement in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. y Geiselman, R. (1988). Enhacing eyewitness memory with the Cognitive Interview. En: M. Gruneberg, P. Morris y R. Sykes (Eds.) Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues. Vol. I, Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Flavele, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. En: L. Resnick (Ed.) The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, Nueva York: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Feaveel, J. (1977). El desarrollo cognitivo. Madrid: Visor Libros.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. y Wellman, H. (1977). Metamemory. En: R. Kail y J. Hagen (Eds.) Perspectives on the developmentt of memory and cognition. Hillsdale, Nueva York: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Grusing, R. y Gordon, M. (1975). Policeman or priest which one's testimony will most influence jurors? Journal of Forensic Psychology, 7, 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J. (1967). Memory and the memory-monitoring process. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 685–691.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (1977). What is being counted none the less? En: I. Birnbaum y E. Parker (Eds.). Alcohol and Human Behavior. Hillsdale, Nueva York: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., Kahan, T. y Raye, C. (1984). Dreams and reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 329–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. y Raye, C. (1981). Reality Monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. y Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kail, R. (1979). El desarrollo de la memoria en los niños. Barcelona: Editorial Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M. y Miller, L. (1978). Effects of juror's identification with the victim depend on likelihood of victimization. Law & Human Behavior, 2, 353–361.
   Google Scholar
• Krulewitz, J. E. y Nash, J. E. (1979). Effects of rape victim resistance, assault outcome, and sex of observar on attributions about rape. Journal of Personality, 557–574.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, E., Conley, J., Erikson, B. y Barr, O. (1978). Social attributions and conservation style in trial testimony. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1558–1567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R., Lim, R., Marando, L. y Cully, D. (1986). Mock-juror evaluations of eyewitness testimony: a test of metamemory hypothesis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 447–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. (1979). Eyewitness Testimony Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelace, E. A. (1984a). Metamemory: monitoring future recallability during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 756–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovelace, E. A. (1984b). Metamemory: monitoring future recallibility in free and recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 497–500.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Bostock, S. y Clifford, B. (Eds.) (1983). Evaluating witness evidence. Nueva York: John Wiley & son Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, A. (1978). Sexism in voir dire. The use of sex stereotypes in jury selection. En: W. Hepperle y L. Crites (Eds.) Women in the Courts National Center for State Courts Publications Department, Williamsburg.
   Google Scholar
• Marchesi, A. (1984). El desarrollo de la memoria. En: J. Palacios, A. Marchesi y M. Carretero (Eds.) Psicología evolutiva. Tomo II, Madrid: Alianza Universidad Textos.
   Google Scholar
• Markwart, A. y Lynch, B. (1979). Effect of polygraph evidence on mock jury decisionmaking. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 324–332.
   Google Scholar
• Mira, J. J. (1989). Estudios de Psicología en ambientes procesales: Un análisis de metamemoria. Tesis Doctoral Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Piehl, J. (1977). Integration of information in the Courts: influence of physical attractiveness on amount of punishment for a traffic offender. Psychologicxal Report, 41, 551–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. (1986). Feeling of knowing ratings distinguish between genuine and simulated forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Schooler, J., Gerhard, D. y Loftus, E. (1986). Qualities of unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 171–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, D. M. (1988). Eyewitness identification: Can Jurors assess its accuracy? En: Gruneberg, Morris y Sykes (Eds.) Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues. Vol. I, Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, B. (1972). Effects of rape victim's attrativeness on a jury simulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Vidmar, N. (1979). The other issues in jury simulation research: A commentary with particular reference to defendant character studies. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1978). Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546–1557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. y Lindsay, R. (1985). How do people infer the accuracy of eyewitness memory? Studies of performance and a metamemory analysis. En: S. Lloyd-Bostock y B. Clifford (Eds.) Evaluating witness evidence, Recent Psychological research and new perspectives. Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G., Lindsay, R. y Tousignant, J. (1980). Efects of expert psychological advice on human performance in judging the validity of eyewitness testimony. Law & Human Behaviour, 4, 275–285.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. y Loftus, E. (Eds.) (1984). Eyewitness Testimony, Psychological perspectives. Londres: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yarmky, A. D. (1979). The Psychology of Eyewitness Testimony. Nueva York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yarmey, A. D. y Jones, H. P. (1983). Is the psychology of eyewitness identification a matter of common sense? En: S. Lloyd-Bostock y B. Vlifford (Eds.) Evaluating witness evidence. Recent Psychological research and new perspectives. Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar